/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21430707

it's real.

It's real, I've lost everything. Probably committing suicide if Binance doesn't help me get these funds back

>>21430707
the price isn't crashing because the hackers aren't selling

>>21430707
It's fake and gay.

>>21430755
How they hacked your account in binance?

>>21430707
It's true but only happens to people who also bought PNK. They just announced on Telegram that a hacker cracked the nodes of PNK and went through LINK. He is now on the loose and is cracking through ETH

All gone hacked out of my trust wallet

>>21430707
Larp. These faggots have no life and have to flood the board with 50 fucking threads

>>21430707
Check binance rn

>>21430707
ill drop some crumbs
any time you see Link threads talking about hacks, scams, etc.
it's all fud to get the weak hands to sell before the pump
check the archives its been happening for 3 years
dont fucking sell

>>21430707
Fake and homosexual. They want you to sell. There's no news about this anywhere except here.

>>21431790
Based fren

>>21431840
Boomers finally figuring out what’s going on
Just a bunch of transsexual nonsense so they can accumulate more
Otherwise it’s pajeets trying to fill their $20 longs

>>21431840
Check reddit

>>21430707
>What is this exploit?
There's a security layer in LINK's source code that deals with storage ticks. Basically, even in cold storage where they're untouched, there's a cache protocol that will occasionally ping public wallet addresses to verify their contents. Unfortunately, LINK has a slightly different version of this protocol in order to make micro-pings for staking purposes. Most staking rewards are going to be really small transfers, so the LINK devs lowered the tick rate for these pings. However, if you're using a hardware wallet, your storage is operating at the NORMAL tick rate, creating a cache gap where someone can use an SLQ% injection to gain access to your wallet. There's already been many posts of Anons opening up their wallets to find all their tokens transferred out to mysterious addresses, losing tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars.

>Does this affect other tokens in my hardware wallet?
No, as this isn't a vulnerability with the wallet so much as Chainlink specifically. Other tokens, even on wallets that have been affected by the exploit, are safe.

>I haven't touch my wallet in years! Can someone really randomly gain access and steal my LINK?
Sadly, yes. This affects PUBLIC addresses, and these are most likely being chosen at random.

>I have my LINK on a hardware wallet! What do I do?
Either transfer them to a paper wallet (safest), an exchange, or trade for fiat.

>Can this be patched?
Yes, but it will take time. This isn't something that can be done in one week, as it's tied to the security layers focused on staking. These have to be rewritten very cautiously, else other major functions of the LINK source code can break.

>>21431790
>This is the real fud.
This guy want's you to risk losing your link. We are not telling you to sell, just move your stack to an exchange so that it will be safe. Obviously the choice to take profit is up to you.
Just ask yourself why this anon wants you to hold on to your link so badly. Do you really think he has your best interests at heart?

>>21432000
>Do you really think he has your best interests at heart?
i do you beautiful faggots