[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 10 KB, 300x168, 299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23284962 No.23284962 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.23284984

I unironically yesterday after holding for over 1 year....have I made a mistake?

>> No.23284985

Too many layer 2 solutions coming for eth like LOOM CELR MATIC ALEPH Skale and the list goes on…

>> No.23284996

Matic is gonna crush them all… seriously guys no other layer 2 solution comes near matic

>> No.23285009

I don’t know how but these $5-10 worth tx fee are unbearable and after started to shift me away from eth these days…

>> No.23285022
File: 48 KB, 800x450, 308.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23285022

>> No.23285033

LOOM is more like a separate blockchain now than a Layer 2 scalability solution. CELR is partnered with Matic for better User experience.

>> No.23285041

>this uniform one post by this id writing style
Shill better jeetnigger

>> No.23285045

SKALE even though not yet available publicly, is too centralized and all tx go through a single node.. Matic is the only decentralized Layer 2 solution which I trust.

>> No.23285049

>>23284962
dude, matic, arbitrum, loopring all use chainlink
why are we still asking which should you buy?

>> No.23285056

Will the L2 layers be of any use after ETH2.0 is live

>> No.23285069
File: 44 KB, 848x477, 300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23285069

>> No.23285085

ETH will still take couple of years to still complete all the phases for eth 2.0 until then L2 are the way

>> No.23285096

Actually L2 layers can add features which the projects cant add directly on L0 so L2 will always be there as L0 implementation is too slow and not always feasible.

>> No.23285107

>>23285056
Eth2 is now focusing on rollups which is an l2 solution

>> No.23285109
File: 16 KB, 275x183, 309.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23285109

>> No.23286113

>>23284985
yeah should really keep it to something that layer 2 doesn't need to solve. LOKI and the like make it look easy

>> No.23286139

>>23285056
No, because L2 systems are bad for the mother network. This is why BTC/ETH are trying to figure out a way to make things work without them, before another project takes over (xrp)

>> No.23286243
File: 163 KB, 1702x1384, 1597487906981.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23286243

>>23284962
It's not the best.

ZK roll-ups are the best.

Still, I have a bag. Scaling is the next sector to pop.

>> No.23286365
File: 59 KB, 657x527, 1597889675934.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23286365

>>23285056
Yeah, the benefits are additive.

So for example ETH 2 might do 1000-3000 tps alone.

With L2 it could do 100,000-300,000 tps.

For the record, with L2 full adoption ETH 1 should be able to do 1500-4500 tps

Plus you can run computation on the L2 rather than just having data. ETH 2 is considering running predominately data-only shards to avoid the complexity/risk etc and just focus on being very good at the one thing.

>>23286139
Definitely ignore this low-information cripple bag-holder (or better yet DYOR and find this out for yourself).

>> No.23286374

>>23286139
you are a virgin arent you