/biz/ - Business & Finance

N

>>22506999
Wut ya drinking bruh? Some olde English?

>>22506999
Because we are going back to 60k sats

It's all fine.

>>22506999
>Still doesn't get what LINK is
Too risky not to hold, Perfect way to strengthen a portfolio. But Hey you had three years, and I doubt anybody that doesn't get it by now will later. Same game as with eth early 2016

>>22506999
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_p7dXbDAXuQ

>>22506999
Whales are waiting for you, specifically you to sell.

>>22507028
I

>>22507695
Is it worth buying link now or is it correcting downwards atm ?

>>22508357
Link is going to dump below $10, followed by a sudden dump, after which we will see a significant downtrend, with a dump right after, succeeded by some dumping.

>>22508436
Why?

>>22508538
Why not?
Nothing new is set to be released in the coming months or even years.
Certainly nothing is ready for the Q3 Oracle integration, so that's a $5 dump right there in early October.

>>22508607
So it’s just another ripple tier shitcoin? No contracts , most coins owned by the team which they are dumping

>>22508698
500k LINK gets dumped on your head every Friday.
Google partnership confirmed fake
Oracle Q3 isn’t happening and wasn’t going to happen to begin with
Top wallets own >80% of the supply
Futures have LINK around $14 in December

Scam shittoken is running out of hot air.

>>22508759
>Futures have LINK around $14 in December
15% GAIN
not bad

>>22506999
Bwahahahahaha, one should only invest their hard-earned shekels in coins that normies heard of like BTC and ETH :3

>>22508607
>>22508759
fuck off
FUCK OFF

>>22508357
According to my TA and some others, you might catch lower prices, but we are on the upper band of the accumulation channel, dumb money is sold. Aiming for sub 7 is possible, but extremely risky

>>22508835
>behind this post is an ugly fat tranny

>>22508698
Well Link is instrumental in Defi.
But if they want to serve data to companies like Swift, Oracle, Google, ... they need to implement features like reputation, enclaves (SGX), mixicles, staking, ...
And none of those features are coming any time soon.

>>22508919
I'm trans but won't ever transition. Either that or I'm mentally insane.

>>22508977
which is what they're doing. they just hired Ari Juels for goodness sakes

>>22509002
The important part is that you're ugly

>>22509157
>which is what they're doing
No they're not.

>they just hired Ari Juels for goodness sakes
Ari Juels has been closely working together with Chainlink from the very start in 2017.

>>22509157
They have bought two ari juels projects after he wrote the white paper. How much of our money has to go directly into his pocket? How is this not self dealing? If he loves the project so much why doesn’t he just work for it instead of staying a freelancer helping run the show then profiting off of founder dumps? Ari Juels name should be a cuss word around here by now.

>>22507482
Number going down during a pump is the exact same as number going down on dump.

70% of this shitcoin is owned by like 9 people. Everyone knows this. It's pumped as high as it will go. Other than that, you're just going to get dumped every time it goes up.

>>22509286
Hiring Ari directly was a solid move.
But it means very little when Chainlink keeps refusing to release a single new feature for years and years.

So if I shouldn't just leave my LINK alone and the numbers go down, what should I put my LINK money into instead, at least until it recovers, if it recovers.
What is the probability of LINK reaching 30 by eoy?
Is ETH any better at this point?
Everything is just going to keep decreasing, isn't it?