/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19818181
I heard iExec is working with Google Stadia so yes

>>19818221
I keep seeing this mentioned, is it true?

>>19818221
google stadia is a shitshow.
and iExec has always been a shitcoin.
no real fundamental purpose or reason.
an old aged dinosaur bringing nothing new to the table has been around since early cryptos beginning yet what has it fucking done?!
the tech is rubbish the name is rubbish its nothing but rubbish.

>>19818221
>>19818266
Wow wtf really?

>>19818274
why
do you
write like this.
you dumb nigger dolt

>>19818181
I don't understand their whole cloud computing thing. like why the fuck would i use blockchain for cloud computing when i can just simply and quickly use Amazon AWS?

>>19818274
Is this true? I can never tell who is serious on here.

Google is a big company and LINK went up a lot after they partnered so wouldn't stadia be good for RLC?

>>19818291
Because if your "decentralized" app runs on centralized computations it becomes your weak point? RLC literally performs the computations needed for decentralized TEEs that Chainlink is using.

>>19818274
They've partnered with Ubisoft? They're a microsoft start up? They have steadily hit milestones which make the product more valuable as well as the addition of staking to increase token utility. Pay attention or get left in the dust.

>>19818274
Hey cuck boy
If its rubbish why is JJ abrahms working with RNDR token?
It's a basic use case of Iexec but cucks dont know that I guess
Iexec is the toolsuite needed to enable web3.0 and will be widely used by academics as well as businesses.

Get the fuck out of here, you're not familia.

>>19818413
>>19818291
>>19818274

Why the hostile tones cant we just figure out if this is a larp or inside info?

>>19818446
Fuck off

>>19818478
Not productive conversation can you please stop posting here.

>>19818446
Have sex in ganges

This token unironically will 10x in the next few months when their customers are announced. Similar to NKN this coin is going to go meteoric on actual network usage. Very exciting times we all need to hold tight and enjoy the moment.

Cornell is using I-exec in their science department currently, the university stakes tokens to get access to stronger hardware without the department actually owning it. It's a clunky UI but easy enough to submit jobs to when processing models or sequencing data.

>>19818576
is this shit true?

>>19818490

>>19818616
?? I'm not a virgin

>>19818627
Wtf just answer if this is true or not

Incels make me sick

>>19818627
This was not directed at (you)

>>19818531
are there any public stats on their network usage because i think it is abysmally low at the moment..
I had a look today and i saw like 10 orders over like 12 hours for some computing capacity on their marketplace . pretty pathetic as of now

>>19818181
They used iExec for double blind random placebo and control group testing to measure the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine. The test was done in their native setting of France and the findings were statistically significant. RLC tied and validated via doracles the off chain information to the blockchain. This has been kept under wraps because the results propel the Trump Admin in a positive light. You can find the results if you use Yandex to search rather than Google.

>>19818605
no, they use golem

>>19818719
big if true

>>19818719
basd 10000 eoy

I hate niggers so goddamn much i cant even pour my wheaties in the morning without spilling

>>19818655
I realized after and felt stupid but I'm not revealing anything further just ask any student at Cornell doing a master's level science, math or stats course.

>>19818719
Is this true? I cant tell if you weirdos are larping

>>19818759
No, we dont. Keep your lies to yourself because Golem doesn't even have an accessible product we can use with the format of our data sets.

is this resistence or support @ 7k sats?

>>19819020
Resistance

>>19818266
No, its always the same fake partnership shit shillers from Mumbai. iExec has one of the worst offender shills in here. They try to pass their project as legit, with some intellectual shit and team having phds. Meanwhile the keep shilling partnerships that become not true. Notice they start shilling it here 24/7 aprox 1/2 months before every version release (supertranne dump party). Graph and shills always follow the same pattern, pump the price a couple months before a version release, shills pajeeting biz, chico crypto suddenly remembers iExec and starts making videos about it (having filled his bags before that, of course), satsgang joins the party and keeps pumping the price, retards buy all the way up, then days to weeks before version release, they dump it all and it goes to ATL again and again. Dont fall into this pajeet scam

>>19819112
But the version release already happened? What are they pumping it for now

>>19819163
V5 is in July and Setember, 2 releases for 1 version, double the P&D, double supertranne dump party

>>19819184
V5 was may 2020, why do you know so much about the project if it's a scam?

day dreams about buying btc at .30 won't buy rlc at .60

>>19819184
Shouldn't we be buying now so we can dump before version release?

>>19819219
See? Thats the level of pajeet shillers in here, dont know anything about the project and get butthurt when someone tells the truth

>>19819280
I just need 10x to help my sister bro I dont have time to research

>>19819299
DR:NS

>>19819257
Truth is only chico crypto and satsgang know where the top is. This shitcoin is manipulated by whales at will. Also it fluctuates a lot in price due to low liquidity. So what will happen is you'll buy at 60c, itll pump to 70c, dump to 30c, you'll sell here due to panic, then it'll pump again to 60c before going to stable price of 20c near ATL.

>>19819337
Fucking Denny Daggins

RLC will go to $8 this year btw

>>19818181
rlc is notorious for being a pajeet shitcoin - they were caught out straight up lying about other projects on an infographic after clearly not doing any research as some kind of weird attempt at marketing - it copped a lot of shit from linkies especially because they were saying that link didn't have any features which it clearly did - and they even tried cashing in on the "decentralized oracle" meme and ended up partnering with link anyway

then a few months back there was brigading from them and their paid marketing team spamming ripped off "digital oil" memes and claiming that v4 would be the big one please do the needful, just like v2 and v3

no one was surprised when it dumped for the 4th time

it's unironically over gilles
no one gives a fuck about your shitcoin except for a few dumb newfag

>>19819483
Those infographics weren't made by the RLC team though?

>>19819483
Pajeet shilling and bag holder made infographics dont really reflect on a team of Phds who have the most peer reviewed journals of any cryptocurrency.

The only way I can get a penis extension surgery us if this does a fat 10x

please be

>>19819483
oh shut the fuck up you retarded faggot cuck

proof of contribution is award winning tech boys, we gonna make it

>>19819567
they were

>>19819666
Damn nice trips anon, looks like 10x is back on the menu

>>19819696
yeah they were this was the oracle comparison chart
but who gives shit, only a brainlet would sell his stack over this fud

>>19819728
The team actually apologized for it and then bent the knee to Sergey to become a more powerful team for the virtuous cycle.

>>19819728
>>19819799
Is this true?

>>19819877
how can a picture lie?

>>19819877
they announced their doracles days after link was added to Coinbase

>>19819877
>77
Yes.

>>19819887
it can't

>>19819112
>They try to pass their project as legit
so why is it a scam?

>>19819112
>Notice they start shilling it here 24/7 aprox 1/2 months before every version release
But V5 is in december so yo' not correct

Fuck niggers and I also hate jannies

Talking about you Si

>>19820056
This guy is big mad that biz is finally catching onto the Chainlink ecosystem partners

>>19818274
>the tech is rubbish
Why?

>>19820198
None of these guys have any back up for their fud it's just baseless accusations made by poor white men.

>>19820125
Why don't you keep your mouth shut until were ready to hear it?

Don't be thinkin now, it ain't what you do good.

its over gilles

WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT GILLES

>>19820353
friday night is tranny night

>>19818221
That would be hilarious, two separate shit shows creating one grand collaborative shit show.

>>19820382
How is LINK a shitshow???

>>19820353
a dump
dump
dump kek

Finally getting to the bottom of this thread and honestly I'm bullish on this coin. FUD is there but not daunting, partnerships with LINK and university connections it's all making me feel something I haven't felt since 2017... FOMO. Bad memes in this thread but overall a good read 7/10

>>19820379
Only discord trannies

>>19820503
This is actually a really good thread for new investors, read it again.

what it looks like is the whale tried dumping to start a massive panic but another whale ate his asshole

we win, its over gilles, 1000x eoy

>>19820582
I have this feeling they fucked up with the initial supply distribution of this coin, this is why they need a whale to keep dumping on our faces repeteadly

anyway we win in the end, just like jesus

>>19820641
that's actually a fucking based take on it, even though the distribution is pretty solid.
I knew a whale had been manipulating for a while now but I think other whales have their eyes on it now and it'll go insane soon.

80 million RLC most of which is already taken. Supply suck and price exploration will happen around v5

>>19820676
>v5
kek

>>19820726
wahts funny about v5 anon?

>>19819728
>but who gives a shit if they behave like complete retards
kek
>>19819653
>b-but muh phds
and nothing to show for it except really scammy marketing spam campaigns on biz
>>19819666
>j-just shut up
nah, you can fuck right off
i don't give a shit about you or what happens to your filthy little pajeet village if you don't swindle enough rupees

The V4 was supposed to bring in new users. And guess who is using it right now? No one.

Hello dear 4chan friends

I have hearf about this cone in 2018 shilled here as one of ''the giants'' along with Link... we could say a ''brother'' of Link. they also work together.
What are the odds it actually delivers and people start to buy computational POWER from it?

>>19820848
1/30

Anyone else here about the Raytheon partnership? Its fucking nuts that Lockheed is already on board, but fucking RAYTHEON!?!?

>>19820803
A guy in this thread said they use it at Cornell is that not true?

>>19819238
>day dreams about buying btc at .30 won't buy rlc at .60
You don't have to put emotions into trading
You didn't buy btc and you didn't made profit
you won't make profit on rlc
When will you be making profits then?

>>19820860
why so low?

>>19820870
Dave Portnoy is buying next.

>>19820876
If you're not up at least 2x on RLC you are a cuck

>>19820781
gilles literally wrote a book on grid computing

>>19820876
The crazy part is RLC is the BTC of cloud computing..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................

>>19820993
he should probably pay people to shill his book on /g/ rather than his retarded shitcoin on biz then, don't you think?

>>19821297
he should pay you to kill yourself actually

>>19821297
Ok buddy but what are you doing for BLM?

>>19821316
oof, did I hit a nerve there rakesh? or is this just your brain on curry and dysentery?
>>19821319
niggers can go hang themselves - pajeets are only marginally better, but only because they're more like cockroaches rather than monkeys and lack the strength to actually chimp out

>>19821450
shut up faggot sell your RLC and leave

>>19821489
>sell your rlc and leave
I already sold it back when it was like $2.50 a few years back
i just enjoy shitting on pajeets like you when you're trying to gear up for another rlc spam campaign before it dumps again in v5

>>19821606
blah blah blah DR;NS stay poor faggot watch as it goes to 10$ this year

>>19821622
>i-it will go to $10 this year and do the needful sirs honest i swears
KEK
yeah, i'm sure v3- uh no, v4 - oh wait, v5 will do it this time, as vishnu has promised of course

>>19821776
DRNS thanks for bumping

>>19821450
Who's side are you on faggot?

>>19821906
>implying that i don't S on every single post
>>19822158
the side that kicks pajeets while they're down

>>19822243
I'm up 80% in a month try again loser

Guys i keep watching this Raleigh NC chimpout and I think I'm going to lose it

>>19822248
>i-i'm up %80 in a month for real sirs, only intelligent mens purchase this token! y-you're BAD *plugs ears* lalalalalallala
oh i'm totally sure you did, rakesh - when your nest of discord parasites starts spamming the board like last time, maybe try to come up with a better pitch and go to reddit instead

>>19822294
RLC is tried and true faggot your fud is so bad my grandma could do better

>>19822294
nigga u need to chill

>>19822302
>"tried and true"
>5 mil volume
>still far, far below ath when people were actually gullible enough to buy this satsgang and paid marketing manipulated shit
>has to pay to get on panels
LOL jesus christ i really, really hope you're just a swindler and not actually someone who holds this crap
i refuse to believe that there are people that dumb on this board - and there are unironic bsv holders here so that's saying something

>>19822348
Why do you hate RLC so much? You said you made money so why do you fud it?

>>19822348
You haven't pointed out a single piece of actual FUD. Everything you say can be easily disproved or is just flat out wrong. I dont know why you're trying to deter anons from huge long term gains but you need to cease and desist.

>>19822318
don't worry pradesh, i am as chill as can be
look at how tilted plebs like >>19822302
are, all you have to do is point out previous spampaigns that they've run in the past and they start sweating like kikes but aren't even smart enough to shut it all down

>>19822394
I'm not tilted at all... I told you I'm up 80% in a month and it's only going up from here... You're just a hater i guess.

>>19822385
do you know what FUD actually is? it's disinfo - so you're right, no FUD here - just pointing out what a scam this all is
>>19822363
i don't hate rlc that much, it's just another ponzi in the ocean
i just like taking shots at retards like you trying to shill it before v5, because we know that gilles will release some more funds and we'll get 5-6 threads an hour like last time and this board will be saturated with curry before the colossal dump back down to .20-.30

>>19822429
>it's just another ponzi in the ocean
??? Explain?
> because we know that gilles will release some more funds
This isn't LINK dude, team/gilles funds have never moved and you can look it up for yourself.

>>19822456
I'm not sure this weirdos angle.. it's a scam because it's a ponzi even though the team is still rich af and funded for long after V5 but they need my money? Smells like glow niggas

>>19820919
>If you're not up at least 2x on RLC
I bought at 1.80 usd

>>19821011
>The crazy part is RLC is the BTC of cloud computing
this is not some exsclusive feature. Theoretically any dev can go out with the same idea it's basically a marketplace for computational power
The tokeniteself it's not comparable to BTC or Link tokenomic
(BTC is the gold meme while in Link holding the token has a real purpose)

In rlc you could do everything with eth... but we can say that the parallel compunting stuff is pretty well... so if Gilles doesn't scam we should grown in tandem with the giants (BTC ETH and Link)

Why do guys keep on saying ''it's the Vn pump'' ?
V5 is in december

>>19822561
>The tokeniteself it's not comparable to BTC or Link tokenomic
This shows you don't understand RLC at all
>In rlc you could do everything with eth
Not true!
> compunting
ah it's this pajeet again, fuds every RLC thread in existence because he missed the dip

>>19822646
>>In rlc you could do everything with eth
>Not true!
EXAPLEIN THEN YOUR COUNTER-ARGUMENT

Its over Gilles

>>19823621
it could x100 in the next bull
buy

Why do guys keep on saying ''it's the Vn pump'' ?
V5 is in december

V5 is in december

>>19824895
>>19819280

>>19825348
what a pajeet coin... so it's pumping because of the classical Vn?