/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19811362
shitcoin going to zero

>>19811461
>shitcoin going to zero

The real BitCoin, going to $100,000 EOY.

>>19811461
Seething

>>19811461
>shitcoin going to zero

Unironically going to nominate this uncut gem for best pasta of 2020
>In b4 "le gem lol fuck off plebbitard”
I'm taking it back fuck off

BSV is worthless for the simple fact that if blocksize started to become a real problem the core devs would just raise it too, taking away bsv and bch whole reason for existing.

>>19811362
Thank you for reminding me to pack my pipe.
*PUFF*

>>19812841
There entire identity hinges on blocksize remaining at 1mb, how do you justify lightning or segwit at that point? Are you new here?

>>19812841
>if blocksize started to become a real problem the core devs would just raise it
It's almost like some posters here haven't been around for the last 5 years

>>19812940
Do you really think they wont raise the blocksize if they see the forks start getting more users?
All they care about is money.

>>19813060
You still don't get it. The only reason to raise the block limit is if you are experiencing a high TX volume. In order to have a high TX volume you need users and usecase driving that volume. While BSV has adopted this mindset and built up usecases/products over the years and will have gradually built up all this IP, users, etc. You can't just sit there as BTC and be like hey guys we will just flip our block size to 100mb too! It means nothing, when your only usecase right now is 'digital gold' which is meant to just be held and never transacted and actually used, changing the block size will mean nothing...

>>19812499
1st post: you hold an asset hoping for an increase in value, this is not bitcoin's purpose. bitcoin is a means of exchange the big block fork I endorse exchanges faster and so is the better novelty phone cash and therefore the true bitcoin.

post 2: $100,000 EOY.

>nice one m8.

Not a chance in hell the 1MB limit will ever be lifted, anyone that thinks this is delusional

They are going to try and emulate big block bitcoin on the liquid network though

>>19813060

The fork already has more users. There are currently twice as many money button users as lightning network nodes, lol

>>19812499
>>19812560
>>19812668
delusional, enjoy poverty

>>19812940
Blocksize will be raised when it is deemed necessary and necessary improvements have been made. Most likely after utreexo has been released.

Cannot comprehend the retardation of you post.

>>19814018
If the plan is to eventually throw up your hands and raise the blocksize, why continue implementing other solutoins? Why wouldn't you just up the blocksize right now? Don't you see the flaw in your logic? They contradict eachother.

>itt: seething commiunist blocklets

>>19814018

Says who? Who is possibly going to support that?

>>19811362
>blah blah schizo.
Creg got FUCKING DESTROYED ON STAGE tho. Completely debunked in public in person. Topkek Scam Version faggots

>>19814220
kek

>>19811362
Shillbo Faggins

>>19813222
>1st post: you hold an asset hoping for an increase in value, this is not bitcoin's purpose. bitcoin is a means of exchange the big block fork I endorse exchanges faster and so is the better novelty phone cash and therefore the true bitcoin.
>post 2: $100,000 EOY.
>nice one m8.

Big Businesses, Governments, and Central Banks are flocking to build on BSV.

Before the years end you will see the true, stiff power of Satoshi's Vision.

$100,000 for a whole unit of the worlds most secure and censorship resistant database is a small, insignificant price.

>>19814690
who is that next to Calvin?
and that one with the glasses - isn't that Steve 'no list without error' Shadders?
truly, the dream team
>as in, you believe anyones buying this bullshit, dream on

>>19814837
Thanks for sharing your asshurt Greg

>>19814837

>>19814811
dream on, not happening

>>19815327
>dream on, not happening

PURE COREKEK COPE

>>19814837
imagine being this assblasted

>>19816416
cope harder, your shitcoin is getting dumped

>>19815248
>>19815271
>>19817057
imagine being such dullards this is your only reply to people pointing out, correctly, your 'team' is a bad comedy of circus act proportions. The only one with competence (in any field) also appears to have fled. The absolute fucking state

>>19817145
that "circus" team are the only team to have managed to scale bitcoin