/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23285578
Insider trading and faggot community of holders dumping everytime it makes +10%

>>23285578
parts of the team are pumping this before every news release and then dumping immediately like clockwork. And the shill campaigns here are always timed exactly after the first pumps and peak at the top to sucker in enough buyers - its pretty obvious that a lot of them are paid to do so by the team. I know "paid indonesians" has been a meme here for some time, but I think there is enough circumstancial evidence to say that a) members of team are insider trading and b) team is paying for spam shill campaigns on here

>inside trade a securities compliance announcement
Yeah I'm thinking based

>>23285578
Should I buy the dip?

>>23285745
> team is dumping on me and preventing organic growth
> iexec bagholders: BASED! THIS IS BULLISH!

>>23285773
Lol you missed the point retard. This curry scam is so brazen they pump and dump a sec announcement. I don't bag hold any shitcoin splattered all over the catalog every day

They should've used the french SEC thing to completely rebrand and change the name to something reasonable

>>23285815
relax mr monopoly

>>23285578
TOKEN NOT NEEDED

>>23285850
It actually is since it'll prove you passed kyc

>>23285860
KYS bfore KYC

>>23285850
The token is 100% needed in order for enterprises to gain eRLC to utilize the iExec Enterprise marketplace

>>23285860
It's only KYC for enterprises since they all deal with regulations and shit. The regular public iExec RLC market is unregulated and always will be.

>>23285870
>enterprises to gain eRLC to utilize the iExec Enterprise marketplace
no enterprise gives a fuck about the product, fren
so again, token not needed

>>23285870
NOT NEEDED AHAHAHAHA

>>23285578
>pretending that kyc / aml compliance is a big deal when dozens of shitcoins already had it before rlc applied
>spam it all over the board as per usual
>shitcoin dumps because 0 adoption and no one cares because quant makes this shit obsolete with its integrations
You taking the hint yet, pajeet? Maybe your "barrels" of digital dogshit are better off being shilled on Twitter. Tell your buddies in the telegram that I said that Pakistan should nuke them.

Quant is king.
RIP rlc niggers.

>>23285885
Isn't the main bet that all rlc eventually gets converted to regulated erlc tho? Enterprises have deeper pockets than average users

>>23285945
>dozens of shitcoins already had it before rlc applied
Name one?

>>23285945
XRP is king you sand nigger

>>23285996
Quant, for starters. DYOR, not that it would help much because your average rlc fag struggles to comprehend anything that their handler doesn't give them.

>>23286003
No. Xrp is trash. Sub dollar shitcoin eternally.

>>23285972
The endgame is that dApps and private individuals use RLC while B2B use eRLC.

>>23285721
The shills campaign are after they teased some shit so I doubt it's connected, the market buys however are ALWAYS before they even posted something.
100% Blair or one of the other 2 biz guys (Baptiste and Wassim) is doing insider trading.

>>23286074
Shut up you slavic trash every tread same gose in with big words and at end shills quant scam that is well known to waste funds and dump on people

>>23285890
>>23285908
>>23285945
Not even going to bother with actual pajeet fud
>>23285972
If most of the RLC on the market right now gets bought up and swapped to eRLC the price will moon incredibly hard, making those that have the rest of the supply (holders like me) incredibly rich as they need me to sell my RLC so they can use eRLC.

And I'm not selling until 11,490$.

>>23285945
>the ugly friendless jobless buttblasted quant faggot is here again
Obsessed
Why don't you try sucking our dicks like you did last time? I loved your subversient bottom tone, fitted you well

>>23286131

>>23286050
If I can buy quant on the open market it isn't kyc or aml compliant

𓆏

>>23286100
Hmmmm true
They should've capped it at 50/50 then

>>23286131
>n-not gonna bother with "fud" because I can't refute it lallalalalala *plugs ears*
That's right you cornered, retarded faggot. Rlc is hot garbage, and the fact that their shills have to latch on to recent regulatory wind-pissing as "big news" shows the absolute state of how desperate the seasonal rlc spam brigade is.
Tick tock, rlc nigger. The quant steamroller is going to demolish your village.

>>23286112
Go suck on that retarded xrp goblins cock, you fucking LOSER LMAO.

>>23286183
Wrong. You have no idea.
Rlc retards barking at shit they don't understand yet again.

>>23286211
You're weird

>>23286198
KYS quant brainlet

>>23286211
Why don't you go back to your empty thread schizo? Noone cares about your shitcoin.

>>23286211
Too true. Rlc pajeets have no idea what's coming. We're going to make it bro, they aren't.

>>23286257
You dont understand quant its THAT GOOD so good that its not even crypto shitcoin sooo good cyka

>>23286188
Your fud is just incoherent mental illness in text form with a splash of pajeetery
Imagine holding quant when you could hold DIGITAL OIL instead. Enjoy the bags loser. Regulatory measures are a big deal, but you wouldn't understand because you don't understand how the world works kek.

>>23286183
Why cap it? The price of RLC will increase with enterprise adoption (good) and enterprises will be able to utilize iExec without regulatory problems and also have invoices(also good). It's a win win.

RLC and the "public" iExec network would operate just fine if say, RLC was over 11490$ per. Price wouldn't matter as we operate in fractions anyways. Having a public and KYC-based marketplace is genius, especially how they made it to keep RLC value intact.

0.00000001 RLC per computation
The future is all computations and data
I am a billionaire

>>23286211
>>23286296
Lamo sir such organic conversation

>>23286307
>incoherent
Just because you're a low iq rlc nigger with reading comprehension issues, doesn't mean that what you're reading is incoherent. Get your handler to help you come up with a response.

>>23286366
All you are posting is a bunch of blabber and nonsensical trash. At least tell us, technically, why iExec RLC is "hot garbage", mr genius?

>>23286385
Better ask him why quant is and why nobody adopted it or why he replys to his own posts and acts as different person. So many questions.

>>23285578
Why the fuck do I still hold this

>>23286385
>please list everything wrong with my retarded rlc shitcoin with no adoption
Maybe you should list something that it actually does well vs quant? You can't. There's literally no refutation. Rlc is cooked. Quant is king. It's not hard to understand.

>>23285578
>Becomes KYC/AML compliant in basically what is all of EU
can you explain. do you need to pass kyc to own iexec now?

>42 posts
>12 posters
Jesus, /biz/ is damned

>>23286366
>8 posts by this ID
Lmao faggot I know you’re an RLC holder. Probably have a five digit stack you gay fudding nigger.

>>23286442
Haha see, you don't even know why you're here. Oh wait yes you do, it's just to shill your quant bags.

I don't care about your shitcoin anon, in fact no one here does. Thanks for the bumps though I guess
>>23286451
No. Just for enterprises to use iExec(eRLC)

>>23285721
>"paid indonesians"

Does it make you feel more legit changing the 3rd world scammer race that's supposed to be doing this shit every few months?

Nigga, I often post memes here when number goes up for a laugh. I'm an Aussie with exactly no interest in selling this decade.

I definitely think there could be something fishy going on, that price action recently was very suspect.

I'm just saying don't assume everyone on the chin is a 3rd world shill. Most of us are just retarded faggots having a good time.

>>23286555
Why even entertain his fud?
To me the chart looked like it needed to bounce and someone took the opportunity, it's not like RLC is a flavor of the month pajeet biz scam, it's a coin with a solid foundation

>>23286188
Regulatory approval is massive, lad.

I get that you're basically pretending for the fun of it, so this is more for any retards here who might want to transition from gambling on uni shitcoin scams to investing in legit blockchain projects.

>>23286584
It happens during every single announcement, I used to think it was just swinger buying pre announcements and selling news but you have to be a psychic this time as they didn't say shit on the date.
This shit kills the momentum of every pump we could have and now on telegram they all sell like lemmings because they have been conditionned to be dumped on by insiders.

>>23286584
I think it's the same autism that has me posting on here at all. For the fun of it.

TMI ITT NSMDO! 10 USD EYO!

>>23286689
True fren i guess that makes sense
>>23286683
Yeah sorta, but the market also acts in weird ass ways too, especially RLC, it's almost always been decoupled from the market.

There is definitely a single whale manipulating it for years, and if anything I take it as an opportunity to buy every large dip.

I'd trade 1$ for 1RLC any day of the week. There is zero point in ever having USD over RLC when RLC will outgain it year over year

>>23286733
Look at telegram gook cm admited for insider trading

LMFAOOO Korean CM admitted insider trading
> iexec bagholders come out of woodwork to defend their digital dogshit

>>23286975
>>23287035
???
Post screenshot

>>23285721
Hey Mr. Monopoly :)

>>23287097
I'm not Scott, fuck off.

>>23287097
Sup Kang

>>23287140
Who the fuck is Kang? I've been following iExec since ICO and never heard of him.

>>23285721
I wish I was a paid shill but I post for free.

>>23287183
Gook cm that spearged out moment we started talking about somebody from asian time zone trading with insider information

>>23287208
So wait let me get this straight
>RLC perpetually dumps 100%
>finally bounces
>muh insider trading!!!!!!!!!
its all whale games and bots

>>23287208
Yup. Guy hasn't posted for a year (despite being a CM) and then suddenly comes in screaming with rage as soon as this is mentioned

>>23287234
sure, whales and bots with perfect timing before news, every single fucking time

>>23287261
Maybe but I doubt blair gives information to any CM's before they announce it via all channels

>>23287238
Noooo no such thing I work very hard I hold not coin for 3 months mr white pigu I got proof font tolk this is very bad

>>23287183
You guys are just jealous Kang comes from the future and knows when to buy and sell RLC

>>23287430
sure sure

DIGITAL CURRY

>>23287741
More like gooked all pnd came from korea

>>23286484
lmao yeah

>>23287140
Mr monopoly.. we had this talk already STOP FUDDING MY FUCKING COIN REEEEEEEEE

posted in another thread but here is a black and white version
>>23289114

>>23285745
lmao based af indeed if true
proof iExec is truly confidential
NSMDO

digital coin
>rolleyes
it's 2020 and you retarded crypto hopium cucks are still falling for the most retarded projects in crypto history

>>23289383
Wasn't that lambo the first thing iExec ever blender rendered? If so, how fitting

>>23289446
Lol ??

>>23289479
dude I think you're right actually...

Sirs we make it never sell ok? i buy since 2017 every week have 200 total now please sirs pump right now!!!

Regret Losing Chainlink

>>23289742
Real Life Chads
Get it right or get the fuck out and stay poor

>>23289479
Recently they rendered two red bmws. Not kidding. Idk, lol.

>>23289617
>Another unoriginal Indian impression
Yawn...

>>23289810
Based

>>23289742
Kys

>>23289810
>>23289997
My words sting I know, but what hurts your eyes more? My post or your rapidly declining portfolio?

>>23290470
WTF but you bagholder of rlc yourself

>>23290470
What would hurt the most is listening to your FUD, selling and missing out on an easy ticket to financial freedom.

>>23290590
This.
NSMDO

>>23290719
Agreed, NSMDO. I will think about it when it hits at least 1k each, even then it will go much higher.

>>23290775
I will only sell maybe 5 to 10% of my stack at 1k. It will go far beyond 1k if my calculations and predictions are correct.

>>23290825
Just to add, remember, LTC went to 400$ being a useless shitcoin, and it has the sameish supply as RLC.

>>23290857
On my phone now, if LTC, a useless shitcoin can go to $400... Oh boy. I can't wait until next year for RLC. It's regulated now on top of everything for enterprises.

>>23290963
The next few years are going to be interesting that's for sure.
All I know is I'm never selling my digital oil unless bezos himself begs me

>>23290963
Isnt RLC now the only blockchain company to implement and fully compliant token?
I saw with my eye own eyes that Google is interested in Blockchain (Joining EOS) And I know google knows who iexec is.
This is a no brainer right? I look at the price and feel stupid.

>>23291405
Regularity compliance doesn’t mean shit if there isn’t any demand for your token. Enterprises are going to rent your crappy pc in your cuckshed, they are going to use a established cloud. Oh, what’s that, they’re already doing that just without a shit token and an additional layer of stinky software that is super restrictive because of “POCO”? Naaah enterprises are still begging to use the token, surely! What’s that, google cloud and AWS already offer confidential computing, the same functionality IExec then rents and tries to “resell”? Oh naaah the enterprises will surely still want to use this French middleware and attached volatile shit token instead of using the underlying cloud in the first place.

>>23291405
Whale manipulation is real with iExec. I think it ends soon though

>>23291576
Are you retarded? iExec would allow enterprises to transact value trustlessly and privately over a decentralized network, never possible before.

nobody is developing anything on this piece of shit

>>23291621
Lmao you think enterprises can’t use encryption today? How dumb are you ?

>>23291576
"rents" indian hands type such words and Im sure I saw this pasta few times before

>>23291636
Nah there is some people if you go looking. That's why were in adoption phase anon. I know it's hard to understand but you can get it if you really squeeze hard enough

>>23291668
Ah not even going to bother with you lol stay poor. Everyone look at this guy he figured out iExec!!! He's smarter than a team of PhDs!

I'm gonna buy more in your honor

>>23291669
That’s two massive copes in one sentence, impressive. Too bad you can’t refute it

>>23291735
> stay poor sirs
> muh 6 PhDs
ahh the classic retard cope, when shills are called out for their bs

>>23291856
You are the one coping.
Stay poor fren

If RLC is such an amazing hidden gem that is guaranteed to moon, why is nobody buying it? Volume is pathetic.

>>23292144
Idk because it's ... hidden?
You answered your own question lmao

>>23292191
it's been "hidden" for over 3 years

>>23292196
Correct

>>23291576
this. There's a reason why this piece of vaporware trash hasn't had any users in 3 years and thats not "muh regularity compliance" - its rather that the functionality already exists and no one cares about "muh tokenized decentralized computing" except for crypto fags that have never even used a cloud themselves in their whole life. Literally a coin for midwits that think they are so smart because they buy into "muh awesome tech" - its basically the same as nano bagholders that just can't understand why their token is always dumping and never mooning.

What happened to this thing? I remember during the summer anons were shilling this like crazy. Now its exactly where it was price wize as in june. I dont see the appeal and the replies from back a few months ago said to wait and in like 2 years it will jump. I sure hope so, seems like half of /biz/ bought into this coin this summer.

>>23291856
And I seen same post like 10 times before you guys just copy paste that shit now?

>>23291576
Didnt ask fot brainlet takes

>>23292312
>its basically the same as nano
fun fud until you went too far
stay poor though faggot

>>23286050
found the faggot who sold his RLC at the bottom and bought some shitty scam coin....go try and pump your bags elsewhere... this is a NSMDO thread now

>>23292312
Fuck you fudder ok, I punch you bitch ok? I’m big and strong

>>23285578
>1:1 token swap for enterprises in the form of an escrow
what does this mean?

i hope y'all know that RLC is the way of the chad!

>>23285721
>parts of the team are pumping this before every news release and then dumping immediately like clockwork
I suspect this too. Because it happens every fucking time

>120 posts
>41 posters
>half of them with only one UUID
This can't be organic.

>>23294832
It was already confirmed, some korean CM accidentally admitted it in the telegram and is now rage-deleting everytime someone mentions it

>>23294945
No its carbon based

>>23295030
Prove it. People keep mentioning he said this, but I have not seen any proof so far.

>>23295030
>>23295381
Who has screenshots?

>>23294945
It’s based

>>23296652
No one does, otherwise they'd be posted already.

>>23296780
I saw them on Telegram but I didn't have time to screencap. Blair is deleting everything single message about it.
Just go there and talk about it, sure they will ban you.

>>23297117
There's a few comments about it in the TG group right now.

For the millionth time, the price is controlled by binance and a few elites. Everybody knows this should be at a minimum of $10 right now. When they want to let it loose they will. Until then, you accumulate.

>>23295381
>>23296652
>>23297117
I don't think there was one where he said "yes, I commited the insider trade sir", but hard to tell because he immediately deleted his most suspicous ones.

But basically he's a CM who never posts in telegram, last post was 1 year ago. People started talking about the timing of the insider trades and that it would have been at 4.00AM in france making it unlikely that its from blair &co, and rather in the asian zone. The second someone posted it, Kang, the Korean CM jumped in full of rage and started insulting people etc. and when they told that he just outed himself, he started deleting messages of people etc. Also he said he doesn't hold "any cryptos since at least three months" and posted some pic of a empty trading history (lol) which really doesn't seem likely for a korean CM in some crypto project.

bump

Bro back up your claims
Mr monopoly was the first to call it out
If there's a rat on the team I'd like them flushed out but I can't see them being that stupid to actually dump the price after somewhat positive news for a 5% profit

>>23298218
Can someone produce any concrete examples (ie, screenshots) of Kang insulting commenters or denying accusations?

>>23299211
Only "proof" I saw was the pump to $1 a day before random news then dump back to .90
To be fair they were hinting at the news for a week

>>23285578
>decentralised cloud computing
>requires KYC

>>23299430
KYC only needed for enterprises, not anons providing cloud computing resources. Try harder, FUDrucker.

>>23299211

>>23299473
How can an enterprise stay anonymous then? They literally can't and have to trust iExec not to disclose informations.

>>23299365
They were hinting at the news for 2 months and the price jumps 17% EXACTLY the day before the announcement in a few buys before falling 15 minutes after said announcement with the same sell amount of RLC as the buy twenty four hours before?
It's "Epstein killing himself" / "Larry Silverstein out of the WTC the 9/11" tier chance for the buyer.

>>23299211
I can just tell you we were at least 4-5 people posting on the thread at this time and all saw it, was funny as fuck desu.

>>23299647
Come to think about for last year same dumps happend. Somebody buys 150k or so just day or hours before announcement and dumps 10 min after when some fomo starts.

>>23299647
There were probably hundreds that knew of the news between the french gov/agencies/iExec

Blaming it on a shady korean community manager seems far fetched

WORLD DOMINATION

>>23299581
You rattled him. Was watching that unfold live

>>23299799
He could just played it cool but sperged out like 12yo

>>23299799
>There were probably hundreds that knew of the news between the french gov/agencies/iExec
No way hundreds of people knew when the announcement would be made to the day/hour.
Some dude at the french gov wouldn't know if they would announce it this week or the week after, besides some guy working in a financial regulation agency doing crypto insider trading? I don't buy it.

This type of chart pattern happened more than once too besides, so it makes someone "new" doing it unlikely.

>Blaming it on a shady korean community manager seems far fetched
I don't know if the korean dude is guilty because autismo Blair can't even be assed to tell us straight if those guys are informed in advance but he sure as hell acted strangely.
He said he doesn't hold any RLC which actually makes him look more guilty because he has nothing to lose selling the info.

Anyway I don't really give a fuck who is guilty, we'll probably never know but it's not hard to keep the date of a public announcement secret.

>>23286733
>There is definitely a single whale manipulating it for years
it's Gilles

>>23286733
>RLC when RLC will outgain it year over year
look at the all time highs and where is it now lol ahahahahah

RLC FAGS REJOICE, FOR YOUR PATIENCE WILL BE REWARDED
PATIENCE, MY FRIENDS, WE WILL CONQUER ALL

>>23301215
based meth poster

>>23301215
You're a fucking faggot you turned me into a bagholder you fucker I hope you get jailed

>>23294945
you know that people can reply more than once?
I'm guessing your a magatard. cry shill whenever something is posted that you don't like

>>23298218
>>23299647
>>23299737
>>23300382
Take your meds
17% move is within the normal range for rlc, it’s pumps before each version which is public ally disclosed
You need to get some sleep or take a chill pill man, who gives a fuck is a Korean community manager swung for 20% on a regular news output. As if he would even be privy to that news
You fudders have lost it

>>23301726
If you think that insider trading is a normal thing then you're just another deluded RLC bagholder

>>23301741
>a Korean community manager
>insider trading
Ok bro it’s an obscure shitcoin in a tiny market rife with manipulation and you think a Korean community manager insider traded some nothing news for a tiny profit
Get help

Insider trading of some nobody Korean is just the new booleans

>>23302153
Except that the boolean problem was never solved

>>23302221
yes it was

>>23299638
Enterprises don't want to stay anonymous retard. Regulation exists for a reason so they can't money launder. Jesus some of you are retarded

>>23302919
ya its sad FUDDERs are so obsessed with this project
plus while their address is public they can run tasks over encrypted data and get an encrypted result back