/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23490888
888, gr8 trips m8, i r8 8/8. NSMDO, this shit is going to fly so fucking hard once more and more mainstream companies/institutions are going to use it.

>>23490888
975 barrels here, wat do

This is a Quant board now.

>>23491100
this is a digital oil board now, gtfo, NSMDO

NMSDO, 51k barrels, moon is near

2000 barrels, will I make it?

RLC has been around for years and still hasn't took off, even chainlink took off, cope harder

>>23491325
market capitalization 10 billion to 100 billion, Gilles said they want to dominate the cloud computing market, so that will be worth 1000 billion coming years, so 10-100 billion should be doable in theory, that's more than 1k-10k a token, so that's anywhere from 2 million to 20 million you are holding there in theory in the coming years if you ve got the patience and things work out...Not bad.

Wont succeed on Ethereum. And they have no plans to go elsewhere.

>>23491463
apples and oranges, different use cases, different markets, with iExec the product had to be developed first, only from now on you can judge whether it has merit by measuring adoption.

>>23491480
Why wouldn't it?

>>23491480
wtf u talkin bout? computing takes place off-chain so it doesn't matter.

>>23491503
Ethereum is congested and at its limit. Hence why big companies havent touched it. Lmao the fucking gas fees needed to make computations alone is more than reason to believe there can be no future for RLC as long is its on Ethereum.
And I dont think the sidechain can do all the work.

>>23490888
Ah geez
Ah geez
Ah geez
Ah geez
Ah geez
Ah geez

>>23491540
You literally miss the whole concept of RLC. What this guy said >>23491516. Ethereum literally only verifies the result of the computation ONCE... You should read more about RLC, since it's clear you don't really understand it and if you did you'd probably buy it. Big companies don't use it because it wasn't compliant until 1-2 weeks ago. Also the 2nd part of V5 (this part is part of the original white paper, the 1st part was an added bonus) is still comming out in december. 2nd part of V5 is the last planed major technical release and after that they're doing their IPO selling eRLC (enterprise RLC which is regulated and compliant)

>>23491540
Also this, RLC could scale ETH... Since dapps could easily use it in order to do the heavy computations at an affordable rate

>>23491630
IEXEC not selling eRLC that just wrap swap for enterprise workers. Hell even ones who have eRLC will have to swap back to RLC in order to cash out its 1 to 1 and all value stays in regular token.

And to fags who will come shitposting about how it competes with chainlink well it not they aiming at different things

How many do I need to be rich?

Thanks for the opium anon

>>23492046
87

>>23492114
Lol doubtful

Here is adoption roadmap
https://trello.com/b/oSCT5z09/iexec-adoption-roadmap

>>23492129
He's right.
Only 1 million people can have 87 RLC

>>23492005
Ah yes, I worded it wrongly. Yes 1 RLC = 1 eRLC. But the eRLC is a fully compliant version for companies to use and I bet my life EDF will use this in some kind of form

>>23492046
87 suicide stack
870 killer stack
8700 make it stack

If you have 8700 you can upload your mind to THE CLOUD

>>23492190
And yes, this is true. Only 1 million people can have 87 RLC. If this project goes up it goes up violently due to the low supply of 86,999,785 RLC

>>23492190
Well I have 3.1k so.. probably a lot less than that.

>>23492190
are there any tools online that let you see the wallet breakdown of a particular erc20?

>>23492261
That's the point man. A lot of us have well over 87 so good luck getting even close to 87 in a couple years.

>>23492301
etherscan?

>>23492327
I mean something that tells me the total number of wallets, and data buckets. Eg 1% of wallets have > 10,000 RLC, 10% have 5000-10000, etc.

BTW why nobody posted demo on biz or I just never saw post about it?
https://developers.iex.ec/goal

>>23492129
87 is the suicide stack

>>23492327
this, as someone holding 8.7k, i know Im holding 1000x my "fair share", assuming it's fair if only a million people ever have any.

>>23492409
100x** my bad

>>23492374
Hm I'm not sure really can't you just look at the top wallets and figure the math out? idk, i thought etherscan had that answer.
>>23492409
8700 is at least 8.7m in 1 year

https://cryptorank.io/price/rlc/holders

>>23492301
are you a retard? >>23492504

https://etherscan.io/token/0x607F4C5BB672230e8672085532f7e901544a7375#balances
https://bloxy.info/token_holders/0x607f4c5bb672230e8672085532f7e901544a7375

>>23492544
that's better but not completely what I was asking for. I am looking for info on the total distribution, not the top 100 holders

>>23492571
I don't get it. Like which wallets hold the most % of the supply?

Top 10% hold 50% of the supply... ? stuff like this

>>23492604
like I said here
>>23492374
Maybe that info doesn't exist in any accessible place, I was just curious if there was an online tool that would show the % wallets meeting certain token thresholds to get a good idea of how its broken down between all holders

>>23492671
Never saw such statistics about rlc

>>23490888
If someone can explain what the actual token is for I may buy some. Bonus points if you can explain why it needs it's own token and not just eth.

Where’s the fucking product OP? It’s still vaporware at this point

>>23492671
One problem with those wallet distribution metrics is that there are thousands of unaccounted for virtual wallets which are controlled by the bittrex and binance funds. Basically: until you withdraw your RLC, you're not on the wallet ranking.

>>23492740
that's a good point. That is probably mostly composed of small holders as well

>>23492726
Just no. Dyor if you are intrested if not move on.

>>23492726
How much money are you planning on putting into RLC? Maybe I'll shill you if it's over a threshold

>>23492736
and
>>23492388
Or Im replying to one of trolls?

>>23492854
they're trolling, everyone knows iExec has a product and is one of the only usable crypto technologies

>>23492890
Regret Leaving Chainlink

>>23492968
I hold LINK too nigger, thinking about selling some more though since RLC makes it obsolete

Yup bait posters have arived. Careful not to cut yourself with that edge

>>2349272
It's a decentralized cloud, which means it doesn't need big data centers in order to compute. Anyone can join with a CPU or GPU and do computing work
It also has a data and computing power marketplace and can tokenize any cloud resource.
It has oracles superior of LINK (more secure)
It can do ENS
It is fully compliant by the EU and it'll soon hold a token swap from RLC to eRLC (enterprise RLC), which companies can use in order to use the computing power provided in a fully compliant way

Tokeneconomics: https://medium.com/iex-ec/rlc-token-economics-iexec-34757f4885c2

Partnerships and collaborations: IBM Cloud, Intel, Alibaba Cloud, EU commision (Ontochain) + French SEC approves, Ubisoft, EEA, CCC, EDF, Chainlink, Genesis Cloud, H7, BPI France, Scontain, Shift, Fortanix, TFCloud, Nerdalize, Ubisoft, Cloud & Heat, Stimergy, OpenFog, ....
Next technical release: V5 2nd part. FOG/edge computing to keep the latency low for tasks that require real time data.
Adoption roadmap: This is the new adoption roadmap with 2 partneships and 1 NDA reveal comming up.
https://trello.com/b/oSCT5z09/iexec-adoption-roadmap

Website: https://iex.ec/
Medium: https://medium.com/iex-ec
Twitter: https://twitter.com/iEx_ec
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/iExec/videos <--- Look at their showcases or demo videos

>>23492726
This, >>23493111

>>23493111
That is some delicious summary pasta

Why is there a random page on iexec on Ubisoft lol

>>23493111
>Anyone can join with a CPU or GPU and do computing work
I like this a lot. Obviously I know that rates would depend on usage and your computing power, but does anyone have any estimates of earnings (or real-world data from their earnings)?

>>23493333
lol wat

and checkd

>>23493333
link or GTFO

>>23493410
https://www.ubisoft.com/en-US/careers/gcdetail.aspx?id=321969

>>23493333
wat I've never seen this pic

>>23493520
Yeah I just googled Ubisoft Iexec to what comes up and that was the first or 2nd result.
Anyways,
I'm all in now.
9.5k

>>23493111
Doesnt explain why it needs its own token and why it cant just all be done using eth.

>>23493578
Because tasks are paid with rlc, workers are paid in rlc, its iexecs marketplace and thats how it is. Lmao what kind of question is that?
And far as I know, it CAN be used with only eth. The eth-wrapped rlc txns take place on the backend.

>>23493333
>>23493384
>>23493410
If you faggots actually looked at this post >>23493111 you'd realize that they have a partnership/collaboration
https://medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-and-ubisoft-collaboration-start-up-program-at-station-f-ff43d3885523
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=iexec+ubisoft+

>>23493381
Earnings only depends on the supply/demand. If you have 10 GPUs but 0 tasks then you get 0. I think that if you want to do a task that's worth 3333 RLC you need to have at least 10000 RLC staked. So the biggest task you can complete is 33% of your total stake in a RLC worker. Which means workers need a shit ton of RLC in order to do big tasks. But I think that the max task size is limited and that if a task is too big it's divided into smaller tasks so that even people with let's say 100 RLC can execute tasks.

And there was a period about 1 year back where the team was testing this out. You could join in with a CPU and do tasks. The team basicly made real tasks and you computed them and received RLC back. The public worker pools currently don't work anymore, since it's all done on private sidechains, since NDAs and crap...

>>23493578
The only way you can do any of the stuff is by using RLC. Even if you're a corporation you first need to get RLC and do a "company KYC" then you switch your RLC into eRLC which makes it compliant and the company can use it to execute tasks.
Also what this anon said >>23493612
Also I've posted this article and this is exactly it: https://medium.com/iex-ec/rlc-token-economics-iexec-34757f4885c2

>>23493111
>>23490888
Alright, I'll bite, how many do I need in order to make it?

>>23493612
I like how with the eRLC token they made sure it would not in any way harm the original RLC tokenomics, shows they care for investors and can be trusted.

>>23493717
Yeah, they couldve forked it.

>>23493111
Checked
It also does more..."unimportant" things like robotics, AI, and machine learning.
It allows for the commoditization of computations and data in special ways, especially when combined with NFT's.

It is basically the first time in the known universe that a world computer marketplace exists and anyone can contribute power to it

>>23493333
this doesnt make any sense its literally just in basic html

>>23493713
over 100IQ and some dyor

>>23493333
RLC getting a lot of digits lately>>23490888
>>23491100
>>23491477
>>23492144
>>23492388
>>23492544
>>23493111

>>23493737
exectly ;) , or just introduce another token. That's how many blockchain projects screw their investors.

>>23493750
I just really wish they had a mainnet on a more viable network, like Algorand. Iexec on EOS, DOT, or Algo would be unstoppable.

>>23493791
It's blockchain agnostic so no one gives a shit. Also ETH will probably be decent enough eventually

>>23493750
look at who Gilles is, his background, his level of expertise, the professionalism of the team, when it comes to quality standards and mass adoption potential this definitely belongs in the top 20, very exciting future ahead.

>>23493717
Yep they could have forked it and fucked investors over

I feel bad for anyone not in RLC with over 870

>>23493713
Already said it in this post >>23492253

If you have 8700 you can upload your mind to THE CLOUD. You get your conciousness uploaded and can generate an infinite amount of halal approved virgin goats. RLC is halal and shariah compliant 100%

>>23493717
>>23493737
This is true

>>23493801
Also this

>>23493801
Im looking at his picture right now

>>23493823
>>23493801
Why hasn't a billionaire or millionaire pumped it yet?
Unbelievable it's been able to stay under the radar for this long. How the fuck is it able to be suppressed this long is beyond me also considering how small the walls are

https://techhq.com/2020/10/ibm-splits-business-to-refocus-on-cloud-computing/

I wonder how big iExec will play a role in the blockchain era compared to the IBM split off. The fact is that cloud computing is definitely going to be big in the future, and iExec is the only project aiming at that market from a blockchain perspective. So this makes iExec a good investment opportunity because it doesn't have to share market share with other projects unlike many other projects in the blockchain space.

>>23493634
>The public worker pools currently don't work anymore, since it's all done on private sidechains, since NDAs and crap...
So I can't even do this and make money unless I'm in the secret club? How many tasks have been completed to date?

>>23493858
I think Gilles and Gilbert could learn a lot from each other, wish they would merge, the potential would be insane.

>>23493874
it's under the radar, I'd say once this project starts to get used it will take off rather quickly.

Big brain anons get it. This company has been out for years, the argument goes, so where is all their tangible progress?!?!?! Well brainlets, this company has such class that they decided to build a product rather than market a product, then aim at adoption once it's complete. Well, it's complete frens. See you on the moon. Just bought a comfy stack

>>23493874
Link also wasn't worth shit until people used it and the adoption is literally been promised for next year. Also, people have a hard time understanding it and their marketing lead Blair Maclennans is a fucking marketing retard. Things like their doracles, data/cloud resources marketplace are never talked about, they only represent themselves by only being a decentralized cloud.

What this guy said
>>23494012

>>23493914
This is the guide to become a worker. It's super easy https://docs.iex.ec/for-workers/quick-worker-start
This are the worker pools: https://pools.iex.ec/

There used to be the public test pool which had about 4500-5000 tasks done. The team made the tasks for testing purposes, but they paid out real RLC. Each was worth 5 RLC (because it was for testing). But currently testing is done on private sidechains, since it's the same crap, but cheaper

>>23494030
true

>>23493333
>>23493384
>>23493410
>>23493520
>>23493520
>>23493767
>>23493779
what does this mean bros?

https://www.ubisoft.com/en-US/careers/gcdetail.aspx?id=321970

>>23493823
>tranny poster still trying to force his cringe 8700 le make it halal shariah mind upvoted xD we did it reddit
Fuck off

>>23494301
And you're the faggot who can't even green text for shit

>>23491540
Why cant it just switch to something like ftm or algo

>>23494369
>N-NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST MAKE FUN OF ME WITH GREENTEXT LET ME SPAM MY TRANNIES IN PEACE
Go FUD something else faggot

>>23494301
This