/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22932083
>and are planning to buy 50% of their funds in good faith
to burn*

Bump.
Be sure to save the pics.

Pics like these make me emotional for some reason. I feel happy being born now since I could still catch the crypto train in time before massive normalfag adoption in the next ten - twenty years, but I feel sad because real VR and fully fledged VR probably won't be a thing until at least 2050.

At least by making it I'll hopefully have the funds, time and peace of mind necessary to properly experience what the future has to offer in that department. Maybe even invest in companies making 2D closer to reality. Time will tell.

ALSO BUMP

why shill xeth? We have a great community and everyone is making huge money, we don't need 4chan retards

>>22932746
I’m just here for the pics

>>22932746
This post almost made me sell. Almost.
>>22932782
And I'll keep delivering.

>>22933200
Nice. I’m genuinely skimming through your post right now. Much more in-depth and articulate than the average pajeet scam but I’m still skeptical

>>22933309
And you have every reason to be skeptical, since it's not particularly ground-breaking. It's just a rebase token without the hindrances of AMPL that was listed 2 weeks ago. Its main advantages again the competition are the low mcap, and how easy marketable it can be as a money printer/hedge. (see pic related)
As I've said countless times in my previous threads, if the volume/buy pressure decreases significantly, it won't take long before the whole thing falls apart. I've been shilling xETH for the past 4 days making sure not to leave this detail out, as I feel it wouldn't be honest to tell other anons to jump in without making them aware of what they're getting into. In fact, I waited one week before making threads here to ascertain if it could be considered sustainable at least for the short/mid term before talking about it here.

The sandcastle of holders is getting bigger as I speak and as that nigger said, the community and team both are playing the game in order to make this last. I hate being associated with these people but greed is more of less the same no matter where you look at in this space.

>>22933486
>Its main advantages again the competition are the low mcap, and how easy marketable it can be as a money printer/hedge.
against* easily*

Bump.

And also one piece of bad news, straight from the announcement channel :

>"Hello everyone, we will delay the launch of the liquidity staking for a bit. We won't give an ETA yet, but it should still be around the corner. This is in place so that we can ensure maximum security and UI/UX for our users. Thanks for your understanding.

>Burn event will happen this Friday!!! Who else is excited to see the token burn?"

Wew lad. The delay means that we'll be stuck with low liquidity for a while. What was the point of proudly announcing that it would be ready by Friday other than to make people buy the news and pump the price? That's one shady point for the team.

Not to be paranoid here, but maybe they want to keep the liquidity low for the time being, as it was hinted that an e-celeb was contacted by the team for marketing purposes. At the very least, in his latest video, he acknowledged xETH in a comment mentioning it by replying "I think you might be right." So they might be doing it voluntarily to allow for a nice inorganic pump for him to dump his bags - this is a schizo take but you can never be too worried.

(Don't forget to activate uBlock origin and/or invidious so that you can't give more views to who I assume to be a PnD device)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXGiVdhxOms

>>22934336
Here is the comment in question. Now I'm getting all paranoid.

>>22934336

what does the burn event mean? will the price go up or down? I think I might swap xeth for eth before the event, what if we get rugpull instead

>>22934791
I think I mentioned it in the OP, but what the team refers as Burn Event is when they'll get rid of half of their funds in order to ease fears firstly, and reduce the supply.

The price is expected to go up as a result, thanks to hype following this event ("oh wow, the team isn't greedy!!! buy buy buy!!! moon time!!!") and of course supply and demand.

>I think I might swap xeth for eth before the event, what if we get rugpull instead
Trust me, you're not alone worrying a little about what may come afterwards. The team remains anonymous and there's no guarantee if the code was properly audited to prevent a sudden bug or something.
Now I'm myself wondering if the cons and risk outnumber the potential profit to be made. Scared money doesn't make money, but there's a difference between taking a measured risk and blindly believing in something just because.

>>22933486
>>22933506
Hmm I’ll dump $200 into it just to see what happens fren

>>22935078
Do what you will. I think I did my best to lay out both the advantages along with the risks, and the most recent red flags so to speak. Perhaps I'm just too worried over small details, but I have seen more elaborated exit scams in the past.

I hope the endeavor will remain fruitful, 11 days in and I'm green so I pray with joined hands that this trend will continue.

Bump, I'll continue dumping random pictures. Don't hesitate to ask for sauce if Yandex or Google shits the bed

>>22932083
Office Ladies are the best animus

>>22935592
I wholeheartedly agree.

>>22935138
Yes your commitment to this project is admirable. As is your taste in anime boobies

>>22935489
I really like this one. What animu?

>>22935644
I believe it can succeed with or without me shilling here, but I'd like other anons to take part in the experiment. Still, a little marketing push cannot hurt. I wouldn't bump the thread otherwise.
So that I can be happy in knowing that I helped people make a profit. I'd feel genuinely disheartened if it turned out to be a scam or fail for whatever reason, even if I did warn about potential risks. We never know what might happen but this is what makes crypto and browsing /biz/ so great. It forces you to be on edge but you can put the odds in your favor, with the little touch of randomness and dumb luck in the equation.
>>22935659
Character is namaya from Grandblue Fantasy. I'm on mobile so I'm too lazy to go on pixiv to check but I'm pretty sure the artist is isaya
I actually went to check and yes I was right

https://yande.re/post?tags=isaya_(pixiv4541633)

Read Ane Naru Mono, both the hentai doujins and the serialized one focused on the plot. Pochi is the only 3D female I respect for creating such a delightful read, both for my dick and my heart.

Shilling for another coomer piece of media, play Imouto Life Monochrome. It's a little on the grindy side though, unless you use cheat engine but what would be the point?

ALSO BUMP

I love boobies!

>>22936944
You had to say so earlier.

How big is too big?

Okay this time it's an actual bump with a purpose, next time I'll include this link in the OP. It's basically a dashboard listing all of the rebases since September 15. Goes to show that the team actually listens to the pajeets on TG

https://xeth-rebase-dashboard.herokuapp.com

>>22932083
I’m excited to see where this goes

>>22937605
Me too. Also that was a great picture, anon.

The pajeets in this thread know whats good

...that 52% xEth wallet holder though --> https://etherscan.io/token/0xaA19673aA1b483a5c4f73B446B4f851629a7e7D6#balances

>>22937146
>too big

>>22938957

devs

Doesn't matter how big your wallet is when the liquidity is so small!? Seems like when/if they get the liquidity up, then it can dump...idk...kek...

>>22938032
Glad you appreciate it. Also I'm not one of them but I guess it was to be expected that I'd be associated with them sooner or later, considering I've been pretty active shilling xETH.
>>22938957
It's the dev wallet. And they're going to burn half of their funds by Friday, I said so if your eyes were focused on the text and not on the girls. Moreover, their funds are locked until December 15 so there's still time before we can genuinely worry about dev dumping on us.

>>22939204
Sorry to tell you, but only the 2nd holder has locked funds. Check out the contract yourself (you can see the 49k locked up)

https://etherscan.io/token/0xaA19673aA1b483a5c4f73B446B4f851629a7e7D6?a=0x30763939b717efe725d0e221d77237bc419e4732

The first one is just a plain 'ol wallet, like any other wallet. It can dump anytime (and I'm 100% not saying it will. I'm just pointing out it can, fren. Not hating on the project, just talking risk)

Either way, I'll try to keep muh eyzz up and we'll see if that one gets cut in half on Friday, I suppose!! Price will go to the moon if it does!!!

>>22939430
JUST
This is unironically concerning
>implying it's not the dev or someone in cahoots pretending to have participated in the presale
Who the fuck would own 50% of the supply otherwise.
I was 100% convinced that the two wallets were locked, turns out I was wrong. I wonder what the team would say on TG if someone were to ask about it? At any rate now this is one MAJOR RED FLAG and unless they have a proper explanation I'll unironically sell all I own.

>>22939606
...when/if you ask, let us know...definitely curious...but, yea, any project where I see that kind of disparity I don't risk it (though bet you are in profit because rebase, babeeee!)

ahh..

>>22940057
Some people reading this thread already asked the question in the TG. Depending on their answer I'll sell everything and be sure to make threads telling people I might have convinced to buy to do the same, even if they weren't that many to begin with seeing as these threads died with 5 or 6 posters at best participating.

And yes, it'll be a shame to give up on the daily rebase profits. But if I sold now I'd be up x3 since my initial investment even without the price pumping like crazy, which is great. PerhapsI'll sell 2/3 and let the rest ride or die, just in case.
>>22940084
Hope you liked the goods anon.

>>22939430
does the team own the first wallet? you're right, I can see the token lock contract here https://etherscan.io/address/0x30763939b717efe725d0e221d77237bc419e4732#code

>>22940663
So this was a nothingburger?

>>22937278
more!

>>22941546
I'm confused, I see 49k locked by the token lock contract but that particular address holds around 222k tokens
https://etherscan.io/address/0x30763939b717efe725d0e221d77237bc419e4732

>>22941715
It was 49k when locked, but it also gets rebased I believe...so it locked up and then grew while in prison...

>>22941634
Anon asks for sauce, I spoonfeed. I apologize for phoneposting though.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jema000/status/1123227121508175872?lang=en
>>22941715
It may be possible that the rebases significantly increased the stack, hence why they're actually burning the token on Friday. We'll see by then if the wallet gets halved. If it does this will be a massive buy signal

>>22941762
I could confirm if I knew how much it has rebased. Has a token lock contract like this been tested with rebases and tokens with elastic supply? In other words, is only 49k out of the now 222k actually locked? Normally, etherscan does update values from elastic supply coins. You can see supplies and wallet holdings change.

>>22941851

...if they burn 50% of holder 1 (the wallet) it'll have a noticeable hit on supply and the price will go up 25% immediately...and folks will/should sell...maybe..

...if they burn token holder 2 (the locked) it'll go up 10% and meh.

it'll be a good faith sign, but doesn't have any impact on how much anyone can really make because liquidity is still so low...

>>22941992
The whole amount is probably locked. The contract probably cannot be unlocked at all (so all of it) until 3 months or whatever....

>>22937278
>>22941546
Urgh critical hit

>>22941992
>Normally, etherscan does update values from elastic supply coins. You can see supplies and wallet holdings change.
I know that the change isn't instant in my case. Metamask showed that my stack had increased but it took almost one hour for etherscan to update the correct number on my end at the very least.
>>22942382
Don't tell me you're already out, anon. This is merely the beginning.

Bump.
I don't post TG screencaps often but if xETH turns out to be a scam the team must be among the most sociopathic ones I have ever seen. Imagine being sly enough to try and build confidence to the point of going as far as paying peoole making up tools for the community to use.

I seriously hope the whole debacle about the first wallet owning 52% of the supply will end up being a small schizo-tier episode. Also I didn't realize but this thread lasted way longer than the previous ones, it's been up for almost ten hours. Even if nobody bought I hope people used this thread for other forms of profit.

This one is a favorite of mine.

Last bump for the day, with something NSFW this time since I'll be taking a nap.

See you next time anons and make sure not to pay your taxes.

Thanks to these generals I now see why they called the token "X"ETH