/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22017356
>Chainlink will be the world's first true QUANTUM COMPUTER (QC)
relevant excerpt from the book titled "NOW" (pic related) by Richard A Muller:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_A._Muller

"Often the most difficult challenge is in asking the right questions. It is hard to know where the next physics revelations will appear. Einstein showed us that time is a suitable subject for physical study. I think he was unable to address the meaning of NOW for the simple reason that he refused to accept the notion that physics was incomplete.

We may not soon understand the interplay between relativity and quantum physics or the meaning of measurement, but the issues are worthy of further attack. Advance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy. Whoever cracks open these problems will likely do so with some very simple examples, maybe using nothing more than algebra, perhaps referring to the little hand of a watch and where it points. It may happen when some simple experiment gives a result that is unexpected. When the next breakthrough happens, I predict it will take a regression to childhood, a way of looking at reality that focuses on something in physics that we don't even realize we're assuming is true, and turns it on its head. Who will this new Einstein be? You?

>>22017356
Daily reminder that quantum computers are not happening in our lifetime.

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-cosmic-rays-stymie-quantum.html

>>22017435
https://www.sciencealert.com/a-new-quantum-paradox-throws-the-foundations-of-observed-reality-into-question

We have found a new paradox in quantum mechanics – one of our two most fundamental scientific theories, together with Einstein's theory of relativity – that throws doubt on some common-sense ideas about physical reality.

Quantum mechanics vs common sense
Take a look at these three statements:

When someone observes an event happening, it really happened.

It is possible to make free choices, or at least, statistically random choices.

A choice made in one place can't instantly affect a distant event. (Physicists call this "locality".)

These are all intuitive ideas, and widely believed even by physicists. But our research, published in Nature Physics, shows they cannot all be true – or quantum mechanics itself must break down at some level.

This is the strongest result yet in a long series of discoveries in quantum mechanics that have upended our ideas about reality. To understand why it's so important, let's look at this history.

>>22017464
chainlink will be the first one
the problem known as the "measurement" problem is actually the "oracle" problem:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_problem

https://blog.chain.link/what-is-the-blockchain-oracle-problem/

>>22017464
I’m sure you tell people that daily.

Go back, redditard

>>22017435
>Advance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy. Whoever cracks open these problems will likely do so with some very simple examples, maybe using nothing more than algebra
pic related

>>22017511
I'm actually from /sci/ you fucking moron.

>>22017435
>dvance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy. Whoever cracks open these problems will likely do so with some very simple examples
>>22017435
>perhaps referring to the little hand of a watch and where it points
pic related

>>22017527
feel free to contribute to the thread and add your own thoughts on QCs, "grokking" and "brainstorming" is always useful

>>22017494
There are many problems with physics and mathematics. Chainlink will not be solving them

>>22017435
>When the next breakthrough happens, I predict it will take a regression to childhood, a way of looking at reality that focuses on something in physics that we don't even realize we're assuming is true, and turns it on its head.

what is the "SHAPE" of the earth again?
song related:
https://youtu.be/bLaSXpqp__E
pic related

>>22017573
>Chainlink will not be solving them
I disagree
>gif related

>>22017435
>Advance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy
so true Richard

>>22017573
>There are many problems with physics and mathematics
I don't disagree with that statement
the concept of "NOW" (aka the present moment) and of "TIME" are critical to understand for the next stage of scientific advancement

"NOW" is the leading crest of the 4D-wave big bang expansion
space and time are expanding (big bang expansion) and we are cresting the wave of "NOW" that we perceive as the "present" moment

a meter stick today, won't be the same length in 1000 years
we need to account for the big bang expansion and establish a new "ruler" (aka a new meter stick)

>>22017494
>the problem known as the "measurement" problem is actually the "oracle" problem:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_problem
>https://blog.chain.link/what-is-the-blockchain-oracle-problem/

"Bridging the connection between the blockchain (on-chain) and the outside world (off-chain) requires an additional and separate piece of infrastructure known as an ‘oracle’."

>>22017573
>Chainlink will not be solving them
we have the best scientists working on it

>>22017659
>"NOW" is the leading crest of the 4D-wave big bang expansion
>space and time are expanding (big bang expansion) and we are cresting the wave of "NOW" that we perceive as the "present" moment
keep in mind that space/time are expanding at all points in all directions
the "leading crest" of expansion known as "the present moment" exists everywhere "simultaneously"

quantum computers will need pilots to operate them (pic related)

Elon is working on that part of the project
Ari is working on the consensus algorithms and cryptography part of the project

>>22017764
https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/rokos-basilisk-the-most-terrifying-thought-experiment-of-all-time.html

chainlink is "roko's basilisk"

>>22017731
anyone know why ari went from rsa to cornell?

>>22017801

>>22017764
Why 42?

what a bunch of retards who don't even understand what a quantum computer is.

>>22017801
>chainlink is "roko's basilisk"
https://youtu.be/yilQ25Wr-S8


>>22017857
>Why 42?
42 degrees is the angle at which the rainbow is perceived by the human eye
42 also relates to how time and space are bounded by light."
much like the standing waves on this drum bound geometry of the patterns you see:
https://youtu.be/wvJAgrUBF4w

>>22017888
>chainlink is "roko's basilisk"

>>22017851
>anyone know why ari went from rsa to cornell?
probably so he could develop chainlink after his work as "satoshi"

>>22017659
>a meter stick today, won't be the same length in 1000 years
>we need to account for the big bang expansion and establish a new "ruler" (aka a new meter stick)
there are time and space dilation effects that need to be measured and factored into our definition of "meter"
essentially, once they realize what I'm doing here as "42" they will have established the new definition of the "meter"

>>22017852

>>22017983
>>22017951
>essentially, once they realize what I'm doing here as "42"
their faces when...

Holy shit seek help. So much bullshit in one thread

>>22017356
Well Chainlink isn't a computer so it Won't be the first quantum computer.
I would have gone with something more Realistic, like "hey they're making a movie about Chainlink"
t. baggy

I tend to take posts like these seriously, like 42 is actually Ari Juels or something. Yes, I'll play into the larp

>>22018009
>>22018030
>I tend to take posts like these seriously, like 42 is actually Ari Juels or something
we work together
I showed up to my local chainlink meetup (early March 2020) and I started explaining to other attendees regarding chainlink as roko's basilisk and chainlink as a quantum computer
needless to say, they (((COVID))) the world pretty much the next day
I sure don't believe in coincidences haha

>>22017617
is that a mirror for phase conjugation perchance? This will be a trillion dollar tech if chainlink is up in there, a real solution to the oracle problem
I'll see if i can compress my plan got in mind, for some fun intermediate things, I'll see if i can build in chainlink bridges to it

>>22017356
42 is a psyop shill, designed to talk so much degen bullshit about chainlink that sensible people will say it must be a scam before even reading the whitepaper

>>22018058
>I showed up to my local chainlink meetup (early March 2020)
>>22018058
>they (((COVID))) the world pretty much the next day
mfw

>>22018070
very nice, yeah I've been studying how mirrors work as well
Feynmann has a good rundown on why it flips light left to right and not up to down

>>22018070
>is that a mirror for phase conjugation perchance?
I was using that gif more to show how the concept of "NOW" works:

>>22017659
>"NOW" is the leading crest of the 4D-wave big bang expansion
>space and time are expanding (big bang expansion) and we are cresting the wave of "NOW" that we perceive as the "present" moment
>>22017764
>keep in mind that space/time are expanding at all points in all directions
>the "leading crest" of expansion known as "the present moment" exists everywhere "simultaneously"

>>22018030
>>22018026
>>22018018
>>22018082
>>22017851
Would you absolute cock guzzling newfags stop giving the schitzo attention?

>>22018070
>This will be a trillion dollar tech if chainlink is up in there, a real solution to the oracle problem
indeed
it's going to take humanity to the next level of our evolution, a true quantum leap in understanding the nature of reality:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571064513001188
>the oracle problem aka the quantum physics measurement problem

>>22018132
thanks for the thread bump:
https://youtu.be/aq3OtxPP1tU?t=5994

>>22018180
https://www.space.com/amp/jupiter-saturn-moon-conjunctions-august-2020.html

>>22018102
thanks, i'll have to take a look. Now i'm not talking what your planning just yet, a real ass solution to the oracle problem and the 'always another unsecured endpoint' problem endemic to classical physics. But there is a dearth of odd reports in quantum social science that can be experimented upon with ethereum, and of course, with a smart contract that can actually digest foreign data without the above problems

>>22018153
Hey 42. glad to see you're back. One time last year you shared some sort of powerpoint slideshow on mathematics and how "42" relates to fractals. I thought I saved it but can't find it anywhere, mind dropping it again?

>>22018180
I sage your shit threads retard, every time I ever see you in fact I only sage regardless of whether I'm replying to you

>>22018232
yeah I've been saying that ethereum is already the quantum computer
but chainlink is attacking the specific problem of "measurement"

very cool infographic by the way, thank you

>>22018249
>One time last year you shared some sort of powerpoint slideshow on mathematics and how "42" relates to fractals
might need to be a bit more specific than that
here's a good documentary on fractals:
https://youtu.be/5qXSeNKXNPQ

>>22018257
nobody cares bitch

>>22018232
>But there is a dearth of odd reports in quantum social science that can be experimented upon with ethereum, and of course, with a smart contract that can actually digest foreign data without the above problems
there's been talk of re-writing our laws in the "ARE" tense
a kind of "quantum syntax" that prevents (((interpretation))) of the law in the future by bad actors and activist judges

>>22018310
nobody cares about your schitzo rambling either. For all the time you spend shitting up threads you only even get a handful of replies and they're always newfags from reddit.

It's incredibly sad that the only way you can get attention is by namefagging for half a year now and even then most people on /biz/ hate you. Would you please just fuck off you retarded discord tranny? I know you won't, but I just wanted to shit on you in your own thread. I'm out now, have fun replying to yourself for the next 5 hours

>>22017435
>relevant excerpt from the book titled "NOW" (pic related) by Richard A Muller
also it has (((42))) illustrations
very cool Richard

>>22018384
>nobody cares about your schitzo rambling either
and yet here you are

>>22018384
>I'm out now
bye bye

>>22018405

>>22018336
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymIcYjEnVuc related?

>>22018510
very cool, thank you for the link, haven't seen that one
I learned about the "quantum grammar syntax" in these videos:
https://youtu.be/Cxe_q9rFTI8
https://youtu.be/jDK3VF34dDE

>>22018493
Sup 42, how were the shrooms? Also have you looked into Kleros? I'm thinking of accumulating that for the next year

>>22018599
>Sup 42, how were the shrooms?
fucking amazing
just got back from the cottage and was on a 5-day journey (my friend brought a strain "Penis Envy" that was developed by Terrence McKenna)
delved deep into Richard's book titled "NOW" and developed my understanding of time and space and light much more
I feel an epiphany coming, I suspect that physicists will be approaching me in a year or so asking how I knew. The realizations are indeed as simple as Richard describes:

>>22017435
>"Often the most difficult challenge is in asking the right questions. It is hard to know where the next physics revelations will appear. Einstein showed us that time is a suitable subject for physical study. I think he was unable to address the meaning of NOW for the simple reason that he refused to accept the notion that physics was incomplete.
>We may not soon understand the interplay between relativity and quantum physics or the meaning of measurement, but the issues are worthy of further attack. Advance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy. Whoever cracks open these problems will likely do so with some very simple examples, maybe using nothing more than algebra, perhaps referring to the little hand of a watch and where it points. It may happen when some simple experiment gives a result that is unexpected. When the next breakthrough happens, I predict it will take a regression to childhood, a way of looking at reality that focuses on something in physics that we don't even realize we're assuming is true, and turns it on its head. Who will this new Einstein be? You?

>>22018599
>Also have you looked into Kleros?
not yet, but it is on my to-do list

>>22018599
>I'm thinking of accumulating that for the next year
God speed

>>22018668
>just got back from the cottage
was a dope time by the way
you wouldn't believe the views of the Moon, Jupiter, and Saturn that we saw
the cottage had a perfect view of the planets while we were there, brought my telescope of everyone to see
>pic related

Pluto was also in between Jupiter and Saturn
that week at the cottage was one of the best times of my life these last few years, a lot of close friends and their spouses (including my wife) were there with us
amazing time indeed

>>22018668
I will have to read that book soon. What are the highlights that you took away from that book?

>>22018708
>What are the highlights that you took away from that book?
I quoted some of them here, but there's another relevant quote as well:

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident"
-often attributed to Arthur Schopenhauer

>>22018336
Thats some 3 city states level of intense lol. I wonder how to perceive aretense, a fascinating idea, echos of a past future king. causation-correlation bias, a product of temporal mindedness, seems the justification to keep the iterative law process, but perhaps with the 'quantum syntax' coming into general salience with those subject to the law, a better understanding on how to transition to an 'are'-tensed law without virtual photon backtracing to before the magna carta but to manifest it as an emergent technology

>>22018705
>you wouldn't believe the views of the Moon, Jupiter, and Saturn that we saw
>the cottage had a perfect view of the planets while we were there, brought my telescope of everyone to see
https://www.space.com/amp/jupiter-saturn-moon-conjunctions-august-2020.html?jwsource=cl

>>22018310
It wasn't a youtube video, it was on some kind of academic website and had a scroll-through slideshow. I don't remember much but I remember it involved a bunch of colored shapes fitting together and the number 42 played a part in why.

>>22018763
I'll have to fish around for it
the research folder has gotten quite large at this point
brb grabbing a coffee, feel free to bump the the thread and add your own ideas

>>22018735
very interesting way of understanding it

>>22018795
https://www.forbes.com/sites/benjessel/2020/08/29/chainlinks-new-acquisition-from-cornell-university-could-transform-blockchain-for-good/

>>22018795
Thanks, I await you're return. I've been numerology-pilling some friends and keep referencing the slideshow but can't find it

>>22017356
Physicist here, you're full of shit.

>>22019015

>>22017527
Oh shit, (you) sure showed him

>>22017464
> Daily reminder that quantum computers are not happening in our lifetime

>>22018026
t. retard

>>22019052
I recall that the sum of three cubes for 42 was discovered around September 2019:

https://interestingengineering.com/the-sum-of-three-cubes-problem-for-42-has-just-been-solved

still can't find the slides you're referring to

>>22019083

lol
they're going to have to EAT their words when I'm proven right

>>22019151
>they're going to have to EAT their words when I'm proven right
https://archive.is/9RInv

>>22019084
Please understand you just called yourself a retard

>>22019182

>>22019114
Saved that link, but that wasn't the one. If I can try to be more specific I'd say the slideshow started with a slide with a single shape, maybe a square. Then would add shapes every slide, and by the last slide these shapes became a pattern and 42 was written where they connect. I can't say I remember any of the logic from it, hence why I'm looking for it again.

>>22019217
>>22019114
There was also notes on each slide explaining the process, just don't remember any of the logic to further explain

>>22019217
I don't remember posting that, could have been someone else using the name

>>22019053
>Physicist here, you're full of shit.
Professional Engineering Physicist here, you're a smoothbrain
>pic related
guess which one I am...
>hint: 42

>>22019255
>Professional Engineering Physicist here
>>22019255
>guess which one I am...
June 2018
it's happening
42 is revealing himself now haha

>>22019279
>42 is revealing himself now haha
while on the mushrooms, my aura was shown on the polaroid camera
look at the aura around my feet and body
like I said before different spectrums = different dimensions
>pic related

>>22019279
Based 42. Added you on link ed in

>>22019363
based and chainlink pilled
we're actually doing it hahaha

>>22019255
Prove it to me, here's a simple problem you should have no issues with :)
Integrate sqrt(x)*ln(x)/(x^2+a) from 0 to inf for real a>0.

>>22019354
>while on the mushrooms, my aura was shown on the polaroid camera
>look at the aura around my feet and body
>like I said before different spectrums = different dimensions
it's the same phenomena I described with the rotating magnetic horns on my temples like Moses:
>>/biz/thread/16791241
>>/biz/thread/16793613
https://youtu.be/ZaYREzYrdNU

>>22019395
Been listening to you since you put on the mask in June 2019. Very enlightening individual

>>22019418
haven't done integrals in years lol

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1299512615001964544?s=21
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1299430971494731776?s=21

"All of physics is either impossible or trivial. It is impossible until you understand it, then it becomes trivial"

>>22019436
>>22019527
some sketches from the cottage trip
Jupiter was so bright in the sky that it made a light beam reflection on the surface of the lake
astonishing, my camera couldn't capture the image since it was too dim but a friend of mine sketched it on the blackboard

>>22019527
If you'd studied complex analysis you would at least be able to describe the process of how you can solve integrals of this form.

>>22019586
like I said, it's been years since I did the math from my undergrad and graduate studies
and like Richard says in his book:

>>22018668
>"Often the most difficult challenge is in asking the right questions. It is hard to know where the next physics revelations will appear. Einstein showed us that time is a suitable subject for physical study. I think he was unable to address the meaning of NOW for the simple reason that he refused to accept the notion that physics was incomplete.
>>We may not soon understand the interplay between relativity and quantum physics or the meaning of measurement, but the issues are worthy of further attack. Advance is unlikely, in my mind, to require complex math or arcane philosophy. Whoever cracks open these problems will likely do so with some very simple examples, maybe using nothing more than algebra, perhaps referring to the little hand of a watch and where it points. It may happen when some simple experiment gives a result that is unexpected. When the next breakthrough happens, I predict it will take a regression to childhood, a way of looking at reality that focuses on something in physics that we don't even realize we're assuming is true, and turns it on its head. Who will this new Einstein be? You?

oftentimes the math comes downstream from the physics insights. I never claimed to be a mathematician but a physicist. Once the physics is understood, the math becomes trivial:

>>22017659
>"NOW" is the leading crest of the 4D-wave big bang expansion
>space and time are expanding (big bang expansion) and we are cresting the wave of "NOW" that we perceive as the "present" moment
>a meter stick today, won't be the same length in 1000 years
>we need to account for the big bang expansion and establish a new "ruler" (aka a new meter stick)

>>22019354
you are literally the faggot i imagined you as, even the faggot hat that fat dorks wear in high school. hahahhahahahah

>>22019834
>even the faggot hat that fat dorks wear in high school.
it's called a fedora
and all the cool scientists wear them
>pic related

>>22019646
Okay, how about some more conceptual physics questions then.
>What is the most convenient gauge to quantize the electric field, and why?
>What is the relation between frequency and wavevector in vacuum?
>What is a photon? How can it be shown to be bosonic.

>>22019944
I am in the mood for some dang dominoes pizza, is there some sort of quantum equation that will make one appear in my kitchen?

>>22019834
did you check out the optical aberrations?
that's what I refer to as my "aura" (aka light dimensions) emanating from my spirit and body
it's invisible to the human eye but I can feel it pulsating when focusing
also during intense moments of focus, the horns in the temples and an aura behind my head is felt
>pic related

>>22017356
‘Quantum” is a meme of “science”

>>22020122
Stop spamming you gay kike. Nobody believes your shit

>>22017464
nice try you aren't getting my LINK bud

>>22019354
So what does it mean if i can see auras all my life naturally?
Every solid color inanimate object has a corresponding color, but people are different.

>>22020136
>‘Quantum” is a meme of “science”
not even close

>>22020025
instead of trying to prove that you're (((smarter))) than me, why not read the book to understand the point of this thread better?
https://g.co/kgs/v6k86P

>>22020228
>So what does it mean if i can see auras all my life naturally?
not sure
I can bend light with my eyes like a prism, but I can't "see" auras
I can only feel mine when it happens
the mushrooms during the week heightened the experience

>>22019834
>you are literally the faggot i imagined you as
rent free

>>22020108
>is there some sort of quantum equation that will make one appear in my kitchen?
not yet lol

>>22020188
>Nobody believes your shit

>/biz/ doesn't know about Project Looking Glass on level *4-2* of area 51

the trick is to hold Link AND XRP (Probably XLM too)

the real FUD is that Link schizos and XRP schizos can't both be correct.

>>22020319
>XRP
nobody cares about cripple

>>22020337
https://twitter.com/JasonP2049/status/1299985785442181122?s=20

>>22020232
Thanks for confirming my original hypothesis.

>>22019255
>>22019279
as you can see, I am not Nick Hinton, or crypto oracle, or Ari Juels, or Sergey, or Timo, etc.

>>22020374
you never had genuine intentions coming into this thread
you just proved it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ze720kEy6pI&list=PLDGjfpzzwYX4NwbQThgezgAM76JrLU5wK
https://youtu.be/hvb3DOhu_RI
https://youtu.be/ocwxNvM6uLU

>>22020253
My sister can see them too, it might be a genetic trait.
Try it by putting your hand extended in front of you with a whitish background behind it. Stare at your palm, keeping your eyes fixed in the center, but focus your awareness to the borders of your hand and expand that to the space surrounding it. Eventually you wont see your palm anymore, but the glow around your hand instead.

>>22020419
some more "tunes":
https://youtu.be/v_EV63PpiT0?t=565

>>22017356
Thank you for not flooding threads with your bullshit during smartcon

>>22020443
very interesting, will try and report back what I find
thank you for the tip
most people don't believe me when I tell them, but I know it's very real
the aura "feels" like gif related
a lot of people touched by God call it the "fire of the Holy Spirit"
I called it the "electricity of the Holy Spirit"
Nikola Tesla definitely knew about this

>>22020494
I attended smartcon under my real identity and mostly watched and congratulated the presenters for their great work
/biz/ and twitter are where I have my fun under the alias of "42"

>>22020419
okay larping physicist.

What the fuck is this? ChainLink is not a quantum computer and it never will be, shut the fuck up and stop feeding normies bullshit covered in science words

>>22020537
>ChainLink is not a quantum computer and it never will be
lol
>>22020536
>okay larping physicist.
remember your rude words when you hear about me in a year or so

>>22019354
>42 is revealing himself now haha
>while on the mushrooms, my aura was shown on the polaroid camera
>look at the aura around my feet and body
>like I said before different spectrums = different dimensions

>>22020600
>42 is revealing himself now haha

>>22020565
You do realize that a quantum computer would make crypto pretty fucking pointless right? So it's going to make itself useless? Wow I can see the mcap rising already

>>22020642
>You do realize that a quantum computer would make crypto pretty fucking pointless right?
source: just trust me bro
also 42-chekked

>>22019354
>while on the mushrooms, my aura was shown on the polaroid camera
>look at the aura around my feet and body

>>22020698
I'm going to be spreading my aura so others can join and we can be "interlinked"

>>22020653
No but crypto is done on classical computers... You do know about quantum computers and cryptography right? Also what you're saying doesn't make sense either way, crypto is all done on classical computers so either way it's not gonna become a quantum computer. Maybe a supercomputer tho but we have that already so I don't think ChainLink would make it more efficient.

>>22019083
>>22019151

>>22017356

>>22019354
lmao a fat retard go figure

>>22018058
the funny thing is the media misreported his birthday. He actually died at 42 instead of 43. Wikipedia changed the birthdate and other sites such as IMDB did shortly after to cover their tracks to fit the code aka gematria to the day.

>>22020721
>Also what you're saying doesn't make sense
that's because they're approaching the problem of building a quantum computer the wrong way
they still conceptualize it as if it were a digital computer
the quantum computers that will be built in the future will not just be one machine or one terminal
it will require a network to overcome the "measurement" problem that currently makes it impossible to "read" or "write" to the memory without collapsing the wave function

>>22020788
interesting

>>22020789
>he quantum computers that will be built in the future will not just be one machine or one terminal
>it will require a network to overcome the "measurement" problem that currently makes it impossible to "read" or "write" to the memory without collapsing the wave function

>>22020789
>We need to build it differently than we've done before
>Let's use networks
Bro, what?
You just described a supercomputer. Are you talking about the supercomputer equivalent of a quantum computer?

>>22020842

>>22020915
>Bro, what?

>>22020789
>the quantum computers that will be built in the future will not just be one machine or one terminal
>it will require a network to overcome the "measurement" problem that currently makes it impossible to "read" or "write" to the memory without collapsing the wave function
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/07/biggest-flipping-challenge-quantum-computing
they're going to use a network of QCs to correct for the measurement errors:

Whether it’s calculating your taxes or making Mario jump a canyon, your computer works its magic by manipulating long strings of bits that can be set to 0 or 1. In contrast, a quantum computer employs quantum bits, or qubits, that can be both 0 and 1 at the same time, the equivalent of you sitting at both ends of your couch at once. Embodied in ions, photons, or tiny superconducting circuits, such two-way states give a quantum computer its power. But they’re also fragile, and the slightest interaction with their surroundings can distort them. So scientists must learn to correct such errors, and Kuperberg had expected Google to take a key step toward that goal. “I consider it a more relevant benchmark,” he says.

If some experts question the significance of Google’s quantum supremacy experiment, all stress the importance of quantum error correction. “It is really the difference between a $100 million, 10,000-qubit quantum computer being a random noise generator or the most powerful computer in the world,” says Chad Rigetti, a physicist and co-founder of Rigetti Computing. And all agree with Kuperberg on the first step: spreading the information ordinarily encoded in a single jittery qubit among many of them in a way that maintains the information even as noise rattles the underlying qubits. “You’re trying to build a ship that remains the same ship, even as every plank in it rots and has to be replaced,” explains Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist at the University of Texas, Austin.

>>22021067
And HOW is all of this even remotely connected to ChainLink?

>>22021102
the consensus algorithms will be how we avoid or minimize collapsing or interfering with the wave function when "reading and writing"

>>22021118
>the consensus algorithms will be how we avoid or minimize collapsing or interfering with the wave function when "reading and writing"
and don't forget, quantum computers will need pilots, not just the machine

>>22021146
>don't forget, quantum computers will need pilots

>>22021146
Haha I give up. You're spewing complete bullshit, but you're good at it, I'll give you that

>>22021174
as always, the DEVIL is in the details:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_demon

>>22021178
lol remember our conversation when you hear about what I'm writing here in the future
don't say I didn't tell you ahead of time

>>22021178
>but you're good at it, I'll give you that
haha thanks

>>22021229

4 8 15 16 23 42

>>22021327
tell us more

>>22021327
>>22021360
https://lostpedia.fandom.com/wiki/The_Numbers

>>22021389
The numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42 frequently recurred in Lost. Each corresponded with one of the final candidates to replace Jacob as protector of the Island. The numbers also formed the coefficients in an equation that predicted mankind's extinction.

>>22021327
by the way, is Lost worth watching? never saw it when it aired originally

>>22021323

>>22017517
https://youtu.be/3vi7043z6tI
https://youtu.be/WkEleGB5ICk
https://youtu.be/T3FvtMSUeLk
https://youtu.be/_NUD8Z_cRh0
https://youtu.be/F1NgFQnToEA
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mVWd1aLiYZQU8VvYFBnW8kxodeYim3bYDIFfh-w42eU/pub

>>22021418
Its good but the ending isn't very satisfying. It does that Christopher Nolan thing of being confusing for the sake of confusion and not tying everything together perfectly. You'd like it 42 cool religious overtones.

>>22021605
>You'd like it 42 cool religious overtones.
now you've piqued my interest
might go on a binge watch, been looking for a good series to dig my teeth into lately
Hannibal was a great one (the netflix show)
IMO it's better than the movies

>>22021605
>It does that Christopher Nolan thing
https://youtu.be/L3pk_TBkihU

>>22021638
Yeah man I loved Hannibal too. Watched the first season right after it aired, I remember watching the third season and finding out in the middle it was getting cancelled was really sad about it. Trying to watch / finish Mr. Robot but my attention span has been fucking obliterated. Trying to quit weed I know it'll definitely help with that at least a month break. I remember reading in June about your views on drugs and how they relate to spiritually. I think you or some anon mentioned not doing psychedelics like acid since it's not natural like shrooms, either way I think that's spot on. I see people doing all these concentrates of weed and it's ao toxic. Thanks for all the inspiration you and this website have brought me so much closer to God this past year.

>>22017591
I always wonder about the shape of the earth. I feel like the moon is visible too often to me. Meaning it could not be visible to the people on the other side of the plane(t) if the earth was round.

The moon is basically visible a lot more than 50% of the time

>>22021923
>I think you or some anon mentioned not doing psychedelics like acid since it's not natural like shrooms, either way I think that's spot on.
yeah I avoid synthetics for a reason, however alchemy (like marijuana and mushrooms) can be dangerous even when you know what you're doing. I use it sparingly and usually only for special occasions

>>22021923
>Thanks for all the inspiration you and this website have brought me so much closer to God this past year.
really glad to hear
that's the entire point of my posting, to show others that God is real

>>22021958
I suspect there's a base on the dark side of the moon that we never see due to it being "orbitally locked"
https://g.co/kgs/WDdpAv

>>22019586
Complex analysis as in the complex plane or complex as in difficult? If the former, wouldn’t real analysis answer the question? Separately, do we need semantics? Does a physicist need to know why a+b=b+a in order to come up with a solution to a specific physics problem?

>>22017888
I always wondered why jackie robinson wore 42.
I always suspected it was assigned to him and not his choice.
Pic related confirms

>>22022013
I also suspect that Egypt was an alien colony
some of those monuments were constructed 30,000-50,000 years ago
you try and explain to me how a human civilization can last 12,000-20,000 years
what we commonly know as ancient egypt is just the last few decadent centuries when God (Yaweh) crushed their little alien colony and released the human slaves
He hates it when they call themselves god

>>22022050
>I also suspect that Egypt was an alien colony
>some of those monuments were constructed 30,000-50,000 years ago
>you try and explain to me how a human civilization can last 12,000-20,000 years

>>22022050
>what we commonly know as ancient egypt is just the last few decadent centuries when God (Yaweh) crushed their little alien colony and released the human slaves
>He hates it when they call themselves god

http://www.rexresearch.com/pdf/musaioslionpath.pdf

>>22021067
>Qubit?
>Cube it

>>22022016
yep

>>22022015
complex math refers to complex numbers (aka imaginary numbers):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number
https://youtu.be/sKtloBAuP74
https://youtu.be/rFtYzVJcWyA
https://youtu.be/fEWj93XjON0

>>22022050
>I also suspect that Egypt was an alien colony
>>22022050
>what we commonly know as ancient egypt is just the last few decadent centuries when God (Yaweh) crushed their little alien colony
they should have known better than to piss off Father

Earth's "zookeepers" (pic related)are getting in trouble again

>>22022013
>I suspect there's a base on the dark side of the moon that we never see due to it being "orbitally locked"
>https://g.co/kgs/WDdpAv

>>22022156
>they should have known better than to piss off Father
>Earth's "zookeepers" are getting in trouble again

>>22018232
By quantum social science do you mean in regards to architecture with quantum game theory built in or something else? If you're generally willing to have conversations about this topic and its meanings for money and experience, do drop me a line on telegram @noahmc

>>22022190
>Earth's "zookeepers" are getting in trouble again
they are the "first" race as outlined in Genesis 1
we are the "second" race (filled with God's spirit) as outlined in Genesis 2

the movie dark city outlines these concepts very well:
https://youtu.be/gt9HkO-cGGo

"aliens" have been around for thousands of years on earth, if not more:
https://youtu.be/fbT1fCHOjfI

>>22022226
>the movie dark city outlines these concepts very well
this movie is probably the more realistic depiction of the "aliens" (aka angels/demons) that have colonized earth

God isn't an alien, but satan definitely fell from space

>>22022050
>I also suspect that Egypt was an alien colony
>some of those monuments were constructed 30,000-50,000 years ago
>you try and explain to me how a human civilization can last 12,000-20,000 years

>>22022249
>the movie dark city outlines these concepts very well
>this movie is probably the more realistic depiction of the "aliens" (aka angels/demons) that have colonized earth
that would explain the child (aka virgin) sacrifices
>pic related
video related:
https://youtu.be/MkyFbcnIQV4

>>22022335
https://youtu.be/ZaYREzYrdNU
no wonder they got so nervous after my interview
they know I know

>>22022156
>they should have known better than to piss off Father
>Earth's "zookeepers" (pic related)are getting in trouble again

>>22022104
>what we commonly know as ancient egypt is just the last few decadent centuries when God (Yaweh) crushed their little alien colony and released the human slaves
https://youtu.be/t-8YsulfxVI
https://youtu.be/N0Vh65UrBK4

most people don't realize that the Bible is a HISTORY (his-story) book

>>22021067
When will these QCs be in production from your point of view?

>>22022440
>When will these QCs be in production from your point of view?
the more "consensus" algorithms that chainlink operates on and the more blockchains that use chainlink will be when the "QC" starts emerging

we don't yet know what the future will look like with these kinds of machines but I expect there to be a psychedelic element to it as well
particularly when you look into the work Elon is doing on "neuralink"
https://youtu.be/DVvmgjBL74w

>>22022495
>the more "consensus" algorithms that chainlink operates on and the more blockchains that use chainlink will be when the "QC" starts emerging
https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/269.pdf

>>22022050
>I also suspect that Egypt was an alien colony
>>22022050
>what we commonly know as ancient egypt is just the last few decadent centuries when God (Yaweh) crushed their little alien colony and released the human slaves
>He hates it when they call themselves god

>>22022495
Is neuralink something you'd want to get? Is it the mark of the beast?

>>22022202
>4KsBI177
as a listener of thoth, master of the palindromic digits, I will heed your invitation as I am able.

>>22022561
https://youtu.be/hCZnXg0vNs0

>>22022597
>Is neuralink something you'd want to get?
the mushrooms I did over the week at the cottage is more how I imagine something like "neuralink", hence why I said I suspect the "quantum computer piloting" will be psychedelic in nature
this is also where the latest physics developments will be advancing to

that being said, I agree with chips in the brain for people with disabilities or impediments (like being crippled, or blind, etc.) I don't condone it being used on "healthy" people since there's no need

>>22022597
>Is it the mark of the beast?
it could easily be made into it, imagine a circuit with a "kill switch" in it

>>22019255
>>22019279
p.s. my birthday is 9/11
mfw

>>22022761
anyways, fun times anons, going to enjoy the rest of the day outside
cheers
now you all know who the "real" 42 is

>>22017356
literally dumping as we speak

>>22022685
What do you think about the need for decentralized dispute resolution in blockchains. For example, imagine a decentralized 4chan. There can't be centralized jannies anymore since it's decentralized. So you'd need some way to have jannies moderate in a decentralized fashion. Instead of reporting to jannies, you'll report to Kleros court and the jurors will decide what the outcome is. Now extrapolate the decentralized 4chan with pretty much any type of system that requires human input or subjectivity, such as online freelancing. Do you think this is important or do you think Chainlink will come up with a solution for disputes that may arise in these types of scenarios?

>>22022202
but to your question it seems to be a quantum strategy game theory, as in a quantum coin flip game where a hadamard transformation as an addition one in the choice to X gate or leave the coin alone. Or the literature on the prisoners dilemma game, which supposes that the shannon entropy could be adusted as a regulator or policy maker in prisoner dilemma games where strategies like superpositions of cooperate and defect exist in gradients of perfect and imperfect propensities to entanglement. Also some strange stuff on mixed strategies that i think are crucial but i dont understand, and also that time entangled blockchain paper. At the moment i'm thinking that a smart contract with an oracle could be made to que up the quantum coinflip game move set for execution on whatever computer can host the logic gates. Get players 'competing quantumly'

But to your architecture, your point about the network is the computer in response to the measurement, or error correcting problem, that would be the vision, a current needs a potential, yes?

>>22022685
Hey 42, big fan, have been for quite some time. Come talk to me on telegram, we've got plenty to talk about in regard to the way human culture/collective consciousness will merge with tech in this psychedelic sense and be catapulted into the cosmos. I've already go the plans for the system that necessitates this such transition, and it's a matter of connecting a few modern systems and BCI tech. Give me a chat on telegram, you can be Tesla, I'll be lucifer. @noahmc

>Who will this new Einstein be? You?
Yes. Nearly to an extreme.

>>22023076
>Give me a chat on telegram, you can be Tesla, I'll be lucifer. @noahmc
will do
probably later this week, busy these next few days
you can also reach me on my twitter:
https://twitter.com/capitalist1911/status/1299503917122887687?s=21

>>22023076
>Who will this new Einstein be? You?
>Yes. Nearly to an extreme.
funny isn't it?

>>22020253
>I can bend light with my eyes like a prism
No you cant. You seem like a habitual liar from your threads, with delusions of grandeur. In a year, physicists are going to be reaching out to you? No. You make a good cult leader with the ppl that are like your "followers" here.

>>22023344
okay last one
this rundown is too good not to share

>>22023518
>I can bend light with my eyes like a prism
>No you can't
pretty sure almost everyone can do that, it's called squinting/focusing
you can see the light beams elongating and splitting

>>22023518
I don't need followers, I just want people to "get it"
once they do, there's going to be a bunch of us and the world will never be the same again

>>22017494

so you are proposing that the Measurement Problem is a probabilism -> determinism measurement problem, which is identical to the Oracle Problem?