/biz/ - Business & Finance

Couldn't even hold 13 cents. Back to 11. Where's the binance pump... oh ya

>>19733462
V-ID has partnered with HOWDOO UDOO, FTM, and LTO. All pump and dump scams. The reseller partners are either shell companies or outright scams.

Acronis owns the patent for blockchain validation technology in the United States (and it is enforceable if V-ID does any business in the United States, regardless of bagholder claims): https://patents.google.com/patent/US10114980B2/

Make a clone of V-ID and own 100% of the token supply: https://www.udacity.com/course/blockchain-developer-nanodegree--nd1309

VIDT is an illegal security token (and not a utility token) and if SEC hears about it this shit is going straight to zero. They sold VIDT at ICO with the promise that they will convert to VIDS (shares in the company down the line). They also hinted at Binance listing being locked in and other shady shenanigans, such as unlocking supposedly locked tokens to pay a woman to namedrop VIDT during an online Powerpoint presentation. They (meaning you) paid over $10,000 for it. In other words, team is dumping tokens left and right without the "team" technically dumping.

>>19733566
>In other words, team is dumping tokens left and right without the "team" technically dumping.

>>19733462
VIDT will fly past ath soon. Getting rid of weak hands on this red day. Bullish af!

>>19733560
So what's ur excuse for not buying right now? looks as if June is going to surpass the last 3 months in document validations.

>>19733566
But they aren't doing any business in the United States. This is a European project, you mutts keep to your own rubbish.

So much cope. I'm sure IBM knows it's a big scam too, right? hahaha

>>19733566
>HOWDOO UDOO

>>19734015
>I'm sure IBM knows it's a big scam too, right? hahaha
V-ID IBM "integration" allows devs to skip the V-ID contract, therefore pay nothing to the devs nor use any VIDT in the process of validating. Hahahah

>>19733566
It's a Dutch project you retard. SEC oversees the USA market, don't post stuff if your brain is the size of a pea;)

>>19733566
I also wondered about their connection to the crypto advisor lady. she apparently is a somebody who looks/looked into possible blockchain use cases for the EU. Her last talk had apparently nothing to do with vidt and although vidt's twitter account congratulated her by name, they did not @ her official twitter account, only retweeted her tweet. I also didn't find anything vidt related on her twitter or on her employer's page about her.
it's weird since she is displayed prominently on the vidt website. though maybe this is normal procedure in the world of crypto, or maybe I am just missing something obvious?

>>19734315
Ok retard, then explain why were they worried about SEC >>19733566 You can't explain it.

>>19734337
If you look into her resume, she's just an HR rep bullshit artist that glomped onto the blockchain buzzword to carve out a corner for herself in the field. Zero technical knowledge. The question then is, why would V-ID pay her to be an advisor?

>>19733462
almost at 50k
VIDT gonna have an Unibright like run sooner or later
fucking huge clients using their product, gaining exposure and integration in working processes from Procentec, that means vidt is used in the integration of their products for companies like SIEMENS
fucking hell DYOR and you see how big they are. this mcap is a fucking joke

>>19734700
nobody cares bag holder, its a scam. Everybody hates vidt here KEK

>>19734700
VIDT already had it's Unibright run last year. In fact Unibright is mirroring the pump and dump of VIDT almost identically. Also coincidentally both are Chuck-e-cheese shitcoins.

>>19734806
>Everybody hates vidt here KEK
you bought the top and sold the bottom, you did it the /biz/ way, its okay
>>19734849
that image made me laughing, thanks