/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22471023
Also, nvidia bought arm.

>>22471034
>To conclude, the resulting decentralized application while with much more potential for scalability than purely using blockchain, and being more user friendly as to not need a user to run a
full time node, there certainly are many potential improvements possible, and with the foundations
laid out a continued feature integration could produce an application to rival current centralized
e-commerce alternatives, thereby solving the problems of consolidation of power to a few large
companies as laid out from the start of this document.

>>22471152
Also, not in top 25 because nobody knows about any of this. Worst marketing and pr-team in the history.

>>22471034

What’s a fuck you stack?

did they change colors and logo

I hate this shitcoin my god

>>22471401
True but those are easily fixable. I remember when Apple was the shittiest company on the planet with the shittiest marketing.
>>22471633
Anything over 870 is a make it stack, so whatever multiple of that, probably like 20k
>>22471674
No it's a meme because of the fact that iExec is the next LINK and also does oracles
>>22471700
Based it also hates you

I have spent the past 30 months building up a stack of nearly 74k barrels
All I need is a 10x to make it

>>22471034
>nvidia bought arm
Hypothetically what if iexec was bought?
Wonder what Gilles values the company at...

>>22472339
Based but rlc will get at least 100x

How the fuck is this still $1

These bags getting heavy with all these defi scams mooning

>>22472339
>all that money spent on toys
>deathtrap contraption for lift

>>22472380
iExec will get bought sooner or later
Not many confidential computing projects out there let alone blockchain based projects
so many companies are kicking themselves for not acquiring chainlink when it was valued at $50m

>>22472380
Cloud computing is 700 billion in 2023. Let’s say iexec can get 10%. So 70 billion. Iexec current market cap is 90 million. So around 700x. Let’s say iexec gets only 1%. That’s 70x.

>>22472542
>>22472518
Ya gilles isn't a dummy. He might seem lazy but decentralized cloud computing will explode soon. Factor in confidential computing and he knows he's sitting on a goldmine.
The EU news will be massive

gilles cannot be stopped

>>22471401
>Also, not in top 25 because nobody knows about any of this.
Many of us know about it and have dismissed it. It is worth buying to sell to Greater Fools during the inevitable release pumps, just make sure you sell it before the equally inevitable post-release dump.
>>22472542
>Cloud computing is 700 billion in 2023. Let’s say iexec can get 10%. So 70 billion. Iexec current market cap is 90 million. So around 700x. Let’s say iexec gets only 1%. That’s 70x.
Your numbers make absolutely no sense. Even if RLC captured 10% of the cloud market, that does not mean RLC's market cap would be equal to 10% of the cloud market. If there were $100 MM worth of electric cars sold per year and 10% of them were Teslas, would TSLA have an mc of $10 MM? Obviously not.
Why do you think a company's market cap would equal it's annual share of a market segment? Seriously anon, you need to go back to the drawing board and rethink your approach to investing. Not even crypto - just how business works in general.

>>22472900
Take your blog post to Pinterest faggot. You don’t know shit you are shit hit the bricks bitch.

>>22472518
>>22472657
It's pretty sad thinking this lmao, fucking retards gilles has 1 MILLION RLC. He will be a trillionaire without these faggots.

>>22472900
Also RLC isn't just simple cloud computing.
It's quite literally a new bastion of technology

>>22471023
Will be different this time

>>22471401
>Worst marketing and pr-team in the history.
They tried TOO hard if anything.