/biz/ - Business & Finance

When Gilles is done sucking tranny dick in Jakarta

SLINK is already mooning, get in here faggot https://app.uniswap.org/#/swap?outputCurrency=%200x03E7438AEF0CF54aB0c25cE3e71861d288cEB543

The RNDR network makes iExec useless. The only way to succeed in the decentralized computing space is to have projects that dont already encroach upon centralized solutions. iExec is just trying to become a more costly and painful version of AWS and Google Cloud services. RNDR on the other hand has identified the problem of there not being enough GPU power on public clouds and has found a proper niche where it will continue to grow.


Here is OTOY CEO/RNDR founder addressing the lack of GPU rendering on public clouds at an AWS conference and how RNDR can solve the problem:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AqmPGrrXzA

idk lol

>>21656876
>iExec is just trying to become a more costly and painful version of AWS and Google Cloud services.
Kek this summarizes it perfectly. But RNDR is also token not needed and a shitcoin

>>21656876
>only time he gets replies to his graphic coin is when he posts it in an iexec thread
tone it a down a little would ya, your bags are showing

>>21657016
That is where we differ. iExec is not needed in any regard because there is no way it can compete against the existing cloud service providers, its going no where! On the other hand I have linked a video to you where the CEO of the leading rendering software company directly addresses AWS to their face about the lack of GPU on public clouds and how they are going to fix it.

>>21657114
Its not that it makes me happy or that I get anything out of it. I have a genuine desire for the people in this community that have helped me grow so much and allowed me to get where I am by spoon-feeding me projects that ended up being legitimate non-scams. These values that have been given to me now are manifesting into the RNDR token, a truly genuine project that has a chance to make a difference and I dont want people getting ripped off with a Golem-tier project like iExec.

>>21656876
Rndr has no way to encrypt the data. Meaning easily stolen/copied video
>>21657271
AWS is worth 500b and can't connect to ethereum smart contracts
Iexec can....

If seen your other posts. You're kinda IQ desu

>>21657271
>>21656876
Your rendering shitcoin is but 0.000000000001% of what iExec does. iExec could render around v1 if I remember correctly Ranjesh

>>21657374
Holy fucking shit...iExec is able to connect to smart contracts and AWS cant do that? That changes everything....I guess its completely over for AWS all the government contracts...private contracts...everything will move to iExec!

Get a bit better grasp on reality retard. Not everything is centered around crypto and ethereum and a system right now that has zero worker participation besides themselves (I am serious about this download the virtual box worker for iExec and check) and has problems printing hello world is NOT going to be fixing or disrupting anything.

>>21657508
Is that really so? Interesting claim however upon testing the iExec network it was found to utterly collapse under the strain of printing out "hello world". On the contrary JJ Abrams used the RNDR network for his recent star wars films and will most likely use it in the future. You should really start getting with the times. Talk is cheap, action is not.

>>21657557
>collapse under the strain of printing out "hello world"
>he fell for the fud
That was done during maintenance.

>>21657584
Even if it was done under maintenance I absolutely implore you, I BEG you right now to start up a virtual machine using the download from the iExec website. There is literally NOBODY besides iExec themselves running a worker node. A system that is so weak like this will never ever properly work out.

Here is a lead developer from the team talking to an anon when the iExec system completely collapsed under the strain of print hello world. Here he says that adoption is hard and that perfectly makes sense. Such a shitty garbage system will never gain traction because it is just a pebble in the water of giants.

>>21656876
Dumbasses like anon here doesn't know Genesis Cloud (GPU cloud computing) is on the iexec platform. Since he couldn't do some simple research, it also means he still has no fucking idea what iexec does.

>>21657722
Once again I repeat, the structure of this project and the fact there are is nobody lending their computing power right now (please check this) make it so that it will never be used for anything. To succeed in this space you have to find a niche and stick with it....iExec is just a more costly and annoying AWS and gives no benefits in using it. Please show me some projects rendered or processed with iExec that can rival a star wars movie.

>>21657635
No shit adoption is hard. Look at every single crypto project. Do you see full enterprise or individual adoption from any of them? Everything is speculation including your baby RNDR. Go watch every single conference videos and in every single on they talk about tackling issues with privacy and security. No one is ready for adoption until every single i is dotted and t is crossed.

>>21657828
Now you are getting it! The projects that sucked are going to be the one that achieve ADOPTION!

Lets take a look at RNDR for a start. RNDR is made by Jules, a man who has created a company called OTOY and has developed powerhouse rendering software that is industry standard. The name octane is universal in the field of rendering and the otoy name is well known. The OTOY advisors are powerhouses like Eric Schimdt of Google, Brendan Eich of javascript and mozilla and more as you can see from the attached image.

Now lets take a look at iExec, realistically does it have any chance of being "adopted" instead of simply being a "partner"? Right now you can make the argument that small fringe teams in big companies are working with them but that is done ALL THE TIME. Take a look for example at the Google Confidential Computing program...iExec made a huge deal in participating in it but that realistically means nothing...Google has already created their own in-house solution!

So I am extremely glad we are starting to go onto the same page. I understand that this can be extremely tough for you since you seem to care a lot about Iexec but I am doing this for your own benefit...I want to help you in the best way that I can.

>>21657900
The projects that succeed*

>>21657900
Nothing like getting my little grasshopper hyped and typing an essay. You don't need to shill me RNDR. I'll repeat once again, most projects are great but are all still speculation, including RNDR. You clearly aligned with me since you had no idea GPU rendering was on iexec from a company that specializes in it. So my little grasshopper, do you know who's leading the way for cloud computing security?

I will bring great knowledge to you young grasshopper.

>>21657900
Fuck off with your shit tier token
> comparing this to iExec
> Can’t stop laughing

>>21657948
I guess RNDR isn't going to succeed :(

>>21656345
he fell for the Gilles meme instead of buying Ocean

>>21658153
Intel and Google are leading the way for cloud computing security. But the thing is that even if iExec was ahead by a marginal amount it is nothing that would require a decentralized solution. Google and Intel are able to incorporate this into their own systems it does not require adopting iExec. On the topic of iExec and GPU rendering I was aware of this, but it does not matter much if there is nobody participating in the network! Right now there is no person except iExec run nodes that are lending computing power to the network making it ultimately useless.

>>21658254
Ocean is a huge project that iExec holders not even taking into consideration. It has a potential coinbase listing just like RNDR and if iExec truly was something impressive it for sure would have been looked to in-depth. iExec is in great danger right now of becoming Golem-tier as ocean gains momentum.

>>21657114
>your bags are showing

>>21658303
Wow. Listing potential. Must be a good token sir

Truth is nor ocean nor RNDR have any chance to outperformed iExec’s tech in a near or distant futur

If iExec doesn’t succeed, none of these projects will

>>21658556
Thats bullshit and you know it. Centralized systems will have no problems adopting confidential computing. You are thinking in the clouds right now and should ground yourself in reality.

>>21658303
Young grasshopper, all of your arguments apply to all of crypto. There's always a possibility big tech can take advantage or eliminate competition. Again, everything is speculation. And again, no shit there's no participation, as explained in post above. But a working product is better then no product, nonetheless. For decentralized cloud computing, we all know who's leading that *hint..nevermind you shouldn't need it.

Young grasshopper, master has one advice for you: this is biz, stop taking what people say on here seriously. Assuming people aren't taking consideration of other projects cause one person commented in an iexec thread of it being a shit coin. No bueno. Shillers, fudders, manipulators and you falling into the suckered category. New to biz, let me train you young grasshopper.

>>21658592
Here is reality, nothing in the world needs crypto to operate, yet here we are.

Iexec solves the boolean problem, the biggest hurdle for crypto projects getting mainstream adoption. Rndr, ocean, golem will never be capable of doing this because of their bad coding

NEVER SELLING REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

NSMDO

>>21656876
What a piece of shit kek token, you have to be a retard to hold this trash

Now listen you faggots. You're trying to sell me your mediocre projects in a RLC thread... Why is this? Because you fear what you don't understand and you want to take some of our money that we put into RLC and you want us to put it into your pajeet tier projects. RLC has been around and shilled for 3 years, we're all happily accumulating more and more and you retards know that your projects do some of the things that RLC does and the mentality goes along this lines "If he's interested in cloud computing, he must be interested in my pajeet project, since my pajeet project does the same thing as his god tier project which does my thing and 5-7 other things".

Look, if your project can't do all of the following; data marketplace, cloud computing provider (CPU/GPU), cloud resource tokenization, fog/edge computing (soonTM V5 part 2), doracles, has nice website and documentation (yes, this is a very big plus), has people who worked in this field for years (cloud computing, distributed cloud, fog/edge computing).
And has all the partnerships a crypto project wants Chainlink, Genesis Cloud, IBM Cloud, H7, Alibaba Cloud, BPI France, Scontain, Shift, Fortanix, TFCloud, Nerdalize, Intel, RSK, Ubisoft, Cloud & Heat, Stimergy, OpenFog, Enterprise Ethereum Alliance

If the above do not apply to your project than no RLC "bag holder" is interested in your shit token. We've got everything and that's why you fear us. You've got your niche little market, which is good, but not good enough for the future. We are no interested in your market caps, we are not interested in what you think you did, we are no interested in buying.

>>21659158
Based anon. Exactly this

>>21659158
Based anon, NSMDO

>>21659396
Forgot Confidential Computing Consortium in the partneships... And probably a few more maybe? Maybe even forgot to list a use case for iExec RLC. But who cares, can't even beat the list above...

>>21656876
well you have a bag of both like I do, but yes I am basically a crypto retard and should have made it by now

>>21659158

>>21659158
Based sheik