/biz/ - Business & Finance

Once they get things up and running I can see this becoming huge.

>>22715363
I won’t settle for anything less than 1 QQQF = 1 SPDR. Call me insane if you will.

Low liquidity
No developers in team
Team is not doing anything for project advancement

My leading, reliable tipster put me onto QQQF over a month ago. I instantly bought a whale bag.

>Hodling strong , enjoying watching the project progress.

>>22715684
Low calibre FUD, and quite simply BS.

>>22715684
Low liquidity is indeed a problem. The pre-sale barely gained anything because it flew under the radar and got ignored by many thinking it was a scam. The dev didn’t abandon the project in spite of that and kept working on it and since then there’s been new team members, a whitepaper, new website, locked funds and the team even added personal funds from their off-ledger wallet to help with the liquidity issue.

I’m not going to lie, this project is a long-term hold and is not for those that expect to become rich in one day but the team is constantly working on improving the project and coming up with new ideas and working closely with the community, it’s certainly not dead.

>>22715738
Is liquidity high then?
In tg it seemed like 1 person remade website and done dao smart contract who clearly stated that he's an investor and not a team member, what other devs do they have?
Out of 3 team members 1 is always shilling in tg and dis, others are nowhere to be seen and fuck knows what they are actually doing for the project

Sorry to disappoint you anons, but sold this at 2 cents when I had the chance.
Now I actually regret proudly boasting that it would reach 50 cents by EOY, with absolute certainty. Looking at the state of things right now, it would be nothing less than a miracle. It's not that I don't believe in the team, but while they have a good spirit and did their best to handle the project, they unfortunately failed to retain a long-lasting attention and support from the market. I'll have to remind you of this : QQQF pumped by accident at some point because another token shared the same ticker, leading to a lot of confusion.

It's a shame the project is performing this badly, since the idea is really good on paper.

I'm still overseeing the project from afar. But I wouldn't take unnecessary risks for now.

>>22715849
Sad to see you have lost faith in the project based Lambdaposter, I understand why you’re concerned and indeed this project hasn’t lived up to its potential but that will happen in due time, this I’m sure of. The project itself is sound and if there is someone to blame it is the short-sightedness that plagues so many people in crypto. As crypto matures so will the people who stuck around and those people will sooner or later recognize the need for a project such as this. Feel free to keep watch over the project, the game is not over yet.

>>22715845
Due to there being so few team members they are quite disorganized and don’t have set roles at the moment but they are commited to the project. Unfortunately they also have work and studies to take care of so progress has been a bit slower than usual lately. Not everyone has the luxery of working full-time on a crypto project.

>>22715845

They are currently getting more team members. The three original members aren't webdevs but from STEM and finances, so they are creating the foundation for this project than just blindly developing a half-baked product.

The development is certainly not ideal, but it has been slow and steady.

>>22716058
That's the thing, it doesn't even look like they are involved in it part time apart from 1 shill, really poor project management overall, don't see it going anywhere with current team

>>22716129
Not all projects have their own dedicated webdevs. If I recall correctly, the current dev has been paid for his work, so I wouldn't necessarily call it just volunteering investor.

The team is doing their best, and honestly I believe them. Not everyone can work full-time on a crypto project.

Would I invest my whole fortune on this like a degen? No. But would I hold a healthy stack or at least a suicide stack? Absolutely.

>>22716129
Worst case scenario the project might be handed over to a more competent team if things don’t work out. The foundation has been built, all that needs to be done now is to start building upon it. If they can’t deliver on it then someone else will have to do it and the team knows this, make no mistake. That’s why they are looking to recruit new people, it’s too big of a project to be done on their own.

>>22715738
Kike

>>22716212
How much did he get paid if the team can't even provide liquidity? Anything under 5 eth for a website is volunteering

>>22716328
As someone who’s in the DAO there’s been a discussion of the team putting a part of their UNI claims as liquidity. That should help a fair bit.

>>22716058
>>22716230
>As crypto matures so will the people who stuck around and those people will sooner or later recognize the need for a project such as this. Feel free to keep watch over the project, the game is not over yet.

This is something we can agree on. I still stand by the idea that projects trying to build upon the desire to lessen your exposure to risk while at the same time making steady gains will become more common, as the space grows. However, even putting aside the team's management of the project, it may be possible that without an attractive gimmick for this childish market (i.e Statera's deflationary aspect) such a project is slightly too early for the space. It would be like trying to teach complicated philosophical concepts to a 3 years old child - they aren't even able to process the idea correctly because their lack of life experience prevents them from seeing things differently. The crypto market is still too immature.

But as you said, the foundation is built. The idea resonates with people, even if it's not many TODAY. If by the coming weeks I were to learn that more competent and available devs were to work on QQQF, you bet that I'd be here to enjoy seeing the project grow.

>>22716384
That pic is gold. Saved. I agree with everything you’ve said. Being too early is a blessing in disguise though, make no mistake about it. It took Bitcoin 10 years, but if you ask those who were in it from the start if it was a good idea I’m sure most people would agree that it was wise of them to do so.

>>22716384
>Pic related

>>22715226
Pee pee poo poo scam

>>22716523
Reminds me of the anon in the ETH screencap, as well. Poor soul.
Goes to show that "time in the market" isn't actually a meme for the most part.