/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21643584
12yo pussy is the best
dot to the moon

Wtf did I just read

>>21643584
vitalik approves

>>21643750
>engage the DOT partnership

>>21643584
why??

>>21644572
what do gavin and vitalik have in common in this thread... do either of those faces look trustworthy anon?

>>21644621
gavin and web3.0 foundation are trustworthy!!

>>21643584
pretty hot ngl

>>21644447
More vatlik pics pls

>>21643584
fucking pedo gang

>>21643584
what the fuck is this real?

thanks just bought 100k
must be a great project when the only fud is the founder's sexual orientation

>>21644986
it sounds like autistic work of fiction to be honest

>>21643584
he's british dog, it's just his culture

>>21645146
pedophilia isn't a sexual orientation you absolute degenerate

>>21644986
>>21645146
>>21645165
guys it's time for a big change ... the crypto world needs fresh air .... xrp, bch, ltc, bsv are useless ..... ethereum is dying, the fees are very high, it's always more slow, there will never be eth 2.0 miners don't want pos! it is time to change, and this change is called Polkadot.
fucking looser fags shill these stupid threads every day ..... why don't they accept the change .... you will stay poor

>>21645440
i like polkadot. i don't like pedophiles. simple as.

>>21644986

>>21645563
Over the past few months, several reporters have approached me or my associates asking aggressively about a fiction story that I authored more than four years ago and is no longer posted online.

The story posted on my blog was fiction ‒ a made-up story meant to spark debate and conversation.

The fact that my blog is no longer on the internet and reporters, unassociated with my industry, have still “found” and pursued it indicates that individuals with less than good intentions have been actively trying to disparage and slander me.

My public acknowledgement of the story, along with my strongest possible rebuke that any part of this story is true, is meant to end all attempts to destroy my reputation. I sincerely apologise to anyone who found my experiment in creative writing upsetting, and I hope we can all come together in understanding its original intent and purpose. The content in question was created four years ago, when I wrote a story in rather poor judgement. I published it to my personal blog, Insights into a Modern World, in which I offered readers “projections of thoughts for you to reflect upon and refract over.” To reiterate, this story was entirely a work of fiction ‒ no characters or events described anything real. The story, entitled “Elizabeth” was the last in a series of posts (“Sexism and Physics” followed by “Lolita Justice” and then the post in question) that were prompted by current affairs at the time, specifically the Jeremy Forrest case in the U.K.

>>21645563
>>21645923
My story is fiction and was written purely as a literary thought-experiment in the context of current events. In the months before I wrote those posts, I had read “Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!”: Adventures of a Curious Character by the physicist and Nobel-winner Richard Feynman, in which the author applied a unique critical perspective on the world, ruffling a few of his audience’s feathers along the way. Along those lines, my blog posts at the time were meant to provoke intellectual debate and discussion around generally taboo subjects like the nature of consent. Nothing about it should be taken as indicative of my personal position. My only position here is that rigorous, rational and unrestricted discussion on all topics is generally a requirement to make informed decisions as a society.

It was not my intent to upset anyone, and I took the story down as soon as I realised it was being misconstrued. Recent re-publications of this story have been entirely by others, and I am very sorry to anyone that may have become upset by its contents.

Gavin Wood