[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 44 KB, 1200x560, linkpool.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20168526 No.20168526 [Reply] [Original]

Remember last week when I was telling you to buy LinkPool at 36 ETH a share?

Now it's 68 ETH per LP.
Tick tock.

>> No.20168640

>>20168526
https://youtu.be/JRObURKH_tk?t=2190

>> No.20168723

>>20168526
I didn't have 36 eth then and I don't have 68 eth now.
Shut the fuck up.

>> No.20168748

>>20168526
not buying your bags, link has given me a 3x from march

>> No.20168749

Told everyone in the RPL threads that unit price is not important and LP is undervalued relative to RPL. No one listened. Now RPL has tanked and LP is up.

Sold my RPL to buy 2 LP shares, incredibly comfy.

>> No.20168780

>>20168748
LP has 68x since ICO

>> No.20168784

>>20168723
>>20168748
Reminder that 1 LP share will ultimately pay out over 10,000 LINK over the next few years. And that's a conservative estimate.

>> No.20168844

>>20168784
not buying your bags sorry lil buddy

>> No.20169030

>>20168844
You're poor.

>> No.20169303

>>20168784
based on what?

>> No.20169341

That buy/sells gap... you really think we're this stupid?

>> No.20169410

why should I buy this if I can stake Linkies on my own?

>> No.20169558

>>20168526
I was going to buy some in may but forgot and now fuck me I missed out

>> No.20169587

>>20169410
Priority to stake from the beginning

>> No.20169591

>>20168526
I'm still pissed off that I couldn't buy this during the initial offering. I'll always be jealous that you all could.

>> No.20169626

>>20169410
What data are you gonna sell? Where will you get the data from? Why should somebody choose your stupid neet node over a quality node?

>> No.20169635

>>20168526
someone just bought a bunch and cleared the book again. nice. it should never be below 777ETH per 1 LP

>> No.20169641
File: 141 KB, 1200x1200, 1594095190675.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20169641

>>20168526
I've got 0.04 LP. What am I in for?

>> No.20169661

>>20169410
If you can stake on your own you might want to list your node as a pool on Linkpool so people can stake with you, giving you a chance to acces higher value contracts. You dont need LP shares for that tho, of course.

>> No.20169684

>>20169626
I don't care. LP shares give me a cut from all node operators on the platform AND from ETH 2.0 stakers. I am not going to run an oracle node, I am no company, I just want passive income.

>> No.20169719

>>20168526
Curious to see how this all plays out. It's hard to believe a single staking pool token will pay out more than having accumulated more LINK and the staking gains there, but if LP is processing trillions of dollars then maybe a single LP really will be all you ever needed. When they first came around I thought it was a nice idea in theory but that when there were thousands of nodes nobody would ever choose LinkPool. Then of course, they started the KYC program & Johnny joined Chainlink. Pretty much sealed the fate of LP as a positive one. I am sure the original buyers will be VERY happy, but for 68 ETH per LP right now it's hard to say if people buying in will win. That's a higher return than LINK itself.

>> No.20169747
File: 377 KB, 750x742, 1592540309396.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20169747

1lp here, comfy as fuck

>> No.20169778

>>20169661
>If you can stake on your own you might want to list your node as a pool on Linkpool so people can stake with you, giving you a chance to acces higher value contracts. You dont need LP shares for that tho, of course.
I don't need LP shares for that well... so if I stake with other frens toghete do I have to give some of my profits to Lin pool shares?

>> No.20169801

>>20169778
to link pool?*

>> No.20169846

are the horse rumors true?

>> No.20169953

>>20169778
I would imagine so, yes. Might be a subscription like NaaS or a percentage of your revenue. https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f

>> No.20169997

>>20169953
>a percentage of your revenue
50%? like coinbase?

>> No.20170002

2 LP and a nice stack of link. Supremely comfy. The LP fomo hasn't even started yet and look at the price. Never selling my golden goose, though. You'll have to get your poolies elsewhere.

>> No.20170082

>>20169997
I don't know, anon. If you're actually interested you should ask jonny, he or another team member will definitely help you on your way. Also, give the article a look it kinda shows how they are zooming out from link and setting their sights on the pooling industry in general.

>> No.20170149

>>20170082
I doubt it would be 50% tho. There was another anon a couple days ago saying his NaaS subscription was very reasonable with great service from the linkpool guys so you could expect a similar experience with this, I would say.

>> No.20170344

>>20168780
Incorrect. LP has done a x68*1.4 since ICO

>> No.20170395
File: 9 KB, 225x225, 1559888207740.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20170395

>>20168526
Why wouldn't I just buy more actual link tokens instead? LINK went from $1 to $5.50 in a year

It was 36 ETH per share like half a year ago too, I smell pump and dump tranny antics.

>> No.20170658

>>20168526
reminder that 68 per is still a steal and one linkpool share will eventually be worth 500k usd.

>> No.20170809

I find it unsettling that LP is being shilled so heavily here for the last few days. My spidey senses are tingling desu. 68 ETH for 1 LP is a joke. Thats $16200 to stake 10k Link. Someone is getting greedy.

>> No.20170846

>>20168784
Kek I hold LP but you are delusional. There are 4000 LP so according to you LP will earn 40 million link over the next few years?

>> No.20170854

>>20170149
>I doubt it would be 50% tho
yes because LP is interstead in having the vast majority of Linkies to stake in order to serve a lot of requests

>> No.20170856

I have 3.68 LP from ICO. Am I going to make it?

>> No.20170887

>>20170809
>Thats $16200 to stake 10k Link
you don't need LPto stake with them

>> No.20170894

>>20170658
This

>>20170809
Lp's primary purpose is the distribution of dividends. Priority staking is only an afterthought

>> No.20171179

>>20170395

Well yeah, the actual holders decreased from 657 to 655 there after the 68 eth buy.

Also for people who don't check it, someone spent 8 ETH at this price. Its not tonnes of people buying at 68 eth. Its some person, who already owned LP buying more LP at this price. Number of holders dropped by 2 since this run started. In total, it has taken 64 ETH to drive the price from 47 ETH up to 68 ETH.

15,000 USD to drive the price up by 47% in an INCREDIBLY illiquid market. That's the bet. You can't dump if you buy, so once you do, you're stuck.

>> No.20171264

>>20171179
I'm not stuck anywhere you dumb asshole. I've got 5 LP and I'll be using all of them to stake my LINK. If I sell them I won't be able to stake all my LINK. It's that simple. They aren't for sale.

>> No.20171349

>>20168526
I wish I got a bag early. There is 0 chance I am buying at this price.

>> No.20171380

>>20170854
Sure, but I sincerely doubt any node operator is going to accept a 50% cut. So I expect a lower percentage cut (if they even decide to take cuts like this)

>> No.20171388

>>20171264

Yeah and I have 3.64LP you dumb fag. Put in 2.5 ETH into the ICO. I don't give a fuck. This is a blatant shill thread, trying to con young anons out of buying LINK by buying a ridiculously overpriced LP share now.

I plan on staking too, but jesus christ fuck off. this is clearly a shill thread you kike

>> No.20171409

>>20171388

*3.4

>> No.20171440

>>20171179

fucking brainlet.

>> No.20171477

>>20171388
you can check them 8's of hate at the door. frens only zone anon

>> No.20171496

>>20171388
>overpriced.
Eh. No one said staking would be free. If you don't like the price then don't buy any. Just hold your LINK for a year or however long and wait for other staking opportunities that suit your budget.

>> No.20171805

>>20170846
exponential decay bro

>> No.20172009
File: 6 KB, 237x240, 1593558486723.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20172009

>>20171388
you put 2.5 ETH in the ICO?

>> No.20172412
File: 60 KB, 986x442, Screenshot 2020-07-07 at 18.59.08.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20172412

>>20171440
>>20171477
>>20171496

Discord Jannies
>>20172009

Around that yeah, it was 2.4 as you had to do it in 0.2 bits of ETH. Regardless, this is a shill thread. I have mine. idc

>> No.20172437

>>20170658
>>20170894
>>20171264
>>20171496
>>20171477
>>20171440
>>20171409

Jannies out and about trying to pump linkpool. Watch out frens

>> No.20173175

>>20168526
This. Time is literally running out of being able to own a full LP for most people.
Remember that Linkpool will...
...stake tens of milions of Link filling the highest value data requests
... stake hundreds of thousands of ETH
... provide additional services like NaaS
...generate even more income from the market.link services

>LP is overpriced
Don't look at nominal prices! There are only 1000 shares in circulation, so of course a single share can't be in the pennies, like the shitcoins with trillions of supply.
Linkpools market cap is actually still really small.