/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19174694
No thanks. I'll stick with LOKI for my Monero fix

>>19174694
Fuck off

>>19174702
Loki has $18mil market cap

>>19174694
Cringe. 0xBTC had the best 50x. Suterusu is next. Stop this shit, anon, its embaaaraaaaZING

Mining it on my laptop now

>download the .net framework for my shitcoin
KYS.

>>19175158
Too complicated for you? There are instructions on the website, so easy a 6 year old could do it.

>>19174694
>2018 shitscams 2; electric boogaloo

>>19174694
>A mixer
>A zkSNARKS mixer
>A zkSNARKS wrapper

If you can't make your own smart contract you sure aren't making those. How much did you pre-mined?

>>19175237
You are being disingenuous and deceitful. The 0xMonero contract follows the EIP 918 standard. The mining contract exists for fair distribution of the token. A zkERC20 contract will allow first layer privacy.

Listen, I can tell you hold 0xBitcoin. 0xMR is not a competitor of 0xBTC, so there is no need to bash it. 0xBTC is focused on being Bitcoin on Ethereum. 0xMR is focused on bringing privacy to Ethereum. They are completely different use cases.

>>19175369
how nice of you to follow 99.5% of the 0xbtc's code, why don't you fix the 0xbtc reference in your smart contract?
Just how much did you pre-mined?

>>19175530
lmao thats embarrassing

>>19175530
410k coins have been mined out of 18.4 million. There is no pre-mine. The project was announced here, Twitter, and on Bitcointalk.

>>19175530
Some 0xMR holders are also investors and miners of 0xBTC. There is no beef here except from you.

If you have to trash another project to make your's look better, you are invested in the wrong project.

>Ethereum
into the trash it goes

>>19175182
>privacy focused
>first step is become part of the microsoft botnet
>you're not that bright anon!
it's the honorable thing to just end it this point.

>>19175530
So now we know why it's fixed amount. Pajeet didn't even figure out that the real monero caps out at 0.6. Christ what a retard.

>>19175725
0xMR has a fixed supply, unlike Monero which is inflationary.

https://uniswap.exchange/swap/0x035dF12E0F3ac6671126525f1015E47D79dFEDDF

Uniswap Exchange Link

>>19175795
Admit it, you just copy & paste the 0xBTC code, can't even properly clean up the multiple references to 0xBTC and they're in your smart contract FOREVER.
Now you try to bash on Monero but the truth is you don't know how to implement it .

>>19176023
0xMonero is a fairly mineable community project. You can continue your toxicity but we aren't going to stop. Keep bumping the thread btw.

>>19176131
I don't mind bumping this post as long as people see how much of a joke this project and you are.
But they can also look into the smart contract and see for themselves.

>>19176294
There are only about 36k 0xMR for sale on exchanges out of the 410k mined. Miners are holding strong because they believe in the project and it's vision.

>>19176337
you never know when to stop, d'you? just quit already. you can't win this. 0xMR is a shitcoin! Period!

They really did it, the one idea stupider than 0xbtc. I'm going to make my own coin and shill it too, same guaranteed 0x. I'll call in 0xeth. It's a mineable ethereum on the ethereum blockchain. I will lie and say it's going to do more than 0x their money though. Marketing is the trick here.

It's funny how there is currently an open 0xBTC thread with a dozen people talking down your project and instead of defending 0xBTC you are here attacking 0xMR. You are obviously afraid or else you wouldn't be here.

one 0xMR = 0.01$

>>19175530
you're a newfag if you give a shit about copy and pasted code in crypto; this shit happened daily and we still mined the fuck out of them

>>19176610
>// total supply is 2100000000000000 because of 8 decimal places
> //we want miners to spend 10 minutes to mine each 'block', about 60 ethereum blocks = one 0xbitcoin epoch

>>19176772
As far as I am aware, no one has complained that 0xMR is using the open source EIP 918 standard. Additionally there are half a dozen other projects using this standard. There is no beef between the two projects. Like I said, many of the 0xMR miners and holders come from the 0xBTC.

>>19176952
Question: what's 0xMonero's total supply and how many decimal places does it have?

>>19174694
0xbtc is coo
smart money's been buyin

>>19177050
If you would like to learn more about the project you can visit 0xMonero.com

>>19174694
>>19175369
Why not just make these things building on top of 0xBTC instead of redeploying the same contract? It's inviting these questions about a premine and why another token is needed. One of the major points of 0xBitcoin is that it's a bitcoin-like token natively for Ethereum that was designed to be easily expanded upon for use in dapps. There's nothing wrong with cloning 0xBTC to make another ERC-918, but why make a new token to support forthcoming contracts that could have been developed for 0xBTC in the first place, which already has fair distribution and an established community? This just invites problems imo
Not a criticism just legit inquiry. Good luck!

>>19177584
you could also have it be merge-mined and that would be a lot more interesting than asking people to divide their hash power. I see no reason the privacy contracts wouldn't work and it would avoid falling into the old hole of making a token for every project and a cluttered landscape

>>19177584
0xBTC is simply focused on being Bitcoin on Ethereum. 0xMonero is working to bring privacy to Ethereum. The projects have completely different goals and use cases. I don't see 0xBTC ever implementing privacy features, if they did, they wouldn't be Bitcoin on Ethereum and could open themselves up to another project taking their usecase. The last I checked they were building an exchange. It would be great to see the two projects collaborate on that in some capacity.

Additionally, I should reiterate that 0xMR is the mining contract for the first layer privacy contract.