/biz/ - Business & Finance

from discord:


@everyone The QQQF DeFi Pool is now up, and can be accessed on the official website:

https://www.standardcryptofund.com/pool

or on balancer.finance:

https://pools.balancer.exchange/#/pool/0xd2ea320734e325c9034b1758c3e267c4e8ca160c/

We are also announcing that we have locked up 5 million QQQF on Unicrypt and are planning to lock up another 60 million (that is 60% of the total supply) QQQF using lock.finance:

https://unicrypt.network/uniswap-browser/pair/0xE82C14F88300e3a44f17C2009Be999E3D608fdB3

The whitepaper is coming along nicely and should be finished soon. We have also acknowledged the community’s wish of a revamped website and are currently working on a redesign.

>>21791574
Bought the bottom, 10 cents here we come!

>>21791591

>and are planning to lock up another 60 million
bullish.

Good news, this shows that they haven't been inactive. Still, the token remains at a fragile state and while the prices are low to allow for a nice accumulation period, please keep in mind that the risk of getting dumped on after a significant positive price movement is still extremely high due to the low liquidity. I've been watching this on the sidelines for a while and as soon as it's fixed, I'll grab a bag.
At the very least, this should finally push away the niggers calling it a scam, or that there isn't any progress for this project to begin with.

>>21791760
Based

Yeah I bought at ico, can’t wait to see how this grow.

>>21791574
Well fug, I sold at a 2 ETH loss earlier in the day because I listened to the FUD in a previous thread. Bought 0.3 ETH after seeing the discord notification, glad there's finally progress.
Will probably drop in 0.5 in a minute

>>21791863
Yeah they do seem a bit disorganized, but I’m still holding my ico tokens . Give it a couple months this has potential

>>21791962
I pray they'll be able to gather enough funds to finally kill the volatility. I acted like a retard earlier wanting to buy huge amounts at a time

>>21791962

Money comes to the patient. STA succeeded, this will too given enough time, community support and a little marketing push. The price movements right now don't matter in the slightest if you're not a short term braindead monkey. This is not a prediction, but a certainty. QQQF, just like Statera, will be a guaranteed ticket to the moon by end of year.

I'll say it in red :
>>>/q/qqf-will-be-worth-50-cents-by-eoy

>>21792352
BASED

>>21792352
>>21792387
I fucked up! Let me fix that real quick.

>>>/s/tandard-crypto-index-fund-also-known-as-qqqf-will-reach-50-cents-by-EOY

There, it's been proclaimed in red. Buy now, or stay poor because you missed the next Statera.

Things are finally rolling frens!

liquidity locked, i packed my bags, lets do this brahs

>>21792352
>>21792527
Not doing too well, are ya?

Everyone here should join the discord and telegram there. News are often announced there indirectly, before they're posted here and on other big channels.

Telegram:
t.me/standard_crypto

Discord invite:
VhyNxkS

There are already website previews in their TG group.

Locked up liquidity with even more to come makes me bullish. I am hodling my suicide bag, good things are about to come.

bizlets will forfeit this chance, too...

What's the suicide stack ?

>>21793280
Not sure, coin is so cheap and it's hard to tell how far we can go. I'm a top10 holder on this though

>>21793280

Depends. I'd say 10K-20K should be good enough...

>>21793280
1k unironically.

Bag filled

QQQF has applied for CG and exchange listings. A new website is coming and liquidity is going to be locked. This is going to get really interesting.

https://blockfolio.canny.io/coin-requests/p/qqqf

It would also be very kind of people if they could vote for us here. We have 18 upvotes, so we should be getting listed soon, but more upvotes would help regardless

>>21794349
Bump

>>21795134
Can't believe biz will sleep on this gem kek

>>21794539
sent ;)

>>21793423
I have 20k and I feel it's waaay smol. 100k is a minimum.

It's baffling how you can tell who's actually an anon from the pajeets shills just by reading and analyzing the speech patterns of the posters ITT.
>>21791653
>>21791962
>>21792142
>>21792720
>>21792759
>>21793068
>>21793173
>>21793409
>>21793423
>>21793902
>>21794264
>>21794349
>>21794539
>>21795439
>>21795944
>>21796086
unironic pajeets

>>21791574
>>21791863
>>21792352
>>21792817
Normal anons, some I recognize from the STA threads
don't buy this, you can clearly see the discrepancy between pajeets and anons who probably got fooled into buying this who are now forced to shill to make up for their loss

>>21796337
Do not reply to me without my permission.

>>21796337
Fudders gonna fud

>>21796481
>>21796507
fuck off pajeets

>>21796337
Sorry mate but I'm Scandinavian and whiter than 10 of you Amerimutts combined.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk3y2l4_z7Y

>>21796549
Dang brah you seem very intelligent

>>21796563
Fuck off redditor
>>21796586
Faggot
I will never buy your worthless bags. Seethe and cope because you invested in a PnD but didn't manage to get out on time. Retards

>>21796337
Eh, I've actually bought 25000 for 0.09 ETH, then my stack went fast to 1.9 eth, then it dumped and I sold 5000 for 0.11 or so to cover my initial "investment". I ain't selling. I've said it before, this has potential and I don't care if it flops or tanks or whatever...

>>21796635
>potential
Yeah. I sure love buying illiquid assets with no future

>>21791574
This is another gay Statera scam. Go back to Telegram.

>>21796621
I got in below 0.001. DESU I don't care if you want to suck your jewish managers cock for the rest of your days lol. Are you the guy who got banned from the discord channel for fudding because you sold at loss?

>>21796815
And now you've admitted to banning people when they raise legitimate issues about your token? Wew lad. Surely there isn't anything to hide

>>21796337
>>21796549
>>21796621

i wonder what this guys problem is

>>21796880
Banning people for ad nauseam spamming nonsense and threatening to SWAT the main developer lmao

>>21796791
Then don't.
>>21796880
Share your wisdom with us, please. We're all ears.

look you gay marines, if you wanna get away and suck on some cock. Phuket is opening up in October, the tranny boyz told me they waiting for some white expat cock. Thai cock is too salty they want that American and euro cheese. Use and buy travala (Ava) they accept direct crypto payments. Why cash out and have Uncle Sam up your asses when you can use it to travel the 7 seas.

>>21796992
yo are you in the right thread lol

i have no idea what you are getting at

>>21796880
You can tolerate retards to a certain point but if their owners don't keep an eye on their internet behaviour they need to be banned.

>>21796967
As if something this retarded could happen. Nobody would be salty enough for a token who couldn't even manage to raise 1k at its ICO three weeks ago. Who are you trying to fool here?
>>21796979
I have nothing better to do so I'll tell you every single motive as for why this piece of crap you even dare to call an index fund will never work.

>worthless ponzi making you believe the token is tied and backed up by a portfolio composed of valuable assets (pro tip : it's not)
>dev is unknown and has absolutely NO EXPERIENCE, nothing to prove that he can make this work
>used an online contract generator
>website looks like shit
>token is illiquid because the ICO raised $1k
>trading volume is extremely low, telling of the massive interest there is for an useless ERC-20 token claiming to become tools to lessen risk for crypto investors
>marketing is limited to bagholders pajeets shilling on /biz/ hoping to dump on clueless anons
>'devs' hold more than 50% of the supply, meaning as soon as it pumps they start selling and you can check this easily on etherscan

Should I conitnue or have I said enough to permanently shut your mouth? Next time try twice before babbling incoherent stuff because you can't part ways with a failed investment.
>>21797267
Once again, show proof this occurred. I'm looking at the discord history right now and there's nothing indicating someone threatened your dev or something like that. This is a bizarre method of shilling and I don't see what you have to gain by lying to people on the internet.

Every week there's a rugpull, a planned PnD, vaporware that gets shilled to oblivion for one day then you hear nothing the next. This needs to stop if we want more people to get interested in cryptocurrency. You degenerates are morally wrong and tainting this space day after day. You all deserve the rope for luring in newfags, same for the retards who get greedy and buy into these obivious scams. FUCK OFF

>>21797452
ico even thought it was almost nothing was loked up they had the txn postedd

they added more to unicrypot they just announced it and launched teh secon pool

at least its moving forward not backward

you do know chainlink owns 60% of the supply right

they also announced in disc that they are going to lock 60% of the supply

but since youd nt know does that mean you are not in dsocrd??/ let me guess your the guy they banned or you wold know this lol

>>21797568
>comparing fucking Chainlink to a poorly made STA copy
Your delusion is showing

>>21797740
no skin off my bones im not teh one raging lol

>>21797740
>>21797452
>>21796880
>>21796791
>>21796621
>>21796549
>>21796337
>>21796337

>>21797768
I'll be waiting for the pink wojaks and the despair in the catalog when they dump their entire stack on your face if it miraculously manages to even gain traction. But at the rate of how things are moving forward... I heavily doubt so. No CG or CMC listing after three weeks, nobody buying this, the overall amateurish feel this has I'm pretty sure it's already dead lmao. Delete everything and come back in a month perhaps it'll work with newfags.

Fucking scammers I wish I could strangle you all right now

>>21797568
Its candide and I was there. He got so aggressive after the moment he realized that the token has no "new" tech and what makes or breaks this will be if the ecosystem surrounding it are setup the right way and trust building by the dev.

>>21797923
i bought at ico already got back my investment and holing a good amount

they did say it was suppose o be a inddex fund, dont see what knew tech they were offering. only thing i seen was liquidity mining

yeah i think its the same guy, or he would see they announced locking of supply and new pool

that dude has problems

>>21797923
>”I’m in it for the tech”

>>21797923
This will be my last post ITT. Just look at this fucker namefagging and his discord friend trying to put a band aid on criticisms he knows he cannot refute because he knows deep down that it's true.


If you buy QQQF, you're giving free money to pajeets from TG and discordtrannies. You've been warned. Pathetic scam. This is my last warning.

>>21798036
I did not say this ... you were the one going parabolic after seeing it was just a online contract generator.

>>21798036
sorry wrong person

>>21798037
so you admit to being that candid dude lol kek

>>21798068
I was talking about his logic lmao, I’m not him.

While ID FrTB2EZt might be seething he's raises valid concerns
I have a small bag that I bought at 1.6c but I'm now tempted to sell, I didn't know that the contract was made an online generator and probably unaudited. Can anyone debunk or confirm this? I didn't join the discord or TG channels

>>21798157
they mentioned they used generator, dont think they ever denied

candid guy in disc went apeshit lol when he found out

Wait, you guys actually bought this shit?
The "dev" spammed every thread on biz for 2 weeks, that should tell you something

>>21798185
dude wtf
then anybody could create a QQQF competitor but providing more liquidity instead
If I wasn't slightly in the red I would have sold instantly. I unironically feel scammed

I don't get it. How is this supposed to follow the markets as an index if it's price is influenced by how many people are buying into it or not? It's literally impossible to dump QQQ because it has no value on its own, it's just following the underlying index. How can this coin achieve the same?

>>21798233
think somoen did make a clone qqqf its still viewable on uniswap they made it a couple days after the original qqqf launch

>under $4

PIECE OF SHIT CHINA HUSTLE VC SCAM TOKEN IM FINANCIALLY RUINED

>>21797452
If this was a PnD it makes no sense to not have any marketing going on. Also, I'm not shilling with the discord ban comment, it's just there are a few vocal fudders around and considering how unknown this project is right now I find it unlikely you're not one of the fudders in the groups

>>21798193
I bought the top at 3 cents two days ago. Not much, but it still hurts to see parts of your portfolio in the red because you made the foolish mistake to FOMO in a project that will probably never deliver, compared to STA which I know will go back up. I loaded up a little more on that dump by the way, but I'm getting sidetracked here. I bought because I unironically believed it would be the next STA in terms of mcap and potential, without taking the time to look at the liquidity or at the contract. I'm really interested in index funds for crypto. But I don't have high hopes for QQQF. Still, in other threads from now I'll unfortunately have be among the moonboys telling you to buy because I only wish for one thing, that is to break even and forget this mistake ever happened.

>>21798233
While that is true QQQF has first mover advantage and a great portfolio that is hard to beat. By the time a worthy competitor exists QQQF will already be far ahead in the game.

>>21798424
How can you call these posts FUD? Every single thing he said is true and can be verified

>>21798408
You invested into a project that has only begun taking its first steps. Be patient, these things take time. It took Bitcoin 10 years, Ethereum 5 years and LINK 3 years to get to where they are now.

>>21798470
its suppose to just be an index with liquidty mining from what i read, i dont see how this is a bad thing

>>21798546
These projects have solid backing or were game changers. False hopium will get you nowhere. Even Statera managed to do well in a short timespan compared to this. Because they had the means. Here we have nothing but soon™

>>21798631
statera is not just a 2 month old project

they started with the burn tokens more than a year ago

then airdorppped all burn tokens holder statera v1 then v2 then v3 its at least a year old

>>21798710
cope

>>21798408
I plan on throwing in a few grand to this down the road as the funds become available to me anon, these sort of "Index funds" are going to be a big thing a few years down the line.

>>21798631
I can tell you’re a newfag, if you were here in 2017 you’d realize just how hard LINK got bashed on relentlessly. People said that it was just a 1 man team run by a russian scammer and nobody believed that it would succeed.

what is this and what's the make it stack
if it's an index fund shouldn't I just stick with Statera

>>21798773
statears a good project but they have burn, burn basically reduces supply. if they wante dlwo supply why didnt htey jsut start with 1 token with 18 decimal places its no diffferent it 1 token has 18 decimals

>>21798773
Its statera, but different in several ways.

1. It has multiple pools and is more defi-focused
2. It doesnt have a burn
3. Its a hybrid model, so its part balancer oriented, and half off-chain.
4. Its much earlier.

>>21798773
one thing i didnt get about statera, they burn supply doenst matter if they get down to 1 token, that one token will have 18 decimal places making it essential the same as having (1+(18 zeros) in supply))

>>21798773
10k sui 100k make it I’d say

>>21798896
It makes it deflationary. If you hold lets say 10 token, out of 1000 tokens, it will increase in value if you hold them for a year till the total supply is 100 tokens.

>>21798984
yea maybe, i bought around 15 cents, its seem slike a cool project. i hope it can hit 45 cents again.

Damn the token seems cheap for the idea that it tries to advertise, but I'm scared of buying. Even a 0.1 ETH order is enough to make a significant increase in price. I suppose I'll wait until this gets taken care of. Why won't the devs add more liquidity?

>>21798762
Based cat poster

>>21799056
think thye only raised like 8 eth during the ico and launched the first pool and sent the pool tokens to burn addres. so they didnt have much to go off on

i was suprsied it wa at like 5k liquidty for lika week

its gainig a bit of momentum

>>21799101
>8 ETH
What the fuck

>>21799095
A toast! To the future of cryptocurrency!

>>21799226
yeah im suprsied this hit 32k in liquidity, its been hovering around 15-20k liquidty for a week, its gainig some traction buts its slow

This is a scam with the Statera Nigerian scam in it. You don't need your tokens "balanced" by the Nigerians.

>>21799469
>Statera
>Nigerian
Statera was made by a South African just like Elon Musk is you tard

>>21799469
its using balancer.finance, which is very reputable, idiot

Thanks to the fudder the token unironically got more exposure lmao, 5 more holders

scam

>>21800123

What a nothing burger. Nothing more is coming up after all this time. Sell

>0.01 stablecoin
Oh no thanks

>>21801400
Kek

When will there be more liquidity??

>>21797452
Thank you for your input. I'm not interested in selling.

>>21802467
Lol