/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22539248
just another of day waiting in mumbai.

>>22539248
You will be waiting for a loooooooong time...

>>22539248
STOP
SCAMMING
PEOPLE

I love how the "License" market shows garbage like made up heartstone cards or straight up heartstone cards that have been downloaded from google images. So much for integrity.

>>22539434
Stfu faggot

>>22539465
you don't seem to have any vision for where nft's can go. without some vision or imagination, you'll never make real gains. yes, there's crap on rarible, and there's also a lot of shitcoins in crypto, and there's a lot of garbage websites going all the way back to angelfire times. does that mean crypto as a whole is worthless, or that the internet is just a fad?

there's a lot in the works for rarible. what you're looking at right now is the tip of the iceberg.

I can’t tell if people truly believe this will only be a marketplace for art or they’re fudding.

>>22539653
Based comment

>>22539248
$100 is fud

>>22539996
Based in Calcutta.

>>22540939
ahaha, no actually based in brasil, but american

This looks like it can't break 10$, some dumbass keep selling everytime it starts pumping. Good luck going up when it's full of weak hands

when we talk on solutions with bright prospects we also need to evaluate the tech. and there is just 1 fav I follow on supply chain field - Morpheus.Network. Something entirely new on the field. Any time a document needs to be shared with multiple institutions, putting that record on the blockchain enables real-time updates that can be seen, but not tampered with

>>22539248
Rari or bust. I need a win for once.

Just voted to add the seller and buyer fees. Once this is implemented and stakers get their cut of the fees it will send this to fucking moon. Volume is growing and will explode once more and more projects utilize nfts. Bullish as fuck.

>>22541421
can you link me to the vote in the gov portal?

>>22541013
If you were a real Brazilian you would have sold your RARI for AAVEGOTCHI.

>>22541506
well, i'm not a brazilian! just an american who ended up here before the covid scam and decided to stay (rio beats ny). anyway, i'm also researching aavegotchi, looks cool but i'm still learning.

>>22541421
I heard that the fees will be added to discourage wash trading, but is it confirmed the fees will go to the hodlers and/or stakers? If so, then it's a genius solution to fixing the tokenomics, which right now are kinda shitty.

>>22541613
Not with that attitude you aren't.

>>22541483
https://snapshot.page/#/rarible/proposal/QmY48QUS2uj6GSd9EdQ1puAcmAyd5L75Q6HjFdNcVTNNWD

revamped proposal https://snapshot.page/#/rarible/proposal/QmdeqdRKcVzv55hJwqRhTyHoS6n7JjNxAEMdEYk4ZznPoZ

>>22541659
Yes, that's confirmed.

>>22541696
i like being a neurotic jewish american

>>22541659
yeah, weak hands selling because they dont know that or dont want to wait.

>>22541764
>>22541951
Bullish as fuck, but I still do think that 75k tokens/week (just shy of $600k/week at the current price) is simply too much in the current state of Rarible's development as a platform afaik, it might cause the market cap to rise too quickly.
It wasn't a problem when the token was worth less than $2, but if the price pumps even more, the inflation might potentially bite holders in the ass, i think some kind of a halving is due.

>>22542033
I really doubt it's going to be a problem. The 75k tokens don't go to one person who could market dump it. It's spread among the most active users on the platform which are also the most passionate users. It would take a coordinated effort among them to make a dent in the price. Not very likely to happen.

>>22541764
sauce? i read the proposals linked above but they suggest all the fees will be reserved for dev and community building, at least for the time being. which isn't a bad thing.

i wonder though if it's good to impose any fee on sellers at all, at least for initial sales. isn't it the same reason some exchanges didn't charge fees to makers? incentivizes liquidity

>>22542191
Forgot to ask for sauce on that as well.

>>22542033
its not that big of a deal as most people are not looking to dump their tokens, and it was also discussed that it will probably be lowered soon.

>>22542191
I can only say that its confirmed that the staking for fees will be implemented, i dont know when and how and dont remember where i read that. I feel like the 2.5% fees on a marketplace like this does not really matter to the users but really boost the token price due to better economics.

>>22542177
If only people knew how much USD value in Bitcoin is mined every day yet it maintains its price. Everything comes down to supply + demand.

bumb :-DDD