/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20031482
$10,000 USD to $1,000,000 USD
No where below
Only somewhere in between
ORACLE funneling trillions of value alone raises network value and the coin rises to a minimum of $2-5,000 dollars a coin.

SWIFT moves almost a trillion a day in value. At absorbing value, even at 10%, we will hit a 30,000 Chainlink evaluation.


We still aren’t talking future use cases such as smart cities etc.

370

>>20031534
I don’t know about the future exactly, so 1,000,000 is in play if all the derivatives in the world come to be represented in link, which isn’t far fetched if it is indeed the catalyst of the 4iR and the internet of trust itself

81,000.00 US Dollars (USD)

>>20031650
This anon fucks.
Personally I’m out completely at 10k.

>>20031534

>>20031534
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHA

>>20031680
It cash flow generating though with staking.

>>20031482
For people with 10,000 Link or more to make stupid gains then people with only 500 have to be making out very nicely too. If this is really the 4th industrial revolution catalyst that people say then I can’t see it being below 5,000$.

To be honest though.... don’t sweat it if you don’t have a huge stack. The world is fucking collapsing. I’m more bullish on the chinks invading us and killing us all than being able to realize my gains from Chainlink and be able to plow as many boipucci’s as I want.

I got around 10k and had 30k before. Don’t care one bit because getting rich in this new world isn’t going to be like getting rich with BTC and ETH. New link fags with sub 2,000 stacks are in better shape than those with 20k+ stacks because those of us who got in early found the gem of the century, and now the world is collapsing. Imagine how BTFO is OG linkmarines are gonna be when someone like me has 40 million dollars and you can’t fucking do jack shit anymore.

I mean fucking Europe is banning Americans LMAO and these faggots chainlink assholes think that getting rich is gonna mean something. Best these assholes can hope for is to be able to buy a pimped out doomsday bunker to survive and they’ll still be in the same spot as they are now jacking off to anime porn

>>20031707
Clown world is real anon

>>20031749
Confirmed

>>20031482
Well 1st of all you have to consider LINK already mooned (20c to 4.50).
Now regarding its value, I'd say it it could reach $7 within the the next 3 years and maybe close to $10 in 5 years or so.
But that is the best case scenario

>>20031749
I'll take the bunker and a harem of nice young women with choice brappers and tits.

>>20031482
I love LINK circlejerks

>>20031825
Late Reddit, FUDder, or BSV pajeet

Which are you, fren?

>>20031482
>$1000 EOY meme.
>he thinks its a meme

>>20031749
Thx, just bought 100k LINK

So

When service agreements go live in the defi space, which right now hundreds of millions of dollars is secured by the chainlink network from the last baseline discussion, then that money flows right into contracts. Therefore starting the singularity as the more money pours into the ecosystem? Which will continue to compound every use of the space with fees? Further driving the price of tokens?

Token Grant's would only apply to business, nodes, etc joining or building on the space. The value of the contracts is what will drive the singularity. So if you just gave out link it would not effect the value already secured on the network. But if they think thay 600million is enough for the 4IR for the world then 10k for a NEET means Rockefeller money.

>>20031534
Yeah bro totally if fucking chainlink somehow manages to capture literally 100% of the market and somehow their magical 'first mover' status prevents any competent competition kinda like how FORD is still the only automaker in the world

$1 mil per lmao

>>20031904
Early-ish adopter. Bought $4000 worth in summer 2018 and sold it all when it reached 4.50 last year. I used the profit as a downpayment for a house

>>20032067
There is only one internet
there are many intranets

>>20032134
This the beauty of LINK is if anyone tries to monopolize it would be worthless, it is the most valuable as an open source resource.

>>20031482

1000$ is FUD.
If you understand the tokenomics behind Link you will realize that this shit is gonna explode one day and then just keep pumping. Staking means that no one is gonna want to sell and Link will just keep on rising in value.

>>20031749
I own 2500 link and 0,08 LP. Will I make it to $1,000,000 by 2022?

>>20032359
No
You will by 2024

Well it literally can't hit 5 bucks and is dumping again so, probably like 3 bucks a token

>>20032436
From 4.9 at 600mm volume to 4.5-6 at nearing 250mm volume tomorrow

That’s bullish
Google how low volume/decreased price indicates coming mass price increase

>>20032412

>>20032502
>my asset losing value is bullish!

>>20032359
Ehhh I’d say more like 2024

>>20031825
>Now regarding its value, I'd say it it could reach $7 within the the next 3 years and maybe close to $10 in 5 years or so.
LOL.

>>20031482
Around $50 this time next year

>>20031534
Based.

>>20031482
"we"

fuck off back to whence you came

>>20032681
A year ago we were at 4.50 and today we are still at 4.50 (or close). LINK already mooned anon, sorry you missed it

>>20032279
Well people are gonna sell their staking rewards. Don't be stupid now

>>20032885
I know I will

>>20031482
>ITT FUD and Shilling

I got in at 0.20 in 2017 and out at 4.60.

Latelinkers about to ride it down to sub 2 while circlejerking eachother that they are gonna make it

>>20032792
A year ago we were at $4.50 from a ridiculous pump. The floor is $4.50 now, assumint BTC doesn't shit the bed or more chink flu pessimism rocks the markets. Nice attempt at fud though.

>>20032792
You don't know what you are talking about. I didn't miss anything lol. I got in @ 22c. They aren't even done adding shit to the project, so shaddup.

>>20033050
Lots of resistance around $4.50 now after the recent pump. I agree that I think the only chance for sub $4 buys now is going to be external market events.

It has been said thousands of times before and will be said thousands of times more by EOY.

>>20033048
I too like to lie online

>>20032596
Losing value combined with lowered volume means no one is selling this low

>>20032110
Pay tax on the gains?

>>20031534
Have you been kicked in the head?

ten THOUSAND per token. oh my god someone call uncle oldfag to make fun of you all again

>>20034855
No, but I’ve sucked tranny cock

Bro LINK will be more than $80.000 in 2026. 42 told us and he is legit cause he got a quantic message from the future. They still use Windows 10 in 2026 bro. He got a pic of a screen that has glare so it’s legit. He could never had photoshopped it and then taken a pic of the screen bro. He’s like the reincarnation of Tesla, he feels like these electric horns coming out of his forehead and shit.

>>20034881
Yeah we should all listen to him

>>20034909
42 is bullshit
But the potential of a decentralized oracle is limitless

>>20032885
I will for sure, but I’m always gonna keep 10% of my earnings to grow my stack.

Can’t see it being more than $1000
That’s a 350billion marketcap at current circulating supply. If they release the rest of the tokens that’s 1 trillion marketcap. Where do you see usage coming from to justify a trillion marketcap? Let’s be honest here. I think we should pray for $100 first and then see where the rest of the market is at and who’s using the Chainlink network.

>>20034992
The Chinese govt is putting all of their value on chain using Chainlink

Swift will use Chainlink

Oracle will use Chainlink

Microsoft using Chainlink

EY using Chainlink

If these projects go thru, 1k will seem like LULS

That’s a big IF though
Speculative market

>>20035022
It isn’t a big if. It’s literally happening.

>>20035022
No they aren’t

>>20031534
I think there are $1B link tokens because they know it'll be $1B per token...

>>20031482
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets (literally pic related), no news or partnerships came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during the alt bear market lots of anons and took advantage of this and fudded this coin to all the late money and newfags that bought in January and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like DMG) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team.

>>20035135
This guy knows his shit, better listen to him
Link will never reach 1000$, how delusional are you guys?

>>20031749
>Waaaaa I can't consoom
I'll take the bunker and the shitpost uplink. Would be so comfy to shitpost with all my linkfrens while the surface dwellers are absolutely slaughtering each other. Their blood shall feed the flowers of change.

>>20035222

dude what? you really think these big companies would be working with chainlink if it only had two developers?

>>20031482
It a beautiful pic opee

>>20031534
kek

>>20031534
Fud. Oldfags know that we're looking at at least 6 Gorillion per Link per day.

>>20031749
>chinks invading
a nuclear exchange is 100% more likely than a ground war

which is to say: nothing will happen

>>20031749
Imagine not having the primary goals of homestead, doomsday bunker, arsenal and plane to retrieve supplies from the burned out wasteland of tomorrow. Literally the only point if making it. Select the finest, palest brappers from the refugees to come and help repopulate the world.

>>20035222
Sounds like someone who genuinely cares about our financial wellbeing

>>20031482
"Honest LINK question"
>proceeds to ask the dumbest fucking question
Nobody fucking knows. A lot? A little? Who the fuck knows?
This thread is a fucking circlejerk of hopium-smoking cockblowers sucking each other off for that sweet, sweet hit of dopamine.
The price will go up, or it will go down. It will happen quickly, or it will happen slowly.
Wait and see.

>>20037327
Do you not know? You should get off your meds and take the schizo pill anon.

>>20037327
>Nobody fucking knows. A lot? A little? Who the fuck knows?

The internet is worth $23 Trillion dollars. If the internet was partitioned to 1 billion parts, that's 23000 per token. The internet is going to be revamped by blockchain technology where we now have the ability to create digital assets. Chainlink is the internet of blockchains. We can deduce a potential floor for it as we know the productivity of an internet incorporating by blockchain tech >>>>>>>>>>> the internet as we know it now.

>>20031482
It’s worth as much money as people value secure data so probably zilch lol but I’m all in. Also shad some bonus features like verifiable randomness

>>20032792
>mooned to $4.50 and is able to remain at that price range for an entire year
>somehow not bullish as fuck

>>20033048
Kek, you're bragging about getting out at $4.6 while link is still at that price. If we crash back to $1.75, then you can come here and brag. Right now you have a decent chance of getting burned by a pump

>>20032067
It’s took 30 years and the war industry to figure out ford

>>20035022
3 of those happening this year surprisingly Microsoft won’t happen until next year also no swift this year

>>20037743
Hot take, Ranjeet. Toilets are coming this year too.

>>20034641
it also means no one is buying this low

>>20035135
>it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token.
Do it now then you fucking genius. Oh wait, you are just talking out of your ass and will not back up the shit you say ever.

>>20037632
you cant get burned by something you dont own

>>20031534
>>20031749
this really activates my almonds. Thanks for that, seriously