[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 8 KB, 268x97, provide.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19256048 No.19256048 [Reply] [Original]

So I noticed in the new Baseline Protocol example with SAP and Microsoft Dynamics, this organization Provide is involved:

https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/517507822/baseline-protocol-secures-business-process-automation-across-sap-and-microsoft-dynamics-using-ethereum-public-blockchain

Provide: www.provide.services

They also offer oracles, but have no documentation available as of yet: https://docs.provide.services/microservices/goldmine/#oracles

So what is this? Obviously their logo looks exactly like LINK's. Does anyone have breadcrumbs on this connection? Is Provide using Chainlink oracles or are they creating their own?

>> No.19256117

>>19256048
Sounds like a brown label off brand product with Chainlink lurking in the backend. Mmmmhmm.

>> No.19256120

bump for research

>> No.19256224

>>19256120
Have you asked Github?

>> No.19256369

>>19256224
Only thing I can find about oracles is https://github.com/provideservices/provide-python-oracle

They call it a "proof of concept message bus" and it was last updated 6 months ago :-/ Not much to go on.

>> No.19256416

looks like baseline doesnt need link anymore

>> No.19256574

>>19256416
Well Provide obviously offers oracles, why wouldn't they? But from what I can tell they have not developed an in-house production ready solution, just a stop-gap solution. Since both Provide & Chainlink are part of the technical steering committee for Baseline, it seems likely that Provide would connect to Chainlink oracles as needed rather than try to create their own.

>> No.19256766
File: 151 KB, 1440x728, IMG_20200521_232707.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19256766

>>19256048
>>19256416
Based ari and his smart crime. I have noted at least 30 biz ID of brainlet, and I will find you in due time. Good luck.

>> No.19256941
File: 189 KB, 336x468, 1558958386693.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19256941

>>19256766
Woah, great find! With their Baseline connection it seems very likely Provide will go with Chainlink. This is awesome

>> No.19257205

They brownlabeled it to Provide instead of Link cause link was ruined by autistic memes so they ditched the project. Ubt is still good though

>> No.19257413

>>19256941
I don't know why no one is talking about Baseline? I mean CL is literally at the center of it (key role) and they've just connected msft and sap together...

>> No.19257441

>>19257413
Chainlink wasn't involved in that per Wolpert, but he did say on Twitter that he is looking forward to showcasing Chainlink in future projects.

>> No.19257556

>>19257413
>>19257441
https://twitter.com/jwolpert/status/1263501711622225920?s=19

>> No.19257592

>>19256048
Definitely chainlink. The ceo is a regular of the baseline meetings and a former consensys employee? Point is he's working on the baseline protocol which of course includes chainlink

>> No.19257646

>>19257205
as a professional LINK fudder, you gotta do better with your reasoning

>> No.19257669

>>19257556
Fair enough. Thanks I missed that. Hopefully it's not going to be pajeet tier project.

>> No.19257693

>>19256048
This has nothing to do with Chainlink.

>> No.19257702

>>19256766
>>19256941
Okay, delete the thread now please

>> No.19257869
File: 230 KB, 594x720, IMG_20200521_110732.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19257869

What do these projects do and why didn't they name the links? Is it like naming the jew? Do tech people fear sergey?