[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 41 KB, 483x581, SatoMusk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19351125 No.19351125 [Reply] [Original]

1. Is it solely based on who wrote the whitepaper.

2. Who actually created it, did the coding.

3. Just whoever holds the keys.

Which is it.

>> No.19351209

Peter Schiff is satoshi

>> No.19351268

>>19351125
1. No
2. No
3. No
Nobody knows.
If we did, you wouldn't have these asinine theories, or maybe, YOU still would.

>> No.19351312

>>19351268
My point I'm trying to make is, is one of the 3 more important than the others

yes or no , or all criteria must match ?

>> No.19351396
File: 40 KB, 225x350, Satoshi_performing_live.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19351396

>>19351125
After the release of BTC and the Samurai Champloo soundtrack, Satoshi Nakamoto was tragically killed in a car accident in Shibuya on February 26, 2010. I thought this was common knowledge.

>> No.19351437

>>19351312
>How do you define Musks identity?
>1. Is it solely based on his ability to hype up Tesla stock?
>2. Who actually develops the software within Tesla products, does Musk even code?
>3. Just whoever actually launches Tesla and SpaceX products.

Fuck your armchair general criteria.
Nobody knows.

>> No.19351705

>>19351437

Then why would it even be a question asked by anyone, if nobody can define what it should actually be based on

Satoshi never was any one.

>> No.19351987

>>19351705
I reshuffled your "criteria" for someone that is known to show how foolish your criteria is.
It still went over your head. I'm not surprised.
The problem:
You propose a false dilemma. Is it this, this, or this? Can it be none of the above or something else entirely (yes)?
That's the point. Your criteria and attempts to label are garbage tier.

>> No.19352032

>>19351987
Your reshufflling makes no sense and isn't correlated to my point.

Elon Musk is a person, who's identity is already known.

So you've already started off with bullshit.

>> No.19353044

>>19351396
Satoshi's beats were off the chain. RIP ;_;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9hwjQBQFIo

>> No.19353998
File: 105 KB, 230x345, 1589744568747376222569.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19353998

Like any historical character, ie. fictional one, his attributes are whichever can be unmistakably obtained from the story told. In this case we know he murdered a few whores on foggy nights and got away with it to become a legend. Partition was his most noticeable skill.

>> No.19354174

>>19351125
None of these criteras are specific enough.

The true critera is this:

- Whoever the intellectual and organizational force is, who made the research and the work to conceive of Bitcoin, and made sure it was implemented into the cohesive system that was described in the Bitcoin whitepaper and the early Satoshi posts.

Meaning it could be an individual or a group. But the hand that wrote the whitepaper might not necessarily be Satoshi, it could've been a clerk or an editor for Satoshi.

Holding the keys is a bad critera as they could be lost, stolen or misappropriated.

Whoever collected and synthesized the IDEAS described in the white paper is Satoshi.

>> No.19354203
File: 32 KB, 662x641, satoshi52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19354203

>>19351125
4. Whoever has the most knowledge.

>> No.19354845

>>19354203
So definitely not creg wright as he is technologically illiterate in addition to being a fraud.

>> No.19354924

>>19351125
He likes ripple:
>Ripple is interesting in that it’s the only other system that does something with trust besides concentrate it into a central server.
>Satoshi
>https://nakamotostudies.org/emails/satoshi-reply-to-mike-hearn/

>> No.19354951

Hal Finney is Satoshi. If you don't know this by now you're not paying attention.

>> No.19355080

>>19354951
Nah
>https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/6/

>> No.19355187

>>19354951
>>19355080

Hal Finney and Adam Back co-created Bitcoin. It all make since when you think about it.

The name Satoshi Nakamoto was taken from Hal's neighbor Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto

>> No.19355204
File: 1.35 MB, 1794x1722, 1572623095708.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19355204

>>19354845
>technologically illiterate
>world class cyber security expert

pick one

>> No.19355245
File: 234 KB, 800x450, 1558988605892.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19355245

>>19355187
>It all make since when you think about it.
>make since
>since
No, it doesn't actually. It makes the least 'sense' when you think about it.

Satoshi wanted digital cash - Adam wants e-gold
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - Adam wants tabs and lightning
Satoshi wanted big server farms - Adam wants raspberry pis
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability - Adam celebrates high fees
Satoshi wanted instant payments - Adam disabled it
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - Adam fucked the protocol beyond recognition
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Adam kicked Gavin out

Satoshi wanted digital cash - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted big server farms - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted instant payments - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Gavin testified that Craig Wright was definitely the person behind Satoshi

Did it click yet? 1+1 = 2

>> No.19355286
File: 66 KB, 920x846, 6437568679.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19355286

>>19354924
>He likes ripple.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sbi-holdings-ceo-ripple-partners-could-help-pandemic-supply-chain
Ctrl+F 'friendship'
Topkek

>> No.19355314

>>19351125
the first satoshi is dead, one might even argue there was more before the current. but the current has been around since the first.
and its not craig

>> No.19355326
File: 38 KB, 609x325, craig-wright-fed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19355326

>>19351125
Sathosi is probably the feds desu, it doesnt matter who it is because anyone working to embrace regulations is a shit cunt and should be stepped around regardless. Bitcoin is censorship-proof money, its economic freedom for the economically oppressed, like white nationalists.

>> No.19355331
File: 290 KB, 416x716, satoshi36.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19355331

>>19355245
2+1 = 3
It was destiny

>> No.19355356

>https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/finneynakamotoemails.pdf

>> No.19355394
File: 38 KB, 768x432, 654264353.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19355394

Tl;dr: Creg lied, Dave died.