/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19219390
>copyrighted whitepaper
Good luck with that Mr Shit Eater.

>>19219390
Imagine just for a moment seething so much that you threaten lawsuits against someone because they called you out for plagiarizing their white paper

>>19219406
...no, no it isnt copyrighted...thats the point, thats why the man has confidence to publicly anounce he will pursue litigation you fuckwit.

>>19219444
Youre the one seething, fucktard. Blow a hole through your skull with a pistol.

>>19219406
Wow. Idiot.

>Opensource Whitepaper.
>Gets called out for copyright
>coin dumps
>explains that he’s not going to change what stays the same
>coin pumps
>threatens lawsuit
>/biz/ jizzes pants
>I buy late fuuuuuuuck

>>19219390
>deformation

it's defamation you idiot, he has no grounds whatsoever though. they just tweeted that ghost plagiarized their whitepaper which was 100% true.

>>19219616
You can’t plagiarise something that is open source.

>>19219616
>>19219625
No one cares. Were going to the moon. You in?

>>19219452
yes it is.........

How is a con artist on the run from the law going to use the law to sue someone?

>>19219633
Of course

>>19219649
show me where on the whitepaper it states 'copyrighted', it doesnt, I looked.

>>19219616
ok man, Im actually an engineer so more of a mathematics guy, language can be fuckery at times.

>>19219659
he's not on the run anymore? he's back in america after a stint in spain due to the lockdown, before that he had some trouble in belize but its actually an interesting story check it out, like really get your facts straight lol.

>>19219390
I'm in a bit, but come on. Frankly copy-pasting the whitepaper was retarded. They included figure references to figures that din't even exist in their paper. If you were fully competent in the tech WHY THE FUCK DO YOU NEED TO PLAGIARIZE. Furthermore, if you had some good tech, why the FUCK would you outsource your writing to a fucking pajeet? A competent team could write the whitepaper in a day

>>19219667
Based. Ive got a Big Dick with huge nutsack stack.

>muh lawsuit
yikes what a scam

this is just a distraction for /biz/lets to hold their bags while mr cokehead dumps on you even more

They'd just sieze any judgement on behalf of the $25million verdict against him out of Florida by the daughter of the Belize dude he supposedly hired a hitman to taze his balls and then kill.

>>19219768
Come the 25th please dont kys

>>19219390
Boarding this rollercoaster because why not.

>>19219707
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
you don't even know how copyright laws work. you need to be over 18yrs ol to ost here. kekked at this levels of newb.

>yeah we've got the next big thing
>yeah lotta billionaires involved
>yeah how should we communicate this to people
*epic brainstorm*
YES, A PAJEET ON FUCKING FIVERR. Let's spend thirteen dollars on a paper!!!

>>19219707
>show me where on the whitepaper it states 'copyrighted', it doesnt, I looked.
It doesn't need to that's the thing about copyright laws. The way the team expressed their ideas is covered by copyright laws.

I still can't believe the pettiness of the pivx team. Your stupid coin failed 3 years ago

>>19220127
Well I express the PIVX team are a bunch of failed cunt, and if they say anything I’ll sue them too.

>>19220127
>>19220055
Sorry lads, a document with legal status must therefore always present itself this way.

This of any research paper, there are dates, publishers, names etc. Why do you think TM(Trademark) is next to the names of certain brands, because itts a legal entity.

You fuckboys hammering away at your keyboards have no idea how things really work in the real world.

I've worked in a field heavily involved in finance and governance.

If you have a unique idea that you dont want stolen, you patent it, if something is intellectual property, you copyright it. Its really that simple.

>>19220127
>>19220055
>>19220498
I would also add to this, if it was 'Copyrighted', the actual stance would be the opposite, PIVX would be the antogonist pursuing litigation, so the fact that they havent even mentioned 'lawyering up' what does that tell you.

Honest to god you weebo's..

Although I dont know half the time if you are just supressing the price until this goes on bigger exchanges and thus obtains more exposure and drives the price up.

>>19219390
literally all PIVX did was tell the truth kek

>>19220543
There's people playing ever possible angle.
But the matter of fact is non of what you said really matters, pivx is a team of pajeets, McAfees on the run from alphabet agency's who literally can't find him. Theres going to be no lawsuit.
What there is though is drama, tweets, threads, YouTube videos.
Its exposure, and that's literally all that matters.
Yeah the weak hands sold and line go red but ghosts not even out yet. We are going to the moon.

>>19219406
not copyright kekekekek first post worst post

>>19220578

No threw tried to throw shade because it outshines their pajeet tier project

>>19219390
>deformation

>>19219390
This is not true, they can release any artifact with any license they want.

>>19219452
It is automatically copyrighted. The question was under what license McAfee availed himself to the document.

>>19219625
But you can violate the license, if indeed the document in question was released under an open source license. Does anyone know if it was?