/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20129084
Link will eventually be able to do what RLC does

>even the memes are a shit iteration of the Link one

>>20129111
THIS IS NOT TRUE ANON LINK NEEDS RLC IT IS PROVEN HERE
YOU NEEEEEEEED TO STAY UP TO DATEW ANON. THIS GAME IS VERY FAST AND TECHNOLOGICAL. THIS ISN'T LINK VS RLC BUT GAINS VS GAINS

>>20129133
My understanding of Link and RLC leads me to conclude that they are competitors in the same space, where Link has the clear advantange.

Link and RLC perform off chain work whose results can be trusted. They differ initially on what kinds of work they decided to focus on. RLC focused on computation, Link on data retrieval. But both can be modified to do the other.

Link has far greater visibility and I am assuming Link's consensus mechanisms are superior to RLC's. As such Link ultimately is a "better" RLC.

Is this not correct?

TECH

GIANT

>>20129182
RLC IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED AS A MARKETPLACE FOR CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA.
LINK IS SPECIFICALLY DEISGIGNED TO BE AN ORACLE TO CONNECT WEB2 TO WEB3.
THE TWO ARE NOT THE SAME. YES RLC HAS ORACLES, BUT LINK HAS NOT PROVEN HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTATION ON A BLOCKCHAIN AND IF IT WERE POSSIBLE IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG FOR IT TO BE WORTHWHILE SINCE IEXEC IS ALREADY REALLY FAR AHEAD

>>20129182
AND I FORGOT ABOUT CONSENSUS MECHANISMS, THEY ARE BASICALLY THE SAME.
PLEASE KEEP UP ANON, DO MORE RESEARCH

>>20129182
>Link's consensus mechanisms are superior to RLC's
chainlink doesent have off-chain consensus
it's built to be a on-chain medianizer (average the results) or true==true within the smart contracts

iexec is built on distributed computing tech like folding@home where there's off-chain consensus

>>20129269
>>20129213
>>20129231

Are there any competitors to RLC for off-chain computation? How many partners are currently/planning to work with RLC?

>>20129213
>>20129231
>>20129269
Not that this matters, but the name/branding is cringe-tier and not aesthetic at all like blessed Link

>>20129291
>COMPETITORS
NOT REALLY, SOME SAY GOLEM BUT THOSE PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND RLC.
>PARTNERS
A GOOD AMOUNT OF HIGH CLASS PARTNERS LIKE EDF, INTEL, IBM AND MORE. OF COURSE THERE ARE MORE PLANMING, RLC WILL BE THE WORLD COMPUTER

>>20129323
WRONG, WE HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE ILLUMINATI. THE BASIC BRANDINNG AND WEIRDNESS IS OUR BIGGEST STRENGTH

>>20129291
currently golem is their #1 competitor but iexec started off with existing tech the team already built so they're ahead
>>20129323
chainlink and iexec are completely different projects and its not logical to compare them

>>20129344
>>20129269

What about the tokenomics? Link has staking and a limited supply which makes it an ideal token. How about RLC?

>>20129360
I disagree but by "biggest strength" you mean it being forgettable is it's strength?

>>20129371
If you can query APIs and return the results, you can most certainly do computation and return the results.

>>20129379
RLC's TOKENOMICS ARE STAKING AND 11.5X LESS SUPPLY THAN LINKS.
LINK IS 1.6B MC
RLC IS 65M MC
RLC CAN GO EXTREMELY HIGH
>>20129371
GOLEM CANT DO 90% OF WHAT IEXEC CAN

>>20129402
Ok finally how about the team? There better not be any pajeets working on this.

>>20129397
EVERYONE USED TO THINK GOOGLE WAS A FUCKING STUPID NAME AND THOUGHT APPLE WAS A FUCKIGN STUPID NAME AND AMAZON WAS A FUCKING STUPID NAME????????? SO??????????? IEXEC??????????? YELLOW BALLS IN A TRIANGLE??????? STUPID BUT YOU WILL REMEMBER IT EVERY TIME YOU SEE IT.

YOU CAN QUERY API'S BUT CAN YOU DO PRIVATE COMPUTATIONS VERIFIED BY POCO WITH THE POWER OF MULTI-COMPUITATION IN A SINGLE WORKER POOL IN AN SGX ENCLAVE DRIVEN BY AN OPEN DECENTRALIZED MARKETPLACE? DOUBT IT

>>20129420
MOSTLY WHITE FRENCH ULTRAGENIUS CHADS WITH A SPRINKLE OF CHINESE MEGAMINDS

>>20129440
Its a stupid name

>>20129440
>>20129458
Fair enough. I'll consider it more. Thank you for the info

>>20129469
Seriously. But then again Neo used to be called AntShares, maybe they will do a rebranding?

>>20129112
>runs on a large amount of niggers

>>20129469
YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT THEN CHAD MAN
>>20129492
THE NAME HAS INTRINSIC SENSES IN IT.
IEXEC = I EXECUTE (RELATING TO COMPUTUING)
RLC = RUNS ON LOTS OF COMPUTERS
IT JUST MAKES SENSE ANONS

>>20129528
RLC I don't mind so much but iExec is obviously derivative of the i### trend which is outdated and gay

>>20129538
BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS
WHEN YOU SET UP A WORKER YOU ARE LITERALLY "I EXECUTE"

>>20129556
Doesn't mean a rebranding should be off of their table though. As shallow as it may seem a good rebranding will likely make it gain more attention here

>>20129574
>>20129574
THEY HAVE ALREADY BUILT TOO MUCH ON THEIR NAME AND BRAND IT WOULD BE SUICIDE TO START OVER !!!!!!!!!

>>20129084
Gilles won't betray us like Sergey

>>20129589
Nah rebrandings happen all the time man

>>20129574
iExec is fine, buy a bag or kys later

>>20129589
Maybe anons want that? Who would profit from deluxe suicide?

>>20129614
BUT DUDE IT WOULDN'T DO ANYTHING BUT MAKE GOOGLE SEARCHES WORSE. ITS NOT WORTH IT FOR A SMALL AMOUNT OF CRYPTO NEWS PRESS THAT WILL FADE THE NEXT DAY

>>20129635
Do you disagree that if they come up with a better name and logo that it would gain much more traction here?

WE FRENCH NOW

>>20129659
No here retards jump on any this that gose or will go up scum would lliterally jump on trannycoin with choped up dick logo if go 10x

>>20129659
MAYBE 3 YEARS AGO BUT TOO MUCH HAS BEEN BUILT. IT GROWS ON YOU AFTER A WHILE ANYWAYS. LIKE I SAID GOOGLE WAS DUMB, AMAZON ????????????, ETC. SO MANY DUMB NAMES

powerful

>>20129697
THE LOW AMOUNT OF ANONS POSTING ABOUT RLC SHOWS ME THAT BIZ IS GOING TO MISS OUT ON RLC LIKE THEY DID ON LINK
IT WILL BE 10$ VERY SOON

>>20129737
Well /biz/ didn't miss out on it, it was all it could talk about late 2017/early 2018. RLC was talked about more back then as well if I recall correctly but never as much as Link, although I am impressed to see it still being talked about, unlike say ODN

t. 34k link holder

>>20129737
they had 3 years, fuck retards
the ship is full, let's go to $10

>>20129762
>>20129737
Why are you peeps suddenly saying it's going to go to $10 very soon?

>>20129771
The supply is super small compared to link so its very possible. Especially in the advent of them announcing the tech giant that they are partnering with.

>>20129771
I ran the numbers.

>>20129758
RLC WAS TALKED ABOUT ABOUT AS MUCH AS IT IS NOW, LINK WAS LAWAYS SPAMMED NONSTOP BUT EVEN MORESO NOW BECAUSE MORE NORMIES AR E INVESTED.
I HOLD LINK TOO AND BOUGHT AROUND 34CENTS
>>20129762
>>20129771
BECAUSE A 10X IS VERY LIKELY THIS MONMTH

>>20129771
it's a nice round number
what do you want? 589?

>>20129790
>>20129785
>>20129782
>>20129780

Ok you've convinced me for now.

What's a good suicide stack?

>>20129790
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE WHALES WANNA BUY MORE THAN 35 BTC WORTH OF RLC???????? THERE'S ONLY ABOUT THAT MUCH IN THE ORDERBOOK????????????????????? 35????? 355335353? 35 BTC WTF? THAT'S IT? IS SUPPLY LOWER THAN WE KNOW ON EXCHANGES?????????

>>20129785
>BOUGHT AROUND 34CENTS

Me too, how big is your stack

>>20129846
5-10K IS PROBABLY GOOD ENOUGH IF U WANT TO MEDIUM(1-2Y)-LONG(2-3 YEARS) HOLD IT

>>20129846
I dunno man I got 15k which is a big amount for me

you said you have over 30k link, then go for 10k barrels atleast

>>20129859
AORUND 40K INITIALLY BUT I SOLD 15K FOR RLC DURING RLC DIPS

>>20129863
>>20129868
Yea 10k is no problem for me

>>20129873
I had 50k but I sold 15k during the corona scare :/ But I swear I won't be caught off-guard by black swans like that ever again

>>20129898
10K IS THE GOLD STANDARD I FEEL SINCE SUPPLY IS 81M
LOL I SOLD THE MEGAPUMPS AND RLC WAS DUMPING SO IT WAS WIN WIN. RLC IS SAFE ANON ITS STILL VERY LOW AND THE CHART LOOKS SOLID

>>20129931
Good move anon

But why do you think RLC is so ignored when it has such potential? Any doubts?

>>20129931
Also do you/does RLC have a discord

>>20129999
>>20130020
Based quads lets GO! I also want to join the discord.

>>20129852

>>20129084
look at the chart, line it up with versions releases
its over Gilles

>>20129852
WE ARE THE WHALES

>>20129084
Pathetic FOMO shilling retards. It's always the same shit on every version, kys already faggots

>>20129852

is this really not a lot?

>>20130020
Bunch of RLC holders in here ZbxAuX

>>20129999
CHECKED I HAVE NO CLUE ANON MAYBE LIKE YOU SAID ITS THE BRANDING OR SOMETHING? OR CLOUD COMPUTING MEME?
>>20130020
NO IDEA ANON I DONT QUARREL WITH PAJEETS
>>20130177
>CHECKED
>>20130180
BTC CAUSED RLC TO DUMP ANON
>>20130187
ARE WE?????????? ARE WE REALLY? THE ORGERBOOK IS SO SMALL
>>20130222
>CHECKED
350K$ IS ALL THE RLC LEFT ON BINBANCE??????

Why is it still 70 cents if it has so much potential. I looked at their marketplace and the last job was executed 6 months ago. Literally no one is using this shitcoin. The team is incompetent in selling their product even though big names may be attached to it due to the founder connection in distributed computing space. Stop pumping your bag kid. And type in small letter. No need to shout with all caps.

>>20131086
they are working on adoption
you also might be looking at the wrong workerpool it's not as long as 6 months ago, there are multiple workerpools

>>20131086
BUY WHEN ITS ANDOPTED ETHEN ANON WE WAREND U AND DONT SAY WE DIDNT WHEN ITS OVER 515$

high energy thread

>>20131086
>Why is it still 70 cents if it has so much potential
>I looked at their marketplace and the last job was executed 6 months ago
I mean, that's basically it

>>20131685
NAME ONE CRYPTO THAT IS ACTUALLY USED THAT ISNT ALL FAKE OR FAKE USAGE ILL WAIT

>>20132250
$1000 EOY is fud.

>>20132827
I did it all for the glizzy

>>20129084
You're so desperate you're stealing Link symbols for your shitty "Cloud computing on the blockchain" token #485.

Stop fucking with dead 2017 shitcoins and buy some EPIC. At least you'll have a new spec run and possible 100x.

>>20133230
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOU AREA TALKIGN ABOUT. NAME A BLOCKCHAIN COMPUTING PROBJECT THAT ISNT GOLEM AND ISN'T A DEATD SHITCOIN

Again why should i buy this shitcoin from 2017 when i can invest in DeFi in 2020 for easy 10x.

>>20134072
Your mutt I.Q. is showing. By that logic people shouldn’t be buying Bitcoin then. Its just a shitcoin from 2008.

>>20134072
RLC IS DEFI U CUCC DO RESEARCH PLEASEEEEEEEWWE

>>20134169
Can i get more RLC by lending ? How much RLC bag do u hold since 2018?

>>20134226
IDK ANON I DONT LEND I HAVE MONEYS THAT I DCA INSTEAD AND WHY WOULD I SAY HOW MUCH RLC I HAVE? IOTS WAY MORE THEN MOST IM SURE. AND I WILL HAVE 10'S OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE FUTURE

should i just wait for next market crash to buy in? get march prices again

A
M
A
Z
O
N

>>20134364
NOT HAPPENINGI ANON,. LOOK AT THE CHART
>>20134378
IT IS MAYBE HUAWEI OR GOOGLE TOO

>>20134396
https://iex.ec/iexec-for-enterprise/

>>20134417
>https://iex.ec/iexec-for-enterprise/
AHHHHHHHHHHH MY RLCIESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

>>20129084

Not gonna lie:

French Anon + Investing in iExec since 2017.

Anons, this miss is going to hurt more than LINK. Trust me.

How this thread still alive?