/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20950157
Its gonna be glorious when they fogure out that they cant stake their link on the best paying node lmao

>>20950157
>667 LP holders
What do you think will be the reaction of noLPers when they discover they won't be able to stake?

>inb4 muh coinbase staking
Why would a company with enough LINK liquidity share their oracle's payment with you? More staked LINK doesn't mean more rewards with Chainlink staking system. They don't need you. You will be able to lend your linkies to Aave in order to get some APY though

>>20950157
I find myself quite bullish on eth as well with all the defi action going on. I was thinking about where to stake my eth bag when I realized

>LP supports eth staking as well

We're reaching comfiness levels never seen before.

>>20950307
Oh, didn’t even think about that. My comfiness level just plunged into the stratosphere.

>>20950157
>1200LINK
>0.12 LINKPOOL

This is the true suicide stack for LINK and nu/biz/ has no idea.

>>20950455
actually decent for a suicide stack. also checked.

>tfw 10k LINK but only 0.04LP
heres to hoping early staking returns aren't insanely stupid and make me giga regret not picking up 1 full LP

>>20950455
I wish I had more, but Im a poorfag

>>20950512
I mean, If I were you I would start getting some LP now

>>20950455
>>20950488
Checked.

nu/biz/ going to cope so damn hard when they realise this.

>>20950512
>tfw 1.8k link but 2.28 LP

>>20950569
Retard

Because everybody with a brain knew that LINK has more potential than an easily recreated node platform, and with Binance, coinbase, probably Kraken, and Okex adding it as a service, linkpool will have no chance to survive

>>20950698
This. Any gains you think you made with Linkpool are less than the gains you would have made by taking the money you threw away at LP and invested in more LINK instead.

>>20950698
Linkpool is much more than simple node platform, they are the infrastructure itself. Check out market.link and honeycomb.market

T Systems are now node operators. Who's to say they won't offer staking? Even if they take a %age of the profit, surely it has to be a better idea to buy more Link than spend a mint (what is it now, 60 ETH or something) on Linkpool tokens.
If I had limitless pots of cash and was investing my arse off, I'd consider picking up LP. I don't, and I won't.
I'll wager just buying Link and selling it on the way up would be more profitable than this hope/dream shilled by murky LP advocates.
No thanks. If it's so great, why do you lot keep trying to flog it on here? Lemme think....

Another thing.. If LP is all it's cracked up to be, and you guys are SO in bed with the CL team, why not just ask ol' Sergers to verify this? Should be easy peasy for you guys?

>>20950856
No because LP tokens gamuarantee that the LP node wont be flooded with staked link, so payouts stay high per person. If t systems has no token that is needed to stake on their node, the payouts will be a lot less because their nodes will be flooded with link

>>20950894
How new are you faggot?

>>20950695
$400 got you 1.4 shares at ICO. Seethe incel

every thread is the same. poolies tell you to get a token, nopoolies seethe and cope. and every week the price ticks up. you'll be entirely priced out once it kicks off. not shilling cos you're sure as shit not getting any of my poolies.

>>20951066
I know, that ratio is still beyond retarded in my opinion

>>20950969
Which means LP won't be competitive since they are trying to artificially keep their prices high while all of their competitors are competing with each other to offer the lowest price and the best data. LP will absolutely be cannibalize by the competition if their policy is to try and be more expensive to use than everyone else.

>>20950969
So the LP node won't be flooded with staked Link.
You REALLY think that ONE node out of god-know-how-many is gonna reap rewards that justify SIXTY goddam ETH per token?
What exactly does 'guarantee' mean anyway, in that context? We guarantee that you'll get practically (but a bit more than) very little in return?
And where can I see a written contract, issued by LP, which verifies this? Do post a URL. I'd be keen to read this .

owning link since 2017 and not having a minimum of a 1.4 share of lp is what nigger rich looks like
sure, you've made some money. but you're poor in comparison to the rest of us. rip retards.

>>20951158
What are you talking about faggot? There wont be enough demand at the release of staking for all these linkies.

*written statement

>>20951146
who cares? hes going to be rich either way

>>20951204
Jesus Christ you are a moron. Not even going to spoonfeed you.

>>20951186
https://medium.com/linkpool
They are much more than a simple node platform, they are creating the whole ecosystem.
All LP tokens do is give you a revenue of the earnings of LP and a right to stake on their node. If other staking platforms choose to let people stake without token then the payouts will be less per person.

its funny to me that the $400 that netted me 1.4 shares at ICO has currently generated 16.68 LINK which is $144 now. This time next year my initial investment will be covered, not that $400 is a lot of money. Its just amusing.

60 ETH is $23427, for ONE LP
That would buy 2700 Link tokens.
If Link gets to $100 (which we all know it will), that becomes $270,000
You really expect us to risk that, when staking (albeit at a lower return) will be widespread?
I don;t know what you guys are hoping for, shilling this on here. Sounds to me like you're all a bit doubtful yourselves, and need a bit of reassurance.

>>20951365
Any how many link do you think you'll collect through staking. If >2700 then bad idea... If more, not.

>>20951365
LP is not just for staking brainlet, you get a % of their total revenue. Staking isnt the only thing they are offering

>>20951365
I just lurk these threads to be comfy and fantasize about future earnings, actually. I dont give shit if you buy in, it's not going to change my roi when staking begins.

>>20950232
They can, but they pay 25% of all revenue to LP share holders

>>20951442
I have no ill wishes toward LP holders, in fact I hope it works out and they are proven correct. I really do. But think about this..
It's really easy to read the CL whitepaper, follow the announcements, partnerships etc and come away with the opinion that yes, this is a good investment.
With Linkpool... I never had any of that feeling. It has always just been 'a wing and a prayer' and constant claims of 'Chainlink Blessing'. If I am to spend copius amounts of dough on what is essentially a derivative product, I need more than that. It's not forthcoming. There's no guarantee. Just endless shilling.
I hope it works out for you guys, but no way I'd touch it.

>>20950157
>How do they plan on staking
shared pools

How can I acquire some LinkPool?

There's nothing special about linkpool. There will be competitors that will also stake your link for you

>>20951628
>It has always just been 'a wing and a prayer'

It became a sure thing the moment it was adopted by Chainlink team as integral part of the network.

>I don;t know what you guys are hoping for, shilling this on here

Read the thread again. LP holders are all comfy as fuck, nopoolers are aggressive and coming up with the most far-fetched fud. We don't even care about the price since we need our shares for staking. These threads are for entertaining ourselves with nopooler cope.

>>20950232
>>20950256
Does the value of linkpool really depend on you guys convincing people that linkpool will be the only place to stake? As if the entire reliability of the network didn’t depend on being decentralized and having many nodes running. What a scam

>>20952013
the only uncertainty I have about LP is how competitive alternatives will be from a market share perspective.

as it stands, LP nodes are far and away the most used nodes, and LP is the foundation behind market.link, the leading node data platform.
if binance comes in and tosses up a few nodes that start taking all the jobs, then LP could get fucked
i don't see this as happening though, because linkpool exists with the sole purpose of providing high quality chainlink nodes, whereas binance/coinbase have 5000 other projects, and cant possibly do it as good as a company made to do 1 thing

>>20950695
>>20950569
>tfw more than 20 LP but only 3k LINK

>>20951146
>why do you have 20% of X and 80% of Y in total having half a million instead of having 50% X and 50% Y in total also half a million

>>20950856
>T Systems are now node operators. Who's to say they won't offer staking? Even if they take a %age of the profit
You don't seem to understand that they don't need your liquidity. It's like >>20950256 said, why would they share their oracle's payments with you? They can afford to invest by themselves and obtain 100% of the payments for themselves instead of distributing it among retail stakers.

>>20952115
>Does the value of linkpool really depend on you guys convincing people that linkpool will be the only place to stake? As if the entire reliability of the network didn’t depend on being decentralized and having many nodes running. What a scam
Are you aware that independent node operators will be able to stake on their nodes, right? If you run your node that's great, you are contributing to the ecosystem by pushing further decentralization, if you are just a retail "liquidity provider" but not a node operator I have bad news for you, the only company trying to decentralize the liquidity provider aspect of the ecosystem by allowing retail investors to provide liquidity to node operators is LinkPool

>>20952333
So no one will offer reasonable rates of return, apart from Linkpool? Come on man, surely you can see this has to be fud?

>>20950455
5000 LINK
10 LINKPOOL
here
I'm a fucking genius

>>20953069
It's not about offering good or bad returns, it's about why the fuck would a company share their profits with retailer when they have enough liquidity already in order to cover their penalty stack and get 100% of their income for themselves. Node operators will become staking pools using LinkPool contracts as per this article https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f