/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19873881
Pic related
Vision AND YTber hype confirmed.
Bullish.

this shit has made me so much money over the past two days. god bless fellas

>>19873881
Worth about as much a mah goose

>>19873915
same here i've been swing trading and have cashed out 6 eth so far

>>19873932
bro ive made 23 eth off of this and it wont fucking stop, ive been swinging all day i havent slept in 48 hours im fucking pumped

>>19873963
wish i did't pussy out and bought more from the presale

comfy as shit tony stonk here

Why did he mention ETHX, a literal exit scam from last week?

>>19874042
STONKOSAURUS reporting in. Out of all the coins I'm holding I'm most hype about this. Also STONK $2 July 22. checkem

>>19874069
because like 9 people all jumped on ethx at once in the sta disc server, literally all of them lost money except for 1 or two people, noke not included. They even checked wallet histories and shit in the witch hunt that followed, fuck anonymoose. If you recall, everyone who bought into ethx thought it was legit.

>>19873881
This actually seems like it has legs. Congrats on being not a scam.

If you want to get into a uniswap token BEFORE it releases so you can dump bags on other people instead of letting people dump their bags on you come here: https //discord gg/ 2g 2F tWM

>>19874069
dev got scammed so he decided to make a legit project

>>19873918

honked my goose just now. thanks

>>19873881

>>19874042
goldman stonks reporting in for duty sire

>>19874069
I don't blame him at all, I thought EthX was legit too and my "scam radar" is typically sharp as hell.

I lost 8 ETH on that damn token

I've made it all up and then some with Stonk... When I found out me and Noke both took the same L on EthX lol... Poetic

>>19874375
Hahahahhah wtf 3k liquid yes I’m sure this is not a scam and people are committed and believe

>>19874415
Omg 3k pooled wow this is screaming scam. Just like how devs ban anyone who questions stonk or raises doubts

You’ve been warned look it up yourself 3k pool

>he's not in the top 100 of STONKS *and STA
ngmi

>>19874415
We JUST migrated to a new pool, 75% of the liquidity still in the old one.

Team has been on people to move to the new one, shouldn't take longer than another day or two

>>19874252
I hope this makes sense, ETHx exit scamming was legitimately the inspiration for making a legitimate project, and not in a weird double-speaky way.

He is currently working on addressing a lot of fud, as well as considering a logo redesign soon. Not to mention all the advertising he's paying for instead of performing the rugpulling he can't even do.

Hahahaha they are literal poorfags who feel priced out of a 4 cent token

>>19874442
?? dev and stonks disc/tg admins explicitly stated they wouldnt ban fudders because it was healthier and more transparent to address their concerns publicly than ban them? who got banned?

>>19874442
Stonks??? Lol what a scam

>>19874521
Exactly.

If have ANY type of instincts/judgment and aren't a complete autist...

It's obvious Noke is a good dude.

Scamming sociopaths can't even pretend to think like this.

So... Keep fudding... or make it

Up to you

>>19874528
But they're all from the sta discord.

>>19874415
idgaf bro i've cashed out 23 eth. im literally untouchable right now faggot, dont even reply, i dont give a fuck if you buy or not

So you faggots would put in the money to create another index fund token to make more money(after 2 weeks of crabbing no less), but you wouldn't put in the effort and money to actually advertise Statera outside of /biz/ and reddit's business board?

What the flying fuck were you thinking?

>>19874790
>not holding both
ngmi

>>19874627
the price was half of sta's last night, on its first day of existence. The pool will grow as need be, stonks is designed to be traded, as it's deflationary, you already know the rules.

STONK has no advantage over STA. The original pitch was that the STONK's balancer pool would contain a higher percentage of STONK making it more influential than STA's. The dev realized this was retarded and that it didn't work like that. He then made a new pool where STONK makes up the same percentage of as STA's pool. Additionally, STONK has a burn rate of 0.3% compared to STA's 1%. STONK has to do three times the volume of STA to burn the same amount. The lower burn rate does make it easier to buy on uniswap but that is not enough to create three times the volume. The defi projects in the STONK's pool might do well short term but during a bullrun BTC and ETH have historically outperformed most alts. Not to mention that STONK's pools are so small they have practically no effect on the price.

>>19874835
the advantage lies in the picks in the pool, tell me you expect bitcoin and eth to 2x faster than, say, lrc and rep? I personally don't. Thank you for mentioning the burn rate is specifically placed there to address the slippage bullshit sta unfortunately has to deal with. The exact phrasing I've been using this whole time is that it will outperform sta on the short term, and POTENTIALLY in the long run.
>>19874415
>>19874442
huh look at that, nearly doubled in the half hour since you posted this killer fud.

Should've included this in the OP

>How to add liquidity

Uniswap:
1. Go here: https://uniswap.exchange/add/0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2-0xb60Fde5D798236fBF1e2697B2A0645380921FccF

Balancer:
All tokens simultaneously:

0. Remember to have a decent supply of each origin pool token before attempting this.
1. Go here: https://noproxy.pools.balancer.exchange/#/pool/0xb9eaf49d9f913bc1314e37bb5482891840c8e3c1
2. Click add liquidity
3. Click unlock on every token - don't worry if their interface bugs out and doesn't show your token as unlocked.
4. Go here https://etherscan.io/address/0xb9eaf49d9f913bc1314e37bb5482891840c8e3c1#writeContract
5. Click connect to web3, and scroll down to joinPool
6. Enter how much BPT you want multiplied by 10^18 in poolAmountOut (make sure it isn't too high, otherwise your transaction may fail)
7. Enter [999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000,999999999000000000000000000] in maxAmountsIn
9. Done!

One click pooling:
1. Go here https://stonk.dev/#interface

>>19874835

Stonk has better coins
saying btc and ethereum traditionally outpeform alts is like saying ibm traditionally outperformed google 1 year after its ipo

>>19873881
buy sDEFI from Synthetix you cuck, much less risk than this stonks shit token

>>19875525
I love low risk, low risk is my favorite amount of risk, for when I don't want to make that much money. I'm all in on Stonks.

>>19873881
Damn, the new logo looks professional as fuck

>>19874613
>It's obvious Noke is a good dude

>Rips off a project that made him money
>Convinces all his discord buddies to jump ship from STA
>His lackeys and discord buddies attempt to destroy the very project that they copied
>Gives a subtle "fuck you" to STA by using the contract to lock liquidity
Yeah, sounds like a swell guy

>>19875765
are you really calling securing liquidity a fuck you to a token that didn't do it. cmon man.

First Medium article published, a nice QRD.
https://twitter.com/stonkdev/status/1275281086860255234

>>19876250
seb went and doxed himself on a basket-weaving forum

>>19876250
I saw the screenshot, he clearly meant it as a fuck you. He laughed about it.

>>19876280
I'm the OP and in Stonks disc. Mine and other discords have shown up plenty in sta and stonk threads alike, thanks for the concern.
>>19876285
was fixing the slippage issue with the burn rate also a fuck you to sta? doing advertising immediately?

>>19874521
Bought after seeing this. BASED dev.

>>19876250
sebbbbbb

>>19873881

>>19876363
shh haha, they call me smuggy

>>19876322
>was fixing the slippage issue with the burn rate also a fuck you to sta?
No, just using an audited and trustless STA contract to benefit the project that was cloned, and laughing about it. The reduced token burn seems a bit short sighted unless it stays on uniswap for it's entire life. That is splitting hairs though. Honestly, I don't dislike the project, just pissed off at how everything went down.

Now approaching 5.5k liquidity

>>19876396
Alright, that's really understandable anon. I can't say I know too many awesome ways to go about introducing competition into a zero sum space either. They'll succeed based on their respective teams putting in effort and funding into spreading awareness, and the individual token picks in the pools.

What do you think about this design? floating ideas.

>>19876460
Err, very jewish. It's a good start though

>>19876486
I heard they were good at making stonks go up

How much will this be worth guys? I need 10,000 smackaroos to pay for child support.

>>19876713
Conservatively 10c eow, in my book. Super bullish on these 100k subscriber youtube shills being on board, the website(looking based) having one click pooling, and the dev teams engagement with the community on their concerns on marketing, appearance etc.

>>19876713
I think we will hit 20 cents by the end of the month. Do with that what you will

>>19874042
STONKOSAURUS BAYBEE!
Is this what making it feels like?

>>19873881
fuck, the medium article is so bullish

Checked and based project.
Fudders can live out the rest of their pathetic lives in the Vault of Eternal Destitution

Ok whats next? This did a 10x, it wont do another one obviously

>>19876826
Lol thats some decent advice, yeah lets all buy in from here.
Its done boys.....next

>>19877054
There is actually a decent amount of funding going into advertisement and marketing.

Also been listed on multiple exchanges.

>>19877054
>Ok whats next? This did a 10x, it wont do another one obviously
If you said that after STA did a 10X , you would have necked after you saw what came next ...

>>19877132
Sta was fist one. I made a shitload of money with sta, a 120x. This wont do another 10x from here for sure

>>19877339
Sta was the first of its kind, Stonks is also the first of its kind. both were based on pre existing protocols combined.

>>19877132
it never did x10, more like x5

>>19877456
Stonk didnt do 10x?

>>19877489
starting price was 0.2cents iirc

I wish it had a better portfolio and it would have a real chance but not with this shit.

I dont see how you still can buy in now....risk is too high

>>19877756
"I dont want a large reward for large risk" ngmi

>>19877756
Oh no it’s two days old!!! No one buy!!!

>>19877812
>>19877756

>>19877854
lol

shit colored children going full deluded here. this circle jerk will end fast when its time, this attracts zero real investors even if you rebrand this. Anyone who does not see the difference between the statera pool and stonk pool is a retard and does not understand the use case at all. This can moon short term for sure, but it will never be here to stay.

>>19878893
cope

screenshot this post and revisit in a week