/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19688851
HAHAHAHAHAHAH linkies turning into xrpfags with the random dates now

Maybe anon, maybe...
Also:
FUCK NIGGERS

>>19688851
216
Revelation 21:6 New International Version
He said to me: “It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To the thirsty I will give water without cost from the spring of the water of life.

1 Kings 6:21 King James Version (KJV)
So Solomon overlaid the house within with pure gold: and he made a partition by the chains of gold before the oracle; and he overlaid it with gold.
>chains of gold, oracle

Is this a new HEX fork?

>>19688863
>>19688851
eclipse this day

>>19688851
How do I date?

>>19689914
and solar storm

>>19688851
It’s actually happening tonight...strap in

>>19688980

>>19689914
holy schizo batman!

>>19690001
>celestial alignments have nothing to do with chainlink
t. schizo

>>19688851
there arent 21 months lmao

>>19688863
>implying it's random
216 is the holy number
at 21.6 the solstice climaxes into the full solar eclipse, then turns into the new moon
After that Saturn comes the great conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn
It's an occult event that happens only every 1800 years
Ari Juels

>>19688851
$35.00 end of month.
poopee

>>19688851
theres only 12 months retard

>>19688851
Just IMAGINE all of the memetic energy we’re about to witness

Exit scam yet?

>>19688934
What does it have to do with my stinkers?

>>19690504
chainlink will cause a eclipse.
its the signal of the new ages

>>19690083

Also for my own input about June 21st, 2020 or "216 Day", with the solar eclipse, I noticed there is another thing that day which probably has some signficance. Its also Father's Day which seems interesting. Perhaps someone with more astrological knowledge can weigh in here, but I know that Saturn Chronos etc is considered the Father or Father Time correct? Also in regards to Mark Passio's Natural Law seminar he talks about Master morality and slave morality like Sergey has mentioned in the past as well as the difference between the 1% and everyone else. Master morality is an abundance of the Divine Masculine and slave morality being too much of the Sacred Feminine. The Enlightened Individual has perfect balance in both brain hemispheres, which compliment each other and naturally produce thoughts geared towards truth, justice, and freedom.

Even more intriguing is the Great Conjunction between Saturn and Jupiter that will come to complete fruition on December 21st, 2020. Jupiter will fully overtake Saturn that day, which in Roman mythology Saturn is the father of Jupiter. Its a transition of power or perhaps a sign of a New World Order as the "son" over takes the "father".

Extra bonus bonus but more or less unrelated to /biz (well excellent bodily health is related to everything I guess)

Start reading everything you can by George W. Carey, pics related

The next couple years are probably going to be incredible Godspeed, I love you all

>>19690083
Exactly 6 months in between the solar eclipse and the Great Conjunction as well.

>>19690558

“Millionaires don't use Astrology, billionaires do.”

--J.P. Morgan

Bump

>3 years

>>19690558
Read Nietzsche you dumb libtard. Master vs slave morality doesnt have to do anything with gender. That guy sounds idiotic

>>19691812

I'm not liberal. I've never met anybody who uses libtard and was even remotely educated on anything beyond a surface level.

If you took the time to even google it instead of directly jumping to insults, you would have found it doesn't have anything to do biological gender, but the mindset, over use of left or right brain hemispheres, and energies each one is coorelated to. Men can have too much the Sacred Feminine energy, which means they are slave morality and too abundant in right hemisphere thinking. Too emotional and not enought logical thinking for example.

These are dualities that have existed since the beginning of time and are in line with what Nietzsche wrote for the most part.

>>19691900
You freaking retard. Don't lecture me when you're illiterate...

How about instead of youtube e-celebs you actually learn? It has nothing to do with that. You leftists are always about bastardizing and changing the meaning of words

>>19692072

I'm not liberal or Leftist. You have yet to state any argument as to why I'm incorrect, and its because you can't. I've read Nietzsche and his teachings about slave and master morality are in line with what Mark Passio lectures.

Mark Passio isn't a e-celeb Youtuber. He isn't monetized. He was a member of the Church of Satan for years because he became reformed. He talks about the church's goal was to get as many people set into a slave morality mindset by writing, funding, and publishing literature that accomplished those goals. New Age religion/spirituality is a good example. It basically tells people to be completely passive and just accept events as they take place. Same with the "The Secret" where if you focus on what you want it will come to you, but they purposely leave out the alternating dynamic of taking action or "works" while focusing attention on what you desire.

These are the dualities I'm talking about, Passio talked about, and Nieztsche wrote about.

Again if you knew what you were talking about in specifics you would simply educate me and not get emotional and jump to insults. Unfortunately you are wrong so its all you have left. I'm not an "expert" on Nietschze but I've read a decent amount

>>19689936
just talk to her man

>>19692319

In other words, Master morality = Divine Masculine and Slave morality = Sacred feminine. These dualities have existed all through time and repacked under different names. The concepts and mindsets are the same

>>19692319
>You have yet to state any argument as to why I'm incorrect, and its becaus
Stopped reading right here. Kys 42, you know nothing

Proof you're a libtard (or retarded and haven't gotten over themself yet):
> and energies each one is coorelated to. Men can have too much
Only liberals say such asinine things like this
>>19690558
>whoreoscoping
>"bros!... does like, Father's Day mean I won't get beaten down today by his cold hard dick?? ... ;_; "

And I quote. Sage and stop with the namefagging self-quoting, you dumb herb. You have much to learn.

>>19688851
I pawned my tanzanite and aquamarine rings so I can buy chainlink, that was 1 year ago and Ive been paying the interest since then, waiting for chainlink to moon so I can get back my sentimental gold rings and still have a suicide stack, its been hard but I hope a big happening would occur on that astrological day. Ive learned a lot from biz since then, morality is heavier than money and Ive been doing nofap, you guys are the real mvp.

>>19692464

I'm not 42. What you do expect? You tell me I'm wrong and then offer absolutely zero counter argument at all? Even though I've asked you to do so repeatedly?

Its the weirdest thing, is saying I'm liberal the new tactic to shut down conversation or make me upset? You surely want me to respond with emotion and aggression, you are doing your best to try and draw it out of me. Yes energies, humans are electro-magnetic beings. Are you some kind of shill honestly, and it doesn't matter because other people are reading this and can obviously tell you have adding nothing of substance while I explained somewhat in depth how they are connected.

Honestly what is this even supposed to mean?

>"bros!... does like, Father's Day mean I won't get beaten down today by his cold hard dick?? ... ;_; "

>>19688851
7.18.2020

>"I'm not 42. What you do expect?"
>quotes himself

>humans are electro magnetic humam beans

Further Proof:
>Extra bonus bonus but more or less>>19691900
>extra bonus bonus
((((You)))

humans are electro magnetic humam beans

>>19692768

Nothing in this post was even coherent. I'm not 42, but I've read a decent amount of his threads. Humans absolutely have electro-magnetic properties.

Idk what you are so upset about but either way it doesn't even matter. LINK has been chosen and the elites are on board. You don't need to believe any of these things for them to be true. It seems increasingly apparent you are just being purposely difficult instead of wanting to have normal discourse.

>>19692931
>but I've read a decent amount of his threads
Don't worry, I can tell fag

>>19692944

Most of my research was prior to seeing his threads. I don't necessarily subscribe to everything he posts, but he is aware of a lot that is going on right now.

>>19688934
>>19688980
based and Biblepilled

>>19688870
Based lives matter

>>19692511
And digits. You're on God's track anon

>>19692996
>third person usage
If you want to blend in, try not self-quoting so hard. At a deeper, truer level, you're too full of yourself and need to overcome that.

>>19688851
What happens on the 21st, OP?

>New marine reporting for hodl duty.

>>19692931
post more about this George Carey, what does he hypothesize?

>>19693156
George W. Carey was a homeopathic doctor and suggested all disease was coorelated to a deficiency in various cell salts that the body/blood is comprised of. Depending on your Zodiac sign and relation to the sun and stars upon birth your body utilizes specific salts faster than others and you tend to need more of those. At first it sounded retarded but I think he is on to something.

For instance I fall under LEO and it says I tend to need higher amounts of magnesium phosphate. You can also be deficient because of various habits. Smoking, coffee, high zinc and Vit D diets making it hard to absorb magnesium in general. Carey also talks about Kundalini and ancient Kabbalah/Freemason knowledge to regenerate your body natural. You should watch this presentation its an excellent entry into the topic. Orgasm rentention is key as well to reach Christhood so to speak. He thinks the Bible was an allegory in reference to the human body, but is likely that Christ also existed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNkISOUYJY

Its long but absolutely worth the watch.

>>19693156
Also research about Freemason practices gave some insight on what the elite do.
If you have heard of Adrenchrome, its kind of a meme, misdirection, or not a completely accurate depiction of what is being done. The elite do harvest young blood and fluids saturated with HGH. Adrenaline and psycho-active chemicals from the pineal and pituitary glands to transfuse in their own bodies. The steal organs as well. People like Soros and Rockefeller didn't simply use state of the art health care with their infinite wealth. The ultra rich want to live as long as possible as their primary goal. There are studies from young and old mice spliced together and it reverted the aging process of the old mouse. Its insane.

Its already being done legally with 16 year olds as well. Its not that hard to extrapolate to young targets on the black market, think John of God and his baby harvesting farm in Brazil.

https://www.ambrosiaplasma.com/

Blood Libel and blood rituals have been around since the beginning of time unfortunately. You can also bathe in blood for healing properties too. The "folklore" of the Countess Liz Balthory.


There are two paths of Kaballah. Its taught in the highest eschelons of Freemasonry that if you treat your body as a temple of God you can activate and "baptise" your Sacred Seed naturally. The pineal gland, pituitary gland, and claustrum all work in tandem to secret oils which get transformed in your solar plexus and then returned to the claustrum for seemingly super human mental processing abilities and regeneration, anti-aging etc.

The Satanic elite stray from godliness and steal those from young children and follow the left-handed path. Its the faster method of course but getting them from other sources turns off your own natural production so its a double edge sword if your supply is cut off, and its evil of course.

>>19690504
Sergey is satoshi

>>19688851
Just because they said they have big announcements for the summer that doesn't mean they are going to reveal them on literally the first day of summer.

Fucking magnets, how do they work?

bump

Its so sad that I have to go to twitter these days for crumbs this board used to be filled with crumb threads now its just trash okpeaceoutbye

>>19693708
Nigger

>>19688851
Pls delete

>>19690558
>>19693251
thanks man! i found the pdf's of the two books you posted, and am about halfway through the lecture as well

interesting stuff, turning out great actually

>>19693708
everyone in your hole village already knows Binance wood be a node operation though, petulant patel. go make the cry in the ganges.

>>19693264
This is a criminally underrated post for too many reasons for me to state.

>>19692464
what does adams have to do with tu is glowing conversation?

>>19693743

These two are just as important as well. If you really have the time you can watch Mark Passio's presentation Natural Law but its like 7 hours long. I broke it up into 3 separate settings and took some notes to refresh my memory

Part 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1Ufx1RWNF8

Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA

Part 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=204aGDVa3Vw

These get into the nitty gritty of how occult knowledge the elite use to control people on a mass scale through psychology and archetypes. Its beyond fascinating for sure

Look for these two books as well
>>19690575

>>19693759

Thanks the elite want to dominate us and can't have people wakening up reaching self actualization more or less

>>19693862
Anti-freemasonic Party. Know your American roots bro

remember the facebook folder? yea that was such a nothing burger. makes me think all you schizos just throw everything on a wall and hope something happened to stick.

>>19688851
June 21? 24 hours before the DMG public sale? Oh, interesting. ;)

>>19692641
>I explained somewhat in depth how they are connected.
#RemindMe 6.21.20 when 42 proves he wasn't blasphemous

In some remote corner of the universe, poured out and glittering in innumerable solar systems, there once was a star on which clever animals invented knowledge. That was the highest and most mendacious minute of "world history"—yet only a minute. After nature had drawn a few breaths the star grew cold, and the clever animals had to die.

One might invent such a fable and still not have illustrated sufficiently how wretched, how shadowy and flighty, how aimless and arbitrary, the human intellect appears in nature. There have been eternities when it did not exist; and when it is done for again, nothing will have happened. For this intellect has no further mission that would lead beyond human life. It is human, rather, and only its owner and producer gives it such importance, as if the world pivoted around it. But if we could communicate with the mosquito, then we would learn that he floats through the air with the same self-importance, feeling within itself the flying center of the world. There is nothing in nature so despicable or insignificant that it cannot immediately be blown up like a bag by a slight breath of this power of knowledge; and just as every porter wants an admirer, the proudest human being, the philosopher, thinks that he sees on the eyes of the universe telescopically focused from all sides on his actions and thoughts.

>>19694225
It is strange that this should be the effect of the intellect, for after all it was given only as an aid to the most unfortunate, most delicate, most evanescent beings in order to hold them for a minute in existence, from which otherwise, without this gift, they would have every reason to flee as quickly as Lessing's son. [In a famous letter to Johann Joachim Eschenburg (December 31, 1778), Lessing relates the death of his infant son, who "understood the world so well that he left it at the first opportunity."] That haughtiness which goes with knowledge and feeling, which shrouds the eyes and senses of man in a blinding fog, therefore deceives him about the value of existence by carrying in itself the most flattering evaluation of knowledge itself. Its most universal effect is deception; but even its most particular effects have something of the same character.

The intellect, as a means for the preservation of the individual, unfolds its chief powers in simulation; for this is the means by which the weaker, less robust individuals preserve themselves, since they are denied the chance of waging the struggle for existence with horns or the fangs of beasts of prey. In man this art of simulation reaches its peak: here deception, flattering, lying and cheating, talking behind the back, posing, living in borrowed splendor, being masked, the disguise of convention, acting a role before others and before oneself—in short, the constant fluttering around the single flame of vanity is so much the rule and the law that almost nothing is more incomprehensible than how an honest and pure urge for truth could make its appearance among men.

>>19694240
>—in short, the constant fluttering around the single flame of vanity is so much the rule and the law that almost nothing is more incomprehensible than how an honest and pure urge for truth could make its appearance among men.
They are deeply immersed in illusions and dream images; their eye glides only over the surface of things and sees "forms"; their feeling nowhere lead into truth, but contents itself with the reception of stimuli, playing, as it were, a game of blindman's buff on the backs of things. Moreover, man permits himself to be lied to at night, his life long, when he dreams, and his moral sense never even tries to prevent this—although men have been said to have overcome snoring by sheer will power.

What, indeed, does man know of himself! Can he even once perceive himself completely, laid out as if in an illuminated glass case? Does not nature keep much the most from him, even about his body, to spellbind and confine him in a proud, deceptive consciousness, far from the coils of the intestines, the quick current of the blood stream, and the involved tremors of the fibers? She threw away the key; and woe to the calamitous curiosity which might peer just once through a crack in the chamber of consciousness and look down, and sense that man rests upon the merciless, the greedy, the insatiable, the murderous, in the indifference of his ignorance—hanging in dreams, as it were, upon the back of a tiger. In view of this, whence in all the world comes the urge for truth?

>>19694256
Insofar as the individual wants to preserve himself against other individuals, in a natural state of affairs he employs the intellect mostly for simulation alone. But because man, out of need and boredom, wants to exist socially, herd-fashion, he requires a peace pact and he endeavors to banish at least the very crudest bellum omni contra omnes [war of all against all] from his world. This peace pact brings with it something that looks like the first step toward the attainment of this enigmatic urge for truth. For now that is fixed which henceforth shall be "truth"; that is, a regularly valid and obligatory designation of things is invented, and this linguistic legislation also furnishes the first laws of truth: for it is here that the contrast between truth and lie first originates. The liar uses the valid designations, the words, to make the unreal appear as real; he says, for example, "I am rich," when the word "poor" would be the correct designation of his situation. He abuses the fixed conventions by arbitrary changes or even by reversals of the names. When he does this in a self-serving way damaging to others, then society will no longer trust him but exclude him. Thereby men do not flee from being deceived as much as from being damaged by deception: what they hate at this stage is basically not the deception but the bad, hostile consequences of certain kinds of deceptions. In a similarly limited way man wants the truth: he desires the agreeable life-preserving consequences of truth, but he is indifferent to pure knowledge, which has no consequences; he is even hostile to possibly damaging and destructive truths. And, moreover, what about these conventions of language? Are they really the products of knowledge, of the sense of truth? Do the designations and the things coincide? Is language the adequate expression of all realities?

>>19694266
Only through forgetfulness can man ever achieve the illusion of possessing a "truth" in the sense just designated. If he does not wish to be satisfied with truth in the form of a tautology—that is, with empty shells—then he will forever buy illusions for truths.

>>19694286
What is a word? The image of a nerve stimulus in sounds. But to infer from the nerve stimulus, a cause outside us, that is already the result of a false and unjustified application of the principle of reason. If truth alone had been the deciding factor in the genesis of language, and if the standpoint of certainty had been decisive for designations, then how could we still dare to say "the stone is hard," as if "hard" were something otherwise familiar to us, and not merely a totally subjective stimulation! We separate things according to gender, designating the tree as masculine and the plant as feminine. What arbitrary assignments! How far this oversteps the canons of certainty! We speak of a "snake": this designation touches only upon its ability to twist itself and could therefore also fit a worm.

>>19694290
What arbitrary differentiations! What one-sided preferences, first for this, then for that property of a thing! The different languages, set side by side, show that what matters with words is never the truth, never an adequate expression; else there would not be so many languages. The "thing in itself" (for that is what pure truth, without consequences, would be) is quite incomprehensible to the creators of language and not at all worth aiming for. One designates only the relations of things to man, and to express them one calls on the boldest metaphors. A nerve stimulus, first transposed into an image—first metaphor. The image, in turn, imitated by a sound—second metaphor. And each time there is a complete overleaping of one sphere, right into the middle of an entirely new and different one. One can imagine a man who is totally deaf and has never had a sensation of sound and music. Perhaps such a person will gaze with astonishment at Chladni's sound figures; perhaps he will discover their causes in the vibrations of the string and will now swear that he must know what men mean by "sound." It is this way with all of us concerning language; we believe that we know something about the things themselves when we speak of trees, colors, snow, and flowers; and yet we possess nothing but metaphors for things—metaphors which correspond in no way to the original entities. In the same way that the sound appears as a sand figure, so the mysterious X of the thing in itself first appears as a nerve stimulus, then as an image, and finally as a sound. Thus the genesis of language does not proceed logically in any case, and all the material within and with which the man of truth, the scientist, and the philosopher later work and build, if not derived from never-never land, is a least not derived from the essence of things.

>>19694186
>>19694186

Again what are you even saying? I'm not 42, just a guy who browses /biz a lot, I went all into LINK in early-mid 2018 after I saw Smartcontract.com in The 4th Industrial Revolution book by Klaus Schwab and the Blythe Master's feet photo with Dan K. You realize it wasn't 42 who came up with the 216 Solar eclipse connection. He even said in the thread the didn't think anything would happen. You legit have no idea what you are talking about.

>>19666573

>>19694299
>>19694290
Let us still give special consideration to the formation of concepts. Every word immediately becomes a concept, inasmuch as it is not intended to serve as a reminder of the unique and wholly individualized original experience to which it owes its birth, but must at the same time fit innumerable, more or less similar cases—which means, strictly speaking, never equal—in other words, a lot of unequal cases. Every concept originates through our equating what is unequal. No leaf ever wholly equals another, and the concept "leaf" is formed through an arbitrary abstraction from these individual differences, through forgetting the distinctions; and now it gives rise to the idea that in nature there might be something besides the leaves which would be "leaf"—some kind of original form after which all leaves have been woven, marked, copied, colored, curled, and painted, but by unskilled hands, so that no copy turned out to be a correct, reliable, and faithful image of the original form. We call a person "honest." Why did he act so honestly today? we ask. Our answer usually sounds like this: because of his honesty. Honesty! That is to say again: the leaf is the cause of the leaves. After all, we know nothing of an essence-like quality named "honesty"; we know only numerous individualized, and thus unequal actions, which we equate by omitting the unequal and by then calling them honest actions. In the end, we distill from them a qualitas occulta [hidden quality] with the name of "honesty."

>>19694310
we know only numerous individualized, and thus unequal actions, which we equate by omitting the unequal and by then calling them honest actions. In the end, we distill from them a qualitas occulta [hidden quality] with the name of "honesty." We obtain the concept, as we do the form, by overlooking what is individual and actual; whereas nature is acquainted with no forms and no concepts, and likewise with no species, but only with an X which remains inaccessible and undefinable for us. For even our contrast between individual and species is something anthropomorphic and does not originate in the essence of things; although we should not presume to claim that this contrast does not correspond o the essence of things: that would of course be a dogmatic assertion and, as such, would be just as indemonstrable as its opposite.

What, then, is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms—in short, a sum of human relations which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins.
>no longer as coins

>>19694225
>>19694240
>>19694240
>>19694256
>>19694256
>>19694266
>>19694290
>>19694299

Nice slide spam

>>19693891
thank you for the breadcrumb

>>19694322
We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as yet we have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it should exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors—in moral terms: the obligation to lie according to a fixed convention, to lie herd-like in a style obligatory for all. Now man of course forgets that this is the way things stand for him. Thus he lies in the manner indicated, unconsciously and in accordance with habits which are centuries' old; and precisely by means of this unconsciousness and forgetfulness he arrives at his sense of truth. From the sense that one is obliged to designate one thing as red, another as cold, and a third as mute, there arises a moral impulse in regard to truth. The venerability, reliability, and utility of truth is something which a person demonstrates for himself from the contrast with the liar, whom no one trusts and everyone excludes. As a rational being, he now places his behavior under the control of abstractions. He will no longer tolerate being carried away by sudden impressions, by intuitions. First he universalizes all these impressions into less colorful, cooler concepts, so that he can entrust the guidance of his life and conduct to them. Everything which distinguishes man from the animals depends upon this ability to volatilize perceptual metaphors in a schema, and thus to dissolve an image into a concept. For something is possible in the realm of these schemata which could never be achieved with the vivid first impressions: the construction of a pyramidal order according to castes and degrees, the creation of a new world of laws, privileges, subordinations, and clearly marked boundaries—a new world, one which now confronts that other vivid world of first impressions as more solid, more universal, better known,

>>19694355
Np bro
and more human than the immediately perceived world, and thus as the regulative and imperative world. Whereas each perceptual metaphor is individual and without equals and is therefore able to elude all classification, the great edifice of concepts displays the rigid regularity of a Roman columbarium and exhales in logic that strength and coolness which is characteristic of mathematics. Anyone who has felt this cool breath [of logic] will hardly believe that even the concept—which is as bony, foursquare, and transposable as a die—is nevertheless merely the residue of a metaphor, and that the illusion which is involved in the artistic transference of a nerve stimulus into images is, if not the mother, then the grandmother of every single concept. But in this conceptual crap game "truth" means using every die in the designated manner, counting its spots accurately, fashioning the right categories, and never violating the order of caste and class rank. Just as the Romans and Etruscans cut up the heavens with rigid mathematical lines and confined a god within each of the spaces thereby delimited, as within a templum, so every people has a similarly mathematically divided conceptual heaven above themselves and henceforth thinks that truth demands that each conceptual god be sought only within his own sphere. Here one may certainly admire man as a mighty genius of construction, who succeeds in piling an infinitely complicated dome of concepts upon an unstable foundation, and, as it were, on running water. Of course, in order to be supported by such a foundation, his construction must be like one constructed of spiders' webs: delicate enough to be carried along by the waves, strong enough not to be blown apart by every wind.

>>19694385
As a genius of construction man raises himself far above the bee in the following way: whereas the bee builds with wax that he gathers from nature, man builds with the far more delicate conceptual material which he first has to manufacture from himself. In this he is greatly to be admired, but not on account of his drive for truth or for pure knowledge of things. When someone hides something behind a bush and looks for it again in the same place and finds it there as well, there is not much to praise in such seeking and finding. Yet this is how matters stand regarding seeking and finding "truth" within the realm of reason. If I make up the definition of a mammal, and then, after inspecting a camel, declare "look, a mammal" I have indeed brought a truth to light in this way, but it is a truth of limited value. That is to say, it is a thoroughly anthropomorphic truth which contains not a single point which would be "true in itself" or really and universally valid apart from man. At bottom, what the investigator of such truths is seeking is only the metamorphosis of the world into man. He strives to understand the world as something analogous to man, and at best he achieves by his struggles the feeling of assimilation. Similar to the way in which astrologers considered the stars to be in man 's service and connected with his happiness and sorrow, such an investigator considers the entire universe in connection with man: the entire universe as the infinitely fractured echo of one original sound-man; the entire universe as the infinitely multiplied copy of one original picture-man. His method is to treat man as the measure of all things, but in doing so he again proceeds from the error of believing that he has these things [which he intends to measure] immediately before him as mere objects. He forgets that the original perceptual metaphors are metaphors and takes them to be the things themselves.

>>19694392


Only by forgetting this primitive world of metaphor can one live with any repose, security, and consistency: only by means of the petrification and coagulation of a mass of images which originally streamed from the primal faculty of human imagination like a fiery liquid, only in the invincible faith that this sun, this window, this table is a truth in itself, in short, only by forgetting that he himself is an artistically creating subject, does man live with any repose, security, and consistency. If but for an instant he could escape from the prison walls of this faith, his "self consciousness" would be immediately destroyed. It is even a difficult thing for him to admit to himself that the insect or the bird perceives an entirely different world from the one that man does, and that the question of which of these perceptions of the world is the more correct one is quite meaningless, for this would have to have been decided previously in accordance with the criterion of the correct perception, which means, in accordance with a criterion which is not available.

>>19694407
But in any case it seems to me that the correct perception—which would mean the adequate expression of an object in the subject—is a contradictory impossibility. For between two absolutely different spheres, as between subject and object, there is no causality, no correctness, and no expression; there is, at most, an aesthetic relation: I mean, a suggestive transference, a stammering translation into a completely foreign tongue—for which I there is required, in any case, a freely inventive intermediate sphere and mediating force. "Appearance" is a word that contains many temptations, which is why I avoid it as much as possible. For it is not true that the essence of things "appears" in the empirical world. A painter without hands who wished to express in song the picture before his mind would, by means of this substitution of spheres, still reveal more about the essence of things than does the empirical world. Even the relationship of a nerve stimulus to the generated image is not a necessary one. But when the same image has been generated millions of times and has been handed down for many generations and finally appears on the same occasion every time for all mankind, then it acquires at last the same meaning for men it would have if it were the sole necessary image and if the relationship of the original nerve stimulus to the generated image were a strictly causal one. In the same manner, an eternally repeated dream would certainly be felt and judged to be reality. But the hardening and congealing of a metaphor guarantees absolutely nothing concerning its necessity and exclusive justification.

>>19694418
Every person who is familiar with such considerations has no doubt felt a deep mistrust of all idealism of this sort: just as often as he has quite early convinced himself of the eternal consistency, omnipresence, and fallibility of the laws of nature. He has concluded that so far as we can penetrate here—from the telescopic heights to the microscopic depths—everything is secure, complete, infinite, regular, and without any gaps. Science will be able to dig successfully in this shaft forever, and the things that are discovered will harmonize with and not contradict each other. How little does this resemble a product of the imagination, for if it were such, there should be some place where the illusion and reality can be divined. Against this, the following must be said: if each us had a different kind of sense perception—if we could only perceive things now as a bird, now as a worm, now as a plant, or if one of us saw a stimulus as red, another as blue, while a third even heard the same stimulus as a sound—then no one would speak of such a regularity of nature, rather, nature would be grasped only as a creation which is subjective in the highest degree. After all, what is a law of nature as such for us? We are not acquainted with it in itself, but only with its effects, which means in its relation to other laws of nature—which, in turn, are known to us only as sums of relations.

>>19694392

Why are you just spamming Neitzsche? Its not even remotely related to LINK and occult connections?

>>19694377
tldr

>>19694435
Because 42 twisted his words

Therefore all these relations always refer again to others and are thoroughly incomprehensible to us in their essence. All that we actually know about these laws of nature is what we ourselves bring to them—time and space, and therefore relationships of succession and number. But everything marvelous about the laws of nature, everything that quite astonishes us therein and seems to demand explanation, everything that might lead us to distrust idealism: all this is completely and solely contained within the mathematical strictness and inviolability of our representations of time and space. But we produce these representations in and from ourselves with the same necessity with which the spider spins. If we are forced to comprehend all things only under these forms, then it ceases to be amazing that in all things we actually comprehend nothing but these forms. For they must all bear within themselves the laws of number, and it is precisely number which is most astonishing in things. All that conformity to law, which impresses us so much in the movement of the stars and in chemical processes, coincides at bottom with those properties which we bring to things. Thus it is we who impress ourselves in this way. In conjunction with this, it of course follows that the artistic process of metaphor formation with which every sensation begins in us already presupposes these forms and thus occurs within them. The only way in which the possibility of subsequently constructing a new conceptual edifice from metaphors themselves can be explained is by the firm persistence of these original forms That is to say, this conceptual edifice is an imitation of temporal, spatial, and numerical relationships in the domain of metaphor.

>>19694454

You are actually retarded. I was the same person from earlier and still not 42. You also didn't quote anything even remotely close to what we were arguing about. You just wanted to slide the following:

>>19690558

>>19690575

>>19690586

>>19691174

>>19691900

>>19692319

>>19692357

>>19692641

>>19692931

>>19692996

>>19693251

>>19693264

>>19693867

>>19693881

>>19694435
All this misdirection reads like a mossad misdirection tactic. Something big is happening on the 21st. I can feel it.

>>19694454
>muh metametaphorical ouroboros

>>19694454
shit, forget picrel

>>19688851
>MOM he posted the Chainlink logo with a date again!!

>>19694565

Exactly, I think if not directly on June 21st after that day will be the marker of tons of companies going public with blockchain/LINK and it will continue until the Great Conjunction on December 21st. Its so clear they are shilling non-sense completely unrelated to the topic at hand. No one can deny the LINK occult connections there are too many.

>>19690558
https://youtu.be/ktt3Z4aiwNA
https://youtu.be/TQHve_8fDxk

>>19692931

>>19694635
>>19694635

Interesting thanks I'll check these out

>>19694670
https://youtu.be/s3KF8HGCvqg
https://youtu.be/_BCIny1P7L8
https://youtu.be/AqitE_w9pYw
https://youtu.be/A-fqJvBKUpU
https://youtu.be/W8LxQU-WgVg
welcome

>>19690000

>>19694712

Elite future control matrix from what I can see:

-Forced Contact Tracing to identify uncooperative and require vaccine to operate in public HR 6666
-Artificial Intelligence to analyze data
-Blockchain/Distributed Ledgers to store data
-5G/Quantum processing powers to amplifly the above
-Internet of Things Smart devices to gather data
-Smart ID/RFID chip internal tracking body data WO2020 060606 Microsoft Patent
-Decentralized Oracles for automated inputs/outputs based on arbitrary circumstances for all the accumulated data
-Digital USD/Currencies and physical money phased out
-RF's to implant thoughts or emotions-patents already exist on this believe it or not. Also they can target specific devices with extreme RF frequencies to degrade people and target them based on specific keyword Google searches etc
-Neuralink brain implant
-Internet censorship push Earn It Act
-Gun control in various cities and states

I feel like I'm missing something else but honestly all of those things in tandem would be a living nightmare only God should be capable of such powers

>>19694738
I went to Marks TNL workshop.
Trust me anon. Follow Derek and Zachs work I linked you

>>19694758

Very nice...I'll look over it all

bump

>>19688851

It's unbelievable how a fat flanneled piece of shit without scruples has managed to mesmerize and systematically scam a community of retarded homosexual incels, he can't get away with that

>>19695901
he's a billionaire right now and continually dumps 500k on baggys, pretty sure that counts as getting away with it

>>19692686
Ethiopian calendar 11/11
Remember the world was gonna end in 2012? In ethiopian calendar its 2012

150 RUPEE
EOD

>>19691174
Never stop meming about chainlunk and when crypto is finally usable in ten years it'll shoot up first regardless of what it does

>>19690558
I understand what you're saying and I don't get why there are these fags hating. You could be misappropriating words but modern men are too feminized and we are lacking the divine masculine indeed. In fact, this board is a perfect example of that. People buy chainlink or some shitcoin, penny stock, gold and expect them to moon. Or they even save and put aside money for ETFs. No one on this board is asking how to make connections, how to set up businesses, cheat taxes, get customers, get good at what they do. It'll about buying a secret hope instead of taking action.

>>19690558
interesting take.

Nietzsche is overrated by the way, he has good prose but little insight, basically just disillusion with religion and society in the modern world and a fallback to Aristotelean virtues.
Difference is Aristotle builds from a decent foundation, Nietzsche just reiterates and builds from a foundation of resentment.
For example on the master slave morality, Aristotle also says that slaves cannot achieve virtue, but he does so from a factual point, not blaming the slave for his situation, while Nietzsche rages against the slave like a petulant child.

>>19688851
you may want to be in tether before this date

>https://twitter.com/ian_keane/status/1271499208693100546

what's this movement called

>>19693712
Based and redpilled

>>19696982
That's called the 'Where's the zoom-out button on this thing' movement

So uh, I read the thread

What the fuck is going to happen on 21st? /pol/ aalso had a schizo thread today about 21st June, but it was removed to bant

>>>/bant/10521088

>>19694315
>a literal tome of reddit tier psued brain nihilism
Dialate