/biz/ - Business & Finance

People will be blown away once they understand the power of content curation and Kleros helps the world decide on what news is fake. We're going to be the new fact checkers. Imagine Snopes but decentralized without the agenda driven bullshit. Twitter and Facebook will eventually be forced to integrate Kleros on their platform.

>>20731050
>>20731256
Thanks anons, just sold my entire stack.

>>20731050
>>20731256
so what do you guys expect? How high will it be

>EOY,
>2021,
>2020,
>2025?

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo

>>20731256
It is scary and exhilirating to realize we are actually going to make it.

>>20731289
How does 1 trillion sound?

what is case 302 about. if you should be allowed to upload a 300x300 logo as an avatar to tron-fanforum.org?

>>20731050
Nice, just sold

>>20731050
How how is it going to pump? Can't you just rig the results? Let's say I buy more votes than the opposite side even tho my stance is incorrect this shit is still going to register it as valid no?

>>20731050
Just waiting for the moon, comfy with my stack

>>20731289
>$.50 EOY
>$3 2021
>$100 2025

>>20731282
>>20731346
Brainlets

>>20731358
Then buy more PNK yourself and stake them. This self-reinforcing feedback loop is exactly why PNK will moon. In any case, there are incentives in place to make sure voting honestly is always the best strategy (secret votes, appeals).

>>20731310
Feels good fren

>>20731358
That like saying one could just buy enough hash power to push an invalid block onto the Bitcoin blockchain. Sure, possible in theory, but financially infeasible

>>20731828
Nigga of course now you need alot of gunpowder for btc but pnk as It is is small and group of whales can fuck around

what an absolute dumpster of a court this is lmao, one guy presents 9 most reputable sources jurors denies him, the other makes a video and jurors go with him, oh and by the way this time we let the outlier wins because 2 people spaming telgram chat all day but next time we go with consensus, actually not really we just wait and see what the plutocrats vote on and follow them lol what a joke, this thing will never scale.

>>20732862
Nice copy pasta

>>20731050
to me, this showed that even kleros can come up again cases that are not resolvable
it is not possible to go exhume all the bodies postmortem to determine the cause of death
official counts are not in agreement, it is an unanswerable question
people are just trying to game the system

>>20732953
I'm not fuding, i didn't lose anything on this case, I wanted to invest in kleros but now I see the flaws

this was not justice, this was 2 people making decisions lol

their influence was much more than just the 163votes, you can probably see it on-chain but once the 2nd whale voted the rest followed, anyways, maybe one day you'll see what I see, I'm moving on, good luck

>>20733013
To me this shows the little fucking pea brain that you have. If this isn’t bullish for you then you’re dumber than a bitch

>>20733027
>2 people making decisions
>1 80 vote whale chose no
>1 83 whale votes yes
They cancelled out you fucking queer lol this is how I know you’re a fuddin faggot that already has a bag with this brainlet tiered response. Kys incel

>>20733013
Although I understand your sentiment I need to explain that people allegedly tried to game the system according to people like you who don't seem to understand that the system worked and even if said people were trying to do what you claim then they still failed because once again the system works. I'm not sure what you're problem is here.

>>20733027
I somehow responded to the wrong post and anon. If you're gone for real, good luck. Your intentions seem sincere so I hope you reconsider and stay with us.

>>20731256
Time to sell

>>20733305
We don’t need a beta incel with a sub 100k stack. He’s a cuck and and an incel

>>20733305
>>20733173
I don't want to argue on this anymore, but I'll say something, Jurors don't care about Kleros, they just want to make money, this incentive alone will destroy kleros, and to the omen team, you just opened yourselves up to a real mess that will eventually be brought up in the futur, that plutocrat with the 80votes who voted yes, congratulations you killed your project, you won't see it now, but you will, I'd give it 6-12 months and I will be watching

Sirs, I sold a tiny bit of my gains at 0.7c because my cow was sick so I buy medecine for my cow
But now that my cow is healthy, I will go and sell her milk at market sir. I will then buy back more Kleros sirs

Sorry sirs

>>20732273
Sure, but they would be destroying their own money. Why would anybody do that just for shits?

>>20733364
>They just want to make money
>Unironically arguing why Kleros works
Stay poor buddy.

>>20733474
Ok, Ranjeesh. Next time please tell us before you sell. Otherwise sirs will be mad at you.

>>20733950
this was not justice, this was 2 people making decisions lol

>>20733364
their influence was much more than just the 163votes, you can probably see it on-chain but once the 2nd whale voted the rest followed, anyways, maybe one day you'll see what I see, I'm moving on, good luck

>>20733364
This isTHE absolute worst fud attempt you can come up with. The fact that you think YES was the wrong choice just shows how deluded you are. Case 302 shows that kleros works.

>>20734741
Move on already you beta twat. This whole board knows you’re a little bitch irl. You probably wouldn’t even know what to do with a pussy if it peed in your face. Get lost

>>20733364
Yes was absolutely the right choice. I wasn’t staking so had no say in the matter but if you were to read the question LITERALLY as opposed to inferring subtext like a brainlet, it had to be yes. Seethe.

>>20734850
if CMC showed eth at 200, binance 199, coingecko 201, and uniswap 300, what would you say the reported price of eth is?

>>20734870
if I say you're a three leged alien does that make it true ?

>>20734492
they will when people start to refrence case 302 outcome in futur cases

>>20734703
What is your argument even? The net effect of both votes was +3 for yes. Are you retarded anon?

>>20735245
I'm in the no camp sure, and so is google bing worldmeter covidtrackingdata who cdc reuters NYtimes

>>20734959
If the question is “had ETH traded over 300” then I’d answer yes, your fucking clown
You got proven wrong in a decentralized court by a jury of 40+ people. You just got shrekt

>>20735545
yep, there is just an overwhelming amount of sources sitting in the no camp and they just can't stop talking about there beloved statnews lol

>>20734959
The question wasn’t “What was the reported number” - It’s about “a” (read: ONE) ((1)) outlet reporting a certain thing, or not. It doesn’t matter if every other outlet says one thing, if ONE reputable outlet says the other, that fulfils the question. Even if only 1 death occured, the question was, will ONE reputable outlet report over a thousand. If they wanted it to be anything else they should’ve phrased the question better.

>>20735007
No because it’s not about what it literally *is* but what was reported.

>>20735404
The no camp misunderstands the question then. The actual number of deaths, most would agree with no hangups, was under 1000, but the question posits whether or not over 1000 was REPORTED

>>20735404
How was this vote decided by 2 people? Not counting these whales, there are 40+ No votes and 180+ Yes votes you absolute brainlet.

honestly I should be getting payed for these advisory comments lmao

>>20735591
The question isn’t what is the consensus, the question is if they reported it.
Literally just dispute this argument — John Hopkins, one of the best medical universities in the world, reports over 1k twice in the first 14 days. What do you say to that?
You can’t get out of this one. “Outlier” isn’t how investigations and research works. It still counts. That’s not even mentioning that it isn’t an outlier because others have reported within 100-50 deaths on those same days

>>20735752
>payed
>not paid
Yea, maybe in rupees you fucking pajeet

>>20735769
I'd argue the CDC in this us and WHO in the world, both reported a 'no' answer anyways.

>>20735752
You probably are, by Jorge.
Cry more

>>20735613
the word "reported" dosn't mean a reputable source, it means "someone" or "anyone" including a random facebook post, if go on this basis, the whole question should be invalid at best.

Under the omen rules section: Default Assumptions: the market is trying to predict whether the number of COVID19(not MERS, not SARS1) deaths is going to be 1000(or above) deaths in the first 14 days of July 2020 (not any other year). (just like when there is no time given we’d assume a UTC timezone -when there is no year given we'd assume 2020 - When there is no source given we’d assume the most reputable one). The most reputable one is the CDC by far, or you could argue it's worlmeter because of their reach and alexa ranking. Another example would be like the price of ETH on CMC was 200.00, Coinbase 201.00, Binance 199.95, and Uniswap showed 250.10 and somehow you the Yes camp would say the price of eth is 250… In the absence of clear source, we result to the most reputable one, coming back to this market: the Center for Disease Control (CDC) is the authority on this not some uni…, The answer is no.

one might argue the market is predicting whether "someone" reports more than 1000, to this I say that "someone" could be "anyone" rendering the whole question invalid.

>>20735912
>When there is no source given we’d assume the most reputable one
Quite simply no, your whole argument falls apart on this assumption. Nobody asked you that. You were asked f it was reported at all, not if it was reported by a single most reputable source
God you are stupid. You just have a poor grasp of the English language

>>20735752
Cringe.

>>20735859
yeah.. anyways that's a problem for another day lol, today it's clear who the authority on a pandamic is.

>>20735867
No wonder why you’re so confused. Your English is fucking terrible. You’re supposed to be on our side, pajeet.

>>20735839
God you’re fucking stupid. You can’t just ignore an oppositions argument that wins the case and say “but what about if we ignore it?”

>>20736006
Yes. Universities are. As it should be.
KLEROS $4.20 EOY

how can anyone watch this without voting yes and wanting to buy so much pnk to get in on the next case
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25hFyjQ0PJI

internet flame wars will never be the same
imagine if we had this thing around for the console wars

>>20736006
>Pandamic

>>20736495

>>20736607
Based

>>20731323
JEJ