/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19609108
Based af

>>19609108
90% of those followers are from 2017 peak mania + fake accounts

>>19609288
Your point?

>>19609311
Im just pointing that out
What's your point?

>>19609321
>Im just pointing that out
But the vast majority of the top 20 is at least as old as Chainlink.

>What's your point
That Chainlink is the least normie coin in the top 20.

this guy is the butt blasted autist from this thread
>>19606506

whose having trouble coping link is peak simp coin right now

>>19609346
it is the most normie simp coin in existence >>19609347

all the other coins in top 20 are from mostly dead accounts.

>>19609347
>>19609358
>"most normie coin"
>least amount of Twitter followers out of the top 20

Pick one.

>>19609346
>Least normie coin
Everyone in crypto bought link in the last year
Boomers bought link in the last year
Literal housewives bought link in the last year

Just take your profit and win for once in life

>>19609347
>less followers but more activity
Bullish af

>>19609347
>whose

>>19609369
i keep telling you, LINK had the most ALIVE twitter followers. Shit like Ripple most of the followers are dead acocunts.

Why are you coping this hard?

>>19609386
And yet Chainlink still has the least Twitter subscribers out of the top 20.

>>19609430
>i keep telling you, LINK had the most ALIVE twitter followers.
>Shit like Ripple most of the followers are dead acocunts.

That changes nothing about Ripple having had tons more normie exposure than Chainlink.
You're just supporting my point.

>>19609108
Next do a scatterplot between twitter followers and 1yr price performance.

>>19609346
wrong, tezos has less followers per marketcap

>>19609108
Link official twitter in late 2018 had 6.7k followers and the price was 47c. Then in mid may this year it was 56k followers at $4. Roughly an 8.5x increase in both the price and number of followers, so for those two data points it was a linear relationship.

>>19609465
what the fuck does "exposure matter" matter? LINK has the most active simp followers objectively. This is proven statistically here >>19609347
Most of Ripllea followers are dead accounts like this anon says >>19609288
LINK has the most active twitter interactivity out of any alt coin in the world. It is peak normdom

>>19609489
Except Tezos has more followers AND a higher marketcap.

Are you legit retarded?

>>19609493
based

>>19609514
>what the fuck does "exposure" matter?
lmao
"Exposure" is what defines how normie something is.

The more normies are exposed to something, the more normie that something is.
That's pretty much the only metric.

>>19609522
kek. the only metric is twitter activity and volume. Dead accounts on twitter dont contribute to a coins active volume. Like i said, it doesnt matter if a dead youtube account from 2009 has 5 million subscribers. If a new TRENDING youtube account from 2020 gets 10x more views but has only 1 million subscribers the 2020 account makes more money.

Why are you coping this hard? LINK has literally peaked in simps and trading volume
https://bitcoinist.com/this-surprising-altcoin-dominates-crypto-trading-volume-second-only-to-bitcoin/

>>19609584
>kek. the only metric is twitter activity and volume.
No, that tells you nothing about the number of normies involved.
It only tells you how active the followers are.

>Why are you coping this hard?
Says the anon who can't deal with the fact that Link has the least Twitter followers in the entire top 20 lmaoooooo

>>19609515
He meant followers/mc ratio retard
They can be both higher and the ratio be lower

>>19609622
I know, but it's irrelevant when both metrics are higher in absolute numbers.

>>19609636
so anything with less followers than link and less market cap is better? lmao

>>19609665
Less followers means it's less "normie".

The more normie you are, the better, but when you're rank 14 and the entire top 20 has more normies, that means you have more room to grow just to catch up.

also just noticed
"LINK vs top 20"
lists 15 coins/tokens link included

wouldnt it be LINK vs top 15? or the coins I wanted to list from the top 20?

>>19609688
nvm you're not including BTC, ETH and tether

anyway this looks like the most retarded metric to go by or enter a trade, I don't know why I even stopped to comment on it

>>19609721
>level of exposure
>the most retarded metric

haha ok anon