/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23567137
you're missing one which would mean that you mean to write 'three' instead of two. In that case, it seems to be missing Badger. This stuff has all the right moves.

>>23567159
>Badger
Who? The 3rd is most likely some other coin i'm unaware of because bitcoin and eth are pretty average.

LINK
XSN
LIT

the god tier portfolio.

>>23567507
What does LIT do that separates itself from other cryptos? Ie Infrastructure? Something everyone else needs to use eg chainlink?

Have you check Fiscus.FYI? They're also launching a new gambling platform ..

Check it out at

https://dice.fiscus.fyi/

$uffyi $ffyi

>>23567627
Kys pajeet.

>>23567181
why would you use this fucking image then?
They don't taught you to use MS fucking Paint in your indian school you fucking pajeetos?
link is /biz/ token and with your worthless masternodes you're trying to ride on LINK success.
LINK success is unrelated to your "very soon to be the only good DEX" piece of shit.
>inb4 staking when, link is no different
we ride on huge news on fucking ENTERPRISE blockchain with JPMorgan, sadly stakenet only has bagholders to milk
Your employers are really getting desperate with this shit if they had to hire you to make such shit threads.

>>23567693
Why are you so mad? XSN fudders are so desperate.

Xsn shills are getting despe, now trying to compete and say they are like badger and fiscus. It was pathetic enough when they tried riding the coattails of link but this is beyond sad. Will they ever realize it's a beyond useless shitcoins only cz and his fan boys will ever use? Will Grant ever stop fucking cats? Will soon ever come for those typo and font fixes they've been working on for months?

>>23567738
>baseless xsn fud
Why don't you go fud in the XSN general that is still up?

>>23567749
You mean the one that's the same copy pasted bullshit from the discord 'how to start a shill sub' guide? Why? Nothing ever gets posted in them. If you want discussion you only visit the xsn threads. Xsn generals are just spam. Nice fud though. Blocknet paying you nice these days? Keep it up and you might be able to buy a coke by month's end.

>>23567800
Cope harder faggot. Your fud is shit and baseless, you don't bother in the general because you get btfo too easily.

>>23567810
No one gets btfo because there's nothing but copy paste shit. Look in the archives or try sticking around longer than a week and you'll see. Xsn generals are kind of a dumb idea unless there is actually something to talk about. If there's something to talk about it makes more sense to discuss in an actual legit xsn thread.

>>23567738
>>23567800
>>23567863
>SCAM!
>FUCK YOU XSN SHILLS
>CZ pays you
>blocknet pays you
Cope harder.

>>23567879
Nice try, fudder. Not going to work on me though. If it's lo, shit then please, enlighten us. What are your much better bags?

>>23567991
>fuds
>Calls me a shill
>then calls me a fudder.
Buy rope.

>>23567998
>SEETHE.
You little fudlets are so easy to get worked up I can only imagine that you are pretending. If you tried to display more, typical human behaviors you might be able to discourage people from buying more. As it stands you seem so fake we just disregard you and keep stacking mn's. Guess we'll see who has the last laugh

>>23568050
>Calls me a shill then payed by cz and blocknet, now im a fudder

Hello Mr pajeet!, Right on time I seem Please address the following questions
>How is Stakenet a scam?
>If Stakenet is a scam, why does it have a genuine product in open beta that the public can use, and continues to being developed?
>If Stakenet is a scam, why is there evidence of the X9 team having collaborated with some of the biggest names in crypto? (Ledger, litecoin)
>Do you have any objective evidence at all that the developers Wont be able to meet their goals?

If you can answer any of these with objective evidence I will market sell and post proof

>>23568076
Do not markets sell. Too much slippage. You, should buy. I will answer questions. >xsn is not a scam
>xsn is not a scam(see answers to previous question)
>xsn is not a scam(see answers to previous two questions
>only weak evidence and must be, taken into context. Bottleneck lies not with the team but lightning and Raiden devs. Don't judge xsn for the Raiden and lightning devs incompetence as that is unfair.
Again, easy questions but do not market sell.

>>23568149
If xsn isn't a scam why were you fudding?

XSN is a coin too pure for this world. We cynical shitcoiners don't deserve it.

I'm so sorry this is happening to you XSN fags. Most have realised it was a turkish pump n dump scam and cut their losses. Dev have had no updates in months. COPE lmao