/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23260468
Maybe.
Probably will be Quant, though.

>>23260468
Polkadot is a sidechain for ETH. It will never beat ETH.

>>23260502
Quant’s Overledger means any chain can potential become the top dog.
Polkadot probably has a better chance than Ethereum.

Polkadot aims to be a bridge between smart contract chains. It doesnt even have smart contracts itself.

>>23260567
It doesn’t need smart contracts. Quant’s Overledger has multi-chain smart contracts that will also run on Polkadot.

When you include their other networks like KSM and even Acala.... DOT is looking good af

>>23260468
And Both will get BTFO by AVAX.

>>23260691
nice joke

DOT, DFN, AVAX, ALGO, COSM, HBAR, etc, and arbitrum might cuck them all before they even get a chance.
L1 is a fucking shitshow just buy more LINK.

Dfinity.. It'll be top 3 right on listing and many here will seeth despite haven't read anything about it, You should.

>>23260691
>AVAX
https://hackmd.io/@gavwood/HJrgddTxD

>>23260742
I've been wondering since 2017 how tf do I buy dfinity or are they just an urban legend?

>>23260710
Emin Gün Sirer is the #2 of Cornells IC3 (Ari Juels is #1) and he developed a completely new Consensus mechanism.
ETH will switch over to Avalanche and become the "Athereum" subnet.
https://athereum.avax.network/

Polkadot is centralized and has many problems.
you can read about it here
https://medium.com/@CryptoSeq/polkadot-an-early-in-depth-analysis-part-three-limitations-and-issues-d8b0a795a3e

>>23260796
Cope, I'd rather listen to the guy who has an h-index of 46 and is the #2 of IC3 instead to the Pedophile retard with h-index of 0 who writes cringe pedophile novels.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/20/report-ethereum-co-founder-gavin-wood-deleted-blog-post-about-sex-with-underage-girl/

>>23260823
literally FUD

>>23260468

polkadot is way too high nobody here will care about for good reasons, only few people made money with this.

>>23260850
imagine believing some pedophile coomer solved the scalability problem.

>>23260807
>and he developed a completely new Consensus mechanism.
he didn't develop it, he just implemented it
"Team Rocket" invented the avalanche consensus

>>23260884
>implying he wasnt part of Team Rocket
we will never know for sure but its very likely.

>>23260864
it sure as hell scales a lot better than ETH does

>>23260906
and AVAX is better than both.
there is also no slashing in AVAX and literally anyone with 2k AVAX can run a node.
you can actively participate in the network and validate transactions, hardware requirements are also low.

>>23260923
what puts me off for now is the aggressive distribution, I will wait until after December since there will probably be a dip with the supply releasing quickly

>>23260977
most of it will be locked up in nodes anyway.

>>23260864
Yes.

>>23260923
shitcoin no one has heard of

>>23261034
>outing yourself as a laggard

>>23260923
Avax has storage issues that remain unsolvable in theory, It'll encounter the same problem as network sharding projects had, This problem will defeat the point of high TPS blockchain, The more power they use the more they strangle the network.

Until they don't find a solution for it *IN THEORY* it won't get used long term, Projects will prefer to built on networks with 10% slower latency and 10% slower TPS if that mean their future is "secure".

I'll stick with Dfinity/ETH 2.0/Algo if i were you, Your typing reeks of wishful thinking.

>>23261061
>Avax has storage issues that remain unsolvable in theory
no it doesnt.

>>23261104
Educate yourself, It's the most common problem with the Avalanche consensus ever since the paper published.

>>23261156
I am already better educated about it than you, there is no such problem.

>>23260468
maybe this ecochain meme will change your mind....

you are getting smarterrrrrr...

>>23261205

Quant anon has a point, you know. Why invest into eth and all its 5000 pretenders/"killers", when you can just as well invest into the unifying interoperability overtoken (qnt)? It only makes sense from a hierarchical perspective... Am investment into qnt is am investment into eth avax dot iota... You name it. And it will help them all get adoption thanks to mapps. Meaning that eth avax dot etc... Are no longer direct competitors. (think of having the safety of btc with eth smartcontracts and tps of chain#3.)

Thr founder had an interview with the EU commission today and will also be on real vision today. (if you don't know what real vision is, you're a pleb.)

Quant anon has a point, you know. Why invest into eth and all its 5000 pretenders/"killers", when you can just as well invest into the unifying interoperability overtoken (qnt)? It only makes sense from a hierarchical perspective. An investment into qnt is an investment into eth avax dot iota... You name it. And it will help them all get adoption thanks to mapps. Meaning that eth avax dot etc... Are no longer direct competitors. (think of having the safety of btc with eth smartcontracts and tps of chain#3.)

Thr founder just had an interview with the EU commission and will also be on real vision today. (if you don't know what real vision is, you're a pleb.)

DOT is extremely illiquid, the parachain auction bid will drain the supply, that means that DOT will pump like a bitch

>>23260491
kek delusional

There is one viable competitor, and nobody sees it coming.