/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19531099
or maybe they are using both? who knows?

>>19531232
doubt it. They made that gay alliance thing a month ago and excluded chainlink. I think the team literally lurks /biz/ and must have gotten embarassed by knee bending memes so i think theyre trying harder than ever to produce a better oracle.
They have not mentioned chainlink since that january partnership. I think theyre regretting doing any type of collaboration

>>19531099
dOracle2.0 soon,, it will rule over the chainlink scam yes

>>19531339
more like they signed an nda with link and now they need to stfu about it

digital shit

>>19531811
Chainlink literally blogs about EVERYTHING. If a member of CL was in another company's bathroom, theyd call it a partnership.
just stfu. DORACLES ARE BACK, BABY

>>19531099
It's mooning

Thank you RLC for realising my wildest C U C K fantasies. That was so good to hold this, get dumped on then claim we had the best oracles, post top notch infographics just to get humiliated in the end by kneeling and taking Sergey's big girthy cock in our mouth. I can still feel the burn of this humiliation in my very heart. Now, just the thought of Gilles shaking Sergey's hand, after having bent the knee and publicly annouced that we would use his oracles instead of our home made ones fills me with deep pain and pleasure. Thank you RLC, what's coming next? Maybe we could use Towncrier's systems for our TEE, I don't know, I mean, just surprise me, make me feel ashamed of my holdings once more

>>19532308
is that a black pepsi-man?

>>19531232
I say both anyone not clinically retarded understands that in future we will have multiple oracle providers

>>19532350
RLC can be an oracle hub.

>>19532350
it makes 0 sense to use an oracle solution that costs more and is less secure than another.
Compound open oracle is going to kill everything. It fucking does everything link does without using a shit token to pay providers and doesnt have bullshit collateral system
Literally, the only reason why there hasnt been a major tokenless oracle solution yet is because no one even fucking uses smart contracts seriously right now. Its all vaporware shit.
Have you seen Synthetix? Their professional team has a pinned tweet thats a link to their discord

>>19532364
>oracle hub
stop making up words

I daresay whatever oracles the phd team at RLC build will be a darnsight better than what the motley crew at Chainlink can muster

>>19532498
a few of the chainlink team have phds

link is at least a year ahead of iexec
fuck off with this FUD

>>19532552
who, some gooks they hired last week?

>>19532146
>Chainlink literally blogs about EVERYTHING. If a member of CL was in another company's bathroom, theyd call it a partnership.
Only of that other company announced it first.
Chainlink never announces any partnership first.

You're retarded.

>>19532420
>it makes 0 sense to use an oracle solution that costs more and is less secure than another.
Which is why iexec is integrating Chainlink.

>>19532618
worse, the two australians: john barker and alex coventry. not sure abotu the others, might be more

>>19532420
99% of projects don't need token

>>19532430
I'm not... RLC can use multiple oracles

>>19532926
Everyone can.

>>19532498
Just stop with this bs rivalry seriously cult like tribalism of alts is cancer of crypto space

>>19532498
anon:
>iexec will build much better oracles than Chainlink

iexec:
>*integrates Chainlink*

>>19532942
You don't get it...

>>19532498
Then why are they using chainlink oracles?

>>19531099
>iexec: you wanted oracles? you got em!
wish i could find the video where their ceo said this. oracles were added as a side feature for rlc, no one will use them

>>19532685
>>19532704
that blog is months older than the OP retweet. RLC got so embrassed bending a knee to chainlink that theyre recreating doracles again

How does it feel to be so hated, companies rather reinvest millions of dollars into R&D just to avoid using you?

>>19533087
Seethe

>>19533141
dilate

>>19533205
Have sex

>>19533087
>that blog is months older than the OP retweet.
and?

>>19533087
>companies rather reinvest millions of dollars into R&D just to avoid using you?
That’s not how it works you fucking retard

>>19533025
Why chainlink uses iexec for insurance contracts?

>>19533430
haha what?

>>19533440
Link is using iExec to process insurance information because link cannot

>>19533471
source pls

>>19533440
Nvm won't even read blog and posts nonsense you same shill clowns on link and rlc camps

>>19533487
So no source. Got it.

>the one diehard linkie itt having a complete meltdown
HOLY SHIT AHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>19533485
The link and RLC partnership...........

>>19533430
You don't get it eh? Chainlink doesn't "use" anyone.

>>19533577
>iexec writes a blog about insurance involving a Chainlink node
>"HAHA CHAINLINK NEEDS IEXEC"
k

>>19533676
Cope. Link needs iExecs computational power to process information

>>19533614
LINK token is 100% dependent on ETH, hence why gas always adds to the cost
>but muh whitepaper
i dont care what the whitepaper says, LINK will forever remain eth'a bitch without completely abandoning the current token

Wake me up when iExec has an actual user on mainnet. They will just slowly run out of money.

>>19533731
iExec team has tens of millions

>>19533696
>Link needs iExecs computational power to process information
What?
In that blog written by iexec, a Chainlink node is used to get data.
That's literally all Chainlink is for.

>>19533765
They are writing a dapp together idiot. Link gets the data, RLC processes it. Man you are stupid as fuck

>>19533781
>Link gets the data
And that's all Link is meant to do.

>>19533798
You are missing the point. Link needs iExec to do advanced things.

>>19533798
but Doracles will replace that. LINK is just middleware. Wtf is exactly stopping RLC from replacing a JSON parser. Explain

>>19533815
>Link needs iExec to do advanced things.
All Link is for is getting data.
What happens with that data is not up to Link.

>>19533830
anon:
>iexec doracles will replace Chainlink

iexec:
>*integrates Chainlink*

>>19533835
Again, you are missing the point. That data is useless if you don't do anything with it.

>>19533881
>That data is useless if you don't do anything with it.
And there are many projects that do things with the data Link will provide.
But Link is only meant to provide data.

What you're saying is "UPS needs surgeons to install the pacemakers they transport to hospitals".
It makes no sense. UPS isn't in the business of installing the shit they transport.

>>19533910
Your analogy fails when you realize those surgeons have their own UPS, and can use any other UPS if they please. Link is not special in any way.

>>19533960
>those surgeons have their own UPS, and can use any other UPS if they please
Except those surgeons are saying they're integrating UPS.

>>19533862
that doesnt answer the question. LINK is literally just a JSON parser in its current state. How do you know RLC isnt using LINK temporarily just to test out their new tech? What if dOracles are still in development and will replace LINK when theyre complete?
How do you know this will never ever happen?

>>19533976
For the time being. Link is vaporware.

>>19533981
>but what if [insert wishful thinking here]

>>19533997
>Link is vaporware.
Not according to iexec.

>>19533976
Also not only temporarily, but as you say RLC integrates, it can integrate other oracles as well as their own, all at the same time.

>>19533534
Litteraly that diagram of link iexec collaboration or in that blog fuck you cunts are retarded

>>19534005
>wishful thinking
the OP literally says that dOracles are stilk in development. LINKs tech is literally just a JSON parser right now. Theres no staking, no collateral, no t sigs, no mixicles, etc. It is middleware.

Ill ask one last time. What exactly is physically stopping RLC from replacing LINK when dOracles are done?

>>19534005
Masterful marketing tactic. iExec is an all in one solution, link is not.

>>19534024
>it can integrate other oracles as well as their own, all at the same time
And?
How does this change the fact that iexec is integrating Chainlink?

>>19534033
Link doesn't need iexec for insurance contracts, because Link doesn't intend to do insurance contracts.
All it does is provide data for insurance contracts.

>>19534043
>doracles aren't finished so they're using Link which also isn't finished
lmao

iexectards never got over that epic knee bend, did they?

>>19534120
youre coping really hard you know

>>19534048
>iExec is an all in one solution, link is not.
I'm honestly shocked that there are anons out there that actually think like you

>>19534120
Big cope. Stay poor when your useless centralized oraclecoin dies out. Over hyped vaporware scam

Its getting embarassing

>>19534245
>he thinks a simple json parser isnt replaceable
are all linkies this tech illiterate?

>>19534256
>>19534220
https://medium.com/iex-ec/chainlink-and-iexec-collaborate-to-address-the-complex-off-chain-needs-of-next-generation-702e55ab1ead
The only ones coping are you retards. You bent the knee. Get over it :)

>>19534245
Prove me wrong.

>>19534277
According to that blog link been the knee to iExec because they need computation to do things with the otherwise useless data link can obtain.

>>19534276
Why don't you send an email to iexec community center explaining that they don't need to use chainlink? I'm sure a few dozen developers would love a random ass hoe to give them how they should run things.

>>19534277
see >>19533981

>>19534304
the developers are literally stating in the OP they dont need chainlink

>>19534310
>but what if [insert wishful thinking here]

linkies, if Chainlink is gonna be replace, then why in the name of fuck is RLC still tweeting about dOracles? Doracles dont mention anywhere needing chainlink, just one of their other projects. If chainlink is the end all be all, then why the fuck are still tweeting about dOracles?

>>19534334
>dev can't make decisions about anything
extremely bearish

>>19534346
kek, how is it wishful thinking? see >>19534043

I'm thinking Microsoft might just straight up integrate RLC tech into windows so every computer in the world can share its idle resources + all manner of other things its capable of doing

>>19534397
>kek, how is it wishful thinking
Because you're making 20 posts about it and you still can't get over the fact that you bent the knee

>>19534468
but LINK can easily be replaced by dOracles once theyre done developing. There is virtually nothing stopping them at all from using dOracles to get the job done
>muh wishful thinking
if its wishful thinking, why is RLC literally restating dOracles are still im development? If they complete dOracles, are you trying to argue they wouldnt replace link with them? Why?

>>19534467
Based and yellowpilled

>>19534468
fuck off with your game of throne bent the knee shit basedboy idiot

collaborate means to work together equally

>>19534256
>useless centralized oraclecoin
That's not what iexec called it when they integrated it lmao.

>>19534220
coping with what?

>>19534523
Marketing tactic. Now all you link fags are talking about it and will watch on the sidelines as it goes 200x

>>19534500
>but LINK can easily be replaced by dOracles once theyre done developing
Then why did they integrate Chainlink?

>>19534523
but dOracles are still in development. this is a fact. How do you know there wont be announcement saying Link was on temporary solution and they are now using dOracles
please explain in great detail why that is virtually impossible since LINK is just a JSON parser.
?

>>19534500
>If they complete dOracles, are you trying to argue they wouldnt replace link with them? Why?
someone already answered that for you in this thread illiterate retard.
>>19534507
kek seething

Why the fuck are the nulinkers getting triggered? There is nothing the frenchmen can do better

>>19534540
They can integrate (insert any oracle here) all day because they aren't locked into using a single oracle. Integrating multiple makes their system stronger. It's also a marketing tactic.

>>19534580
>>19534565
anons:
>iexec will use doracles instead of Chainlink

iexec:
>*integrates Chainlink*

>>19534540
because dOracles were and still are not complete. Doracles dont use chainlink, you can check the recently retweeted blog. if dOracles are complete, why wouldnt they replace chainlink with them?

also, how do you even tknow they are integrated? point to where on the CL network you see RLC present

>>19534604
they unironically can once dOracles are done developing. How do you know CL wasnt just for testing?

>>19534605
>iexec only integrated Chainlink because doracles aren't finished yet
>but chainlink is just a json parser that isn't finished yet

>iexec only integrated Chainlink as a temporary measure
>but they haven't integrated Chainlink yet

yikes

>>19534604
>T. Retard
Stay poor.

>>19534628
Doesn't change the fact that they integrated Chainlink.

>>19534642
that doesnt refute anything at all you know

>>19534659
there is nowhere on the chainlink network you will find anything from RLC. I dont think you know what integrate means. My questions still remain >>19534605

>>19534659
Doesn't change the fact that you're a retard

>>19534677
>>19534837
>50+ posts by these ID's

>>19534860
cope

Did y’all baghold this shit down from $3.5? Seem awfully emotionally invested.

>>19531099
Why anyone would buy LINK over RLC at the moment is beyond me.

>>19535331
r u like, stupid?

>>19535331
Based
>>19535378
Buy high sell low

>>19535378
Nop, I even bought LINK at $.16 and sold them for around $4.7.

First, the total market cap is $4b vs RLC's $40m. The relative growth potential for RLC is way higher and they have the same level of "partners". The chainlink team holds 65%(!) of the supply compared to iExec's 5%.

LINK, a token that is now only being used for token transactions on the ethereum network, is in total valued higher than BNB a coin belonging to a company with millions of profit each month.

>>19535778
BASED

theres gonna be an unholy shitwar once when dOracles are competiting against chainlink, isnt there?

>>19534677
>I dont think you know what integrate means.
That’s what iexec called it: an integration.

>>19536418
Probably even bigger shit show gonna be in biz with rlc and link camps shitting on eatch other

>>19535778
I too, bought eth at $1 and sold it at 1k

IExec publicly bent the knee and said they were going to use chainlink. What is there more to know? Their Doracle (what a stupid name) shit must be using chainlink too. Just stop coping Baguettejeets, it's becoming embarassing. oh, and by the way, Chainlink bought TownCrier which has already integrated Intel SGX.. so be ready to bend the knee for the TEE thing too

>>19536418
Iexec are actively and publicly working with Chainlink.
The only competition is in the tribalistic minds of Iexec bagholders.

>>19536555
And there you have it, trips of truth. Link is just above the competition, deal with it

>>19536555
Going to use link for car insurance demo or something ONE thing used in

>>19536555
Checked

>>19536622
>>19536460
Based esl Pajeet

>>19536649
Crist do I need to copy whole description of cooperation?

>>19536555
>>19536570
>>19536618

COPE

>>19536555
imagine being this scared of competition
>dOracles use chainlink
no they dont.
if anyone actually read the collaboration, youd realizee just how replaceable LINK is. It makes me wonder if RLC did it just as a publicity stunt

>>19536733
>makes me wonder if RLC did it just as a publicity stunt
Obviously, for Chainlink.

>>19536555
>towncrier
another useless whitepaper that will never be done. Ari doesnt have patents on shit. Point to me anywhere that Ari has a patent on that will hinder dOracle development

>>19536733
It's like arguing with kids. Its like they don't even read what is written or trolling

>>19536761
LINK has by far more normies hyping it than RLC. I seriously wonder if RLC did it just capture some of chainlinks fanbase. French are autistic

>>19536733
>imagine being this scared of competition
You guys already lost tho. All I’m seeing are seething frogs sperging our over something that happened months ago

>>19536807
dOracles are still being developed though and wont go away. No matter how many times you spam "bend a knee" the development of dOracles wont stop. And they are being developed to replace chainlink

>>19536872
Noooooo what about eoy 1000 and neet nodes

>>19536872
>they are being developed to replace chainlink
Why do you so desperately want iexec and chainlink to compete when they’re publicly working together?

>>19536908
Working on one dapp

MOONING
>MOONINGMOONING
>MOONINGMOONING
>MOONINGMOONING
>MOONINGMOONING
>MOONING

>>19536930
iexec:
>Chainlink and iExec collaborate to address the complex off-chain needs of next-generation decentralized applications

anon:
>hurrrr it's just one dapp

>>19536908
dont play coy. You want RLC to "bend a knee" just so you can say its useless compared to chainlink and their bitch. The reality is that chainlink was nothing more than a testing product used to develop one of RLCs many great creations. Once when dOracles are finished, link will be tossed aside like the used up whore it is. The reality is chainlink lies about most their "partnerships". They think first mover advantage means they will forever be the solution. DOracles are objectively better and once when they are complete, link will be technically inferior in all ways
>stop starting competition
stop acting like a jew. We all know what linkies really think of this collaboration and its very kike-ish

>>19536930
What’s the name of this dapp?

>>19537078
dOracles will replace the use of chainlink when they are complete

>>19537115
I don’t want anything.
It’s the Link haters who desperately want iexec to get rid of and replace Link even though they’re publicly working together.

>>19537161
dOracles are still being develop. They are literally built to replace chainlink. Notice how RLC has not brought up chainlink since January but has been posting shit about Oracle Alliance and decentralized oracles since. No fuck off kike. Chainlink is going to be replace by doracles once theyre finished.

>>19537202
>>19537126
doracles were being developed since May 2019, and yet in January 2020 they integrated Chainlink.

>>19532685
What about SWIFT?

>>19537481
What about it?

>>19537161
So now link and iexec are frends? I don't understand this constant shitting on eatch other if they are BFF

>>19538563
More like king and vassal, with chainlink being the king.

>>19538683
And that's why we can't have normal conversations

>>19531099
they never ditched their own doracles. they just showcased that iexec can work with any oracles including link and biz pajeets sperged out with bend da kny references from feminist show about faggot dragons