/biz/ - Business & Finance

40s

$1000
Check em

>>23506685
This is a Quant board now.

>>23506721
No, it’s a QUAD board
>>23506715

>>23506712
prolly yea

>>23506685
>>23506712
>>23506715

>>23506685
since btc will peak between 100-150k in late 2022 early 2023 I'd guess link would be around $450-$1200

>>23506715
Nope. You lack patience. It will hit 1k, but 2020 is not the year

>>23507063
Rollan for $40. That seems reasonable. Kek bless me

>>23507077
noice

>>23507013
The kikes have papa BTC under control. They said they would do it. They did it. Paypal was some of the biggest crypto news we've ever seen and it only pumped BTC 2k dollars...

I can see it touching ATH again this bullrun, but zero chance of 6 digits.

Link will break $100 in the next couple years.

>>23506685
January we will be $270 ish
March we dump back down to $80 and get dabbed on by Nico
January 2022 we reach $1k
Swift adopts chainlink/DLT october 2022, but we dump anyway

>>23506685
not as high as your sell target and lower than your buy target

Realistically anywhere between $40-$100 before a small dip and we continue going up/another year long bear market happens with crypto again.

>>23507121
just take a look at intothecryptoverse on youtube he is the only cryptotuber worth following

>>23506721
desperation never sells.

>>23507077
Checked

>>23506685

>>23507389
>This shitty meme chart again

$7777

>>23507216
>TA
into the trash it goes

>>23508003
its not TA

$72 by March 2021

>>23507077
If its real bullrun its much higher than that

I'd like to see Link hit $40 eoy. I'll be milled up and have a pleasant festive season.
Although of course, still not fucking selling.

between 50 and 80$ on the next run up.
From there it depends if the run up is 50 or 80
if we get to 50 then we can target 120
if we get to 80 we can target 200 zone,
Then if 120 we can target 300 area
if 200 then we target 500$ eoy
that is assuming steam runs out after 3 pumps. its possible we could only have 2. Its possible we can have 4 or 5. A lot will depend on how bitcoin performs

>>23508231
if you think about it we had 2 good pumps from march to june
so we could do 2 good pumps oct - dec
retrace until march, 2 good pumps april-june/july retrace until october again
then one final blow off top end of year 2021 or jan 2022.
Its possible we blow past 1k in the final blow of top pumps.

>>23506685
There is no bullrun idiot

>>23508231
You don;t take into account the utility value of Link and that it'll likely completely break free from BTC. I has already done this on mere speculation but once network usage starts building, the price will only go up.

>>23508322
those estimates are 100% technical analysis. based on trends and fibonacci. Zero fundamentals were taken into account. I understand the fundamentals of chainlink but i dont have an intelligent way to incorporate them into my TA just so im clear about how I came to those numbers.
In some ways the TA does take into account the fundamentals and utility value of link based on its previous movements. Hard to say Link is a first of its kind asset if they achieve what they are aiming to achieve.
Also ive already noticed that they are obviously trying to dump their btc for link without making it too obvious. Sometimes it becomes noticeable enough if you look closely.

>>23508322
also the further out the estimate goes the less accurate obviously.
Im guessing we blow past 50 and wick up to 80 on the next run up before coming back to test 20$ as support. historically link likes to blow right past conservative estimates such as a 1.618 fib extension. and maybe that is the fundamental utility value you are talking about being shown in the ta...

Anyone wanna give me crypto.com referral code ?

>>23508476
https://crypto.com/app/qt10dc3fcu to sign up for Crypto.com and we both get $50 USD :)

>>23508646
Do you have just the code i can paste into the app? Im phone postin

>>23506685
250 dollars

>>23508758
All these poor nigger kikes sharing their referral codes and shilling coinbase earn shows that we are truly in poorfag nucoiner season.
Reminds me how much I hate women and fags

>>23506685
Torn between trying to time the top and risking selling too early and seeing LINK take off without me, or simply holding for a decade until it hits a crazy number. The reality is your money is probably better off in LINK than in an index fund or real estate. Problem is I’d have to stay lower middle class for many years and I’m not getting any younger. Will also suck to see LINK pump to hundreds of dollars per token only to hold it as it crashes into a bear market like the fags who got burned holding btc in 2018. Very tough decisions ahead.

>>23508758
qt10dc3fcu

>>23507138
saved your post last time you said this, im hoping for the same. 270 in jan would be insane and id have enough to not work the year, and then make it in dec 2021/jan 2022

>>23508896
Have a (you)

>>23508998

>>23508896
Im quite heavily invested and have been for ten years. I just wanted to help someone out. Ive been there.

$1

Dubs confirms

>>23506685
$100 USD, EOTY

>>23506712
>40s
why? I'd say 80

>>23508071
>If its real bullrun its much higher than that
this

>>23508988
>qt10dc3fcu
Thank you

>>23506685
Link will get to 30-40$ easily just during BTC’s run back to ATH next summer. Peak of the next bull, bitcoin will probably hit 100k, and chainlink should clear 100$. But that’s probably not until 2022.

>>23509288
so you think link will just crab around 100k sats? lmao

>>23509323

That’s a conservative estimate. If link has a run where it becomes a meaningful % of the overall crypto space (see those bottom three rows of Eth, XRP and BCH’s peak dominance) it could be a lot higher.

>>23506721
A quant nigger in every thread. Fuck off to your own thread and shill.

I'm so tired of being sub20

>>23509363
>That’s a conservative estimate
I mean no shit I thought my 500k sats end of 2022 early 2023 was conservative

>>23508409
>>23508458
Thanks for the answers. Interesting.

>>23508458
So what you're saying is buy now & don't wait for it to dip back to 10$ which might not happen?

>>23509609
you can always dollar cost average
either way 12$ will seem like a cheap buy very soon.
Maybe save 30% of your cash for a big pullback back but with BTC looking ready to moon I wouldnt be sitting on the sidelines waiting for 10$ with more than 30% of my capital. At least if you buy some now and save 30% for that 10$ dip and it takes off then you didnt miss the train completely. We are out of accumulation zone for btc. For alts its not 100% confirmed but thats why you save your 30% to catch a potential better entry.

>>23508943
That’s why you need other coins as well. To give you spending money and lifestyle money. I sold 1K LiNk at the top for fat stacks of RSR, PNK, DOT, and LGCY. Now I can sell those within the next 2-5 years while holding my LINK ultra long term. The speculative top for Link is way higher than the speculative cap for those other coins. So I’m much more comfortable selling RSR at $.5 or $1 and “making it” vs selling LINK at $100 and getting justed

>>23506685
40 to 200s if extremely bullish we go to 400s eoy nigga

>>23507077
baste and checked

>>23509288
>Link will get to 30-40$ easily just during BTC’s run back to ATH next summer
checked. Why next summer?

oh shit i was looking for link thread cuz im range banned from creating threads
guys i have an insider info about link new partnership coming in q1 2021 and possible(but i dont think so) before eoy 2020
this partner is a new coin which already has kia motors and teltonika as partners it will be huge for linky and even bigger for this coin do your research i wont spoonfeed u if u know u know.

>>23510098
I believe he caused the dump. Link whales dumped on him kek

>>23508458
>Im guessing we blow past 50 and wick up to 80 on the next run up before coming back to test 20$ as support
that's too much buy pressure.. where will it come from?

>>23508943

Set specific price targets where you sell small portions of your stack and keep the remaining part in LInk forever (staking). Don't get greedy and be married to your investment, things can go down aswell. I held through multiple rises and falls of Link since 2017 and it has been very frustrating.

>>23508896
Here, here.

>>23510194
people fomoing in after it starts to blow up
people trading btc profits for link
people trading eth profits for link
people using DeFi platforms to borrow USD with link as collateral as the price goes up they increase their stack to maintain their effective leverage

>>23506685
At least $1k