/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19866515
>telling people to buy a top
You aren't that smart for sure, pajeet. You've been getting BTFO in all of the threads up until now, because your shitty token has no use case.


FOR ANYONE CONSIDERING LOOKING AT TELLOR (TRB), IT'S A PATHETIC CHAINLINK COPY-PASTE WHICH ACHIEVES NOTHING AND IS CURRENTLY OVERVALUED DUE TO HYPE ALONE. YOU WILL GET BURNED IF YOU BUY NOW, THESE POORFAGS HAVE BEEN SPAMMING THE CATALOG FOR 4 DAYS STRAIGHT TRYING TO PUMP THE PRICE

YOU WILL INEVITABLY GET BURNED AS SOON AS THIS THING HITS $10 DO NOT BUY AND DYOR

THE CEO IS FEMALE FOR GOODAMN SAKE

Literally trying whatever I can do to get me 1k of these.

I mean they circulating supply is microscopic. If there’s a bull run, no way this doesn’t see 3 figures.

If you were around in 2017 you know what I mean

>>19866589
Lol at “overvalued because of hype”

Newsflash pal. Literally the entire market is based on speculation. Even your beloved Chainlink

>>19866589
Rightttt... so somehow I how people to drop millions into Tellor this week? Go n get you brains checked Linkie. It’s nothing like Link and specialises in a different area.... you 12 or something?

>>19866589
All the Linkies like you were calling Tellor a scam and a shitcoin around two months ago when it was at $3.50. Try FUD’ing harder next time...

>>19866611
>>19866638
>>19866649
>>19866686
This will be my last post ITT.
Just look, the very first thing they talk about is price alone. No explanation whatsoever, just "I can feel that 2017 wave coming. if u know, u know"
Just look at how they type. To any onlookers. If you buy and lose money, please don't come crying to me because I did all I could to warn you. The fucker replied to my post twice because he forgot to switch his I.P address

>>19866740
Thank you Mr.Financial advisor. Now go and start a new Link shilling/coping thread because there’s only 15 of them up on here at any given day. I missed the buy in at $3.50 bc I fell for your FUD, won’t happen again lol

>>19866740
No I replied to you twice because I had more things to add...like now

>IQ 60 confirmed

>>19866515
>>19866649
>>19866686
>>19866789
>>19866830
No need to antagonize linkies, Mr Doublepost. We might very well become the ones that actually pump your bags. I will be dumping my assessment on Tellor from yesterday in this thread for screencap purposes.

>>19866740
Um I’m a completely different poster than OP and I replied to you twice because I had two things to say.

Lol you are strange man. The defi oracle space is small.

If there is a bull run, link will explode. No denying that. But just like in 2017, people will feel they missed out.

They will look at the next alternative and tellor is primed for growth And is a legit project. Also the max supply is like 1.5 million. Supply and demand- boom

Currently watching this interview with the CSO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frHL3J2NAOo

Read the whitepaper, skimmed the audit paper (fucking 110 pages). Did some digging into the blockchain project that audited Tellor's code base (CertiK) and arrived to the conclusion that they are legit.
CertiK Foundation is founded by Computer Science Professors Ronghui Gu of Columbia University and Zhong Shao of Yale University and is a non profit.
When you look at the actual audit report you will see the correspondence between the auditors and the Tellor team, in which they discuss and point out flaws and errors in the Tellor codebase, which of course have been fixed in later revisions.

So as far as code base goes I'm 99% sure Tellor is legit. However, I'm still not completely sold on Tellor's use case, especially with ChainLink already having captured so much of the market share. In this article: https://medium.com/@unitimes_/unitalk-with-tellor-team-why-we-need-decentralized-oracles-1a545d6de62b, the CEO (Brenda Loya, MA Applied Economics from Johns Hopkins) is asked what Tellor's use case is, and she replies by pretty much explaining the Oracle problem in DeFi. So in other words Tellor is going to provide price feeds in order to eliminate the centralized point of failure in DeFi. This is only one of Chainlinks use cases, and depending on how well Chainlink is going tackle this problem it's going to be very hard for Tellor to onboard users. In the youtube video I linked above the CSO shortly mentions how they are too small to capture big DeFi projects and how they are struggling with onboarding users (starting at around 28:20).

So let's summarize. (Cont.)

>>19867033
Didn’t you say that you previous post will be your “last post”?
>K. Nice I.P swap, try harder.

Sounds like you’ve completely lost your mind. That’s what happens when you shill Link and spread FUD on other coins for too long.

Take some time off & come back in a couple of days, you’ll feel much better.

>>19867061
(Contd.)
>Pros:
+Solves a real problem in a rapidly expanding industry
+Working product (this is huge, 99% of crypto is vaporware)
+No ICO, no premine (also huge, there are no devs or ico whales about to dump on you)
+Codebase has been audited
+Team of dedicated white Americans (scamming potential significantly decreases with this)
+CEO and CTO have master degrees from accredited university (Johns Hopkins)
+Received two funding rounds, one by Consensys one by Binance labs (big players, possible Binance listing)
+Low marketcap. ~10m currently, similar project like Band has a marketcap of 25m. Chainlink is at 1.5b+.
+Hybrid PoS/PoW looks interesting, not sure if it's more than just a novelty

>Cons:
-Competition (LINK) is widely regarded as the to go to oracle solution and has signed all the big players. Is set out to be THE standard and might leave no room for a small competitor like Tellor. This is the biggest FUD desu
-No users. They went live in august 2019, but have yet to announce any real users. Since the security of their network relies on the token price and demand for the oracle (tips), they really need to start onboarding users
-Very barebones oracle solution. They have upgrades scheduled for V2 though.
-According to the white paper, the supply will increase from 1.3m (currently) to more than 3.5m within a year. Inflation will decrease exponentially but still, that's a lot of coin dilution.
-144 queries per day. Tellor queries it's miners for data every 10 minutes. Chainlink promises to do it in real time. If CL manages that and stay secure, Tellor is obsolete (there is of course, an IF there).
-Female CEO (Not a sure negative but hey who knows)
-Small team, not a lot of funds (Only about $400k combined from 2 funding rounds)
-CSO credentials are meh
-Went up 300% in the last month from $2.00 to $8.00. Might retrace to $4-6

(Cont.)

>>19867094
(Contd.)

So in conclusion, I would never bet on Tellor to win a large share of the decentralized oracle market. Chainlink is miles ahead in that regard with more funding, better backing and a way broader use case. However, Tellor could very well become a small subset of this oracle eco system and find their niche since the team seems trustworthy and they have (some) Binance and Consensys backing.

This leads me to believe that investing at these prices, although risky given the recent pump, is not the worst decision. As it stands I believe Tellor is worth at least 25m on speculation alone and might be a contender to breach top 100 if they manage to onboard actual clients. I'm sitting on a small bag of 100 TRB now, but I will definitely keep an eye on them and increase my stack if they make progress on that part.

>>19867046
Don’t worry about him, hes emotionally invested in Link and can’t see past his own pile of shit. Now hes spreading FUD, to make himself feel better. I pity the fool

>>19867064
I'm a different anon. I hope you realize that lashing out at Linkies, arguably the biggest and richest subset of anons on this board, is not going to do much for Tellor.

>>19867094
I’ve seen this up somewhere, the guy who posted it realised that it’s full of errors and is working on correcting the Pro’s and Con’s so I’m disregarding this till he posts the updated version

>>19867176
That is literally me. I just posted the updated version. Also it had only a few spelling errors in it, which I corrected. I also made some minor changes to the pros and cons but nothing major. Every point I made last night still stands until someone corrects me with references to the whitepaper or other documents put out by the Tellor team.

>>19867164
But you’re still an annoying Linkie. Leave is Tellor guys alone, why do always have to cry about Link constantly? I’m not even denying that it’s decent...and no one on here except for the Linkies ever brought Link up

>>19866589
a female that came from Johns Hopkins University

versus

eastern europeans

>>19867292
Yup and also I don't get why Linkies get so emotional over a project with only a 10 mill market cap and who's not even in the top 100 + feel the have the need to shut it down... We're just trying to have our own chill Tellor thread here... butthurt much?

>>19867232
Not mentioning Tellor's biggest competitor would be weird when discussing Tellor, especially since Chainlink is so much more entrenched. If you bothered to read my assessment you would know that I don't think that means it's game over for Tellor. It just means that they have to find a niche. They are definitely the underdog here with a lot of upwards potential.

>>19866686
a few of us were shilling TRB at a dollar, which was about as low as it ever sold for....same shit in those thread
>bUt ItS nOt LiNk!?!

>>19867868
LINK $10000000 EOYYYYY

>>19866589
Lmao somebody told me i was "buying the top" at 4$ and now i'm x2+ suck my dick pajeet

>>19868708
Same here

>>19866515

>>19869253
based n red pilled

>the very moment I buy it dumps back to 5$
haha...

>>19869566
What coin you on about? Tellor is still at $8 and growing

>>19869604
More like everyone is dumping lmao. It was a $9 two hours ago, now that the bubble has popped it will go straight down to $1. Sell before it happens

>>19869712

>He genuinely thought that the poor man's Link would eventually go anywhere
Fucking pajeets man. You can't make this shit up

>>19866589
sold a good chunk of my link to buy this it’s actually a good project retard

>muh DeFi
>ap0lOGiZe
>female CEO with no experience in the field
>token doesn't solve any known problem
>pajeets have been using chainlink pictures and replacing the token logo with Tellor


kek

>>19869712
Riiiight lol, yeah I don't ever remember it hitting $9, but ok Linkie believe in what you want to believe. $9 is our next stop.

>Stay salty + mad

>>19869817
look at the supply and look at the top 200 projects and how shitty they are some people absolutely hate money

Anons. Why are you wasting your time with TRB when link already exists and is more known by the masses and anyone in the cryptosphere? The oracle problem is already more or less solved, it's just a matter of time.

I'm not fudding against this token. But you must realize that nobody will invest in something just because they missed the train of the first mover.

>>19869881
1.3 mill max supply Anon, I'm not selling so that you can buy my bags. Bye

So this is supposed to be the Chainlink killer. lmao

>>19869959
No....Anon....no...

Tellor is not going up against Chainlink....

Sums you up

>>19869881
It's like investing in Microsoft or Apple early, you can't realy go wrong

>>19869881
you didn’t have to miss out you can take some link profits and put in tellor for a basically guaranteed 10x at the very least

Anyone who buys this deserves to lose money and to stay poor. One of the most obvious PNDs after STONK

>>19870011
The price keeps rising since december

>>19870011
Nice FUD linkie cuck. Thanks for your worthless input as always. I remember when you said not to buy into Tellor at $3 bc "muh Link is superior n sheeet"

Now go & cry to your mummy and maybe she'll give you $50 so that you can afford to invest in Tellor.

>Stay mad Linktard

dude.... we're going to the moon..... I can already imagine the lambos

>>19870068
damn straight, x100 is basically confirmed at this point
biz doesn't deserve this

>>19870068
mhhhh no

>>19870068
>>19870094
holy BASED

linkies will regret not getting in this...

>>19870068
>>19870094
>>19870123
>>19870152
Look at these posts and tell me it's not a scam. Avoid this shit like the plague, to think someone unironically thought it could compete with Link lol. Completely useless, this will crash

useless token

>>19870198
Thx for your useless input anon. Quote:

a few of us were shilling TRB at a dollar, which was about as low as it ever sold for....same shit in those thread
>bUt ItS nOt LiNk!?!

>>19870198
>>19870219

Tellor is not completing with Link, shows that you know jack shit about it + stay poor

>>19870231
cringe

Tribute? You steal mens souls!

glad I found this gem... we moonin

SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAM
THIS PAJEET HAS BEEN SHILLING FOR DAYQ SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAM HE'S PAID

>shitty token in Link's shadow
>up 300% in a few weeks

This thing is going down

>>19870322
Oh look another Linkie. Cool story bro.

Calm your tits down or otherwise you'll end up spending all your Link on a hair transplant down the road if you're this mad all the time.

>Muh Link
>T-t-tellors a s-s-cam g-g-guys.

stfu you pajeet I've heard you say that this project was a scam a few months back when it was at $3, we both know you're full of shit.

>>19870372
IT's actually being praised and is starting to trend on every other forum, where the overwhelming majority aren't Link marines, so there's no FUD from people like you. BTC talk, crypto moon shots and how many time do you need to be told that it's not completing with Link but is going after something completely different...

Whatever Anon, do some research and you may actually learn something, otherwise you don't deserve to know

>>19870426
Anon. Look at the IDs. You've been replying to the same person at least twice.

>>19870583
HAHA WOW thx for the heads up. Just sums up all the die hard Linkies and the levels they'll go to, to FUD Tellor.

>How pathetic lol

>>19870671
Do you happen to be a newfag? Things like this are pretty common here. People willing to go that extra mile in order to get a bag for cheaper, etc. I've seen it happen countless times already. Statera threads especially one week ago were full of this. With time you learn to recognize the patterns

>>19866589
>>19866740
thanks dude
you're preventing the newfags from getting scammed

>>19871436
(((Linkies)))

And just like that we went down from $9 to $8. It will never moon

>>19871984
We've never even reached $9 yet today Linkie, but when we do I'll be sure to let you know. I'm not sure what exchange you're using, if any? Been keeping an eye on it all day

>>19871984

its at 9 johnny boy

>>19872206
Go check on uniswap. Unless if my eyes are playing tricks on me it's clearly sitting at 9 USD

>>19872230
Oh yeah, just found it lol, it's on one exchange, but it has pretty low volume so doesn't reflect the overall performance. Nice one. I'm at $8.91