/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22887358
Alright, so GEEQ gives a weak economic disincentive for a node to lie but this isn't the only layer. We all know there's a lot of monkeys out here that will go against things in their best interest, we all saw the fags that sold their UNI instantly for a PS5. These are the monkeys we're talking about. GEEQ pays for ANYONE who contributes to a node, there's not some PoW bullshit that we all know is a scam, the few people that are honest are the only people that will get rewarded. Alright, so proof of honesty, is this legit you're asking? Honestly that sounds like shite! Who the fuck is the team working for this project? Glad you're thinking with your head and asking questions for a change.

John Conley (AKA A GENIUS) who's presented in front of Microsoft CEO's, World Banks and all sorts of smart bastards is behind this project. Check him out, seriously, right now. Or don't, you don't have to make it. Who else is on this team? Ric Asseltine, John P.Conley, Stephanie So, Lun-Shin Yuen, Eric Ball, Ian Smith, Dr Yeap and Kurt Hoppe are all working on this. Who are these? These are literal fucking geniuses who work for NASA, know dozens of programming languages, work for Google, are the former treasurer of Oracle and more.

The best part, you're actually early for a change. The project hasn't pumped 5000x and there isn't a trillion pajeets shilling this trying to get your ETH on a vaporware project that hasn't been released yet. This is a sub 2 marketcap project, with amazing tokenomics, with a product that's out and gaining more adoption by the minute at a low price. This is your one and best chance to get in one a project that will actually make you fucking bank, now of course, do your own research but if you want a fat stack of this baby check out Uniswap or the various other exchanges it's listed on. Did I forget to mention they're working on getting this listed on major exchanges like Binance? That's all, take my freebie or don't.

>>22887358
Checked out their website and Twitter, shit's legit. I'll take a look, thanks for posting this

I'm still accumulating DELETE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SAGE

>>22887358
The project looks interesting. I'll give it some more research, thanks.

Not buying your bags.

>>22887781
https://geeq.io/video-geeqs-unique-poh-and-blockchain-cyber-security/

Can't wait to watch you fomo in at $10

>>22887358
Why bother with this when LINK already does it better and has 3+ years of development advantage

>>22887877
GEEQ complements Chainlink, if you don't see this, you haven't researched the project.

Im in

>>22887877
bruh, literally fucking go to their website at least

I guess I'll give it a shot

>>22888085
Some people just won't make it don't bother, you could lead a camel to water but you can't make it drink

Been DCA'ing all the way down from the $3s. Wish i waited to happy to have more time to accumulate. The question is...HOW MANY GEEQ TO MAKE IT??

>>22888105
lmao, whatever man. I'm still not done reading up on this shit.

I wanted it to go below $0.50 so I could get a decent stack sigh

https://youtu.be/5-SfsRFf7Vw

>>22887982
>>22888085
I read it. There’s nothing this does that LINK doesn’t already do on its own
>>22888105
I’m currently at $500,000 off a $10,000 investment faggot, don’t talk about making it

>>22888259
Read the technical paper.

>>22888259
They are not competing they are literally partnered with LINK you retard

>>22888259
Ngmi

>>22888366
They have a planned partnership, AKA nothing

>>22888259
>>22888382
This low quality FUD, are you feeling it frens? This is when you can tell a project has potential and people want it to go down so they can get cheaper bags. Ask yourself why several of the most talented and educated people in the Blockchain space are working on this project and have locked up their coin, people that run companies that generate billions of dollars in revenue a year working on this project for free right now.

sorry anon, this project was already btfo:
>>22767597

Shills tried to take over but refused to back up posts.

Reality check:
1. they use copyrighted material on their websites where they don't actually have content to back up claims
2. they don't spell check. can't even spell ceo title (pic related)
3. they are dumping consumer on-boarding funds.
4. the token distribution is absolute garbage.
5. The ceo "holds" many companies. These companies basically share the same employees lol.
6. Coordinated shills say " they won't dump". "they do billions in revenue". Simply not true.

>>22888492
I literally don’t have a single penny invested in this. I’m genuinely asking and haven’t gotten any answers: why would I use this early development unfounded system for decentralized verified transfers and transactions when that is literally what LINK already does?

>>22887781
oof. it's almost like the token distribution was designed to dump

>>22888544
The tokens by the team are locked until 2021 and the rest of your points are null, this is pretty shitty FUD

>>22888580
to enrich this kind gentleman (pic related)

>>22888544
>>22888581
>>22888611
For a person who has no money into the project, you seem really dedicated to discrediting it, why would that be anon? Hmm...

>>22888608
learn to use etherscan customer onboarding was being dumped anon.

How are they not true? Do you really believe they're doing billions in revenue? prove it.

>>22887358
>>22887378
Nigger, do you really expect me to read all that shit?

REJECTED

>>22888656
I already went down the rabbit hole on this thing. Just sharing the info and trying to keep the discord shillers at bay. It's a pretty obvious campaign desu. look at every geeq thread. The same exact people show up regurgitating the same phrases word for word.

as always DYOR. if you can refute any of these points, I'll be happy to be educated

>>22888698
Pre staking on bitmax is coming from that wallet. Oh. And love the spelling FUD. Reminds me of LINK 2018. Comfy

>>22888832
I'm sorry you couldn't hire someone fluent English to work on your website. I'm sorry if that doesn't inspire confidence.

Also, don't compare this to chainlink. They're a legitimate project. Once arbitrum rolls out hopefully we won't have to hear about these boomer cash grab "eth killers" anymore.

>>22888759
You don't make any valid points. They misspelled a word in one part of their website and as the other anon said, they're pre staking from Bitmax. The tokens are locked. Guess you forgot the times when Vitalik, Sergey and other devs did the same thing. That's your only points against this crypto which are weak, the reason you're posting this is because you want it go down so you can get a bigger bag, if you were honest you'd admit this, filthy pajeet.

>>22888544
>6 posts in this thread begging anons not to buy it
Just bought a stack, thanks

>>22888907
lol okay. enjoy being dumped on with your racist friend ;)

>>22888994
Me too just bought big stack and new geeq zkthreads shirt. very valuable token here.

Just bought a stack, feels good.

>>22888907
>you're posting this is because you want it go down so you can get a bigger bag, if you were honest you'd admit this, filthy pajeet.


Also, this still cracks me up that anons believe we have an impact on markets. Yes, Geeq fud on biz is really what is making number go down. lmao

This isn't how it works anon

>>22889003
>tokens are locked until 2021
"y-you're going to get dumped on!!"

>>22889122

>>22887781

>>22889003
How much GEEQ are you holding?

>>22887358
Price prediction by EOY? I'm feeling bullish

>>22889214
59.38%

>>22889245
I'm thinking around $10

>>22888544
Is that Roy Munson?

>>22889245
If I'm being conservative, $5. I'm thinking it could go up to $30 but at least $5.

Wow I just bought a giant bag and of course the new shirt! Wow what a shirt. I mean, I looked like a gay retard before but now I am also looking like a pajeet.

>>22887358
This is one of the few projects I've seen on here that actually looks good, thanks.

>>22887358
I have faith in this coin even though it's been down significantly since launch.

>>22887358
Common Anon ! Look at the chart !
Kek

pls buy shirt b4 i die or your mom dies tonight

>>22889624
That's a strong buy signal if you ask me. Buy low, sell high. It's always best to buy when others are scared.

>>22887358
This is our time to shine boys

Is there any decent reason as to why I shouldn't get a stack? I see it being shilled here a lot and it seems like the team is solid and the price is low... what's up with that?

>>22890029
After reading the technical paper, I couldn't find any reason against it besides the coordinated shilling, they're really dedicated to spamming it on biz. I bought a stack, why not?

>>22887358
Its Kadena. Not this boomer pile of garbage. Proof of Boomer vs Scaled proof of work. hmmm

>>22890489
Kadena looks super jewed out. That could be good or bad depending on how you look at it. If I had money in Kadena, I feel like my finger would be over the mouse ready to click SELL at any moment.

>>22890650
Just sold my Kadena stack for QEEQ after reading that the devs literally work with NASA and are billionaires like holy shit

>>22887781
Kek