/biz/ - Business & Finance

They fud xrp but don’t realize it will be the standard for cross border payments

>>19355023
>Gets flipped by tether

>>19355823
global remittance market volume / number of xrp coins = $2000

>>19355869
Unlike tether, xrp can’t print money that’s not there

>>19355952
Tether is mooning btw.
True ether > T-ether

I don’t even really believe in xrp but I’m accumulating at these prices rn, there’s no reason it can’t be at least .50 by the time things recover

>>19356027
It's going to break its ATH at the very least.

>>19355869
This is the biggest hurrr durrr normie fud literally ever

>>19356687

>tfw lazy and hoping some other people in here would try to find new shit on Polysign
>tfw nobody has or its just too secretive
I really want to know what the fuck is going on with this company. There's just a feeling in my gut that it's going to be very important.

xrp ruined my life

>>19356648
LMAO based and xrppilled

>>19356229
In 3 years. So. Cool?

>>19356701
Wtf are you gonna jack off on that thing?

>>19356701
Nice lol

>>19356687
check this one out

>>19356979
>he can’t wait 3 years to make it.

What do you have terminal cancer or something faggot?

based.

i asked this last thread and ill ask again:

Where the fuck is ODL in Italy? R3 said it would happen in May.

When are Japanese ATMs going to utilize XRP? Also said would happen in May

>>19355873
Explain like I hold link.

>>19355023
also, i pretty much stopped caring about ODL upon learning the fucking tracker cant track everything. So even though the ATH is 20 million now, it could very well be 30 million, or 40 million, and we will never know because the tracker cant get everything

>ATH smashed by 4.5 million dollars
Based

>>19357870
$7 =/= $2000

>>19358208
Whats the timeframe we are looking at? Does the 589 thing hold water?

can I still join lads?

>>19358237
If you buy into the "insider" info thats been going around then sure why not?

I don't really know what im talking about but it seems like XRP technology absolutely shits on everything else, like its not even a contest.

>>19358845
What makes you say that?

>>19358875
well it seems to me that it could literally replace the all the networks the world financial system is run on currently, like every bank in the world and every stock market and every business could be linked together on this one network with seamless instant and near zero cost transactions. + smart contracts with oracles, the works.

>>19358845
no shit nigger. see >>19357556 and (pic)

XRP is literally the most layer 1 protocol in existence

>>19358937
People have been saying that this doesn't need smart contracts. Or am I being confused with the link people spewing disinfo?

>>19358937
>>19359047

So I am a linkie but bought some xrp just in case yesterday.

I think the idea is that xrp wouldn't need oracles that bad because every financial instrument can run on the same network. But they would still need oracles to put real world events on the network. Chainlink is still the best system for this.

Aragon Court (ANJ) is the future. Aragon is reinventing organizations and governance. With backers like Tim Draper and Brian Armstrong (Coinbase CEO), this thing is gunna moon soon.

Buy ANJ on Uniswap

https://v1.uniswap.info/token/0xcd62b1c403fa761baadfc74c525ce2b51780b184

>>19359310
>best system
lol, nope. Stop drinking the linker kool aid and realize tokenless centralized oracles are the chosen ones AKA corda. That or its Ripples Codius >>19357556

I am so sick of you goddamn tranny linkers spreading your link garbage in our Citadel. Its so obvious when theres a subtle shill
>i own XRP, but lets face it, it neeeeeeds muh link. it is the best system
why are you saying this outside a link thread?
>...
Were not falling for your glowing bullshit, nigger. Run you over with my car

>>19359561
I didn't mean to shill honestly, I literally posted about buying xrp yesterday in the citadel thread. One of the reasons I bought was the fomo after reading the insider thread. Second reason was the connection between xrp and corda.

I bought xrp as a hedge in case link fails. I don't know what Codius is.

Yeah, I bought a bag of xrp. 100k. Pocket change for me really. Had a video call with some old friends. One of them (a neet incel) brought up Link and how it made him around 15k this year. Another, a software dev, said Chainlink was quite literally a meme and that the Oracle problem would eventually solve itself, then flashed his xrp stack. Neet incel turned red and left the call. As a joke we all bought fat xrp stacks after the Doc told us what it was. We're going to buy the icel a few dwarf hookers if it reaches $2. My doctor friend is pretty convinced it will.

>>19359702
Just know xrp will be the standard for cross payment.
Ripple will replace swift.

>>19360427
who is the Doc?

>>19359561
>>19355023
Apparently Eth is the real NWO coin: >>19358057 what now, cripples? Let me guess "you're a shill / trust the plan" (aka hold my bags).

>>19361216
How big of a bag of xrp should I buy?

>>19361277
Why are you asking me?

>>19361339
You are saying ETH is the NWO coin so I want to know how much XRP I should buy since by default xrp would not be the NWO coin.

>>19361216
>JP Morgan coin 2.0

_Aragon Court (ANJ) is the real deal. Aragon is reinventing organizations and governance. With backers like Tim Draper and Brian Armstrong (Coinbase CEO), this thing is gunna moon soon.

10-50x this year.

Buy ANJ on Uniswap: https://v1.uniswap.info/token/0xcd62b1c403fa761baadfc74c525ce2b51780b184

>>19360789
our circles Doc???

>>19361402
You tell me, your situation sounds convoluted but that is your life.

>>19361356
>You are saying ETH is the NWO coin so I want to know how much XRP I should buy since by default xrp would not be the NWO coin.
I'm not saying anything, that's what people are saying. Do your own research.
>>19361370
A lot of damning evidence in those links, how heavy are your bags feeling right now anon?

>>19361569
>lot of damning evidence for JP Morgan coin 2.0

>>19361569
And others say xrp is the NWO coin. Yea, umm I am going with xrp for the sole fact that I don't think you understand what liquidity even means.

>>19361643
You're asking random people on the internet how much XRP you should buy, I don't think you understand what anything means. The entirety of XRP price predictions rest on some people / one person LARPing on /biz/ as 'insiders' for fun.
>>19361598
>This is considered a retort by a cripple
Zero proof needed for any of their NPC claims. Enjoy holding those heavy bags into the red.

>>19361711
>JP Morgan coin is going to make XRP obsolete. Its days are numbered!

>>19361711
Try pumping xrp like a shitcoin, tell me how that goes. Hint: good luck fucking with its price

>>19361728
>$202.10 Eth
>$0.19 XRP
It's days aren't numbered, it's days are long gone. You're not seriously holding XRP bags from 2017.. are you? Oh nonono, look at the top of his head!

So much delusional cope in this thread it is painful to see. All hopes pinned on some sudden and mysteriously inexplicable increase in price to levels which would make XRP market cap multiples of the world's money supply while ALL the evidence and experience points to some lukewarm action at best. Come November there will be again shill threads about how things are all progressing fantastically on all fronts, except for the price which will surely catch up soon. One day. Maybe. But 100% sure no doubt whatsoever anyone who doesn't buy immediately today wil be priced out forever and ever.

Some mysterious hidden powers who control XRP however don't want you buying though, and they are doing their darnest in supressing the price to shake out the unwanted weak hands, yet somehow at the same time they list XRP on more and more exchanges to make it more accessible to the public and because it was never meant for the public let Ripple release things like a supposedly revolutionary easy to use private wallet. Not to mention the relentless shilling of the NWOs most closely kept secret on /biz. And Twitter. And Youtube. And Reddit. And dedicated XRP websites. And a multitude of crypto articles. And on fucking national TV. Because it is so hush hush hush World Bank FED IMF only secret.

Ostensibly XRP is always on the verge of something major happening, yet also somehow always two years away from being two years away. Nothing ever seems to happen the way it was "foretold" and there are always "unexpected" delays despite everything being 100% sure to happen by a certain date in the not so distant future. All the while it is more than clear that this shit has neither ever gone nor will ever go anywhere without the whole market going there first.

Almost funny, if it wasn't sad.

>>19361782
I think I have realized why pumpers are against xrp. Its because they cant pump and dump. I am starting to think it is a tragedy.

>>19361794
The real fun part of the NWO is, they cannot lie.

>>19361805
>I think I have realized why pumpers are against xrp. Its because they cant pump and dump.

>>19361856
arnt you the same obsessed anon from the last thread who kept spamming that schwartz quote? Here, maybe this image will trigger ptsd in you

>>19361927
not sure what you are refering to here, but I love this one

>>19361927
>only one person shits on XRP ever
If you're randomly bringing up people that you've spoken to previously all I can assume is that this is projection and you're the one with PTSD, looks like that anon really shit in your cereal.

>>19361976
>same reaction images
>same style of post
yeah, its you. Hi

>>19361976
btw, if you want me to prove its you. You are literally going to reply to every single post itt and make the thread reach 200+ posts

just watch

>>19361998
>There's one person who shits on XRP
Say it with me: S C H I Z O

>>19361856
Hows ghost treating you?

>>19362008
>If someone makes me angry enough to reply to a thread so much that it reaches bump limit then the next person I speak to who also angers me is that same person
This is how schizo you sound right now. Btw I won't be sticking around long, I have to go out and get some food shopping done, sorry to upset you but I am not your long lost boyfriend.

another one of my favorite ripple quotes

>>19355873
Won't the minimum wallet balance of 20 XRP render that 2k price unfeasible? Or is that just Exodus fagotry?

>>19362018
Why not just shill another coin? Why only try to get people to not look into xrp?

this one is golden too

>>19362024
>>19362067
I'm all in on Eth / BTC, don't own any shitcoins sorry. I'm not shilling, I talk shit about other coins too, mostly LINK.

>>19362054
It is becoming clear on these threads; the big anti xrp ones just dont want people to buy it, they have no other arguments or anything, not even shilling other coins or even gold/silver. It is rather interesting to witness happening over many threads,

this one is in definitely in the top 10

the zero doubt is a nice touch

>>19362107
Why would anyone care about you buying XRP anon? Serious question.

>>19362096
The best part about BTC is it still has some sort of anon status. But I will buy my bags and you will buy yours. Just don't be pissy when you end up being wrong.

>he keeps a special FUD folder of XRP quotes
>he still dumps them even when no ones replying
autism

>>19362131
Global liquidity crisis that is very apparent even to a normie. Stonks only go up brrrrr.

>>19362145
Again, why would anyone care that you buy XRP?

>>19362145
nice to see someone finally understanding we finna have deflation before inflation

fat stacks of btc and xrp

>>19362190
I imagine no one cares that I buy it, I imagine if many people bought it then there might be an issue. So by extension talking about it people would buy it even if a tertiary action.

>>19362224
Do you honestly think /biz/ is active enough for it to make a dent, even if everyone here bought bags? Don't be ridiculous anon.

>>19362237
keep going

>>19362264
Literally schizo. You discredit the normal, non-schizo XRP holders by proxy.

>>19362237
I think this board is active enough, but not for a pump and dump on an 8 billion market cap coin, which I think is the basis for most of the fud; reasons for it are likely a few I care not for. I will buy what I feel is necessary given what information I am aware of, if it turns out bad, then I would be screwed regardless.

>>19362289
>I will buy what I feel is necessary given what information I am aware of, if it turns out bad, then I would be screwed regardless.
Well you seem pretty reasonable, at least you're not basing the entirety of your dealings with crypto on tenuous (at best) rumours. I talk shit about many coins, XRP isn't anything special, I don't know about anyone else.

>>19362329
Oh no I am buying into this schizo coin do not play me up. I have had a while to actually buy crypto, Ive watched the stock market, I watch a bunch of things. In what I can see and figure out for myself, I am buying into this xrp. Sounds crazy since I have no real reason to back it up lol, but as I said earlier a few grand on a bet, if I am wrong, I was still screwed.

>>19362364
Well time for me to go food shopping. Seeya later anon.

>>19362408
You seem to be in the know, the 589 legit?

>>19362408
Well, shopping for what? Should I be personally worried about myself or those I know?

Do you guys literally repost this everyday?

>>19362998
theyre comfy

>>19362998
There are plenty of link threads you can go on.

>>19362998
yep, These schizos believe all kinds of crazy shit. Once one date passes they quickly move on to another date with even crazier schizo predictions.

It's sad really

>>19363056
Good thing that this year of 2020 is been set by these "insiders" then yeah?

>>19363056
I only make threads pertaining to actual real world news. It's not my fault people like you enable the schizos by ignoring the legitimate shit posted here.

>>19363077
you do realise that companies buy these certificates, right?

>>19363065
I don't know what you are talking about schizo

>>19363077
These certs are bought schizo. Its about as legitimate as the China Hustle.
Of course you can't see reality, you are schizo

>>19363104
>It doesn't matter, they paid for it!
Please show me proof of this. You state it so matter of factly.

>>19363125
As I asked the other guy, do you have any evidence that these "certificates" are bought? It's not even a certification. I provide actual evidence, you just expect me to take your word. Awesome.

>>19363125
It is always fun when people show up for the sole purpose of getting people to specifically not buy xrp.

>>19363127
You actually think the ISO certificates are handed out like the Nobel prize or something?

Every Chink substandrad shit producer has one or more, even you could get one for your shilling if you are willing to spend some money.

It means that Ripple has bought some piece of paper which in actual fact means fuck all. With your money. Congratulations.

>>19363160
i dont think you have any idea what ISO20022 or who is even behind it.
Hint: the council behind it has literal Ripple team members on it

>>19363160
>Still no proof whatsoever, just ad hominem and "trust me bro"
Also, what do you mean "handed out"? Ripple is the only Blockchain firm that has been made a member of this board. You act like an asshole and it doesn't even seem like you know what you're talking about. Where is the proof by the way?

>>19363188
is that a One Piece joker? LMAO

>>19363182
>so you say they got a certificate from a body which they are a member of
>this must really mean something

congrats on this, seriously

>>19363134
You've never had a job, or at least one where company certs are obtained. Good jobs don't go to schizos like you.

>The certification process may sound daunting, but it’s far more straightforward than you might think.
https://www.british-assessment.co.uk/insights/6-steps-to-iso-certification/
You pay money, jig around shit (on paper) submit, & get cert.

Sorry schizo you just don't understand reality, it comes with the territory.

>>19363158
Its always funny when schizos try to convince others what they see is real

>>19363182
Schizo

>>19363188
>I'd don't like reality
Schizo

>>19355023
Are you paid 40,000 IDR to shill XRP or are you dumb? They're dumping on you. It's over. UND will moon like XRP did but you probably won't buy it or hold that long.

>>19363203
notice how none of thoae are for iso20022 you fucking retard. The news of Ripple becoming of ISO20022 was posted all over the place and not a single person (even r/CryptoCurrency who hates XRP) came up with the coping fud
>you can just buy it

And you somehow think you found a gotcha moment? You think iso20022 is the same? kek

>>19363203
>https://www.british-assessment.co.uk/insights/6-steps-to-iso-certification/
That has nothing to do what we're talking about. Ripple isn't getting a "certification", they were made a member of the governing body that determines the ISO standards.

>>19363273
damn, thats even more significant. fuck, i should just let you do all the talking. lol
peace XRP bro-

>>19363203
>schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo schizo
Holy fucking shit just kill yourself already

>>19361782
>You're not seriously holding XRP bags from 2017.. are you?

>XRP March 2017: $0.006
>XRP ATH: $3.50
>XRP now: $0.20
>gains since 2017-now = 33x

>>19363203
So should I buy $500 worth of link or $500 worth of xrp?

>>19363273
>https://www.british-assessment.co.uk/insights/6-steps-to-iso-certification/
proofs?

>>19363238
>notice how none of thoae are for iso20022
NO SHIT
Its basically the same process & ripplets don't like facts so I wasn't going to waste time finding the exact one.
See the real issue is you guys are schizos, you can't face cracks in world as you see it.
>And you somehow think you found a gotcha moment?
its just XRP schizos not understanding reality

FFS schizo retard, go to their site
https://www.iso20022.org/development-new-iso-20022-message-definitions

Its the same basic process, thats the way these work you fuckin schizo retard

>>19363273
You don't understand reality schizo, its an example of reality. No wonder you hate it.

>>19363290
reality is a bitch, schizo

>>19363323
Pic related

>>19363354
Literally who?

>>19363354
Next time this moron replies ignore him. he's a real fucking schizo.

>>19363369
newfag

>>19363354
>link glow niggers still spamming XRP threads with their bullshit
never change, fudders

>>19363399
I think he is just mad that xrp cannot be PnD like others. Or he is a paid shill to fud this for some reason, its not like xrp is going to 2k is it?

>>19363399
Why do you ripplets project so fuckin much?
Its part of your MO
>>19363409
>Doesn't see the irony in XRP shills just posting images as a rebuttal
Yea, its part of the reason why its not worth wasting time providing facts.
XRP paid shills never change

>>19363406
So should I but link or xrp? Hint you wont give an answer given the two options because you cannot lie.

>>19363429
So if you had to buy one, link or xrp. Answer link or xrp or begone.

>>19363429
maybe you should read the images? The anon made it clear here >>19363077
that ripple is part of a standards body, AKA on the board itself.
Thats far from
>just getting a certificate

And all youre going to do is lie and ignore what his image actually says
me the schizo? nah, you.

>>19363431
In my opinion neither. Life is not binary, schizo

>>19363464
Read the /thread schizo

>>19363354
All you do is gaslight and dance around the actual facts. But that's alright, I'm here, and I'm happy to correct you.
>Go to their site
I agree. Your link takes you to a page which describes the process of registering for ISO20022 compliance.
https://www.iso20022.org/sites/default/files/documents/D7/ISO20022RegistrationProcedures.pdf
Do you see that bit of text on the first page that says "ISO 20022 RMG Rules subgroup Approved"? RMG stands for Registration Management Group. The Rules subgroup made that document, and it was approved by the RMG, which is the highest registration body. Once again, what you linked has nothing to do with becoming a member of the RMG. Here is a list of the 37 delegations in the RMG. Ripple is the only interledger focused company in the entire group. Where are the "chainlink shitcoins" that you were talking about earlier, I don't see them? I only see entire nations and big players in finance?

>>19363468
What would you buy then? Direct question, which cryptocurrency would you buy if you had to buy one. If you deflect then we all have an answer to your intentions.

>>19363429
He's just mad his shitcoin is made obsolete with XRP.

What will happen to these threads when the Ripple x Chainlink partnership gets announced, I wonder? Will they still be posted, albeit with an insane angry defensive reaction? Will they just vanish?

>>19363501
I don't think so, his types look for ripple/xrp threads and gets mad at everyone.

>>19363517
Does ripple really need link?

>>19363528

Ripple doesn't need Link to perform its baseline purpose. I suspect there's added value from using it, which is the purpose of all good middleware, really.

>>19363517
Seems like centralized oracles are more likely to be used by the institutions Ripple is partnered with. I wouldn't be surprised if Polysign has some sort of oracle solution as well, since their entire MO is digital asset custody.

>>19363545
So what use would link provide to ripple since you have established that ripple does not need link and others could potentially encroach.

>>19363517
Knowing how chainlink overblows and lies about everything this is how it will go
>RING RING
>Ripple HQ, how may i help you
>Sergey: does Ripple have an oracle problem?
>... what?
>Sergey: DOES RIPPLE have an oracle problem?
>idk, maybe?
>Sergey: You should just use chainlink!
>um, okay
CHAINLINK
>we are glad to announce Ripple will be integrating with chainlink!
RIPPLE
>(no comments or mentions of chainlink at all)

just like 95% of all ChainLink "partnerships"

>>19363560
Only if you can trust those oracles to behave. In a world where the LIBOR scandal never happened, you might have a point. But we live in the world where we know for a fact that banks will lie about their own data to make a profit. It follows that it would be useful to establish an intermediary network for pulling API data, if only to prevent bank APIs from defecting when the daily LIBOR server ping occurs.

>>19363429
No one deliberately would enter a specific thread anytime its posted just to derail and fud this hard without Either being paid to do so or Super autistic. Now which is it?

>>19363569
Oracles for price feeds for smart contracts and shit. But XRP is already moving forward with launching a smart contracts on flare. I can't find info about Flare's oracle solution, but it doesn't seem to be LINK.

>>19363571
A thread from a few hours predicted crypto tanking and xrp going to 10c, still buy xrp?

>>19363604
Isnt the purpose of the blockchain the oracle question itself?

>>19363606
If you believe that XRP is adopted, then you probably think that it will also eventually reach a new ATH. A 10 cent difference will seem minimal if you just gradually DCA In.

>>19363612
No, Oracles are what connect real-world data to the blockchain.

>>19363612
The oracle problem is a specific security question relating to and encompassing the blockchain. It can be roughly summed as follows:

1) Blockchains are useful because they are decentralized ledgers that allow for practical movement of assets digitally, without fear of being copies allowing for fraud.
2) There is data that needs to be put onto the blockchain, which can be done through a piece of software known as an oracle.
3) A singular oracle is a potential point of failure for blockchain systems, effectively instituting a centralized system onto a decentralized one.
4) A network of oracles might remedy this dilemma, and its what Chainlink, Band Protocol, and Tellor are all attempting.

>>19363481
>Ripple is the only interledger focused company in the entire group.
That may be true, but that doesn't change the fact that these certs are paid for & are obtainable without changing around to much. Ripple wants to do an IPO soon, this adds credibility, like the big 4 do. Retail (You) lap this shit up.
Its basically just boxes to check, throw enough money @ it & you can meet the requirements also. You don't even need to change the business around really. Its paperwork approval.

Lets use my original example, the china hustle, These fraudulent companies list on the US markets by way of the same. They then get one of the big 4 to check them off & off they go. The big 4 only can only see what they look at/what they are shown.

You can argue all you like, there is a process for these certs the world over. You don't get them unless you pay, end of.

>>19363501
(((Maybe))) one day banks will use XRP, till then you keep connecting dots that aren't real like the schizos you are.
Libra shows banks don't want to work with blockchain assets they don't control. They're 100% owned by FB, one of the worlds largest companies. But they're going to work with the ripple scam.You did see what the BoE said about compliance, right?

>>19363604
unironically look into Codius >>19357556

also, Flare is 3rd party. Im worried theyre going to do something to taint Ripples image like partnerimg with Link. Hopefully the team knows how much the two communities basically hate each others guts. If flare partners with chainlink, its gonna cause a whole bunch of shitflinging where the conclusion will be
>flare is 3rd party anyway. not Ripple itself

2013 gaslighting

>>19363689
The team doesn't give a rat fuck how much Ripple holders hate Link holders, these are profit seeking entities and they will seek that profit by any means they think will work. Maybe that means they partner with Link, maybe it doesn't. But the very notion that "Ripple Twitter" has a say in the matter is way more delusional than any connect-the-dots screencap could ever hope to be

>>19363681
>That doesn't change the fact that these certs are paid for & are obtainable without changing around to much.
>You can argue all you like, there is a process for these certs the world over. You don't get them unless you pay, end of.
You still haven't shown any proof whatsoever that this was paid for. Your China Hustle example has nothing to do with the matter at hand.
>You did see what the BoE said about compliance, right?
What did they say?

>>19363681
>gets completely btfo
>walltexts to damage control
this is the most pathetic fud ive seen

>>19363670
That makes no sense, if a piece of data can be agreed upon by all, why do oracles need to exist? The point of decentralization is the 3 army problem which blockchain ledger is supposed to solve, there is no reason why oracles should be even existing.

>>19363670
Oh here is a solution, why not just have each address have 3 points of failure to ensure security? Seems pretty simple to me imo.

>>19363721
>You still haven't shown any proof whatsoever that this was paid for.
That's how these things work schizo.
As I said
>Its basically the same process & ripplets don't like facts so I wasn't going to waste time finding the exact one.
You'll just make me work & reject what I show you. Its your MO.
>Your China Hustle example has nothing to do with the matter at hand.
It does, You'll just make me work & reject what I show you. Its your MO.
>What did they say?
Look it up schizo

>>19363717
>doesnt care what XRP holders say
they still see a lot of tweets. Schwartz replies to tweets all the time. They are completely aware of the feud. If something happens like them announcing link integration it will cause a huge schism in the community theyve been building for years. It would completely change the confidence levels of many holders. ripple has been so silent about LINK over the years, the two companies might even have a contract to never namedrop each others name once or else fear getting sued the crap out of them
Notice how LINK has been so joyhappy in name dropping ETH and Tezos, but never once mentioned XRP. They are ignoring them each other

>>19363745

>That makes no sense, if a piece of data can be agreed upon by all, why do oracles need to exist?

In that particular instance, oracles don't need to exist. But in any instance where people might make money off of conflicting pieces of data - all of finance, say - you might want multiple pulls of that data from a third party to ensure the data hasn't been altered based on the requester.

>The point of decentralization is the 3 army problem which blockchain ledger is supposed to solve, there is no reason why oracles should be even existing.

Blockchains only solve the two armies problem once most or all data is on blockchains. We're very, very far from getting there at present.

>>19363766
That's called a decentralized oracle network, and it's what Chainlink/Band/Tellor are attempting to do.

>>19363681
>(((Maybe))) one day banks will use XRP, till then you keep connecting dots that aren't real
Too late you fucking schizo they already are

>>19363776
Why are you so against people buying xrp?

>>19363796

It's gonna be very hard to keep that sort of silence if Flare ends up using Chainlink. Though, crypto twitter is notoriously stupid, they can probably keep up the facade for quite a while.

>>19363804
>they already are
You've been saying the for years, its BS
Inb4 MUH moneygram

>>19363801
You are talking about the lag time between purchases right? Fraud and whatnot? Well with 0 anonymity the oracle question wouldn't even need to be considered.

>https://news.bitcoin.com/join-bityards-youtube-recruitment-competition-win-38888-xrp/
>>19362058
This, it's not exodus fagotry.
XRP is legit and is not going anywhere, but whole $2000 part is a bit too far off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyqdQlCMwjs&t=7733
Notice Christine Lagarde

>>19363831

No, I'm talking about falsifying data based on the requester. This has already happened (Libor scandal) and blockchains objectively don't solve that sort of defection behavior on their own, as long as institutions are interfacing directly.

>>19363816
>flare
i keep on telling you Flare is 3rd party. This is why i hate linkies. They keep acting like 3rd parties are official partnerships. Itll be the same shit with Smart Py and Tezos. Linkies spammed the board how tezos bent a knee even though smart py is just a 3rd party developer for Tezos. Teszure is still developing OrO and they have as much merit as Smart py
If flare does the absolute worst and partner with shitlink, (or literally just get consulting with no contracts) linkies are going to spam the board on how Ripple bent a knee when it was the irrelevant 3rd party

>>19363834
>not going anywhere

can't argue with that

>>19363830
first of all Moneygram isn't a bank, it's a remittance company.

https://www.xrparcade.com/world-top-100-banks/

This list is only what is allowed to say to the public, there could be hundreds of others that are secret due to contracts.

>>19363871
kek

>>19363776
>That's how these things work
Why should I take your word for this? What are your credentials? You don't get to just spout bullshit like this, man.
>Look it up
The only thing I've seen the Bank of England say about XRP is that it trialed well in a proof of concept for replacing their real time gross settlements system, and that they want to run more indepth PoCs in the future.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/research/fintech/-/media/boe/files/fintech/ripple.pdf?la=en&hash=75E5F445230B8A2B794C208D29619A3E33F1FFE7&hash=75E5F445230B8A2B794C208D29619A3E33F1FFE7
How can you just call someone a schizo repeatedly, and then refuse to source your claims? Is the irony lost on you?

>>19363862

Developers choosing to ignore the network's homebrewed solutions for something they perceive as better isn't the own on linkies you think it is. We will see what happens with Link and Ripple, but I personally wouldn't be surprised to see that partnership.

>>19363880
>first of all Moneygram isn't a bank, it's a remittance company.
NO SHIT

>>19362058
2k is unrealistic, but you should know that you can now recover 75% of the 20 XRP wallet fee, and that validators has changed the fee value multiple times. It used to be like 300 XRP or something at one point. I think it was 50 for a while too.

>>19363895
Tezos never ignored OrO. I researched the fuck out of it. Tezos still retweets OrO news just like they did for Smart Py.
Its literally the kike journalists who come up with these sensationalist article titles like
>TEZOS PICKS CHAINLINK HAS RESIDENT ORACLE AUTHORITY
when its completely overblown an exaggerated.
This is why i say the linkies are literal glow niggers. Every crypto kike journalist writes nothing but praise for link and how its taking over everything when they all literally have LINK bags. Have you notice how every crypto project has aome sort of fud journalist article written about it, except for chainlink? I have never seen one journalist or news article that fuds chainlink in anyway. not one

they are literally kikes with link bags

>>19363890
>Why should I take your word for this?
Nope, DYOR, you clearly haven't. You are making the process into something YOU think it should be & discounting reality.
>The only thing I've seen the Bank of England say about XRP
I was speaking about Libra, I do understand it has slightly different use case btw. But it does apply to XRP.
>How can you just call someone a schizo repeatedly,
You guys gave me the idea actually, Its mighty effective!
One of the schizo XRP shills called me shizo...but it turned out he was the schizo. Sad part is you all have this schizo shit in you. Its probably part of the cult mentality, it causes close mindedness.
Its sad

>>19363939
The Tezos Link integration was paid for by Tezos, though. Clearly they aren't adverse to it, even if they would prefer OrO or some other in-house system.

>>19363961
closed mindedness when the entire global trade is about to collapse and people are talking about a possible institutional solution? disregarding the theatrics of it all, holy shit you are obtuse.

>>19363983
There is no institutional solution to the coming collapse in global trade, the factors driving that implosion are a lack of global demand due to demographic collapse and a huge security problem.

>>19363970
Smart Py gets payed the same way as Teszure. I dont want to hear it. Its clear as daylight the kike journalist and media are putting chainlink on a pedestal, and it just happens that a lot of these journalists literally own link bags. Im not gonna keep quiet about this obvious agenda pushing by the kike journalists

>>19355023
I’m about to BTFO of every Ripple/XRP shill in existence.

When Ripple was first trading it was worth $0.0058, Bitcoin at the time was worth $105. So XRP was trading at 5504 satoshis per ripple. Ripple today is worth 2200 Satoshis. If you held XRP for 7 years you have actually LOST over 60% of your Bitcoin. LITERALLY all of Ripple dollar gains are because BTC went up. Satoshis got more expensive XRP lost value.

XRP is literal dogshit

>>19364000
and my id keeps changing cause of static ip. sorry

>>19363996
IE liquidity, don't obfuscate the real issue. It pisses me off when people do that.

>>19364002

>>19364002
tl dr; i cherry picked the sats chart on XRP

>>19364015
It has nothing to do with liquidity, the global economy is overbuilt for the population it's going to have over the next twenty years. With the singular exceptions of the US, NZ, France, and Iceland.

>Be American
>be too stupid to put on a condom
>keep winning BECAUSE you're too stupid to put on a condom

I guess this is a Lucky Nations On run.

>>19363961
>Nope, DYOR, you clearly haven't. You are making the process into something YOU think it should be & discounting reality.
You don't know what you're talking about, and you can't provide any hard evidence to support your claims. You don't just get to state things as fact and then refuse to provide any proof when asked. All it looks like to onlookers is that you're full of shit. I did look up what Bank of England had to say about Libra. All the articles say that the BoE is setting strict regulations that Libra will have to adhere to. But they also believe it has the potential to become an important system. I don't understand what your point is here?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/09/facebook-libra-currency-bank-of-england
Also, very convenient how you replied to >>19363880 but ignored the part about the big list of banks using Rippletech.

>>19364000
Regardless of what the journalists are hyping up, looking at the dev's own posts about it doesn't give me any sort of indication that they consider link inferior or defective. Its just another option for devs on their network, which adds value to their network. Which is what good middleware is supposed to do.

>>19364033
Bruh, the US is one of the few nations that has kept the 2.1 population growth and a large part of that is due to South American immigration. The EU? They want immigrants because they are catastrophically low. Once again dont obfuscate, last time.

>>19364058
Yes, that was explicitly what I said. Are you an ESL or some shit? Eurasia is demographically imploding, the Americas minus Canada aren't. That makes for a collapse in global trade cuz the US was already one of the least connected countries as a percentage of GDP. You can't paper over that with crypto.

>>19363890
>How can you just call someone a schizo repeatedly,
Also, your (XRP shills) claims are truly becoming more & more schizo as time goes on.
If you can't see that, its just more proof of schizo behaviour
>>19363983
>obtuse
Project harder with your schizo BS


>>19364041
>You don't know what you're talking about
Projecting
> All the articles say that the BoE is setting strict regulations that Libra will have to adhere to.
That's not all it says retard, its about compliance, KYC. Something XRP can't do. You can't even look up something without assuming you know everything & stop looking ffs schizo
>I don't understand what your point is here?
I know
>part about the big list of banks using Rippletech.
its a fuckin list, also schizo rippletech does not equal XRP.

>>19364002
No one gives a shit about sats you fucking retard.

and XRP was leading the Bullrun in 2018

since you are terrible at math. if you held 18,103 XRP at 0.0058 for $105
and sold at its ath you would make $66,256

If you held 1 Bitcoin at $105 and sold at its ath You would only make $16,629

>>19364082
Yea, Brazil was like the only country less exposed than the US for some reason.

>>19364116
HAHAHA money printer go brrrr. I like you, SPY to 500 eoy because haha money printer go brrrr

>>19364116
>That's not all it says retard, its about compliance, KYC
Show me where it talks about it. I can't find it anywhere, so give me a link. If you were actually willing to have an actual discussion, you would do this instead of continuing to gaslight.
>also schizo rippletech does not equal XRP.
Anyone using ODL is using XRP. Anyone using Ripplenet has an incentive to use XRP because it is fast, has no fees and it scales. It's an objective fact that big banks like SBI and Santander are using XRP.
Still waiting on anyone sort of proof that Ripple bought their sport on the RMG.

>>19364177
No no no, you are a schizo because the other anon says so.

>>19364177
>Show me where it talks about it.
https://www.ft.com/content/7df7fa22-ea6f-11e9-a240-3b065ef5fc55
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-15/boe-s-carney-defends-libra-concept-as-he-warns-on-regulation
>“In terms of how this will proceed or not going forward, this will not be like social media. This will not be a case where something gets up and starts running and the system tries to work out after the fact how it’s regulated. It’s either going to be regulated properly, overseen properly, or it’s not going to happen.”
Ripple blow out, kek
https://www.pymnts.com/cryptocurrency/2019/bank-of-england-handing-down-strict-regulations-for-libra/
https://www.cityam.com/bank-of-england-establishes-rules-of-engagement-for-facebooks-libra/

Wow all on the first page of a google search

Before you say something dumb
>The principles established by the FPC include the need for demonstrable operational and financial resilience across the entire payment chain, and for providers such as Libra to provide enough information to regulators to monitor payments.
If you don't read KYC in that then you have no business talking about MSBs.

can't believe you are surprised that banks want KYC...well then again, you are schizo

>>19364303
In terms of how this will proceed or not going forward, this will not be like social media. This will not be a case where something gets up and starts running and the system tries to work out after the fact how it’s regulated. It’s either going to be regulated properly, overseen properly, or it’s not going to happen.”

I am pretty sure this is copy paste from a senate bill. Holy shit you suck at this.

>>19364303
Why don't you want people to buy xrp?

>>19364120
>bullrun in 2018
Um sweetie, 2018 was bear market

>>19364352
I'm pretty sure you can see the link posted above the greentext
Holy shit you schizos suck at this.
READ RETARD
Its was a BoE guy that made the statement. not some Mutt retard like yourself
& you cunts wonder why ppl call you schizo

Just keep arguing with reality
Also learn how to greentext newfag

>>19364380
This was for you >>19364425

>>19364392
Error: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again. Error: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again. FUCK OFFError: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again. FUCK OFFError: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again. FUCK OFFError: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again. FUCK OFF

>>19364303
I still don't see how any of what you've shown me is bad for Ripple or XRP.
>"It’s either going to be regulated properly, overseen properly, or it’s not going to happen.”
Aside from the larger quote this was snipped from, all your articles say the exact same thing as the one I originally linked. Now, even though this quote is directed at Libra and not XRP, Ripple has in fact been working with regulators every step of the way. How does this blow them out? They're one of the few projects in the space that's making a big push to be ontop of regulation. Of course Libra would need KYC, it's trying to be a consumer-facing currency coin. XRP is a backend coin for institutions. Banks are going to need KYC from other banks? What is the issue here exactly? Still side skirting the bank partnerships as well.

>>19364572
>I still don't see how any of what you've shown me is bad for Ripple or XRP.
WOW, why even bother with you fuckin schizos. you are NEVER happy with ANYTHING that goes against your confirmation bias.
Sure ask questions, but this is beyond that. WAY beyond that
> Ripple has in fact been working with regulators every step of the way
This is schizo BS, If this was true the Justice Dept wouldn't have gotten involved in '15
Keep lying to yourself schizo
>How does this blow them out?
They didn't KYC from the get go, hence why the Ripple entered a plea bargain with the Justice dept.
>Of course Libra would need KYC, it's trying to be a consumer-facing currency coin.
Then why are you buying XRP? This shows banks won't buy your XRP, it wasn't KYCd
> Banks are going to need KYC from other banks?
As the statement said 'to have regulation in mind from the get go'. Ripple did not, if you think they did you truly are schizo.
> What is the issue here exactly?
you being schizo apparently, face reality
>Still side skirting the bank partnerships as well.
Nope this has been answered, your confirmation bias won't let you be satisfied as this post shows.

I’m Op.
>>19364776
>Confirmation bias
It’s a quote about Libra. It’s a huge reach to say it applies to XRP.
>2015 Justice Dept Case
Had to do with anti money laundering procedures, which is not necessarily KYC. They were audited by the JD/IRS up till 2020 and part of their settlement was to bring it completely within the regulatory framework. This was also when crypto was just coming on to the world financial scene
>My XRP isn’t KYCd
I bought it from Coinbase, how is it not kyc’d?
Also why is the Bank of England trialing Ripple to good results in 2020 if they don’t like it?

>>19364002
Lmfao only incel basement dwellers measure in muh sadoshibitts unit

>decentralised

>>19365108
>It’s a huge reach to say it applies to XRP.
Nope, its not schizo. Libra has more power than XRP (connected to FB). Libra are even trying to be compliant from the get go, unlike XRP. I do understand its arguable but ripple vs libra is not THAT different. Both are offering cross border payments. both need to AML/KYC I do hear one is via a bank & the other is a website. the issue is compliance & how ripple can't.
>Had to do with anti money laundering procedures, which is not necessarily KYC
Although yes it was AML, AML is KYC, they do go hand in hand. Also DESU I should have said AML/KYC when I bought up the BoE article
>They were audited by the JD/IRS up till 2020 and part of their settlement was to bring it completely within the regulatory framework.
to little to late according to the article on Libra. Also ripple only AML the buyer who they deal with directly. where it goes from there...No one knows in reality.
FB should be able to track the transactions completely.
To make it clear, Ripple is in compliance, XRP can't be
>This was also when crypto was just coming on to the world financial scene
If you want to work with banks compliance is huge, has been for a while, defo since 9/11
>how is it not kyc’d?
Yours is sure, the issue is the chain of payments, the person you bought off, was that KYC/AML? banks can't get into such murky waters. Also just cause yours is that doesn't equal everyone.
>Also why is the Bank of England trialing Ripple to good results in 2020 if they don’t like it?
Anything I say would be conjecture, but to make their own would be a logical conclusion. It would be some major mental gymnastics for them to approval ripple (who is not in compliance & never can be with all the XRP) but not Libra which isn't even released yet so has the chance to be in compliance from the get go.

Let me guess you'll argue more as what I said doesn't fit your fragile confirmation bias

>>19365362
you shouldn't post a picture of yourself on an anonymous forum anon, you never know who is watching

>>19365564
Libra has more power, doesn’t mean they have the right model. And I would argue that Libra and XRP are very different, even if they can both do cross border money transfers. That’s only one part of Libra. It draws further regulatory headaches because it was supposed to be backed by an assortment of assets. XRP has nothing like that going on. Furthermore, XRP is a working product being used by actual institutions, in compliance with laws and regulations. Libra might as well just be theory at this point.
>XRP can’t be compliant
Are you going to explain how it had no problems with 4 years of auditing by the IRS/US Justice Department? Are you going to ignore how it is recently getting the go-ahead from other US regulatory Bodies?
https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-consumer-protection-agency-recognizes-xrps-potential-in-remittance
>Ripple is in compliance not XRP
How does this make since when Ripples biggest product right now needs XRP?

>>19365900
They will bend their mental capabilities to justify why xrp is useless

>>19363204
(f)und is the xrp of eth killers

>XRP is a working product being used by actual institutions
Not really. just testing, be honest with yourself schizo
>Libra might as well just be theory at this point.
It is, along with the Ripple bank partnerships
>Are you going to explain how it had no problems with 4 years of auditing by the IRS/US Justice Department?
Already have, Ripple is in complice
>Are you going to ignore how it is recently getting the go-ahead from other US regulatory Bodies?
getting is not having
>Ripples biggest product right now needs XRP?
XRP that they hold can be KYC/AMLed, Ripple are the sole creators.They can come along & replace XRP & still use the same exact tech. All while the XRP cult pay for the testing.
>>19366058
read the /thread schizo
look at all the great info you've put over...oh thats right you haven't.

Do people still not realise that Ripple isn't XRP, I thought this was common news?
The fact they've been selling you the retarded child project which has nothing to do with the ripple banking infrastructure is fucking hilarious.

>>19365900
>It draws further regulatory headaches because it was supposed to be backed by an assortment of assets
So will ripple btw...Especially if they EVER reach the crazy schizo price of $2k.

You have no idea what you are on about apparently

>>19363571
kek

I cant believe XRP actually has several threads going on biz at once with people talking about how its going to be the NWO coin. I remember 4-5 months ago, biz would fud my threads to death whenever I told them that XRP is the chosen one.

We must be getting real close to liftoff if biz has multiple xrp threads a day

>>19363354
>21 posts by this ID
>>19364041
>21 posts by this ID
Hahahahah, my god. XRP has the most vigorous and persistent fudders I have ever see in crypto

EVER

SEEN

in the 5 years I've been trading and investing in this shit. The most persistent fudding I have ever fucking seen.

I wonder why?

>>19366319
>Just testing
SBI and Santander are both using it in a real capacity. Bank of America head of Global Banking just revealed a partnership with Ripple. Pot calling kettle on the whole confirmation bias thing here. This is just me talking about the bank partners that I'm personally versed with, you continue blatantly ignore shit like this, just as you ignored the bank list in >>19363880 You have still never addressed this, and saying "b-b-b-but it's just a list" doesn't erase the very real partnerships that are cataloged within it. And even for the banks that are just trialing XRP, there are no other projects in this space except maybe ETH, that can say they have this much interest from financial institutions. ODL volume is on track to do 5-6 billion in volume this year. How can you seriously think this stuff isn't being used? It baffles me, it really does.

Lets go back to regulation though.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/coinbase-and-ripple-push-for-regulatory-framework-us-congress-stalls
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbrett/2019/10/22/ripple-expands-regulatory-strategy-in-washington-dc/#5eb8d1d21eb4
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2019/06/26/ripple-deal-could-make-xrp-cryptocurrency-compliant-with-fatf-anti-money-laundering-regulations/#4a0db6173aab
No other existing projects are as focused on regulation as Ripple. Why are they going through all this trouble to make XRP the first fully compliant coin, if they're just going to replace it? Seems like a waste of money to me. I'd also like to hear how Ripple could be compliant while selling XRP, if XRP isn't compliant. How is XRP used for remittances between pairs like USD/EURO or USD/MEX by institutions based in those countries if it's not regulated?

>>19366380
>You have no idea what you are on about apparently
That's funny, because I've never endorsed the 2k narrative at all. XRP will never be backed by a basket of assets and securities, which was the plan for Libra. Why? Because XRP isn't trying to become the worlds new reserve currency. It's a back end bridge for remittances and the exchange of CBDCs. Show me anyone from Ripple talking about XRP being backed by anything.

>>19366594
>Pot calling kettle on the whole confirmation bias thing here.
> Santander
using ripple not XRP
https://www.ccn.com/santander-bank-xrp-ripple-confusion/
also BoA is just testing aka its theory
>How can you seriously think this stuff isn't being used?
5-6 Billion is not implemention , its still testing. Swift is implemented
besides you still confuse reality Santander is using ripple not XRP. Makes me wonder where you got 5-6 Billion from...I'd guess its SBI, which is probably all internal to some degree
> institutions based in those countries if it's not regulated?
I've answered this, the XRP ripple own & had custody of, Not yours thats for sure
>No other existing projects are as focused on regulation as Ripple
Libra is an existing PROJECT....
> if they're just going to replace it?
It shouldn't be hard to change once its proven tech.Even if they don't no reason to use your XRP
>I've never endorsed the 2k narrative at all.
Good, you might be sane after all, sadly you still have the cult mentality
>XRP will never be backed by assets (I paraphrased)
What does remittance mean? Just to clarify
A remittance is an asset btw, its a sum of money to put it simply
> Because XRP isn't trying to become the worlds new reserve currency
Agreed
>Show me anyone from Ripple talking about XRP being backed by anything.
Can't show you what doesn't exist

The fact that you don't even know Santander isn't using XRP & possiting that BoA is implemented shows the XRP cult has a deep grip on you.

>>19367792
I'll concede on Santander, but lets not act like they've been a big point of discussion here. I still think partnerships like that are important, because it only makes it more likely that they'll use XRP down the line. I really would like to see an indepth comparison of ODL vs whatever xCurrent is named as these days. Can't really find any earnings reports talking about xCurrent like I can for ODL.
>5-6 billion dollars in volume is just testing
ODL is definitely in its infancy, but that's a lot of money, being moved by real financial institutions. It's growth is only continuing to accelerate, and there's no telling how high it could for daily volume. I get this data from a public tracker of ODL transactions. https://utility-scan.com/#/dashboard..
>Libra is an existing project
No major developments since late 2019 where a shitton of its major partners like Paypal, Visa, Mastercard and Stripe all pulled out. Funnily enough, they renamed one of the libra subdivision to Novi, in order to distance it from Libra. I know you think Facebook is all powerful because they have about 60x more funds available to them compared to Ripple, but this type of shit is out of their wheelhouse as far as I'm considered. Do you really have faith in a project who's biggest partners all sort of left at the same time half a year ago? I don'.
>Even if they don't no reason to use your XRP
If it's the premiere solution for liquidity issues, yes they will, there will be too much demand for them not to. If not them, then exchanges will. Why would they not? It serves the same purpose as any other XRP.
>Remittance is an asset
Okay, but XRP's value isn't backed by them like some sort of remittance backed security. XRP derives value from increased usage on the Ripple Ledger.

>>19368795
>but lets not act like they've been a big point of discussion here.
it is, you think tones of banks use this shite, turns out it's just one....One bank cross boarder payments, in 8 year...sad
anyways not reading further, you literally don't what you are shilling. You certainly have confirmation bias
I feel sorry for you anon, this is an investment, not a cult

>>19366415
These threads are interesting as hell, and after you start pulling layers apart you can really start to learn things.

>>19368897
So you refuse to acknowledge arguments and on the exhale call them a shill. Neato

>>19368984
I've never seen so many threads about XRP go on and on to these post counts. Fudders are the most persistent I've ever seen. Link doesnt get it, Bitcoin doesnt get it, no other coin gets the same kind of fud attention like XRP.

>>19369359
Thats kinda why I like it. The sentiment is a whole other energy on both sides.

>>19368897
You're running away, anon. I only said Santander and SBI use XRP. I admitted my mistake with Santander, but SBI is actually using ODL. There are a few other smaller banks like Euro Exim that are also using XRP, but something tells me you'll just dismiss those as irrelevant for vague reasons. I also think its funny that you try to pretend that big banks like Santander using xCurrent powered-systems is bad. xCurrent uses the exact same systems as ODL, but it requires established Nostro/Vostro accounts. Banks can ultimately save more money by using ODL to free up the trillions of dollars sitting in these accounts. If they're happy with xCurrent, there's a strong possibility that they could use XRP in the future. I don't expect these institutions to leap headfirst into cryptocurrencies. More regulation, and more competition from smaller financial institutions, needs to come before the larger banks will consider using XRP to free up $ in their large nostro/vostro accounts. Meanwhile, there are no other projects in this space with multiple Banks using their tech, even if its in a limited capacity. Maybe ETH comes close, but that's it. And in this thread alone you went from saying no banks use XRP, to saying that they did. Still waiting on you to provide proof for the ISO20022 FUD.

>>19358845
>XRP technology absolutely shits on everything else, like its not even a contest.
You mean the tech that couldnt even handle anons loading jpgs to it? Started bloating everything so much that their Twitter cultists had to stop it.