/biz/ - Business & Finance

Oh wait you didn't claim haircombs

>>19902489
oy vey its a ploy!

>>19902538
You're not fooling anyone, schizo.

>>19902489

Correlation does not imply causation you fucking nigger.

Shitlink always dumps when BTC dump is because it has a price in satoshis and a pair with BTC on casinos. This is precisely how it works.

Now fuck off.

>>19902926

This. OP is a retard and he always the same guy posting this bullshit.

If he’d go check the same with literally any other coin he’d see the same thing happens to them too.

The only jew tier moves on link are Binance going down for maintenance when it tries to break 5$ twice now.

>>19902926
>Correlation does not imply causation
Correlation can imply causation you brainlet. All causation has correlation.
It just doesn't prove it.

And this shit happens way too often to be a coincidence.
See pic from February.
In the span of a few hours, Link tried to breach ATH twice, and BTC managed to dump right on cue each time.

>>19902926
>>19902947
>exact same spacing pattern

Hello samefag. Getting nervous?

>>19902489
So predictable too.

buy the dip retards

>>19902948
Perhaps because the entire market is valued against BTC. Just a thought.

>>19903115
No, BTC is just the biggest trading pair.
If it goes down, it triggers the bots (and human psychology) to go down with it.
Everything on the planet (including BTC) is valued in fiat, because that’s the standard medium of exchange.

>>19902948
There is no cause retard, there is only constant frequency and the attributed habit of the constant association of two events

yes those in the know pump shitcoins before grandad dumps.. only happens every time

>>19903217
>There is no cause retard
This happens way too frequently and punctually not to have cause.

>>19903170
>BTC is just the biggest trading pair.
By which I mean BTC/USD.

The Link/BTC pair for instance is tiny; everyone is trading some form of Link/USD.
Nobody cares about sats value.

>>19903097
Saved.

>>19903238
the euro and gbp just dumped against the usd
>usd went up in value
your shitcoin is irrelevant

>>19903291
Its the only relevant thing in crypto

not that it will convince anyone, but here's another "unrelated coincidence"

>>19903366

linkies never gonna ascend

Last time they manufactured a global pandemic just to stop us
Don't be surprised if they start ww3 next time

>>19902489
FED niggers are our roadblock to financial freedom

Every time LINK is on the cusp of breaking out the king shitcoin BTC dumps

It has happened way too many times to be just a coincidence

>>19903291
lmao what are you even trying to say.

>>19903421
idk as long as we get steaking soon
only thing that matters is stacking stinkers

>>19902948
It's not a coincidence lol. The only other coin that causes btc to dump is Eth. Clearly LINK and ETH are both worth way more than btc and whales know it. Btc whales are literally shaking lol. If I was a btc whale I'd just say fuck it and go all in on them. Not worth risking it at this point. The future of crypto is already here.

>>19902947
>>19902926
Same fag

You may have been able to trick people for a while that btc was king, but people are begining to see through the emperors new clothes. BTC is destined to fail at this point. You suppressed the price all you could. If you buy now you still won't be getting in at a bad price.

CRASH IT AGAIN!

>>19902489
lol and others still doubt.
>locate the cube
>activation code: Ronald McDonald
>dump it to the fucking ground

>>19903400
S’true

>>19902948
But don't you see that i simply follows bitcoin like the rest of the market? BTC goes down bringing all altcoins with it

>>19902489
Everyone but me gotta learn suuuure is my response to everyone

>>19905139
That's the point anon.
BTC is being crashed to bring down Link.

>>19905156

Dude almost every alt is mostly correlated like this with BTC

If someone wanted to bring down LINK price intentionally then there are more effective and cheaper ways than crashing the most liquid crypto (BTC) lol..

>>19905291
>If someone wanted to bring down LINK price intentionally then there are more effective and cheaper ways than crashing the most liquid crypto (BTC) lol..
Not if you already hold massive amounts of BTC for instance.

>>19905301

Uhm... Margin Trading. With Bitcoin as collateral. Heard of it?

>>19905425
>Heard of it?
Yes.

>>19902489
kek

>>19905291
The point is to buy more LINK. If they just outright sold LINK to dump the price, they would seriously risk losing their LINKs or well having to buy in higher since almost nobody is selling. If they dump BTC, then LINK dumps and they can buy more LINK.

>>19903243
>Nobody cares about sats value.

I think the parabolic trend line with higher lows as time passes would like to have a word with you.

Its obvious that when LINK is too high BTC is dumped to suppress it. Yes everything goes down when BTC goes down and after lining up the charts BTC conveniently dumps everytime LINK is approaching ATH if there isn't enough pressure to do so within the LINK/USDT pairing.

>>19903115
Retard. Of course link loses value when btc dips. That is precisely why (((they))) dump btc when link is about to breakout.

>>19902538
>>19902557
>>19902926
>>19902947
>>19903115
>>19905139
You guys are the schizos. LINK had pumped 20% while BTC had flat lined. Every time LINK is majorly outpacing BTC suddenly BTC dumps before a major milestone is achieved. EVERY TIME. And EVERY TIME LINK lands a little higher than where it was. If you don’t think people are using BTC as a lever to suppress LINK by now you are either retarded or psychotic. It’s plain as day, we now have more than 10 events in a row.

>>19903499
Checked and based. It is almost like some big buyers are trying to keep the price down for long enough to shake out early investor hands.... I think the time is coming to an end though - you cannot claim FUD anymore for not buying as yesterday it was made clear that China trust Chainlink - end of discussion.

Just imagine comparing an unique internet phenomena based on PoW with a fucking erc20 centralized pre-mined shittoken, 70% of supply of which is controlled by scammer and nearly non-existent market cap.

Imagine babbling that this shittoken which has only a speculative "value" in sats influenced the whole crypto space, which, if you think for a minute, is just BTC alone.

This level of retardation is even beyond imagination for christ sake.

>Wahhhh bitcoin's fault I own a shit token that whales easily p & d

>he doesn't know that LINK pumped just because BTC was going to dump

>>19905902
This is probably the dumbest denier theory itt.
And that's saying something.

>>19902489
OHHHHHHHHH
FUCKITY FUCKITY FUCKITY FUCK
FUCK B T C

>>19902489
>caring about short-term price movements
Nigga, I've been swinglinking since EtherDelta before Binance, and I've never cared about those.
I used to sell when we have 3 green days in a row, then wait and rebuy - and I've always been successful.
Most people just hodl and it's by far the safest choice.
Why the fug are you staring at a chart instead of doing something productive?

>>19905785
>Every time LINK is majorly outpacing BTC suddenly BTC dumps
what is casuality

>>19905785
By da' way schizo bro
let's say your theory has a fundament and BTC whales suddenly gonna stop SUPPRESSING chainlink... what's the price target of the sudden green dildo that these whales gonna create when they gonna' stop suppressing?

>>19905785
Very based and redpilled. It is so fucking obvious at this point. I’m sick of it but guess what you faggot kikes? I’m not selling. He’s not selling. None of us are selling. Just fuck off. The good thing is this becomes less and less effective as LINK continues to establish higher and higher floors.

>>19902489
remember when I made the thread with all the dead and dying CEOs?
>>/biz/thread/19812018
polar express (Tom Hanks)
Clinton Foundation Donor
>apparent suicide
hahahaha
https://deadline.com/2020/06/steve-bing-dead-philanthropist-film-financier-1202966891/

>>19908206

>>19902926
This. OP was a faggot again today.

>>19903373
OMG THE REDLINES CONNECTED.. WHAT DOES IT MEAN PIERRE?

>>19905838
You're the retarded one if you've been here regularly for quite some time and haven't yet got the intuition that there is something going on with the Sergey Nazarov / Bitcoin connection

The anon consensus of /biz/raelis discussing Chainlink is that Nazarov has been building from the ground up the digital infrastructure of the 4th IR, that it was a task given to him by a group of people or organizations, and that they're connected to Bitcoin
Do you think such a group of individuals and organizations who possibly ushered in BTC before LINK, don't hold massive amounts of BTC?

Also China says "haha well Chainlink wasn't our first choice but we liked the memes so it's a go". How flabbergasting is such an event?
In this timeline we could even say that China's Blockchain Service Network name has been chosen thus because BSN = Bitcoin Sergey Nazarov also

>>19905618
We should all get everyone we know to buy link. More wallets, more volume, more hodlers = more scarce.

A person who owns a lot of bitcoin, especially since they likely bought at very cheap prices - is not losing money by selling. they are making money.

furthermore when these whales dump, it causes everything else to dump, and they can buy whatever token they want at a new low price, with a shit ton of capital from their btc sale.

>>19902926
Yes it does. The slippery slope fallacy is not a fallacy.

op is a fucking idiot