/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22180475
Well we don’t really need google. Or anyone really we don’t need anyone

I’m just curious what makes the Chainlink team so special that they’d be able to do this at all. They seem like they kinda suck are they uber geniuses?

>>22180475
biz can be smart but has no idea how the real world/corporate worlds work
just look how people see the swift stuff

>>22180635
Explain further.

>>22180475
Nice fud. People talking about Swift and Google are so cringe. The real big Player will be Deutsche Telekom when staking rules out. You idiots have no idea
t. gerfag

>>22180475
Chainlink and Google "partnership" is just Sirgay using Google Drive. Screencap this faggots.

>>22180475
Chainlink are making great use of leveraging our entire product suite to improve communications both inside and outside of their team.

Pajeet Mahindra - Intern at Gmail

>>22180576
Networking. Sirgay might be just a Philosophy major, but exactly that do people like. Talking about business is done in 5 minutes, but having a great conversation, shooting ideas forth and back and having a good time talking about whatever, that keeps somebody in mind. In short, Sirgay knows how to work with his

>>22180978
Yep in google drive he uploaded pictures of your retarded down syndrome sister sucking homeless nigger dick in an alley behind mcdonalds screencap this

>>22181035
*mouth

>>22180696
these guys think in multiyear timeframes + don't talk

>>22180909
what they doing other than their node?

>>22180475
>partnership

lol. I did an analysis of words used in s1 filings for the past few decades, the stocks that underperformed the most were those mentioning the keyword "partnership" the most.

"partnership" = scam

Heck my company goes around saying they have a partnership with amazon and shit like that (when i know they just say that cause they use aws)

Take this information as you will

>>22180576
Chainlink's early days seem like such a mystery.

>>22180475
I was literally just going through the new sites. It is worrisome that company logos (paypal, visa, swift, MC, etc.) are no longer on the website.
This is not fud. If you see these logos somewhere please link.
Assuming the logos are totally absent, what does this mean?

>>22180475
read this article and you'll understand how this shitcoin scam is done
https://zeus-capital.com/news/how-the-link-fraud-trives-chainlink-partnerships/

<--- Google hates shitcoins

>>22181035
Dawg it’s incorrect business isn’t 5 min we need major movement on the tech front. Is this small ass team really up to the task

>>22181232
The funding is secured, no need to get pajeets pumping. In all fairness, the new page makes me harder than swift google or whatever web 1.8 company. This is now a true white man project, no pajeetery needed, only time to grow this tree into a forest

It’s so funny thinking of google doing research on that article. First they’re like what the fuck this shut coin has a partnership with google ok let’s go talk to good. Oh oh right ok ya that’s what we thought no partnership with google. Couldn’t find a single fucking person to speak with that talks highly about the project.

>>22181383
>This is now a true white man project,
Good, this is for the best. But that doesn't answer my question. Why are the logos gone and what does it mean?

>>22181431
Meant Bloomberg doing research on the article

>>22181472
still there, they just seemed to have completely rearranged their web presence
https://chain.link/

>>22180909
Cringing is for faggots. You aren't LINK material.

>>22180475
KEK he could get a "science advocate" associated with google to say something about chainlink. bet he's proud

>>22181596
Msm < science advocate
since when do you believe what a freelancer on a blogging site writes. All that loser cares is click bait to get ahead of the rat race. Honesty and truth don't matter in blogging

>>22181683
bloomberg is NOT a blogging site, and the article wasn't written by a blogger like your shill articles generally are lol

>>22181828
>bloomberg is NOT a blogging site
HAHAHAHAHAA

>>22181828
>not a blogger
oh excuse me, I guess Journalist is the legal term, but we both now, its the fucking same shit

>>22181236
You’re still around Simeon???

>>22181596
Apparently he's an official spokesperson according to Google and has a few publications out as well.
Actually kind of bullish.

>>22180475
ILL TELL YOU FAGGOTS ONE THING. YOU TAKE CHAINLINK DOWN, IT ALL COMES DOWN. DO IT, FAGGOT. YOU PAJEETS DONT KNOW WHEN TO STOP FUDDING.

>>22181164
>what are they doing other than utilizing the network?

Holy fuck anon, sell, or dont buy, or accumulate. Nobody cares. .

>>22182316
spokes person for what? The HR department?

>>22182538
he means allen day. have a look into his background

>>22181383
That’s one hell of a team.

>>22181002
So they are shilling Google's product suite

>>22182689
Looks good, better than Bloombergs bloggers source

>>22181173
This. Funny thing is Google has a lot of real partnerships.

Interesting how they literally can't find a use case at all.

big news coming, confirmed by based Wolpert

>>22181540
Please screenshot. You just linked to the home page.

>>22183600
> Yeah I didn't say google
Checked but he retracted his statement

>>22181035
Can someone please post that picture of Sergey sitting autistic alone at a conference

>>22183600
This is honestly beginning to come across as feature creep to me. Concealing stalled progress with announcements of newer greater plans.

From the conference, the big 3 have be outted already. He followed this up by saying there will be a 4th big company in the coming weeks. He couldn't say who they were...

Has anyone been tracking what company this could possibly be?

Should we expect that to come soon based on his words?