/biz/ - Business & Finance

10 usd before edcon 2020 (09th -11th august)
Mark my words.

tomorrow
yes

>>20859864
Let's not get ahead of ourselves here, i was serious, there's no way it gets to 10 before EDCON right?

>>20859832
Ugh, when new logo selected???

>>20859922
First part ending 5th of August, then there's the BUIDL holders and core team voting until the 22

So i guess by end of august we'll finally have the new logo: https://brandcontest.dfohub.com/

uniswap is its biggest barrier to entry right now, seeing lots of pajeets struggling to throw their rupees at it

>>20860035
Good! End of August seems so far. I hope a logo without a ghost wins.

scam scam scam

>>20860406
still salty julian

>>20860406
your momma is scam, butthurt faggot.
Now, C O P E

I think it will hit $10 this year, possibly after EDCON but who knows. It could start crabbing again for a few months.

>>20860632
lmao

>DFOs mean you can simply edit a contract instead of having to make a new token
>makes new token

BUILDL and ARTE are gonna pump for sure

>>20860059
If one cant use uniswap, how is one able to feed oneself?

>>20860406
MUUUUUUUUUUUUHHH MAFIAAAAAAAAAA MAFIA GON KILL US ALL FOR BUYING THEIR MONEY LAUNDERING TOKEN

So here are all the current MCs of the projects speaking at EDCON, in order:

$0.6m ARTE
$6.7m BUIDL

$35m DATA
$60.6m GNT
$67.4m AVA
$80.7m RLC
$113.9m CKB
$121.8m STX
$125.8m LRC
$209.7m UMA
$402.9m AAVE
$845.8m ETC
$2,865.5m LINK
$37,065.9m ETH


And here are their peak MCs, in order:

$0.6m ARTE
$6.7m BUIDL

$67.9m AVA
$121.7m CKB
$135.1m STX
$220.3m UMA
$308.2m RLC
$307.8m DATA
$446.1m AAVE
$920.4m GNT
$968.2m LRC
$3,308.6m LINK
$4,395.4m ETC
$149,491.5m ETH


If our two were to beat even just AVA:

ARTE would do a 108x
BUIDL would do a 10x

If they were to beat half, and sit between DATA and AAVE:

ARTE would do a 491x
BUIDL would do a 45x


Truth be told, they can do even better than that. $BUIDL and $ARTE confirmed for mega moonshots

>>20860804
idk but i cant see the value around ARTE (yet). care to shill?

>>20860683
would it also not be possible to fix contracts like the uniswap routers?

>>20860683
How to solve governance problem without token and still be decentralized brainlet?

At this point it’s not even worth worrying about the price. There is no way this isn’t going to at least 1 billion MC and it will get there a lot faster than you’ll think. It solves a huge problem with smart contract development and with robe allows decentralisation of the front end. This is the definitive decentralised Web 3.0 developers framework. It’s going to make all of the pipe dreams we’ve heard talked about over the last few years finally become a reality. It’s beyond huge.

>>20861042
i have a comfy bag but you're making me fomo for a bigger one

>>20861042
Fucking this

>>20861042
Amen. Need to buy moar.

>>20860718
uniswap only might be ok for now but at some point it needs exchanges, but the team doesn't seem to care about that at all.

>>20862695
exchanges are so 2017, those cunts throttle progress and manipulate the market for themselves, CZ charges millions for listing a coin and a large chunk of your team tokens. DEX is the way forward. hope binance die this year.

>>20862695
They don't, but if the trading volume is good some exchanges might list without having to pay

countdown to EDCON 2020

BUIDL is the project with the lowest market cap of EDCON 2020.
It has ENORMOUS potential if you ask me....

>>20863779
You just know Vitalik will be watching. What time/day is he speaking?

>>20863056
Def with leverage where?

It will get listed on bigger exchanges. Im so comfy to be in this gem before all the redditcucks find out about it.

>>20864140
09th August.
Vitalik will be watching
But not only Vitalik.
Its a huge event.

>>20863056
+1

>>20865501
I am ready, pamp eet

Some of the guys running it look like scammers from Italia

>>20866043
they're respeced og eth devs

WTF
I TRIED TO SELL 3,000 TOKENS AND A WHITE VAN JUST PULLED UP AT MY HOUSE
MEDITERRANEAN LOOKING MEN IN SUITS ARE STANDING OUTSIDE MY HOUSE

WHAT THE FUCK DO I DO?!??

uh oh trannycoin

>>20867175
NGMI

I told you to buy ARTE

>>20867313
my MANNN - got in from a thread yesterday, idk if it was you
randomly checked my phone to a comfy 3x this morning - the only thing I regret is that I didn't buy more desu

>>20867432

It was probably me. It corrected violent after mooning just now but that's fair enough lol. Enjoy the ride

>>20866669
wait it out, move to a dummy wallet and sell there to send them off on another hit

>>20867175
censorship resistance works both ways, nazi's or tranny's.....interesting you immediately thought of the trannys

>>20860035
So it's still going to have the shit logo for edcon? This is going nowhere

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I am buying so much $BUIDL

>>20868599

The logo is a pleb filter, people at EDCON aren't so retarded as to judge a book by its cover

>>20859864
based

mornin /biz/, just entered back in let's gooooooo

HEAD AND SHOULDER PATTERN FORMING
$2.8 FAILED TO BREAK

IT'S UNIRONICALLY OVER

Reminder: devs own 400% of circulating supply. The circulating supply will inflate by 400% when they sell it in one year. This is priced in and will prevent this from going above $5 ever

>>20869948
Zoom out

>>20870007
reminder if the devs ever start dumping we can vote to redistribute funds to user wallets and strongly mitigate the teams ability to control the price

>>20870007

Reminder: the is asshattery with no basis in reality, your facts and figures are nothing more than lies, take your meds julian

>>20870043
Cope. Theres nothing you can do when they immediately sell them all OTC the first day its unlocked.

And then a few VC faggots will have more voting power than all of you combined and can vote to redistribute all of YOUR tokens to their wallet. Lmfao

>>20870139
we can start working of the functionality to distribute tokens based on withdrawls from the dev wallet today if you want. I'm not the best solidity dev but if you guys know your shit we can probably build it in a day or two

>>20870183
VC funds are only sold on condition they are locked lol imagine trying this hard to fud and being named Julian must fucking suck for you

You know the project is good when mafia fud is the only thing we can't prove lol

Nice logo. Yeah im not going to trust my money with a pixel rainbow ghost. Is the ghost going to vanish like all the money soon will?

>>20870792
How retarded do you have to be to not know they have a rebrand going on with a contest that has been shipped 100 times in here?

>>20871154
he just wants to get in under a dollar but it's literally never happening

>>20870792
it's a Mafia money laundering scheme. They made the logo as gay and innocent as possible to not be suspected of any malicious intent

>>20866303
Is that so? Honestly asking. Iam at the verge of buying huge amount.... FOOOMMOOOOOOOO

>>20871154
Oh i know. Why would you promote a unfinished rushed project then? Seeing the shitty rushed logo makes me think the entire operation is a rushed afterthought. What a complete joke. If you want to be a zoomer go ahead and buy the shiny gay rainbow coin. I will choose not to because i cant trust anyone who doesn't care about their professional appearance

>>20871196
it's true. last time I tried to sell I was cornered outside my office building and a tall man in a green suit literally jumped on my head screaming "BRAVO ARRIVEDERCI LINGUINI GOOMBA" fuck this shit I'm changing my identity and moving to Canada

>>20871248
>the entire operation is a rushed afterthought
they were working on it for at least 18 months before it was released

honestly, why don't we have mafia memes
I'm shit at drawing but it would be hillarious to have mafia tuxedo pepes along the channels of Venice with BUIDL logo on their suit tying rocks to the legs of a red wojak that had apparently sold

>>20867432
it might have been me if you were the dopamine anon in the bzr thread kek

Could BUIDL holders vote to hire a professional graphic designer to design a logo with the community funds?

>>20871789
i have grown to like the logo - something comfy about it, i think its the colors in the back

>>20871789
nu buidl logo already decided

>>20871839
is this yours anon? if it is, consider making the weight of the lines thinner. it looks heavy right now. (to me) other than that its awesome.

>>20872056
there is a better version floating around without the rainbow, the artist is a /biz/ fag he's in a lot of these threads. I think we should all agree to support his design, whichever one of them we decide on (pls no rainbow it's too noisey, looks bad when thumbnailed)

>>20872106
i have been seeing his logo. i like it, just needs a tiny bit tweeking

>>20872056
no not mine but the one ill be voting for
>>20872106
the monotone version is good too but this one strikes just the right balance for me.

What if just the eye was rainbow

Oof we have a new contender

>>20872434
idk why it darkens when enlarged

took a screenshot, i think this is my new favourite

new logo

>>20870395
HAHAHA THIS. +1

>>20860729
I still kek everytime I see that in the voting options

Comfy, very comfy. Can’t wait for the future of this gem.

About Vitalik Buterin and Buidl;


“It's not about whether or not other ETH dev is aware of DFO project; he is aware of (or will eventually realize) the need for a flexible governance protocol to control DAOs and fully-on-chain dapps (also storage of all data on web3 potentially [think about it]).

DOFhub is "the protocol of protocols" and will become an essential layer of sorts for the entire Ethereum ecosystem (which will be at the center of the internet-of-internets). Watch every dapp (and company) on Eth (for now) cede control to DAOs; then watch those DAOs get a DFO layer for flexibility and future-proofing. Also this theory suggests that yes, Vitalik Buterin is aware “

what's everybody's target post-EDCON? smallest project there...
>$4-6

>>20873299

my conservative estimates:

10m MC pre-edcon
arte 2m

>>20873299
Low 5 high 11

>>20873299
Honestly it will probably dump

>>20873299
Probably $6-7

HASTA LA VISTA JULIAN, YOU RAT BASTARD

>>20873943
IL CAPO

>>20873943
BASED

>>20873768

i see you Julian ID. see >>20873943 for your impending fate

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHY IS ARTE DUMPING I BOUGHT AT $4.8

>>20874141

Zoom out

>>20874306
I actually regret not putting my money into this when I was shopping on 28th. I picked DEV instead because I was unaware this existed, which yielded 0% gains. Not that I can complain about DEV's returns, atleast it wasn't less

>>20871330
And after 18 months they decided a ghost emoji over the gay pride flag is a good professional logo. Even worse

>>20874442
they are severely autistic anon, not artistic

There's a difference between unprofessionalism and autism. An autist just creates a text-form website like TRND does it. It's does the job without feeling the need to impress anyone. But it isn't necessarily unprofessional like, for example, hosting your meetup in a rented backroom belonging to a sex club or whatever...

>>20874784
>imagine making money off an unprofessional logo
fuck all the Julians in the whole world

>>20874442
Anon, gays don't own rainbows.
Also they're super trendy for "professional" logos anyway, if you saw any corporate Twitter accounts last month.

>>20874843

fuck ALL of them to the bottom of the lake

>NOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST HAVE THE SAME COLORS AS LGBT!!!! I CAN'T BUY THIS NOW BECAUSE MY MIDDLE SCHOOL FRIENDS WILL THINK IM GAY!!!! IM TAKING MY MONEY ELSEWHERE

>>20874442
This. Like holy shit guys get it together. Is the team made up lgbt zoomers?

>>20875402
Rainbows can be aesthetic, just not the piece of shit one they chose. What a fucking joke

It looks like they made the logo in minecraft and then put the snapchat ghost on it. Im fucking rolling right now

>>20870007
18 months not a year

From their Twitter.

give it too me straight boys... I threw 1 eth will I make it?

>>20875860
sui stack is 420 but you will be glad you bought

I was thinking of buying this coin but I'm not anymore I actually did my own research, looked at etherscan and 95% of supply is in 3 wallets.
Be careful anons, rug pull is imminent

I don't think this thing will ever sustain a mcap over 50M.

It's like DAOstacks, it's not that better.
It's a niche inside a niche.

What's the mcap now?
Maybe a x10 possible

>>20875899
just buy back in Jules you can still make shitloads

>>20875850
>fartghost is winning
Democracy was a mistake.

>>20875923
here is DAOstacks admitting they have no idea how to solve the governance problem

>>20875899
are you retarded? you did "rsearch" and still don't know that the tokens are locked till 2022? And the token holders vote on how they will be released?

Get the fuck outta here julian

>>20875850
>>20875949
this is just a crowdfunding sale for the artists to generate art, the actual vote for the logo takes place in a couple weeks

>>20875850
the top #1 #3 #4 are good but the best is the 2nd on the top row. The little space ship one. If they started with that i would be a long time holder. Its all about the logo to me.

>>20875923
Think bigger.

>get the fuck out of here julian

>>20876080
LMAO

fucking tard stay poor

>>20875949
I think that one is alright, definitely one of the most unique and gets rid of the rainbow. Personally I hope pink wojak wins.

Still have no idea what this shit is. Im just here for the logo FUD. That being said, GODDDDD DAMMMMMMN! What were they thinking?

>>20876175
I like the rainbow. I can take or leave the ghost.

>>20876175
>>20876201
I liked this one at first, there are some good options, but I think we need to vote strategically to make sure something good wins rather than making factions and splitting the /biz/ vote. remember, we might be the deciding factor in the vote as one of the few sizable communities holding buidl

>>20875949
you do realize that's a guy voting for his own submission so he gets the eth buidl and arte prize right? real vote is Aug 5 to 22

>>20872434
whoever created this one can you edit it so it's white when enlarged like >>20872539 ?

Okay guys i took a try at the logo contest. Its my take on the rainbow ghost. I really tried to get in the heads of the devs to create this and really tried understand their thinking. I feel like I did an alright job. I know I wont win but im thinking top 10 would be reasonable

>>20876413
I'd honestly take this over the piece of shit that has the most votes according to >>20875850

So I just took a look at the no. of holders and thought to myself it's growing fast at over 700. Then I took a link at shitlink for comparison and saw there are 178 THOUSAND wallets. Damn boi we are still so early.

>>20876382
I just put a white background in

>>20876457
The ghost you are talking about looks smug and its farting. Mine is aristocratic

>>20876324
I really like that one too. Or maybe playing with the color scheme it could look even better. Not like pic related, but I just really like the way the ghost looks in yours or pic related + the hammer for "building" is really well done. I think some form of yours or pic related is really my personal favorite, if we can find the perfect colors it'd look the best.

>>20876201
Honestly why are there so many ghost designs? It just looks meme-y and scammy. Really think they should take a different or simpler direction if they want to look like a serious project.

but dfo

Someone make a hammer with a blue checkered flanell texture and submit it to them

>>20876620
brand is a ghost because no one is in charge of startups or it's like anonymous or censorship proof idk they are autistic who cares, we vote for something professional looking come time and moon because the tech has no competition. the logo is just drag to be eliminated, literally anything acceptable = moon

With programmable equities, does it mean you can basically program every single token?

Btw, I know none of you can predict the price movement, but I hope ARTE reaches a $2 million market cap atleast this month. I bought gold with all my savings so I want to atleast recoup what I spent. But now I just rely on hopium for this to ever happen

one of my fav projects once you look into it. other ones are focused on defi like ren and snx. trying to look ahead anons

>>20876973
you don't program on the tokens themselves. the tokens are your share of the equity, and all of those equities are programmable. I want to post two images so this will be a two part post. so first off this is the structure of a DFO, each of these DFOs has governance tokens, so those tokens give equity in the DFO. this is a lot like most investments so far. you could have equity in bitcoin in the same way. but, if we look at the pic again, the equity IS the voting rights over programming. it's as if you not only have equity in the sense of ownership over a % of the supply, but ownership of the development of the equity itself. 1/2

>>20876973
>>20878112
so this pic related shows me accessing the DFOhub DFO, where I can upload proposals which can be voted into the protocol itself. since they moved buidl to v2, DFOhub is now ONLY programmable through this proposal platform. the devs don’t have any special access, all their updates need to be approved by the community. in a really real sense, you are in charge of how your equity is programmed. the community doesn’t like the 1.5% generation fee? we can change it. we can remove it. we need more liquidity? program a proposal to open up more space in the 12 mo staking period and if the community supports the idea we can implement it. and that generation fee I was talking about? 1.5% of every DFO is owned by the holders of buidl, and how that equity is used is, of course, a matter of community decision 2/2

>>20876766
>Image may contain: one or more people
Truly autism at its finest, buying more

reminder that the clone of ampl, a token which itself doesn't even work, has a higher market cap than buidl after 2 days. buidl hasn't even begun to pop off and everyone itt is early

>>20878429
the fools chasing fool money. no reason to pay them any mind