[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 407 KB, 498x474, pepe.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22771200 No.22771200 [Reply] [Original]

>tfw uploading gore NFT's to Rari

>> No.22771226

>>22771200
Based

>> No.22771404

That's how you do 2020.

>> No.22771590
File: 1.39 MB, 2352x1122, Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 2.34.41 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22771590

>>22771200
>>22771226
>>22771404

>> No.22771649

ok but actual question here
what happens when people inevitably upload cp on this shit?
wouldnt the owners of the hosting servers be liable?

>> No.22771650

>>22771200
checked
I still don't get jpeg NFTs. Do people really spend ETH buying this shit instead of just downloading the jpeg from Rarible?

>> No.22771710

>>22771650
I have a feeling like 90% of the sales are fake

>> No.22771738
File: 35 KB, 500x522, tumblr_nm4wt0t9wk1tezt7xo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22771738

>>22771650
Proof of ownership
Take Mona Lisa, for example. The original painting is priceless, everyone knows that. Sure, you could get a copy of one for $20 or you could have someone paint an imitation for a couple hundred, but doing either of those things doesn't mean you own the original Mona Lisa painting. In the same sense, simply downloading the jpeg NFT doesn't mean you 'own' the original, if that makes sense

>> No.22772049

>>22771738
Fair enough anon, and I get how it will work in the future for trading cards, etc.
But some of the bullshit jpegs people are supposedly paying $80-$200 for? Kek

>> No.22772074

>>22771649
hilarious how 1/3 peoples minds on 4chan go to the same thing whenever file hosting is related to blockchain. its been recanted countess times in the past with other projects

>> No.22772087

>>22771650
Think about the trade in modern art. It's not about the ownership of the piece but the resale value. NFT's are basically ponzis and the loser is whoever is last to hold them

>> No.22772267

>>22771738
Then you realise that people have just uploaded other peoples works they found off random deviantarts channel. So NFT only proves you minted a token. Saw some neckbeards on twitter talking about how they bought a fake lmao. Then when you sell the NFT you are profiting off someone elses copyright, with proof.

>> No.22772300

>>22772074
it’s a legit concern that could threaten the legality of whatever project it is.

>> No.22772343

The value of the pictures don't matter. They're putting an amount in so they can be eligible for airdrops. They just pick whatever picture they want to do it with. I bought a picture of two Spideys pointing at each other.

>> No.22773155

>>22771650
Rari is a known scam for washtrading between friends & family and subsequently shilling their shitcoin RARI on biz. free money for these scammers.. anyway

>> No.22773166

>>22771200
Upload Goatse

>> No.22773191

>>22771590
based

>> No.22773205

> memetics>ownership
I'd rather influence the masses rather than keeping something digital secretive.
kek try advertising to discord trannies, they love luciferian knowledge kek

>> No.22773243

>>22772267
so you make sure you are buying the artists original work and not a copy
this is verifiable on-chain
>have to do a little work to make sure you're not getting scammed
wow, this is incredibly unique to NFTs

>> No.22773250

>>22771590
KEK
https://app.rarible.com/token/0xd07dc4262bcdbf85190c01c996b4c06a461d2430:18615:0xaebca32c690f7bd53315facc06df4a0e0fb04e62

>> No.22773269

>>22773205
NFTs are not meant to be kept secret and actually you really couldn't if you wanted to
unless you bought it directly from the artist and it was never publicly advertised
but even then it's viewable on-chain

>> No.22773546

you guys got a yfi waifu yet tho??
https://app.rarible.com/token/0xd07dc4262bcdbf85190c01c996b4c06a461d2430:18729:0x33afc45defd8578b9c19c9b7610d19fbdf02f1b3