/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19750895

Can I request my money back though?

>>19750895
I am thinking of pickinp up 100k when it dumps during the bitcoin breakout that will soon happen.

>>19750895
Instead of being down 99% it's only down 98%.

That's 50% better

>>19751245
you need to stop looking at previous tops. they were way too overextended. in all honestly req should have never went above maybe... 5 cents.

>>19750895
I just checked their github and they're still working on it, last update was 3 hours ago.
I would throw a few eths at it, but I used to have both req and link in 2017 and I'm glad as fuck I sold the req and kept the link kek, if I did the opposite I would've kms now

.018 wowww. Reminder ICO price for this shit was around .06. I thought I got lucky after buying it at .04 on etherdelta after ICO, but it still is only .018..... This will never recover.

>>19751800
working on what? a 'pay with crypto' button for wordpress websites? this shit is a joke of a project and after 3 fucking years, they still haven't done anything worth doing.

>>19751840

It's dead. One retard throwing a line of shitty code at it on github does not mean it's alive. All those mozzarella faggots have left the building.

yeah, this is one I watched the whole arc on, /biz spammed this one for months and the it pumped wildly, bunch of happy anons then it collapsed totally.

>>19751800
don't throw anything, you fucks don't deserve profits because you only look at fucking graphs. is link really a 100x better project as fucking mcap suggests? it's overhyped shit with a lot of fundamental problems that no one really discusses anymore. REQ, on the other hand, has really sound use cases, but it was fudded to hell and every positive fact about development was distorted to negative. every piece of shit "investor" dropped the ship and now it is how it is. but the truth is, REQ is getting developed and is getting adopted. at least you know it's not overpriced as most of the crypto projects are. it climbed up too fast during 2017 craze, but that doesn't mean it's shit because the price is not $1 anymore.

>>19753766
im sorry you still carry these bags bro.
but they fucked everyone.
the firs round of ico investors got fucked
then the people who picked up those bags got fucked again when they released their product ( a fucking javascript library, worth what 200 to 500 million dollars at the time? )

then they fucked us all again eating pizza
then they fucked us AGAIN and dumped 40 million REQ tokens during the bear market. which made the price go as low as it is now.

no one will ever hold REQ every again.

>>19751800
Anon who did do the opposite here, and will never ever live it down. My only saving grace is I sold all my REQ at 2.5 cents and put what was left into LINK. The plan all along was swing REQ gains into LINK. REQ gains never happened. I literally DCA’d $30k into it from $1 down to like 20 cents. If I had put that same $30k into LINK over the same time period I’d have over 150k LINK.

>>19753766
Huh? The fud was real. They lost every single major non-crypto partner. Every. Single. One. No one who has worked with the REQ team has wanted to continue working with them for very long. Including Kyber and RCN. Gilded is obligated to since it received funding from REQ. Co-founder stepped down. The fact that Robbin is still on the team after his numerous fuckups shows how incompetent this team is. Btw the price is only pumping on low volume because they hired a market maker (see last AMA), otherwise Binance would delist this shit.

is this paypal 2.0?

I will ask what is likely a very stupid question. Who is the REQ team, what do they do daily? is there an office somewhere?

same for link for that matter. Where do there fuckers actually do work?

There isn't a place right, there are no deliverable, there are no timelines, there is no plan to get anyone to adopt and start using this shit.

>>19755041
they are crypto-only right now and that doesn't have to be a bad thing. I'm not happy about Etienne stepping down, but things always change and some people will leave no matter what. not sure if they hired market maker yet, but he should only be liquidity provider, not a cause for pumps.