/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21477783
Everyone knows that the first top will be at 32 billions

>>21477783
I've been waiting for this thanks anon. so what's the general prognosis for possible eoy price? 38.44 seems too low

>>21477857
1/4-39% of eth within 1-2 years.

>>21477783

What I think this chart is saying right now:

1. Selling below 40$ is probably not a good idea. It's very likely the total crypto mcap will eventually reach it's old ATH, and all link has to do is maintain it's current rank/dominance and we will get in the 3-40$ range no problem.

2. If Link ever has a 'mania', the price could get pretty crazy. If link hit the % dominance that BCH, XRP and ETH hit at their peaks, that's putting us in the 100$-200$ price range, even just with the CURRENT market cap. Those rows are still hopium, but at least slightly plausible hopium, which makes the hopium dopamine better somehow?

3. 1000$ eoy is a meme, for this year at least. Keep critical of link, this is an amazing project and investment but there's always a chance things could go wrong. Plan the circumstances under which you will sell in advance.

>>21477857

My pleasure hope it's useful. So, eoy is only 4 months away, things might not be that different by then. I think that there might be some big annoucements at smartcon, and maybe BTC will kick off another leg up. I'm hoping in the 30-50$ range, but that's just guessing.

>>21477783
I Love you. Why isn't there that artwork of the animal soldier or whatever on the chart though?

$200 seems guaranteed at this point, what a timeline

>>21477989
>>21478178
Rational projections thanks anon

>>21478211
Checked.

>>21478206

Ehhh it just got cut as I updated the look of the chart. And having a trip is faggotry enough, no need for a logo.

Also, damn, looking at these old charts makes me realize how far we've come.

>>21478465
You still a sgt or just kept the name the same?

>>21477989
So current total market is roughly 373billion how or why should we expect a growth of 125% by end of year?

I haven’t done the math for annual rate of growth but shouldn’t we be concerned with the immediate market crashing from our current global pandemic causing a general crisis and housing default throwing that growth out the window

>>21477783
OP chart is retarded, use this one instead
link is going to 16% dominace in a market worth 2 trillion

I know endgame is $1k eoy but what's a conservative number? What are you guys expecting eoy?

>>21478211
Checked
>>21478562
When BTC moons - total market cap balloons
And fuck off with your EC101 notes

>>21478516

Yeah just kept the name, been an officer since sub 50 cents

>>21478598

Anon that chart is fucking retarded and if you think it's better you have sawdust for brains. I'm tired of explaining why so please read the fine print on the newest one I posted above. It's also months out of date and includes completely arbitrary changes in BTC dominance for no reason. Stop being a stupid hopium addict.

>>21478562
If chainlink grew 125% the market would grow from 373 billion to 381 billion. Not such a big deal? And, yeah, macro events could fuck everything up. I'm not making strong predictions, this is just a loose sketch of possibilities and only looks at rank and mcap, there are no other variables.

>>21478736
I’m talking about the entire market cap not just fucking chainlink ya god damn sperg and I don’t see you worrying about immediate macro events possibly fucking up everything

>>21478598
>OP chart is retarded, use this one instead

And we broke 20$, these fucking charts are obsolete as fast as I can make them.

>>21477989
>3. 1000$ eoy is a meme, for this year at least. Keep critical of link, this is an amazing project and investment but there's always a chance things could go wrong. Plan the circumstances under which you will sell in advance.
Remember to the lurkers in this thread, 1000 eoy might be a meme but chainlink being under 1000 is fud

>>21479140
lmao
Keep in doing the lord's work, anon. Just don't forget to thank Jesus from time to time.

>>21477783
your chart is dumb as fuvk, in fact its so dumb link can go up to 30$ and still be in rank 5 nigger

>>21477783
bump

>>21477783
I thought you used this >>21478598 retarded method for a second.
If you open source your spreadsheet I can model the market dominance in the past years for a range estimate

>>21477879
bumping for useful info

>>21478598
thanks m8 i was looking for this one.