/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21933974
Is it always the same kids fudding this?

>>21934124
i sold the top at 900% profit

Pls go to 10 cents I want to buy in

>>21934456
Still midwit fud. Up six figures btw, your lunch money didn’t seem to leave a dent

>>21933974
you misspelled 'Euro', fucktard.

>>21933974
Yesterday anon said 'This token is not required by clients' . what is the token usecase ? only trading ig

>>21935566
the token is not needed

LMAO the shitcoin is dumping. collapse imminent. also, token is not needed

This shit isn't even a cryptocurrency. It's a shitty equity in an overvalued company that dumps on you, at best

>>21935566
The token is not needed. Skiddies will just blatantly disregard this that the literal fundamental token isnt even needed

>>21935919
This, bagholders are about to get dumped on, hard

Lol this coin is a scam. Team can just decide to stop burns and just continue business like normal, fucking over the token holders speculating on price. Lol. Good luck with that shit.

Kind of curious how OP became to make daily fud threads about an obscure low cap crypto

Did he miss out?
Did he sell too early?

thats the cup n handle, buy the dip

>>21936158

>>21935998
You can literally track the burns monthly via their website and etherscan txids...

you sold the bottom of a true crypto gem hahaha, and now you FUD the on a daily basis. You said the same things at 20, 40, 60, 80 cents and the price just keeps climbing. You are a salty loser and will spread this same BS at 2, 5 and 10 dollar. See you then, douchebag

team is selling millions of tokens as we speak get the fuck out

token "buyback" is shrouded in secrecy. methods unknown. red flag.

Tokens are bought back from exchanges with transaction IDs provided at the end of every month you fucking loser hahaha

Token has the highest circ supply % of any low cap I've seen and the team owns less than 10% including the fund that is used for listings and liquidity.

It's a fuckin gem and I'm getting rich while youre crying

A reminder that the fudder sold at 1300 sats and will remain forever salty. You need to move on, man. Chase some gains elsewhere. Leave this shit now. Give up.

>>21936828
They are trying so hard to fud. I almost feel sorry for them

Lol shitty version of link fudd

>>21936940
exactly can't even fud right. token not needed.

>>21936662
Why anon say token not needed?

Meh, the token not needed did works for other coins, but for Vidt the token is used to on-board clients so they have a unique wallet where the validations happen.

Can you at least post some relevant fud?

the stansberry report is invalid

it didnt even mention chainlink

>>21937137
Can you prove it?

>>21936471
Post link of both here and prove it

>>21937253
Prove what? It's how validations work, the token is tied to a specific wallet and therefore client so you know it's from a particular client

DYOR you fag

>>21937137
>but for Vidt the token is used to on-board clients

yes the validation pool tokens not the bagholders tokens that are not needed

also clients pay in fixed fiat so it doesnt affect token price

bagholder token not needed

>>21937342
So you can't even shill your own investment with proofs. Give proofs : show wallet article else token not needed retard LMAO

>>21937439
How do you know fixed fiat? Prove it. If this is true then bagholder token not needed.

>>21937468
You just want to be spoon fed because you're a lazy cunt, go buy another shitcoin

>>21937439
You can say that about any crypto

Bitcoin - what does that so? Literally token not needed using your logic

>>21937521
Another shitcoin? By this you meant vidt is also a shitcoin. Token not needed.

Ranjeet can you please make some better fud as it's getting boring as fuck

Thanks

>>21937521
Bitcoin is not purchased with fixed fiat!!

>>21937556
Token is also needed to make us rich

Go learn how to poo in loo Pajeet

>>21937439
>>21937556
TOKEN NEEDED FOR MASSIVE GAINS PRICE CHART VERIFIED WITH EYES STAY POOR

>>21937588
>fixed
>price constantly changes

Who even are you... You're just repeating random shit people say, and sound like an utterly clueless wanker

>>21937600
Vidt usecase : tradable coin. Clients buy at fixed fiat price so token not needed kek

>>21937521
so instead of trying to argue that the bagholder token is needed you just go into whataboutism

got it , confirmed not needed

>>21937293
Literally check here and see for yourself https://about.v-id.org/vidt-usage-dashboard

>>21937645
Like I said, please make some new relevant fud.

Bored now... Stay salty that you missed out.

>>21937631
Anon said clients buy tokens with fixed fiat price. Can you prove it wrong? If not then token not needed!!

For anyone wanting more info, this link has txids for the burns, buybacks, and shows the dynamic vidt amount used for verifications. Clients always pay a fixed fiat fee, and the amount of VIDT used changes depending on market price. Price doesn't affect cost of validations to the client. Its all on here https://about.v-id.org/vidt-usage-dashboard

>>21937695
The token is literally needed to on-board clients so they have a unique wallet for validations.

Also, just to shut you up a little birdy told me they're introducing third party validation (like staking) soon ;) So yeah, token soon even more needed

>>21937695
no bro they dont even buy tokens you see, validations have a fixed fiat price the clients never touch any tokens its all done by the team

>>21937664
Ty anon. I read this here : " V-ID clients pay in fiat for our services since Q4 '18. All certification fees (on all blockchains we support) are paid for in VIDT.

Clients can choose between a fixed € / $ fee (dynamic VIDT fee) or real-time market price (minimum VIDT fee).

The minimum VIDT fee is reset every month as the rounded equivalent of € 1.24 on the 1st day of the month. " client can chose fixed fee. What is that. Could you explain vidt believer? Make /biz believe too.

>>21937759
you still didnt answer what the circulating tokens not on validation pool are used for

>>21937796
The real question is why do you care so much about a low mc shitcoin you apparently hate

Why so so much reading?

Why check the charts constantly?

Why post so much in this thread?

It's all a bit creepy and weird

>>21937796
You can't make biz believe anything.. But what you can do is share links and leave it up to individuals to research themselves. I researched this a year ago and knew it was a good buy. You can literally look at validation wallets and see active validations happening daily.

>>21937829
2nd part of my post literally explains their future usage.

Take Link - right now tokens are not needed until staking. It's called a project still under development you absolute mong

>>21937877
source:your ass

>>21937894
Feel free to screenshot. I've done it for you though and will rub it in your face as you'll still be here fudding when it's $10

>>21937849
I just want to figure out token needed or not. Ig you got tired explaining. Is there any other pro vidt anon out there to prove token needed?

Haha these fud posts always crack me up. The saddest people on the planet united hahaha.

>>21937967
DYOR. Fudders will tell you whatever lies they can. Shills will tell you wherever lies they can.

>>21937967
Token is needed as its a way of tying validations directly to a client wallet. By using the token, that enables the other incentives like the monthly buybacks and burns which are both verifiable. This ties the real world fiat money to the blockchain use. During low price pressure the burns and buybacks help support the price, and gives incentives to investors. Over 3m tokens burned this year alone (all verifiable) and with 43m tokens in circulation, and with clients increasing you know what that means. Also divisible to 8 decimals so this can keep going

>>21937967
To add, the token is used for creating the hash that's directly attributed to the file that's put through the verification system. Also checkout VIDT Datalink. The eth blockchain is used ultimately, but when it's clogged multiple blockchains are used to ensure speed and efficiency for the clients

>>21937967
Their api is also customisable to work with a variety of programming languages. Other companies can use 'powered by VIDT Datalink' as a backbone for their own verification systems or portals. The research tells you all you need to know. Literally a perfect use of cryptography and blockchain tech

>>21938231
Soon literally any blockchain via a "staking" of sorts...

If you know that is...

Fudding seems fun to some people, but it never hurts do DYOR. Make your own decisions.

>>21936158
He sold the literal bottom

>>21933974
So much retarded FUD kek, just bought more

It's mooning, goys!

Who is ready to become a validator node with upcoming staking? Soon the entire validation process will be decentralised

Not sure how much minimum will be required, but it'll be as low as a few thousand

>>21939164
Wtf are u talking about

>>21939200
Secrets... More will be revealed in the future

>>21939224
So the token might finally be needed ?

>>21939296
Yes, although needed right now anyway

>>21939296
Literally explained above the token use. Any further doubts?

>>21939338
Say more about validator nodes

>>21939398
To my knowledge that isn't true. As nice as it sounds. By design, this is centralised as it uses the VIDT api in conjunction with blockchains for the verification process. There's been no announcement of validatior nodes

OP sold at 1350 sats and set it as his profile picture, LOL. OP needs to give up now.

>>21939450
What if the team decides to stop buying back? Clients wont give a fuck and holders would be fucked

>>21939611
Source? That's brutal, but would make sense why OP makes these threads daily

>>21939695
Well its literally part of their business model. 10% of the 20% the burn of all the vidt used every month are bought back. Because the amount of VIDT used for a verification will reduce as the price per token increases, their buybacks will be smaller in amount. When the price is lower, they're higher in amount. Plus an investor can track both burns and buybacks every month. Its literally built into the tokenomics. I can't see why they'd stop that, removing one of the key incentives for investors

>>21939747
Pic is his profile. Even his friends are worrying he's losing the plot.