/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23470317
N

>>23470325
hint: the answer is a number

>>23470317
>>23470368
50%
what you are doing is illegal
I'm literally reporting you to the IRS
/thread

>>23470317
square root of 2

>>23470398
we pay our taxes you dumb ni[redacted for professionalism]
>>23470399
checked

>>23470317
>iq 95
ye im god
>change
change scarry
>rosetta stone
jus torrent that shit lmao
>link spam
no other shitcoins are the problem (and thotposting)
>poor
lmao
fuck you jannie

>>23470472
>no other shitcoins are the problem (and thotposting)
which one is the most annoying so I can be more hip and cool when I post the next thread after the jannies nuke this one

>>23470421
We all know you were going to post nigger. This is also illegal.

>>23470496
we're not in your communist shithole, why are you even in this thread

>>23470484
xrp is the oj but not the most hip. you want PNK or QUANT

>>23470398
It's 2/3 but I don't want the job based on the lack of professionalism ITT

>>23470616
>xrp is the oj but not the most hip. you want PNK or QUANT
Well, I'm a PNK shill so it'll have to be QUANT, although XRP is a good candidate

>>23470317
0.5

I don't want your stupid job though

>>23470683
you are retarded

>>23470699
I wanted the job so little I didn't bother to read the question properly

it's 0.66

>>23470744
you are still retarded

>>23470317
It’s obviously 50%. Nonwhites will be confused by the fact that the first event was not 50/50, without understanding that the second order events are not impacted by the probability of the first

given one ball is gold there's a 50% chance of the other one being gold
also:
fuck pajeet shills. i have a single digit IQ and would still never buy your shitcoins, shill your shitcoins, or even look at your shitcoins.

>>23470569
I'm tired of seeing con artists post here.

>>23470317
Everyone who said 66% is unironically retarded. Theyre in separate boxes for fucks sake. It's 50%. If you pulled it out of box 1, it's 100%, if you pulled it out of box 2 it's 0%. Average is 50%.

>>23470317
My eyes say 50% but my brain says 1/6th. You have one gold ball either from the silver and gold or the gold and gold box that’s 2/3 assuming you put the ball back in its box. So you have 2/3 chances of getting the chance at a gold ball. Out of the two boxes you have 50/50 of a chance or guaranteed gold ball. If you pick the gold and silver box it’s another 50/50. And you have to do this back to back. I don’t know? I’m too lazy

>>23470984
This has to be the most idiotic post I've ever read here

>>23470886

The second event doesnt impact that part is correct. The odds are still 2 / 3.
You don't understand conditional probability. It's ok, most people don't.

>>23471063
>assuming you put the ball back in its box
Why on earth would you assume that?

>>23471111
>mirin Quads
Taking the ball out would change the probability of getting the golden ball in the second attempt. If you grab it from the second box silver and gold your Chances are now absolute 1/3. But if you grab the the first gold gold box you’re guaranteed a gold if you choose from the first again. It’s only 50/50 if you chose from the 2nd box

> Are you tired of people shitting up the board with LINK spam?
no

It's 50% you dumb faggots.

Before I go to bed I'm gonna give the solution to the problem so we don't need to have this thread again.

Call the balls in the first two boxes Gold1, Gold2, Gold3 and Silver1.
The other stuff we don't care about, it has no impact.

You have a gold ball in your hand it's either;
Gold 1, and you find yourself another gold ball.
Gold 2, and you fnd yourself another gold ball
Gold 3, and you find yourself a silver ball.
So the answer is 2 / 3.

This is a seemingly easy problem but it's actually university math.

>>23471486
you;re the dumb fag, switching raises chances to 2/3

>>23470317

75%

>>23471631
how do you guys even come up with this stuff? honestly

>>23471512
>Before I go to bed I'm gonna give the solution to the problem so we don't need to have this thread again.
we're going to have it again either way desu

also for some context
>tl;dr: we’re a DAO, anything we do is on a contractual basis, the DAO is new and just getting off the ground, some info is available at @aegis_directory (telegram) and on twitter. Lots of stuff to cover really but if you can deliver on something we need we’ll take all the help we can get
payment is in crypto

>>23471512
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

>>23471100
Checked but 2/3 isn't a number brainlet.

>>23472930
Can you explain how a fraction is not a number?

>>23470398
>>23470683
>>23470886
>>23470984
>>23471486

Wrong. The answer seems to obviously be 0.5 but is actually 0.67 I.r. Two thirds. It’s one of the best puzzles for demonstrating how unintuitive statistics can be.

Even after I’ve told you that you are wrong, I know people will look it up, read they are wrong and I’m right, and then spend an hour arguing otherwise.

>>23473465
.67 != 2/3

>>23473479
Round up nigger

>>23470317
66%

>>23473523
>wrong
>become racist

There are 3 silver balls and 3 gold balls. One gold ball is removed at random making 2 gold balls.

If you divide the number of gold balls by the number of silver balls you get 2/3 which is the correct answer.

>>23473623
>implying I wasn’t racist prior to posting

>>23473659
>Implying implying posting is still a thing
Hello my fellow oldfag

>>23470317
1/2

>>23473659
>>23473815
I bet you newfags got here in 2016

It's 1

>>23473892
This is bait

>>23473921
>>23473892
Apply the sequential threes alternating multiplication and division theorem
1*2/3

>>23473956
The answer is 2/3 you cretin

>>23471512
This isn't a monty hall problem and there is no independent observer who knows what is in which box. You picked a gold ball. Now you are in a completely new statistical frame that is independent of your first pick. You don't get to switch boxes. There is one ball in the box, either gold or silver. The answer is 50/50 because of the wording of the problem. Semantics matters.

>>23473965
You cheated the answer off me, gj

>>23470317
This isnt an IQ test as much as a fatal flaw with probability

>>23473983
Except that you forgot there's 3 boxes and 2 balls
So you multiply the answer of 1 by 2 and divide by 3 =2/3

>>23473465
It is not a monty hall problem and you are not as educated as you think. Statistics relies on frame of reference and the nature of observance. At the moment in question there exists only only one ball in your box. The first was gold, the next may be gold or silver. You do not have an option of switching boxes, nor is there an observer who knows the contents of the box -- therefore the weight of any previous probability is nullified. Saying it is 2/3 would be like flipping two coins and saying the second coin is more likely to be tails because the first one was heads. No, the probability of the second coin being tails is still 50/50 at the moment of coin flip.
see
>>23473983

>>23474017
re; >>23474134

>>23474134
The explanation behind it is that you have 3/6 chance of pulling a gold ball the first time
now the second pull you have a 2/3 of pulling a gold ball because there are 2 gold balls left and one silver ball from the two boxes

>>23473983
>>23474134
this. Its 50% brainlets

Fucking retards it's 1/3.

"What are the chances your box contains two gold balls?"

Same box, right? Both gold. 1/3.

>>23474275
But if you have to pull the ball from the same box, there is an equal chance of the ball being a gold ball or a silver ball

>>23474275
that would had sense if you would throw all the balls to one box(2 gold and 1 silver makes 3 all balls) after pulling gold one at first turn. The chance is 1/2 because this is still the same box that you are pulling from

>>23474330

2/3 you fucking retards. If you picked one good ball already there's a 66.7% chance you picked from the first box. It's called conditional probability. Look it up.

>>23470317
I'm not answering the gay riddle but I'm a dev I'll help with your website or backend if you give me a large amount of tokens

>>23474746
that would be correct if you could take ball again with 2 separate boxes(after outing 2 silver one) but you are picking balls WITH THE SAME BOX AS FIRST ONE.

>>23474820
>I'm not answering the gay riddle but I'm a dev I'll help with your website or backend if you give me a large amount of tokens
we can't give you a large amount but we can probably pay market rate following our latest product launch if you're useful. Feel free to join our group

>>23470317
The word problem ask what is the probability that you picked the box with 2 gold balls there is one box like that, there were 3 boxes TOTAL the probability of picking the box with 2 gold balls remains the same, knowing that there is one gold ball just shows that it is not the one with 2 silver balls but it doesn't change the fact that only ONE out of THREE boxes has 2 gold balls.

>>23474861
did you really write all that shit instead of just answering the question

>>23474832
There are 3 gold balls you could have possibly picked. So there are 3 scenarios that can unfold.

2 of them involve grabbing the 2nd gold ball from the double gold box. And the third scenario is grabbing the grey ball from the half and half box. LITERALLY LOOK UP CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY LIKE I SAID DICKBAG

>>23474867
I answered the question as well as it was asked. Yeah language games interest me. I'm not really interested in getting a job off 4chan my guy. If I wanted to do a bunch of work and get nothing in return I'd start programming for YFI.

>>23474954
it's just a math problem friend, good luck to you

>>23470317
50%

I have a bootleg copy of illustrator and some branding experience OP. Whatcha got?

>>23475069
well you can't do math but I guess that doesn't matter if you're an artist lol, got any examples of your work? you can post them here or in our group

>>23474919
no you fucking ape. You only have 2 scenarios because you picked golden ball and still have the same box sooooo in this box can be one gold(then you have right box) or silver(then you have left box) during first picking you atutomatically draw 2 boxes where you took theoritically 2 gold balls(which we know from contents of the this task, to be more preceised in this moment "You put your hand in and take a ball from that box at random. It's a gold ball." then you the question is "What is the probability that the next ball you take from THE SAME BOX will be also gold" so thats mean that during first picking you could take gold ball from box that have 2 gold balls or 1 silver 1 gold balls that means you picked theorotically 2 gold balls from 2 separate boxes during first picking......

>>23475179
lol yikes

>>23470317
Lol.
Aegis are a bunch of faggots. They can't stop hackers, they can't even get more than 2ETH raised from their public sale.

Literally a bunch of pathetic third world pajeets who are incompetent and have cognitive dissonance

>>23475233
checked
yeah we're focused on leviathan.surf which currently holds 600 eth in preparation for the launch of SURF, we'll shill our token later

>>23475135
No math good
Draw good
Draw what you need
No math

>>23470317
40 percent

>>23475269
post examples or join the tg group