/biz/ - Business & Finance

>Espen Enger exit scammed with the Bitgrail victim fund money and no one knows anything about the 1 million Nano foundation gave him.
>According to former friend "OberstWeltMeister" in Nano Trade discord, former broke Espen Enger, after Bitgrail, had suddenly more than 100 BTC to daytrade with
>He is no longer active in the Bitgrail group
>Scammed his best friends for another 100 000 dollar
- New con job by Espen Enger
- https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/hz8vq4/new_con_job_by_espen_enger/
>Now has gone underground and in hiding.


One /biz/ anon predicted this outcome two years ago:

>Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

>Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

>Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ

>Team NANO - Sex, Fraud, Corruption and Satanists
>>/biz/thread/16596049

Nano’s relationship with BitGrail, their main trading platform, was incestuous and dirty from the very beginning. However, after “Bomber”, CEO of BitGrail found out that his exchange had been hacked for 80% of their Nano assets in October 2017, close to 10% of total supply of Nano, the relationship between Nano devs and BitGrail became criminal.

BITGRAIL PROBLEMS KNOWN BY NANO DEV TEAM PRIOR TO BITGRAIL CRASH
>Insolvency of BitGrail and missing 10 million nano, discovered and made public by the Nano community [1][2]
>Missing transactions on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [2][3]
>Single transactions replicated multiple times on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [4][3][5][6].
>Millions of Nanos moving out from BitGrail, when the exchange was closed for withdrawals, discovered and made public by the Nano community [7].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to alleged ‘maintenance’.
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to ‘KYC’ excuse [8] [9]. Hundreds of thousands remained unverified [10].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks, due to alleged ‘pending withdrawals’, which were never processed [11].
>Nano withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to node problems.
>Customer support ignores tickets - not just for days but for weeks [12]
>Bomber increasingly unhinged and psychotic. Insults his customers on social media for asking legitimate questions [12]. Nano community expressed concern to the Nano devs.

>nano
lmao

>>22377537
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (1 of 2)

>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano, do arbitrage between exchanges. [13][7][14].
>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano move assets to safety. Just one of these accounts handled 50million USD [13][7][14][15].
>Insider trading on BitGrail done via accounts connected to Nano Devs. Traded tens of millions of dollars [15].
>Nano dev team used incestuous relationship with Bomber to get instant KYC verification [16], impossible for standard Nano investors.
>Ordinary Nano investors accounts blocked from doing arbitrage, moving assets to safety or doing insider trading, unlike Nano dev team. Stuck with coming 80% loss [17].
>Zack Shapiro (Nano dev): Everything under control. Just too much work with KYC. Not insolvent. (statement made 4 days before BitGrail insolvent) [18].
>Zack Shapiro: No reason to worry, BitGrail doing normal KYC, “scams don’t do that” [19]
>Zack Shapiro: “Yes, you can [trust BitGrail]. I talk to Bomber every day and he’s a good guy. We’ll get it all sorted next week. Just hang in there” [20] [21]
>Zack Shapiro: Confirms BitGrail is a serious business. “Opposite of an exit scam actually” [22]
>Zack Shapiro: BitGrail is “Legitimate. Complying with the laws of their contry” [23]
>Zack Shapiro: “Funds are safe on Bitgrail…Again, funds are safe” [24][25]
>Mica Busch (Nano dev): ‘‘funds are safe, [BitGrails] representative account does not show any suspicious activity’’ [26]
>Nano: “Be assured that your funds are safe” [27][28]

>>22377227
SUTER is the new NANO without the drama

>>22377753
Really? What about tps, transaction fees etc? Where can I find more information?

>>22377537
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (2 of 2)

>Person who discovered and exposed 50million USD account being connected to Nano Dev team, got later banned from Nano subreddit [13].
>Nano community member who discovered/reported that nearly all nano on BitGrail was missing, was forced to delete initial post titled; ‘10 Million XRB Possibly Missing XRB From BitGrail’ [2] and repost under different headline ‘I need some help with tracing funds’ [1].
>Nano team systematically deleted threads of investors’ concerns and the sharing of new information regarding BitGrail [4].
>Nano dev team confirmed knowing about all BitGrail problems, told investors to relax, and promised a thorough investigation [29][30][28]. ‘Developers are taking care of that’ [31].

>>22377227
This piece of sh*t scammer belongs in jail.
Also these Nano bastards got away so easily, no justice.
Hope enough people will wake up and both Nano and Espen Enger finally receive the consequences for being irresponsible AND scammer.

>>22377537
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITEIS POST-BIGRAIL CRASH

>Nano Dev team claimed to do all they could to investigate and find missing Nano. No update since. Nothing done. [32]
>Nano community did all the work, themselves researching/investigating. [33][34][35] [32][41].
>BitGrail victim group representative, Espen Enger met with Nano lawyer Josh Kleiman in Italy [36]. Details of the deal made with the Nano team is not made known to the BitGrail victims.
>After meeting between Enger and Kleiman all criticism of Nano Dev team became banned on BitGrail victim discord [37].
>Change in BitGrail victim group management. Protection of Nano Dev team and suddenly non BitGrail victims used as hostile mods on BitGrail victim group discord [38].
>Don’t be surprised if Enger gets millions, and/or cushy job at Nano when all this is over. As a big thank you from the shady Nano team.
>Multiple pending and coming lawsuits against Nano foundation and Nano team members. Outside the original BitGrail victim group, now Discord BitGrail/WebCoin Lawsuit [39][40].

>>22377537
Footnotes to the above Nano -BitGrail Crash (and Nano dev team involvement) –1 of 2

[1] https://archive.is/8mMEU
[2] https://archive.is/LUN33
[3] https://archive.is/V30nG
[4] https://archive.is/pk03o
[5] https://prnt.sc/ilv1gl
[6] https://prnt.sc/ilv0p6
[7] https://archive.is/Wkgvn
[8] https://bitsonline.com/raiblocks-nano-bitgrail-epic-fail/
[9] https://archive.is/CKs1V
[10] https://imgur.com/a/rOn3Seb
[11] https://archive.is/RW944
[12] https://archive.is/DM6Nl
[13] https://archive.is/acLnr
[14] https://imgur.com/a/Owlui
[15] https://archive.is/pC3vC
[16] https://imgur.com/a/mJMhlx3
[17] http://archive.is/86eDr
[18] https://imgur.com/a/aFYpDyk
[19] https://imgur.com/a/KNg2src
[20] https://imgur.com/a/o8lIwDz

>>22377537
Footnotes – part 2 of 2

[21] https://imgur.com/a/urpgzwv
[22] https://imgur.com/a/G7fgqWV
[23] https://imgur.com/a/4YcVEji
[24] https://imgur.com/a/IWP2thd
[25] https://imgur.com/a/rFV6BJy
[26] https://archive.is/bfd0Y
[27] https://imgur.com/a/ql0cjLP
[28] https://archive.is/dykfh
[29] https://i.imgur.com/ddzQlVw.jpg
[30] https://i.imgur.com/7xwM1Lx.jpg
[31] https://i.imgur.com/e8n7fWo.jpg
[32] https://archive.is/lTCkP
[33] https://archive.is/o1BmU
[34] https://archive.is/8Md3N
[35] https://archive.is/f4Q8E
[36] https://youtu.be/40aufi9oJno?t=10m16s [Embed] [Embed]
[37] https://imgur.com/a/gQmoQv0
[38] https://imgur.com/a/d8xG4QL
[39] https://archive.is/MbWv1
[40] Google: silvermillerlaw com 2018/04/2018-4-6-DE-1-CLASS-ACTION-COMPLAINT-1
[41] https://archive.is/0R8Qe

>>22378408
So true. No idea why the Bitgrail victim group is not pushing this harder. Looks like they have totally cucked regarding scammer Espen Enger, just as they did when they got scammed by Bitgrail and Nano Foundation.

why do these thread keep popping up here? it's all negative. makes me wonder if this is intentional fud.

>>22379529
Ryte, all threads about OneCoin, Nano-Bitgrail and Bitconnect are all intentional fud? Is that what you believe? How heavy is your Nano bag?

Nano will moon soon

I am a former Nano investor (so glad I got away from that sh*tcoin with it's sh*t people).
Have you been following the scandals with the completely corrupt Nano team?
Colin completely ignores any legit criticism
He hired a completely unqualified airhead whore as COO! He's obviously banging her because she's 100% useless and does nothing. Just posts on instagram about f*cking pizza, or spending Nano money from Colin in 5* hotels, on yachts or drinking champagne in helicopters... I could go on. Anyway it's a complete joke.
AND Colin made some incompetent diversity hire. They are complete lefties and disrespectful to actual investors and just blow te money on their own hedonism.

Nano's network literally does not work right now. They have delayed pushing epoch upgrade blocks because they have been disabled on so many exchanges.
Literally one dude with a mid range you can bring their entire network to it's knees right now by spamming.
They introduced a bug in v21.1 and if any account deadlocks the whole node does.

It is pretty basic in their pursuit of efficiency they mashed all the threads together which means if confirmations are behind on hundereds of thousands of blocks on one account they stop confirming for all accounts.
To spam hundereds of thousands of blocks takes a 200 dollar Nvidia card and a couple hours.
Some dude just optimized the opencl driver to for Blake2b so possibly a couple minutes.

The key takeaway is they have no anti spam measures in place the nodes never shit list another node (BTC did this shit back in like 2012). So one dude with a mid range GPU can totally cripple the whole network right now.
They guy who works on brainboocks white hatted and showed them this and they are not reacting properly.
Such a shitshow the NF has run a once promising project into the ground.

>>22380584
Dude it is super creepy to see you copy and paste my posts like this.
In general this is a preacher and choir thing, Nano is a scam. Currency coins don't matter anymore. So if you could stop being a total fucking schitzo botting across multiple IPs and maybe just make a normal thread that calls Nano holding redditors faggots that would be cool. Memes win hearts and minds not walls of text with footnotes bro.

>>22380959
I found all this stuff when I was searching for Espen Enger at waruso. I think its still important to understand what happened then, approx two years ago when the posts were made, and what is happening now. It's a total scam and Colin is not commenting and will not even explain what the hell he have waisted the whole Nano Foundation fund on. In just a few months they will go bankrupt.

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail

While both Nano and Bitgrail leaders told nano investors that Bitgrail was safe and not compromised, http://archive.is/dOMVA, they themselves took all their assets, over $100 million, and moved it as fast as hell away from Bitgrail, hiding their assets, while telling everyone that Bitgrail was OK and perfectly safe. This is why neither Nano dev team, nor Bitgrail, have done any kind of investigation who stole the money, where are stolen Nanos now, where are the thief. Firstly they just don't care, they are now rich, secondly there is too much criminal activity from both sides that none of them want to be investigated and exposed. They prefer darkness, secrecy and that all their crimes will just fade away. This will not happen. Multiple lawsuits are pending and coming. Nano tech is flawed and does not function under pressure, http://archive.is/Vva8Z, Nano is Bitconnect

>>22381613
Colin dumped millions of xrb in May from private wallets when there was Nano Binance Competition (100kk+ USD VOL.)
He chose a good moment for send to Binance. Who gives a dam about Nano and Bitgrail's victims who suffered a stolen.
Guess they had some special developer donation account before actual one which exists now.
I'll explain you so maybe you'll figure out.

Old developer donation account:
https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3wm37qz19zhei7nzscjcopbrbnnachs4p1gnwo5oroi3qonw6inwgoeuufdp

The first address that recieved a nano from Old Developer Donation was this:
https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3pg6xswkroybxydyzaxybb1h531sx34omiu7an9t9jy19f9mca7a36s7by5e
(Colin's account)

https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3pg6xswkroybxydyzaxybb1h531sx34omiu7an9t9jy19f9mca7a36s7by5e
(Colin's account connected to the old developer donation account)

2. https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_11iaqa1oppdxzawrbuzh4m5y78i9zngnhwp8urpup97fsf7k8e84gf61ei75
(Colin's private wallet)

3. https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_31kxdcjafw5k5w4u3h9uo7yctkawcjkegnwaqjr1jqq3tanu8bp6m4obru7a
(Colin's private wallet)

2. and 3. are connected to the 1.

https://www.nanode.co/block/BE548A457F28A42119FB22373303690DAB5F40811E4E87643A15267827D6C138
This is the first transaction when old developer donation account sent to this account back in 2016.

Picture is from 02.12.2017
https://i.imgur.com/KEwsZsY.jpg

What is reddit going to do

>>22380177
Yep, George Coxon is a bikini blogger with NO experience, NO contacts, NO education in the business and/or tech field, yet she got the job as a COO (Chief Operating Officer) for a project with a market value in the billions of dollars at the top. Pic is George Coxon showing her ...ahem...qualifications for the job to Colin.

>>22382758
*) taken for her instagram that she later made private

>>22382364
Only good thing is that redditards got assraped real hard by this one. The eternal nanofags

Mr. Schizo Nano Hater is off his meds again.

>>22382758
George Cockon is probably the biggest reason why I am hyper bullish on Nano.
>>22383290
Redditfags already capitulated
>>22383467
Most of that stuff has some merit.
Schizo is just too stupid to see that all of this is the reason why Nano will go to 1000$. Or hes just accumulating.

>>22383467
>>22383604
I don't know what the hell you idiots are talking about. All this information is on warosu.

Soon 4 millions of nano will be dumped on the market due to bitgrail.

>>22383604
>Redditfags already capitulated
Have you ever been to the nano discord?

>>22383691
No I am not retarded why would I go there.
>>22383668
Yes I know about all that information thats why I went balls deep into nano.
IF you care about any of that shit above just go file a lawsuit. All those people should be locked up. That doesn't change the fact that Nano is going to moon violently.

>>22383817
>That doesn't change the fact that Nano is going to moon violently
Very soon no more money for development with just a shitty broken product that can't even produce 10% of their promised 7000 tps years ago. No phone for the exchanges to call when nano nodes crashed.

Nano is not even on the list of considered crypto for Coinbase, even though Nano and Coinbase are both American. Nano is dead in the water. There is no way in hell this outdated shitcoin will moon ever.

>>22384044
Nano isn't being considered for Coinbase because Brian Constrong and his merry band of shillsters know Nano will BTFO his precious BTC.

Also, Nano development is open source and doesn't require a dev fund to continue operating. All this FUD is stale AF.

>>22384044
Do you want to make money or be the savior of humanity?
I don't care about shitty lies, manipulation and so on.
Whatever it takes to pump it up.

>>22384230
Give me one reason why this shit would pump, and pump MORE than the best of the market in a bullrun

>3 yrs travelling solo
We all know what that means...

>>22384516
This chick.
She dumped millons of Nano at 30$.
The Nano team has an insane amount of BTC.
They will pump Nano to 1k in a matter of weeks without anyone realizing whats going on..
You will see all those /r/cc fags Fomo in like 2017.

>>22384968
Nano has crashed tech and is a total disaster:
>Nano has 756 TPS [1][2]. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [3]. Competitors work on 1 million TPS solutions [4]. Nano’s aim to be global currency is either delusional or a fraud.
>7,000 TPS was falsely boosted and promoted, causing the Nano price to skyrocket 97.7x in December 2016 alone. Real transactions per second (TPS) for Nano, however, was a meagre and pathetic 100-200 TPS [5].
>Nano falsely claim theoretical unlimited scalability, only constrained by hardware and bandwidth limitation [6]. This is as absurd as claiming that a car has unlimited speed theoretically, and the goal is to drive so fast that the car escapes earth’s gravitational field and park on the moon. Nano’s technical updates don’t bring it closer to the goal. It’s like saying the improvements on the engine of the car has brought us closer to driving to the moon.
>Nano advocates like to use average demand as benchmark for needed TPS. This is false. Who will use a currency that will crash at every emergency, at Christmas and other holidays?
>Nano (Raiblocks) was a dead amateur coin, worth less than 10 cents less than a year ago, until it was discovered and pumped hard by Italian scammers. Only after the pump did Nano full time dev. This amateur project has had a full-time dev for less than a year, with a horrific team and management picked among incompetent friends and supporters.
>Lead devs are leaving Nano. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.
>Devs are dumping Nano on the market [7]. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.

>>22385053
I read all of your post I know about all of this.
You are failing at basic thinking.
Think about all of the stuff you have written.
>What could the Nano team possibly do with all the millions of dollars they have?
>What is the Nano team unironically good at?

>>22385160
>You are failing at basic thinking.
You truly are. Not only did you not respond to my question, but you also take stuff right out of you ass with rambling about them having tons of BTC, case is that Nano Foundation is broke within a few months because they DID NOT sell when Nano was at 30. These scammers wanted more money and were taken down during the crash. Colin is practically broke after his divorce and multiple law cases against him thanks to his Bitgrail scam and mismanagement.

>>22385486
>>Insider trading on BitGrail done via accounts connected to Nano Devs. Traded tens of millions of dollars [15].

>>22385582
They wasted money like drunken sailors. Pic related, in a private plane.

>>22384968
this nano to 1k is very 2017

>>22385582
And what is your stupid idea? That after having dumped millions of Nano non the market to fund their insane consumption and super bloated Nano Foundation, they suddenly will start to buy Nano with millions they don't have to pressure up the price, AFTER dumping for two years? Do you have any idea how insane that sounds??

Pic George Coxon from her instagram before she made it private.

>>22385782
Do you have any source on that they do not have millions of dollars in cash?
From reading all your posts and reading through Cockons posts I figured the figures behind Nano are loaded and hungry for more.

>>22386154
Why the hell would they be dumping millions of nano at fire sale $ 0,4-0,6 if they magically have millions of dollars? So in your head, their strategy is to dump millions at 0,4 only to buy later super expensive up to $ 100? Are you insane?

Go to nano trade discord. They have all the private wallets of the team. They have been dumping like crazy for years now.

>>22386154
The Nano team have been burning A TON of money a long time now.

>>22386154
Title is "champagne breakfast" at a $800 per day hotel.

>>22386154
Title is "champagne breakfast" at a $ 1 000 per day (and up) hotel.

>>22386265
>>22386709
>>22387071
You are aware of the fact that the Nano team has huge unkown wallets from the faucets?
The "dev fund" is a decoy anon.

>>22387144
>fact that the Nano team has huge unkown wallets
>fact
>unknown
Are you on speed?

Go to nano trade discord. They have ALL their private wallets. If you believe you have found one that they don't know about, most of them Nano node operators, then feel free to post them. And you can post them here. I call bullshit.

>>22387247
"unkown" because you seemed not to know about them.
So how are they broke then?

Imagine not making 30x on XRB/NANO lol

Hold my bags close and warm you fucking faggot

>>22387316
Go to nano trade discord. They have ALL their private wallets. If you believe you have found one that they don't know about, most of them Nano node operators, then feel free to post them. And you can post them here. I call bullshit.

>>22387359
>They have ALL their private wallets.
How much Nano is in them?
How hard would it be for the Nano team to shuffle some nannies through Binance?

>>22385053
>>22387510
You sound insane. Here, what about this:

>Former head of engineering at Facebook, Bryan Veloso: Nano "just a hype...no real use case" [16]. Currently NANO is only processing 0.15 transactions per second. Transactions have gone down in the last months. Extreme low usage combined with a very speculative 90x pump in just one month, causing a flash crash, are all indicators of a coin with pure hype and speculation, without any real value. Bryan Veloso’s claim that Nano is just hype with no real use cases is validated by empirical data.
>Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin: “Nano will have a hard time being decentralized... It won't be as uncensorable as Bitcoin or Litecoin” [17]. “Nano is not without faults...it has a LONG way to go” [18].
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately, at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that devs are dumping Nano in a fire sale [15].
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy.
>Nano’s essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon, eBay, etc. will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through it in a matter of 1-3 years [15]. Also, multiple pending and coming lawsuits against the Nano foundation.
>100 addresses hold 65% of all 133 million Nano. Initial distribution to friends of developers, nontransparent distribution method. Who solved the captchas? Where is the audit? Extreme centralization that only got worse with BitGrail, where large holders of Nano (including devs/friends of devs) managed illegally and unethically to get out of the insolvent exchange, leaving normal investors behind to take an 80% loss.

>>22387670
Holy shit. Imagine keeping all these insane ramblings and links on your hard drive just to keep repeatedly spamming FUD on /biz/. Anon, get help, and fast. And tell us how much you lost on NANO.

>>22387740
It was archived on warosu two years ago. How new are you faggot?

>>22387998
Ok honest to god why are you making these threads?

>>22388022
I am warning anons about what kind of scammers they are, Colin, Coxon, Nano Foundation and Espen Enger, so they can stay the hell away and not lose their money.

Is there some Telegram/Discord for the Nano Foundation lawsuit?
Not the Bitgrail victims one.

>>22388215
there are tons of scams out there why Nano?

>>22388326
Top 100 on CMC, really? Name them. Include scamming previously scammed victims, by the same scammy team.

>>22388364
Hex, XRP, Tether, BSV, EOS, TRON, IOTA, ZCASH, OMG, BAT, QTUM, ICX, BTT, BAND, DFI
and more.

>>22388489
>Victims: bagholders from 2017
Founders: driving around in lambos

>>22388489
Are you serious? They lied about their technical data 7000 tps and could only provide around 1% 85 tps, and then scam their bagholders on a shady trading platform together with Italian scammers, only later to scam the victims with a Norwegian scammer that they controlled, so the victims would not go after them, only to exit scam with more than 1 million dollars in fund for victims. Really? Are you insane?

>>22388639
YES I KNOW.
MY POINT IS
>SCAMS USUALLY PUMP THE HARDEST, COME BACK AND MAKE THESE THREADS WHEN WERE AT 100$+

>>22388639
are u actually the Bomber?
only one I could think of making these kind of threads.

>>22388749
Either that or this anon lost a fuckton of money on NANO. Regardless, he's clearly lost his marbles.

>>22377227
Pathetic fud. Not selling faggot

>>22388796
ye I am jsut trying to get something out of him other than the shitty copy pasta =(

>>22388706
>>22388749
Are you from Nano Foundation. Your comments are insane and to believe that shitcoin Nano, not even considered by fellow American Coinbase, to pump to $ 100 is absolutely absurd. I asked you why you believe Nano has any reason to pump more than the best of the market in a bullrun and you could not give a single reason why Nano woud pump at all, and now you contacted your fellow scammers in Nano Foundation to come here and make additional stupid comments?
>>22388796
>>22388834
>>22388840

>>22388840
You won't. He makes these threads like once a week and can only respond with unverified claims or copy pasta. Clearly Colin fucked his girlfriend and he's still in shock over it.

>>22388882
>Are you from Nano Foundation.
Yes, I'm from the NANO foundation. Consider this your official cease and desist letter. Also consider seeking professional help.

>>22388912
>>22388943
Here, you idiots are unable to defend your shitcoin. Not a single argument did you fuckers make.

> 51.27% voting weight, held in 6 addresses, opens vulnerability to devastating 51% attacks.
>Flawed structure, currently insane 92% of the voting power in the top 1% of the nodes only [19].
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilizing high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model that will most likely crash the network. Even if it worked, no matter how unlikely, with full adaption the cost of running a node would be astronomical, leading to extreme centralization. Having again the elites controlling our money must be avoided. No financial incentives for DPOS representatives to keep securing the network.
>Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH), pumped again. Failing to pump further, will result in a dump again, very soon. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>70% centralization of all Nano, due to Nano original developers setting default node to their own.
>The code hasn't even been audited by an established software security company.
>Nano is permissioned and non-trustless [20]
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [21]
>90% of github commits by only one person (Colin) in the whole “team”.
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.

>>22388882
Take your meds sweetie

>>22389000
Your whole team and Espen Enger will end up in jail.

>>22389055
Your fud is weak, NOT SELLING

>>22388992
What you fail to realize is that we have no interest in trying to defend your baseless FUD. It's already been debunked ad nauseum. And claims like "G Coxon has done nothing" is not even an actual argument; it's the subjective ravings of a brainlet. Sorry you're still living in 2018, anon.

>>22389247
Anon that made this in 2018 was spot on. He prophesied bloody everything. Also then you had you Nano cunts rambling on about Nano 100 EOY, while Nano crashed to 0,4. Why are you all such idiots?

>>22389548
yes yes yes.
Why are you personally so touched by Nano anon?
Where did daddy Colin touch you?

>>22385053
>>22389899
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with, it’s just an empty logo. Unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Nano has post Bitgrail probably the worst community in crypto [22][23], much of it due to the Nano teams catastrophic handling of the Bitgrail crash.>There are many other coins that are far better than Nano, with instant transactions, zero fees, near infinite scalability, near infinite decentralization, permissionlessness and trustlessness, 1 millionth the energy usage of Bitcoin [24][25][26]. Nano is an extremely risky investment [27]
>Posted some of the above questions on Nano subreddit. Got banned.
>Multiple pending and coming lawsuits against Nano devs personally and Nano foundation. Ugly truths about the Nano team, Nano devs and Bitgrail will come out [12][7]. It could lead to bankruptcy and a total shut down of the project.
>Anyone investing in this documented shitcoin deserves to lose their money. Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

FOOTNOTES:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/982bq9/stress_test_beta_network_v15_results_in_here/
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/98alqy/why_isnt_stress_test_result_published_as_5700_tps/
[3] https://www.accenture.com/no-en/success-visa-connected-commerce-car
[4] https://www.ccn.com/vitalik-buterin-ethereum-will-eventually-achieve-1-million-transactions-per-second/
[5] http://archive.is/iq9fP
[6] https://nano.org/en/whitepaper
[7] http://archive.is/lDoCW
[8] http://archive.fo/v2noA
[9] https://news.kucoin.com/en/nano-deposits-and-withdrawals-are-now-enabled/
[10] https://medium.com/nanocurrency/weekly-nano-update-9-17-18-834f3a493994
[11] https://www.reddit.com/r/BinanceExchange/comments/9flnx5/is_nano_deposit_broken_someone_also_having/
[12] http://archive.is/dOMVA
[13] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanotrade/comments/7vwl86/what_are_the_faults_of_nano/dtvpymd/

>>22389548
Why are you seething about NANO, anon? How old were you when your Mom left to be with Colin?

>>22389959
LOL @ these footnotes. Who are you, David Foster Wallace?

>>22385053
[14] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/90wu2v/what_are_the_negative_things_with_nano/e2tskr8/
[15] https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_1ipx847tk8o46pwxt5qjdbncjqcbwcc1rrmqnkztrfjy5k7z4imsrata9est
[16] https://www.quora.com/Is-the-NANO-crypto-coin-a-working-product-If-so-what-advantage-does-it-have-over-on-other-crypto-coins
[17] http://archive.is/e7oVV
[18] http://archive.is/GvyPd
[19] https://www.nanode.co/representatives
[20] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/92b1at/how_does_nanos_dpos_compare_to_other_dpos_such_as/
[21] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/8kt2ed/universal_block_canary_has_been_released/dzakb0a/
[22] >>11104923
[23] http://archive.is/DlNyk
[24] https://www.quora.com/What-are-crypto-currencies-you-are-bullish-on-for-the-next-bull-run/answer/Marius-Kramer
[25] https://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-best-crypto-currency-to-buy-in-September-2018/answer/Marius-Kramer
[26] https://www.quora.com/What-makes-a-bad-crypto-currency/answer/Marius-Kramer
[27] https://youtu.be/JS9tJgbFTUA?t=27m27s [Embed]

What is your end goal with all these insane effort? Surely there must be a better way for you to spend your precious time.

Does anyone know where the scammer Espen Enger is now, after he exit scammed and took with him the Bitgrail victim foundation money and the money he got from Nano to keep them immune to any critizism? 100 BTC is a lot of money.

>>22390803
Espen Enger here. Just came by to say OP is a faggot.

>>22390909
Is it true that apart from $1 million, getting free sex with George Coxon was part of the deal for you to betray the Bitgrail victims?

>>22390909
Others say you lost all your money, 100 BTC on having sex with Jew Zack Shapiro, is that true?

Hard to know, but I believe its all rumours.

>>22377227
Not as much of a scam as this: >>22385114

>>22377227
Look at this scam >>22385114

Guess there will be more lawsuits against Nano and Espen Enger in the future.