/biz/ - Business & Finance

Doesn’t need to be shilled since they actually provide a service. Also inb4 token not needed guy shows up with his Wolpert tweet

Unironically sold all my ubt after the last baseline office meeting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_bKOUNJbi0&t=1624s

Skip to 26:48 in the video. The token not needed meme is fucking real. Stefan admitted it.

chico pump and dump

>>19387970
This is now a chainlink thread, drop your best crumbs

UBT or MITX

>>19388217
what hes saying is that using baseline doesnt require the UBT token but the services unibright offers do? right?

>>19388217
Its not needed for baseline but for connector and all their services it is still needed, so not great not terrible

>>19388294
fuck off pajeet, go to your one of 15 threads on your shitcoin from the ganges

>>19388496
if ubt was required for all baseline services we would prob be in $2 range now

>>19387970

>>19388506
hmm but i think a lot of the value and speculation comes from people expecting the token used in baseline because ubt also mooned after the baseline connections came to light? guess this doesnt really make it worth that much without baseline. thats like where i expected most users to come from

>>19388559

Baseline is how larger corps will be roped into using smart contracts. This is just the trial version. I think Unibright’s current valuation is accurate and I would still consider it a top tier project. At least better than the countless actual scams shilled here daily.

>>19388559
It’s value comes from people thinking all baselines enterprises will have to buy ubt tokens which they won’t. It’ll have some other use cases but it’s not as great as we thought. It’s just a mediocre token now. Enterprises WILL need to buy ETH though

>>19388709
So then sell

>>19388217
OH NO NO NO

I TOLD YOU RETARDS ITS USELESS

YOU THOUGHT ENTERPRISES WERE GOING TO BUY YOUR BAGS ?? LMAO

STEFAN ADMITTED THEY MADE IT OPEN SOURCE TO BE COPIED IF THE CLIENT WANTS IT FOR FREE

ITS LITERALLY V-IDT ALL OVER AGAIN AHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>19388217
I literally just fucking bought yesterday now I’m gonna sell. Fuck it I’m going all in ETH right now. At least enterprises have to stockpile eth for gas fees. Everyone in the world needs eth

>>19388217
Unironically just sold my bags. That fud is actually real. Wtf. Look at stefans face when he admits the token isn’t as useful as claimed. Wolpert keeps pressing him on it and he keeps clearing it up that yes you only need eth for gas to use unibright

>>19388795

>Eth gas to use unibright

And here comes the disingenuous fudders. This is for baseline protocol not Unibright

>>19388825
Did you not watch the video of the team admitting to this ? Ubt tech is free and open source. Token not needed

>>19388931

This is a completely separate project that Unibright is a part of. It has nothing to do with Unibright’s services, which require UBT tokens to pay for. Anyways you’re probably just trolling or incredibly stupid and either way not worth arguing with.

>>19389012
You idiot baseline is what everyone’s buying unibright for. Once they realize baseline has nothing to do with the ubt token they’re gonna dump hard. Baseline is the main thing that people buy ubt for

The other projects are a side show

>>19389064
This. People bought ubt with the hopes that baselines enterprises would buy ubt tokens and now that we know they only need eth for gas. Ubt is just another mediocre token like V-ID

>>19389064

Oh ok so now you’ve suddenly learned that it’s a separate project. How convenient. Well news is out and the token is at 50 cents still. Maybe you’ll get lucky and be able to buy in below where I did, but I doubt it.

>>19389117
Cope. Open source templates from unibright are free to copy and the unibright connector is free to use as well

How low IQ is biz really

- Baseline is an open source 'cookbook" project.
Everyone can provide anything they want to it...

For Unibright services like its connector not the proxy you still need tokens.
Also Freequity will increase the token utillity drastically

In this video Stefan had to make it clear that no tokens are needed for the cookbook Baseline, why?
Because literal Pajeet projects like mitx are useing the hype for their own project

>>19389137
This is not true
Please understand just a little bit of IT and you would know

>>19389155
The connector IS the proxy you mongrel. You don’t need tokens to access the connector he said it like 5 times in the video. Only freequity will have some sort of BNB use case and workshops for discounts paying in ubt.

>>19389155

Based. I’m surprised they’re even able to respond to our comments with a 2nd grade reading level.

>>19388931
You are freaking dumb. Unibright is not free and open source, just the part they want to contribute which is a very small thing.

>>19389173
He literally said in the video it’s just IT stuff there’s no crypto involved for baselining enterprises utilizing unibright. Buying ubt is optional.

>>19389205
>the only part that’s free is the part that everyone’s buying it for
Kek, the absolute state. It’s just an exchange token and workshop token. Everything else is free or can be copied on github

>>19388217
LOL UBT FAGS BTFO

>>19389206
What do you don't get that Baseline is NOT Unibright?
Baseline is an open source protocol 'cookbook'

Unibright is blockchain based business integration, you need tokens for their services, learn to read or to listen.

Any project can provide anything they want to Baseline NOT Unibright.

>>19388217
Wow. Almost bought this token too. Thought the token not needed meme was fud. Damn.

>>19389225
Just leave

>>19389271
You’re dumb as fuck I know it’s not the same as unibright but people bought ubt in hopes baselined enterprises would need to buy ubt WHICH THEY DONT AS ADMITTED BY STEFAN SEVERAL TIMES YOU STUPID AUTIST

>>19389290
Imagine buying a token that the team says is not needed for the main use cases

People didn’t buy ubt just for freequity and some other niche use cases

>>19389306
https://medium.com/unibrightio/using-the-unibright-connector-to-integrate-sap-erp-and-microsoft-dynamics-via-baseline-b19a41256ab0


You cant read

>>19389306

>people bought the token for baseline only

Where is your evidence for this claim?

>>19389326
Then you don't know Freequity. Because it's bigger than Baseline.

>>19389331
They only require ubt if they choose to not copy it for free which why wouldn’t they ? They said they made it open source for those who wish to not buy ubt tokens

>>19389326
Baseline is not a (main) use case its an protocol you simpleton

>>19389358
>>19389355
LMAO THE ABSOLUTE STATE

>w-w-we bought it to be an exchange token forget baseline that’s small stuff !

>>19389359
They don't say that. They provide open source code what they want to contribute.

>>19388217
Lol good thing I didn’t buy this shitcoin. Stefan literally just destroyed the project by admitting that

>>19389405
Rewatch the video newfag

>>19389388
Thinking Freequity is just an exchange...and ubt a exchange token.
Go back to school

>>19389435
You can copy what they have contributed which won't be enough for Blockchain based business integration.

>>19389444

Checked, trips don’t lie

>>19387970
AAVE is like UBT but just plain better lmao
Get fucked newfags

All this FUD.... keep it up bros, I need to accumulate

What I find interesting is there's people on here who think the project is shit, but yet still have 14 posts in this thread. Why do you care so much?

>>19389530
AAVE is great, but I think what Unibright is doing it way over people their heads.
Just takes some time as they are the first mover, but yeah everyone can sell as they please, they'll see

>>19387994
token not needed

I'll see you guys at $1.

>>19388742
>ITS LITERALLY V-IDT ALL OVER AGAIN AHAHAHAHAHAHA
which is why i kept saying vidt 2.0

>>19389564
>What I find interesting is there's people on here who think the project is shit, but yet still have 14 posts in this thread. Why do you care so much?
god I hate faggots like you, nobody is allowed to question your shitcoins that are spammed all over the board with lies and false hope

>>19389609
https://medium.com/unibrightio/using-the-unibright-connector-to-integrate-sap-erp-and-microsoft-dynamics-via-baseline-b19a41256ab0

My Message is from Stefan Schmidt which is the CTO from Unibright - he clearly says that tokens ARE NEEDED.

Your message is from John Wolpert from Baseline a opensource Protocol NOT Integration.

>>19389683
Needed only if you don’t wanna pay

>>19389683
>ctrl + f "token"
>no results

>>19389746
Stop proving yourself a lazy cunt

>>19389705
Go ahead kid, do it. Short answer: no no no it doesn't work that way. Let's just work for free then, retard. Its an protocol, a showcase how you could use blockchain because enterprises are clueless... thats why its barely adopted.

>>19389769
paragraph above that one
>As baseline is an open source project, we decided to contribute the automatically generated proxy incl. the custom coded Baseline connection (via the Provide stack) to the open source community. This also includes the fact that for using the proxy, you do not need any UBT, so everybody can use the proxy for free to keep baseline growing.
>you do not need any UBT

I’ve been trying to get my shit together to buy some UBT for a while now, but every time I go to buy, I end up buying more link instead. For some reason, I just can’t do it when I know Chainlink is out there. Anyone else have this problem?

>>19388294
ubt and mrph

>>19390169
This is the full connector which is not entirely opensource:

The Unibright Connector allows different On- and Off-Blockchain-Systems to be connected to Unibright conformant SmartContracts, thus enabling Cross Blockchain and Cross system workflows

The proxy is a fragment of that.

thanks for the thread guys. i was trying to carefully bait the discussion into this direction to see if people really expect UBT to be needed for baseline.
the fact that the price doesnt give a shit tells me what i wanted to know.
stay comfy UBT marines, the amounts of fud we receive are very bullish, its mostly latecomers trying to accumulate.
they obviously wouldnt spend this much time fudding some random pajeet coin.
guess which other project had the same thread and fud frequency early :))
token needed btw

Smells like DISCORD FUD in here

>>19389646
>spammed all over the board
>1 thread on page 1 and its full of FUD
ok

20k Unichad here and comfier than ever after all this bullish FUD. Not selling you any of my bags until we get to $1.50-$2.00 and even then only gonna sell a small portion

Fud. if ubt token wasn't needed the price would have tanked massively by now from people in the loop.

Literally all of the UBT fud is identical to the old LINK fud (anyone who has been on this board anytime in the last two years can confirm this). If you sold at $0.50, go back to archives and read similar threads of people selling link around $1; they either bought back in higher or are forever JUSTd. Where did all that link fud go? It's drastically decreased since Chainlink ran up from 150mil mc to the current 1.5 billion in the past year. Now you get recycled fud about UBT.

>>19391373

OG linker here. It really is uncanny how similar the fud is. It’s not your typical mud slinging fud, but a more nuanced technical discussion fud. I remember people saying Link token wasn’t needed for the longest time. One day UBT is going to come out with something huge, like Chainlink did with google and oracle, and the price will skyrocket and the fud will disappear. I guess it’s hard to come up with good fud for legitimate projects.

Alright shills, you got me. I'm not buying if it's uniswap only though fuck that shitheap

>>19391571
ill make a thread soon debunking some fud again. there was good discussion in the telegram about the "token not needed" talk. basically they confirmed ALL their services need the UBT token in some way and that it wouldnt make sense to use fiat because its NOT only a voucher but needed for the different platforms like freequity