/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23325395
I know nothing about stakenet, but can you explain why you would need it to convert between different programming languages if all of them end up as byte code or binary?

Blocknet

Friendly reminder that stakeholders are now exclusively posting in official /XSN/ generals >>23325522

>>23325395
$1 eoy

>>23325395
Chainlink nodes and DECO + wrapping make it obsolete.

>>23325395

I hate people defiling this graphic with their shitcoins as the ‘fourth’ one. But every time they do it solidifies the reality that link is an essential part of crypto.

>>23326013
They stole our graphic sir

>>23325823
how would that facilitate instant, cheap, private, interchain trading? dont need a technical answer. just come and boil it down for us all

>>23325522

>>23325823
>Wrapped assets

No

>>23326013
This I understand

>>23325395
This I don't

>>23326139
how can you not understand the desperate need for interchain infrastructure?

>>23326086
Sergey explained it quite well here:
https://twitter.com/SergeyNazarov/status/1314347295966543872

>>23325395
I'm sorry OP but I just can't take your seriously with that meme pic...

>>23325395
HOW DO I BUY THIS SCAM?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pLU6bUFoKY
ITS MONKEY SEASON, I'M THROWING 1 ETH AT ANYTHING BIZ SHILLS ME

>>23326160
yeah that isn't p2p interchain trading

Take it to the general lads

>>23325522

>>23325452
Because blockchains are secure and decentralized they struggle to connect anything not on their own chain. Hence why we still have cexs and layer 1 dexs. Stakenet aims to build bridges between crypto which is why they are building the first no kyc layer 2 dex. They alrady have lightning sorted and are working on eth/raiden atm.

>>23326191
Your p2p interchain trading platform is doing a particular use case of what Chainlink allows in an inefficient and less scalable and secure way.
It's trying to compete with Chainlink on one specific use case.
While it may work for a short amount of time the network with the most use, features and safety will get the most development effort and ultimately drain the support of less efficient platforms.

>>23326380
>Your p2p interchain trading platform is doing a particular use case of what Chainlink allows in an inefficient and less scalable and secure way.

no, it isn't. i already asked you to explain how chainlink will fascilitate p2p interchain trading of real blockchain assets and you have failed to deliver. instead you referred me to a post by sergey which i would guess you hardly understand yourself.

you are a chainlink enthusiast who is in so deep you cant see the forest through the trees. i would not be surprised if you are a late chainlink investor who needs to rationalise why its the greatest investment of all time every time another opportunity comes along. there have been so many linkmarines on biz of late months who have no idea what they are talking about. they are just speculators.

although they are connected, one thing is not like the other.

>>23326159
Explain me like I'm a retard

>>23326579
Hi Rajeesh.
It's nice to see you learned to copy and paste what looks like an argument.
But while I posted a very complete tweet from Sergey linking to 3 full articles explaining everything in detail, you not only failed to read them, but didn't show any argument from your side proving your inability to think rationally.

>>23326887
i can assure you i didnt copy and paste anything, and typed it rather quickly.

once agin, for i shall not engage in inane discourse with you once more,

explain how chainlink will facilitate instant, cheap, private, interchain p2p trading of blockchain assets

>>23326582
>Explain me like I'm a retard
this is retard proof

https://pastebin.com/jiMdEAN8

>>23326887
Looks like XSN fuders are now going down the 'chainlink already does this' route. Probably their best bet desu, considering no one on /biz/ even understands what LINK does

>>23327014
Ok so that's yet another decentralised exchange project, what make you think it's not a scam like most cryptos are and that it will beat all the competition?

>>23327217
you clearly didnt read it because it addresses the two questions you just asked. you can download the beta wallet and try the tech for yourself

im so fucking sick and tired of dealing with the lazy niggers on here who cant do 10 minutes of their own research

>>23327440
bla bla bla, you seems like a standard shill dude I don't trust you nor your project

>>23327217
See
>>23326228

>>23326159
>>23326582
Not only is Vitalik implicitly bullish on Stakenet because he calls for trust-less inter-chain swaps, he is also a huge proponent of layer 2 as a scaling solution for Ethereum, which is the other massive pillar of Stakenet's first native application, the Stakenet DEX.

>>23326160
I'm sorry but citing arguments is not the same as citing sources. If you can't even make your own argument and cannot explain other peoples' its a huge red flag that you do not really understand what you are talking about.

>>23328125
who is this one anon

the problem is that Link + Arbitrum will do the shit

>>23328591
No it won't. That is for smart contacts. It does not provide native trading between blockchains. Wrapped assets are still wrapped assets.

>>23327954
please, for the love of god, do not invest in XSN. put your money in something more suited to someone of your caliber. I think AMPL is looking great these days

>>23328555
I got if off another thread you'll have to reverse image you filthy coomer ;)

>>23328555
Checked

Is the fudding-phase finally over guys?

>>23328738
I appreciate your posts. thanks.

>>23329353
The /XSN/ general helps because all relevant information about the project is their for newcomers to see, and they'll be able to see right through the bullshit FUD

>>23325395
>>23326013