/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21435213
This thing is going way back down before it goes up again

>>21435227
dont mistake your wishes for reality

>>21435213
>>21435227
>>21435252
3/3 green ideas.
Lmao, how many threads that start with only green ideas did we have now?
5 threads? 6 threads?

>>21435321
ids*
Holy fuck getting up before 9 makes my brain fart.

>Mainnet: Q3 2020
Lol, still Q3 2020.
How many quarters have we been waiting for mainnet already?
Four quarters? Five quarters?

>>21435896
imagine thinking that waiting for product development is bad.
fucking retard just get out of these threads

>>21435227
If it's going down, it's not going way down.
Probably around the 13 cent range, but I wouldn't count on it really.
In any case, you have at most 2 months to buy at these cheap prices.
By the end of this year or the beginning of the next it won't really matter to anyone if they bought at 16 or at 13 cents. Hell, even people who got burned and bought the top are going to be happy with their buy in by that time.
Please screencap this.

>>21436807
estimates for price this time next year? once mainnet 2.0 is out can real adoption begin?

>>21436883
>once mainnet 2.0 is out can real adoption begin?
Obviously yes. And it's more utility than most cryptos in the top 20.

>>21435227
Yes if they don't announce mainnet 2.0 soon. Otherwise you don't actually have a clue what you're talking about. We've already gone through a year of bear markets

>>21435896
Yes and it's given us time to accumulate at ridiculously low prices. It's also bullish. See pic.

>>21436697
I love it how people completely ignore Lition because they aren't rushing to the market to generate some quick hype and pump their token price.
Anons who did their research know this is a project of scale that takes time to deliver, not some yield farming shit which one developer can scrap together in a week's time.
Instead their are working diligently to make sure they are actually delivering a viable product.
And retards think that's a bad thing kek.

>>21436697
>>21436697 #
I love it how people completely ignore Lition because they aren't rushing to the market to generate some quick hype and pump their token price.
Anons who did their research know this is a project of scale that takes time to deliver, not some yield farming shit which one developer can scrap together in a week's time.
Instead they are working diligently to make sure they are actually delivering a viable product.
And retards think that's a bad thing kek

Were going to be top 10 cmc within 6 months of mainnet announcement easily $5.... look at link its literally all pure speculation and all it has is first mover advantage and is easily replicated ‘customers’ will chose the cheapest and best oracle IF they need one that is and there are many competitors... Look at the top 30 coins on cmc fuck sake its a joke... its great in a way for us tho because the momentum we gather once we start our run will bring more attention than if mainnet was priced in

Amen

>>21437307
Green ID thread is back... yeah im thinking we are the chosen ones

>>21437307
I agree there's a decent chance that it will become top 10 eventually. I highly doubt that it will be top 10 in 6 months.

>>21437400
Ok top 50 in 6 months

any planned AMA? Richard where are youuuuuu mainnet eta wen

>>21437638
Yeah Mark said the team are scheduling one. No date announced yet.

>>21437307
It's not really comparable to LINK but if the current price of EWT doesn't make you bullish on Lition then I don't know what to say.
Just look at this video released last month.
Most people will let this slide but I get a strong impression that the Lition founders are really passionate about their project and are making it into their life's work while the other woman in the video seems like at top level executive who's just reading a script from her head that somebody else wrote for her (quick hint: she's vice chair of the foundation council of the Energy Web Foundation).
I'm not even trying to fud Energy Web or anything, I just think it's already found it's market value due to their undeniably prominent connections in the energy industry.
You must take into account we're basically investing in startups here and in my opinion the energy of the team leading the project is a very important factor to consider.
Here's the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUmpCNIz_Fw

>>21437776
>EWT doesn't make you bullish on Lition then I don't know what to say.
I agree but of course Lition is so much more than just energy. It's really important to keep on repeating this fact. Calling Lition an energy token is FUD. But even if Lition was just an energy token, Lition already has a working product available to the mass market and EWT. Lition focuses on green energy which is much more marketable and EWT doesn't. Lition is going way past EWT it's not even funny.

>>21437845
>Lition already has a working product available to the mass market...
*and EWT doesn't.

Thing is, Lition is the project closest to mainstream adoption, that is worth a lot of money. I feel very secure considering JUST ONE of their usecases is in energy. A usecase that could be worth the same as EWT. Honestly I find it baffling that the price is dumping this close to mainnet, even with all the shilling on biz. I did my last shopping yesterday and im perplexed that the volume is so low on IDEX as it is. One 10k LINK-holder could easily clear out the orderbook and be in a for a 100x'er over the next year or two.

>>21437977
>A usecase that could be worth the same as EWT.
Not even kidding, this is FUD. The energy use case alone will take it far beyond EWT.

>>21437845
>>21437880
I'm not even trying to compare the projects here or try to argue that one is better than the other.
The point I'm trying to get across is that you must be a complete brainlet to not bet at least some money on a leading team like Richard and Kyung-Hun.
They are not a team that are willing to let their project fail easily.
That said, Lition is a long term investment but if it pays out (which I'm quite confident it will) it will pay out handsomely.
The risk:reward ratio here must be the most asymmetrical I've even seen.

>>21437977
Price isn't dumping. Everyone is waiting eagerly for take off

>>21437977
Thing is that the order book is so thin that only swingtraders makes the price fluctuate a lot, there are no real sell offs in a literal sense. Most people are holding or staking, just check it out on etherscan.

We are incredibly bullish, ama soon and main net announcement. Also don't forget about all of the business related information that was dropped during the last ama, if we get anything close to similar the price will be flying past 2cents based on that alone.

>>21437776
>You must take into account we're basically investing in startups here and in my opinion the energy of the team leading the project is a very important factor to consider.
>Here's the video:
They are very passionate about their energy start-up. And they're doing great. But the blockchain is not needed. The token is not needed. It's just good for cheap marketing

>>21435213
Give it to me straight, frens.
Is this an Ecofash coin?

>>21438178
>haha look mommy I posted the funny phrase again.

kys and choke on your boomerrocks.

>>21438178
Ahhh I love this token not needed fud, my favorite kind.
Just like LINK is not needed right?

>>21438254
Dude, they are doing all they are doing without a working blockchain. You know this. Why the fuck would they need decentralization? What's the point of having Pajeet Singh running a node on his shitty machine?

>>21438292
>LINK
Link is needed to feed data to decentralized smart contract platforms in a decentralized way. The token is needed as a collateral to avoid bad agents feeding incorrect data.

>>21438336
Based fucking retard. I will simply wont comment on your heavily retarded assumption. Hope you have no Lition tokens since they are not needed...for YOU.

>>21438361
>muh json parser
>muh global paradigm
>muh oracles

Ye I figured that you were a sheep. Have I already told you to kill yourselves? If not - here is your official go!

>>21438383
You have no arguments. And I don't need you to reply, I know lition and its history better than you. There are gains to be made (I own ~500k LIT) in the incoming bull run, but it won't be long term. They work very well with a centralized system and they have proven it. Blockchain adds only inefficiencies

>>21435213
7/9 of the listed developer employees/contributors are no longer working with Lition

>seems promising kek

>>21438429
proof please.

oh no proof? kill yourself immediately

>>21438429
They don't give a flying fuck about having a working blockchain, they don't actually need it, hence the big gap in development in which they did nothing other than "theoretical research" i.e. choosing what to copy. Their only drive now from this point of view is to give breadcrumbs to bagholders so they can dump on them at a later stage.

>>21438428
>"I know Lition and its history better than you"
>"Token not needed"
>Now all of a sudden has 500k LIT

Take your meds schizo. The more you talk the more you out yourself as some nutjob. Please! Contine!

>>21438453

Ask them yourself, heres the list

Still working at Lition: Patricio Mosse, Eugene Melnikov

Not working at Lition: Artur Basak, Aliaksandr Zimakou, Marcel Jackisch, Aliaksei Hiatsevich, Ivan Dubouski

>>21438453
Don't pretend to be retarded, we both know it was acknowledged on telegram after ftp exposed them

>>21438466
Yeah, indian larper confirmed. Fully coincidental that your cousi....eh I mean fellow fudder >>21438429
jumped in to insert a witty comment that you can comment about aswell. Patheticly obvious.

>>21438468
The irony is that outside biz we agree, but here you act like a mindless Pajeet shill because it worked for link and it's working now for kleros

>>21438488
Well was about to yolo $5k, any suggestions?

>>21438520
Lition

>>21438469
Also a nice lie ;)


>>21438488
>Sucking ftp's dick

Lmao


>>21438519
But...you dont know me?! How the fucking fuck do you want to agree with me outside biz then?
Fucking brainless schizophrenic fudder. I remember you posting about LIT here and you will ALWAYS be a fucking retard that will definitely sell too low.

>>21438361
Thanks for explaining it to me, I didn't know that before kek.

>>21438566
>Artur Basak
https://www.linkedin.com/in/arturbasak/

Check it yourself you fucking retard haha

>>21438605
>Cherrypicking a name that is actually not working with them to prove your lie

lol yawn

>>21438520
>Well was about to yolo $5k, any suggestions
Lition is fine, it will have a good run, but you need to know what you are buying

>>21438566
I know who you are on telegram

>>21438647
Cmon, spit it out! You can also write a pm so I can laugh in your face.

>>21438662
What's the point? As I said, I agree with everything you say on telegram where you are actually reasonable and provide good arguments, the pajeeteries here are maybe needed but I just can't pretend to be that retarded

Can all telegram normies fuck off? Know your place (this isnt it)

>>21438698
The point is that you are talking bullshit 24/7 and wont stop it after I called you out. Like token not needed. Are you actually believing that their whole P2P Platform can continuously run via a Blockchain AND be more efficient without it? You cannot tell who I am which is why you always be a schizo with made up shit takes that is trying to stir up shit.

>>21438126
Its allready 2 Cents and more boy