[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 176 KB, 512x768, 1559623577955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19185359 No.19185359 [Reply] [Original]

Corecoin hashrate is going down.
BitCoin hashrate is going up.
The flippening has started.
Meanwhile Corecoin lost 2 years of development while sucking AXA's dick

>> No.19185493
File: 14 KB, 1520x2048, dootles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19185493

Bitcoin has gone up 3000%
BSV has gone DOWN 3000%
Creg is still old and sweaty

>> No.19185936

>>19185359
Kys

>> No.19186188

>>19185359
creg rekt.. a million schizo betabois cry out in vain

>> No.19186969
File: 34 KB, 500x377, 1571290925681.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19186969

>>19186188
truth is alpha will continue to be alpha while betas will continue to insult and embarass themselves when seeing alpha.

>> No.19187061
File: 33 KB, 720x568, 1589263795352.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19187061

>>19185359

>> No.19187429

>>19185359
sv hashrate is still way below it's pre halving usual nigga no habbening sorry

>> No.19187485

>>19187429
Corecoin hashrate is below pre halving and is falling like a rock. Nobody will stop it, miners switching to BitCoin.
You must be really retarded not seeing how Corecoin hashrate is going to 2018 levels.

>> No.19187560

>>19187485
exactly 40% hashrate capitulated as expected because you know the halving happened at $9-$10k so miners with profitability over $5k became unprofitable overnight.

new 7nm miners had a breakeven around $3k not at $6k. no need to sperg out.

>> No.19187617

>>19186969
only cucks worship the cult of creg.. you are weak and looking for guidance.. and gullible so you got conned. Here.. thank me later: https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig

>> No.19187706
File: 399 KB, 633x643, 1568738608006.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19187706

>>19187560
It's a trend, not an overnight change.
Meanwhile BitCoin had over 1 million transactions in 1 block, over 50% transactions of ALL cryptos, 83% of Corecoin.
It's a trend, not an overnight change. You really must be blind not seeing the signs.

>>19187617
It's natural selection. While you get blinded by stupid things, Alphas will continue to do what they do best, winning. And you will continue to fail to understand what is really happening.

>> No.19187732

>>19185359
96.058 Ehash/s
+8.98% in 24 hours

>> No.19187747

>>19185359
>BSV has gone DOWN 3000%
that's some serious COPE

>> No.19187756

>>19187706
there is no trend nigga and noone cares about faux bitcoins spoof transactions

>> No.19187830
File: 155 KB, 216x388, 1559713881693.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19187830

>>19187756
>there is no trend
there's a reason why majority buys the top, not lower.

>> No.19187840

>>19187706
he posted that almost 2 years ago and bsv has done literally nothing price wise

>> No.19187855

>>19185359
>Corecoin lost 2 years of development
More like 5-7.

>> No.19187918

>>19187840
wut?
BitCoin is just the most profitable crypto out of all... excluding some scam tokens.
>>19187855
checked and actually true as i didn't include research time that would consume some years too.

>> No.19188030
File: 45 KB, 1778x611, Block #635141.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188030

>>19187706
>Meanwhile BitCoin had over 1 million transactions in 1 block

Thing of beauty, ain't it? The best part is this is going to be peanuts compared to the blocks we'll have a year from now.

>> No.19188080

>>19187840
>BSV up almost 300% YTD
>BTC 60%

Delicious cope.

>> No.19188167

>>19187830
60% to 70% probability bitcoin breaks up high from this current triangle within 2 days the difficulty adjusts down, mempool clears, hashrate will go up to 130 exa within 4 days when it hits $12k.

>> No.19188196

>>19188167
>price goes up
>mempool clears
pick one.
history always repeats itself.

>> No.19188210
File: 7 KB, 231x219, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188210

>>19188167
Imagine needing to wait days for the mempool to clear.

>> No.19188220

>>19188196
the mempool is not clogged from the price going up but the 40% miner capitulation.

>> No.19188247

>>19188210
can't say i particularly like it. but it is how satoshi coded the system.

>> No.19188262

>>19188247
Stop it, my sides can't take it anymore.

>> No.19188270

>>19188220
the mempool is fucked because of your stupid 1MB limit, just say it...
Bitmex alone uses 5-10% of all available transactions a day on Corecoin... imagine ignoring facts...

>> No.19188335
File: 193 KB, 2535x812, mempool.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188335

Imagine having even 1 Cent in such a stupid "technology" that doesn't want to change so AXA doesn't go bankrupt.
The flippening has started and you can decide to do something positive or negative for your future.

>> No.19188337

>>19188270
nothing is fucked nigga fees are a little higher on average that's all. and really within a day or so it will resolve itself fast.

>> No.19188338

>>19187706
>It's a trend, not an overnight change.
No it's not. Hashrate was at ATH not long before. Now old miners are mining shitcoins instead which they'll sell and buy new profitable miners with. It's expected.

>> No.19188365
File: 48 KB, 1190x365, 5-18-20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188365

>>19188337
Yeah, bro. Like totally wait for LN. It's a really shit banking app that creates unneeded middlemen in Bitcoin, but it's totally awesome because... Have you seen my full node?!

>> No.19188387

>>19188262
well every aspect of bitcoin that resulted in this clog has been coded by satoshi with his own hand: the difficulty adjust period of 2 weeks, the algorithm for the adjust, the block interval, the 1mb limit even.

unlike the bcash forks with altered daa btc still uses the original protocol.

>> No.19188401
File: 7 KB, 480x360, 1589212717905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188401

>>19188337
>fees are a little higher on average that's all

>> No.19188417

>>19188365
>unneeded middlemen
lol unneeded my ass exchanges will be the real hubs obviously. we need them anyhow. the relationship with them becomes a little bit more trustless that's all.

>> No.19188440

>>19188401
median fees went from 40 cents to $2.4
considering the circumstances that's perfectly fine.

i honestly expected a lot worse halving. extremely bullish.

>> No.19188445 [DELETED] 

>>19188338
You're confirming that hashrate will continue going down... which therefore is a trend... braindead as fuck not understanding what you wrote while exactly confirming what i said.

>>19188337
see >>19188335
you're fucked.

>>19188365
>full node
god i love the corecoin braindeads not understanding what a node actually is. surprised none of them has written it yet but they usually come

>>19188387
difficulty adjust of 2 weeks came later... it was lower at the beginning... you can thank AXA, i mean blockstream, again for that stupid change.

>> No.19188472
File: 115 KB, 1000x594, Lightning.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188472

>>19188387
The original code for Bitcoin had unbounded blocks. 1mb limit was literally suppose to be a temporary measure for flood control because Bitcoin had literally NO MONETARY value creating no incentive for miners to deal with network demands. Don't get me wrong though, I fucking love that Segshitters want small blocks and reduced functionality. Makes this all easier.

>>19188417
jfc the absolute state

>> No.19188479
File: 77 KB, 640x640, butthurt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188479

>>19187429
>>19187560
>>19187756
>>19188167
>>19188220
>>19188247
>>19188337
>>19188387
>>19188417
>>19188440
Every and I mean EVERY single BSV thread you get some butthurt m'sir who feels the need to defend his beloved corecoin with a flood of low-quality posts responding to every single perceived slight against his fair m'lady. Really activates the almonds.

>> No.19188488
File: 255 KB, 1824x713, 7jfv30wkesr11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188488

>>19188440
Yeah. Just use fiat, bro! It's way better than crypto. No really it is, try Mastercard. It's my personal favorite.

>> No.19188513

>>19188472
>because Bitcoin had literally NO MONETARY value
you think that valuation protects from dos attacks? a miner can include tx-es for free, but even if you alter protocol to make fees mandatory he would only pay himself. then there is the block extension attack using the fact that a binary stream can only be checked for hash once fully downloaded.

>> No.19188535
File: 54 KB, 1652x314, EXBfvt9XgAAg5wp (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188535

>>19188338
You're confirming that hashrate will continue going down... which therefore is a trend... braindead as fuck not understanding what you wrote while exactly confirming what i said.

>>19188337
see >>19188335 (You)
you're fucked.

>>19188365
>full node
god i love the corecoin braindeads not understanding what a node actually is. surprised none of them has written it yet but they usually come

>>19188440
>2.4$ is acceptable fees
you're fucking lost... recommendable to read for once, the original whitepaper before they continue to change it further.

>> No.19188551

>>19188479
just as sv cucks spam their idiotic bullshit about btc in every fucking thread they find. you just gonna have to deal with it.

>> No.19188557

>>19185359

Imagine still holding bitcoin forks

>> No.19188575

>>19188535
lol zoom out little nigga the mempool was in a hell of a worse state before and cleared up fine.
this is nothing special.

>> No.19188577

>>19188513
>you think that valuation protects from dos attacks?
Yes, you absolute moron.

>> No.19188597
File: 154 KB, 1024x566, 1559017771230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188597

>>19188575
Can't wait for 2017 part two: Electric Boogaloo

>> No.19188624

>>19188597
that was actually bad and look nothing happened.
segwit increased the effective blocksize to 4mb there is no way shit gonna be as bad once again. in fact the worst is probably over already.

>> No.19188640
File: 174 KB, 2525x805, mempoolall.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188640

>>19188575
>zoom out
ok, no problem... it just confirms the trend...
oh wait, i forgot that you love to pay 25$ for transactions to confirm in the next fucking 8 hours.

>>19188624
>there is no way shit gonna be as bad once again
hm? did they increment the blocksize?
it's gonna be worse than last time you retarded homoid not understanding trends

>> No.19188681
File: 91 KB, 480x596, 1582609056612.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188681

>>19188624
>nothing happened

How new are you?

>> No.19188683

>>19188640
>did they increment the blocksize?
yup basically they did with an extension block.

>> No.19188731
File: 28 KB, 499x481, de15df26e9bf61c4f5672a08dc60a50b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188731

>>19188683
>yup basically

>> No.19188748

>>19188681
>How new are you?
i'm a 2011 noob sadly wasn't into bitcoin among the first pioneers.

>> No.19188808

>>19188683
segwit adoption would need to be 100% so your statement wouldn't be an absolute lie.
but your stupidity is even bigger... segwit aims for 2MB blocks, not the theoretical 4MB that would be possible paying an horrendous fee. and still, there is rarely blocks over 1400kb... no wonder, segwit never passed 50% adoption as it a completely stupid non-solution for a problem that BitCoin has solved.

>> No.19188829

>>19188748
>being in Bitcoin since 2011
>supports LN and Segwit
>posts in literally every single BSV thread going on a year strong
>is a blocklet

Incredible.

>> No.19188844

>>19188808
>no wonder, segwit never passed 50% adoption
but it did clearly passed 60% too.

>> No.19188879

>>19188829
i fully support increasing the block with real adoption i just don't want to throw out the awesome parts of the fee market with the shitty part.

takes a bit more engineering than going full retard but we are human beings after all not fucking chimpanzee.

>> No.19188920

>>19188844
for some hours?
it's clearly below 50%
also, can you tell yourself and post it here the amount of transactions the biggest Corecoin (size) block had?

>> No.19188945
File: 41 KB, 645x773, 1515128793888.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188945

>>19188879
>I'll just call unbounded blocks full retard for a year and see if it makes Bitcoin (BSV) stop working and people to stop using it

>> No.19188968
File: 25 KB, 702x547, Bitcoin vs Visaa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19188968

>>19188920
It's funny, only one chain in the entire world does what Satoshi described over ten years ago.

>> No.19188985

>>19188968
Satoshi also said that the chain shouldn't be used as a data dump and that the blocksize should be raised incrementally.

>> No.19189010

>>19188945
it's been about 3 years now that i have call unbounded blocks full retard. they can be unbound over time not in any given moment.

>> No.19189048

>>19188968
except for the majority hahsrate honestly participating in consensus part... or the daa that had been raped to avoid chain death breaking the nakamoto consensus irrevocably.

some faggots still think the blockchain is the goal. and they think putting unverifiable junk on it is adoption.

>> No.19189115
File: 154 KB, 350x350, 1559763888687.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19189115

As faggot Gregory won't respond
The biggest Corecoin Block (size) with Segwit had a total of 108 transactions.
5 years ago, before AXA, Corecoin was doing 5-10k transactions.
Now, BitCoin is able to do over 1 million transactions per block while Corecoin struggles to do 2k transactions per block and often has 100-200 transactions, thanks to segshit.

>> No.19189136

>>19188985
>shouldn't
No he fucking didn't on both of those.

>>19189010
For three years you've been wrong. Meanwhile on Bitcoin we're getting world records on a pretty regular basis. Actually since it's been free of a bunch of corruption it's been smashing records and doing all the things people said Bitcoin couldn't do.

>>19189048
Segwit was the break from consensus. Having majority hash means fuck all if the the thing that has it isn't Bitcoin. Otherwise ETH is Bitcoin if it has more hash. Complete non-sense.

>> No.19189162

>>19189136
Yeah he did

>> No.19189320

>>19189162
He said "I think it would be possible" with regard to sidechains that manage other data. Not that weather shouldn't be on the blockchain.

>> No.19189334

>>19189320
No he said those would be competing chains. He said Bitcoin should not have all that garbage on it's chain. You're an idiot.

>> No.19189353

>>19189334
Sauce.

>> No.19189374

>>19189353
Go read through the old forum.

>> No.19189475

>>19189374
How about you go, faggot. He never said you can't store data on Bitcoin or that you shouldn't do it. Bitcoin works in such away that only data that is worth storing on Bitcoin will ultimately find its way there. The incentives for what data goes on chain is baked in via economic incentives. Can you store music videos Bitcoin? Technically yes. Would you find it economically viable? Probably not. Something else like the results of government elections or other important outcomes, would the price be worth paying to keep it stored on chain? Likely.

It's all incentives.