/biz/ - Business & Finance

i have 2 nano can i be fren?

>>19128476

5-10 nano : baby nano fren
11-50 nano : todler nano fren
51-501 nano: baby boy nano fren
501-1001 nano : loli girl nano fren
3000+ nano : virgin 13 year old girl friend
10k+ nano : you get to go to Epstein island 2.0!

>>19128579
ok...ill see myself out

nano 2k by 2021

I like nano

>>19128426
Biz has been truly forsaken

>>19128804
nano went from cents to $30 and now at 70 cents. so still up 10x. seems like a good buy. the next upswing might be a 100x for this one.

shill me upsides and fud me downsides of nano please

>>19128819
go back to plebbit with that nonsense

>>19128852
no. Nano is a /biz/ coin too.
it will unite us nano frens from pleb and biz

My DCA is 2 USD. Holding since the big fall. I dream of being back to our ATH

>>19128833
no privacy, friendly towards regulation
creator has the social skills of a 10 yr old
other than that its pure oversold gold.

did sumbody say nano thread?

Reminder that Charlie Lee is bullish on Nano and we will eventually replace LTC at the very least, if not BTC itself

Reminder that the Nano Foundation is developing a crypto agnostic device and open source software that allows crypto payment processing to take place through a marketplace of payment processors (with the option to self process), allowing anonymous transfers and opening up crypto to shops and businesses around the world. The user only needs a smart phone with a wallet to purchase.

Reminder that Nano crypto credit cards are already available worldwide

Reminder that ONLY Nano has solved the Satoshi Trilemma, balancing speed, security, and decentralization. There is not a single crypto on the market that retains all three. This makes Nano not just an evolved form of BTC and crypto in general, but into a timeless asset. It is the Philosopher's stone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosopher%27s_stone
>The philosopher's stone, more properly philosophers' stone or stone of the philosophers (Latin: lapis philosophorum) is a legendary alchemical substance capable of turning base metals such as mercury into gold (chrysopoeia, from the Greek χρυσός khrusos, "gold", and ποιεῖν poiēin, "to make") or silver. It is also called the elixir of life, useful for rejuvenation and for achieving immortality; for many centuries, it was the most sought goal in alchemy. The philosophers' stone was the central symbol of the mystical terminology of alchemy, symbolizing perfection at its finest, enlightenment, and heavenly bliss. Efforts to discover the philosophers' stone were known as the Magnum Opus ("Great Work").[1]

Reminder that Nano is more decentralized than BTC (with a trajectory trending towards further decentralization, opposite that of BTC miners)

Reminder that Nano is already fully distributed, more will never be created. The developer team only kept 5% of the supply. They are down to their last 700k. There are only 133,000,000 Nanos in existence.

Reminder that Nano works now. Instant transfers. Zero cost. Fully decentralized.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKt9KepQQF4

>>19128426


Just bought my first stack today. Lets go friens

Reminder that Nano is green. It will gain support of eco-friendly leftists and the eco-fascist right. There will be zero legislation against it as there is no mining involved. The Nano protocol was designed to be as light weight as possible. Something built to last.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JChBTohSHlM

Reminder that Nano had no ICO. Meaning it is not a security and there are no whales that purchased literal chunks of the supply. At this stage, it is one of the most distributed cryptocurrencies to exist.

>>19130147
Im nervous that there down to the last 700k. I want them to keep making it better

Reminder that Nano has the best taste in brappers

>>19130230
Reminder that Nano is an open source project and is already more or less finished. If the current devs are unable to perform finishing touches that may need to be applied later on, it isn't too far of a stretch to see this being undertaken by a different dev team.

Reminder that the Nano Foundation is the whitest team in crypto

Reminder that Nano is the ideal cryptocurrency for microtransactions and for monetizing content on the internet. There is no competition.

>>19130269
If another dev team takes it on. Are they going to add fees? I cant see someone working on this for free.

based. i got a small portion of NANO simply because its the best crypto currency.
my main holding is still LINK, because its gonna be much bigger than currency itself.

>>19128426
I bought like 50 of this shit on kucoin when it first dropped because /biz/ told me to
I haven't even looked at kucoin in years nevermind nano, spare me the effort and tell me if I made it or not?

>>19130278
I would really like to put my coxon George.

>>19130278
Wesley SHILLINGford kek

>>19130353
Even if this were attempted, it would be rejected by the nodes that secure the network. They play the role of miners more or less.
Their ability to vote is dependent on there being 130,000 Nano directed towards their address. This can be community directed or self directed. Either way, it is costly or makes the node dependent on community acceptance. This way Nano achieves a democratic consensus model using representatives that can be voted in or out with the touch of a button through the wallet of the holders.

I don't ever see that happening without it causing a fork. Those who run nodes and those who hold sizable voting powers would never enact changes to the protocol that threaten the long term success of the network. It would be like shooting oneself in the foot.

>>19130353
Devs would be funded by investors, similarly to how Blockstream is funded.

As long as there are fees, a network cannot fully support a microtransactional economy. You are not thinking small enough if even a fraction of a penny must be spent. We are going to monetize mouseclicks. The only way to do this, is with a free and instant cryptocurrency. And crypto isn't crypto unless it is decentralized. So that leaves only NANO.

You could even monetize caloric expenditure with a protocol like Nano. If the technology is available, one could even monetize attention by measuring brain wavelengths.

>>19130449
How long do you think they have before they run of money? Will it make it to 2023? It feels like they are lacking in marketing department.

>>19130472
also the 0 fee feature is a major psychological advantage.
its much more satisfying to send 1 NANO and receive 1 NANO instead of sending 1 LTC and receiving 0.998478973 LTC.
The difference between low fee and no fee is key. Its like sending SMS vs. using Whatsapp/Telegram
The option with 0 fee will always dominate

>>19130494
They might run out this year. I am not terribly concerned about it. Nano is a lot bigger than the team who created it. These things tend to exist on their own, even if the creator is hiding in the shadows.

imagine paying netflix for each minute of streaming you watch instead of paying for a ton of content you will never actually enjoy. can be done w nano each minute if you want to. the potential is huge

NANO back to 35$, people have lots of losses to recover from 2018-2019, those -90% losses won't stay like that forever.

Everything you losti n 2018-2019 will be completely recovered by 2021.

>>19130555
Thats the only con i see to this coin. Is that they run out of money and people think its a dead coin. Makes me kind of nervous. Specially since we arent expecting a bull run till next year

>>19130515
Agreed 100x over. This is very important, not just for psychological means, but for machine2machine payments, especially of the microtransaction kind.

I envision an economy where microtransactions are taking place as often as data transfers take place currently. For instance, you want to order some chicken tendies, so you purchase from GrubHub paying with Nano, your payment then is split upon the point of purchase to the company preparing your food, where it is then immediately split between the staff and chef, then the tip % is held for the delivery driver to be released upon the arrival of the goods, and a % of this tip goes to fuel self driving vehicle and those who are renting it to the driver, of which a % of this goes to the GPS and map/route directing company that handles the direction and navigation of the vehicle.

There are a lot of various transactions which are currently only handled in bulk, paychecks being given out every 2 weeks for example, or product/services obtained in large batches... much of this is done to avoid paying excess fees that result on a per transaction basis.

I don't think I am doing this justice trying to explain it, so instead I paint an analogy. Shipping is done similarly because each shipment is expensive and costly. Therefore cargo containers are filled to max capacity to cut costs, and the amount of shipments is reduced in favor of large bulk transfers. Imagine the differences that would result, beginning even overnight, if suddenly there was zero cost and zero wait for sending product internationally. It is the equivalent of a teleportation device. The middle man is cut out directly or his significance is drastically reduced. Because now when you want something, you simply click on a button, and there it is.

>>19130631
It would not be dead, it would be more orphan status. Like BTC.

It is... inevitable

>>19130711
no pls, dont kill LINK, its my main holding

>>19130724
Link is not a foe of Nano, fren. Link is witness to all that will be.

>>19130731
true. my portfolio is LINK + ETH + NANO

>>19130724
It shouldn't have any effect on Link. Link and Nano are the best holds for next bull run. Speaking of when does everyone think well get a bull run?

>>19130711
When do you think well see nano bull run or more adopted?

>>19130750
Best portfolio right there mate. You'll more then make it.

>>19130779
Depends on when and if I work up the balls to close my company and become a full time dev or not. I think as soon as we start seeing some killer apps that utilize Nano it will moon like crazy. Maybe before then. I have been holding Nano all throughout the past 2 years, and have been posting about it here and there throughout this time. I will say one thing I noticed, that I do believe I caught the attention of a large whale once, and we increased in value over 200% in a matter of days, if not a single day. I don't recall the exact numbers or time, but it was significant, and seemed extremely linked to my post of the day... so chances are as soon as one or two of the BTC whales come over to our side.

I don't like to be waiting on something outside of myself to save me, and prefer to take matters into my own hands, developing something like an eBay or Amazon that utilizes Nano/XMR/BTC/ETH for starters, but I am fairly confident that once the ball starts rolling, it will be a race to get in as fast as possible. It has been a blessing to my fellow anons with Link increasing so much in value. I have fortunately come into wealth through my own means. But now that all is said and done, even those who remained neets can join in and take advantage of the promise BTC made, that will be fulfilled by its progeny, Nano. The heir to the throne.

>>19130867
How big of a stack do you need to make it for nano?

>>19130973
133 Nano is equivalent in supply to 21 BTC.

Reporting for duty

>>19131026
MOMMY MILKERS

Keep up the good energy boys and we can ride this bad boy to 9k sats today np. One thing I noticed, is that the volume dropped massively this last year, we are down to a measly 40 BTC per day on Binance! This is Nano, not a random shitcoin, we used to top ETH in terms of volume. Notice how as soon as the volume shifts above the 40 BTC per day median, we start seeing 10%+ price movements upwards. This isn't TA, but is rather just pattern acknowledgement. We are and have been fucking sold out for a while now. There really isn't much Nano left to purchase. Once we break 1k BTC 24 hour volume, expect some serious fucking movement, and a possible exponential growth as a lot of people have been eyeing Nano during its bear market. The question has always been when and where is the bottom. I am pretty confident we have reached it.

Best woman in crypto.

>>19130867
What's a project for someone that sucks at programming? Anyway that I could meaningfully contribute?

>>19131369
get a mortage on your house and go all in on nano.

>>19131395
I already did that with LTC

>>19131369
Go to http://themeforest.net, purchase or download a free template for wordpress that you like. Do some mild HTML editing and replace the paypal/stripe/etc. plugin with the http://brainblocks.io payment gateway for nano. Now unleash your creation onto the world.

Some ideas of my own: Music streaming, Video streaming, Pay per download for (x) content that is not easily obtained for free, ecommerce website where you can sell whatever the fuck you want, social media, meme distribution, multi-vendor marketplace (ebay, amazon), a Fiverr type network where people post jobs and tasks....

What I think would really help would be something that allows people to obtain Nano who would otherwise not purchase it. Create a small localized economy. This is how Germany saved its economy after WW1 with the Reichsmark. Lots of people are out of jobs. Creating an environment where people can pay or request nano for services/items would be pretty useful I think. Since it is decentralized there could be no limits to what is sold.

Something like OnlyFans with Nano would also be a great idea. Especially as the banks are keen on regulating and destroying the ability for services like this to accept payments. Nano is the logical conclusion.

It is inevitable.

Another idea would be a simple community forum for cross-game transfers. Nano could serve as a platform agnostic currency used to transfer between different game services. (Think WoW gold in exchange for CS:GO skins). Money can be made anywhere there is improvement to be made. Anytime you can make someone's life easier, there is room for profit. Some of these services may very well end up being the next eBay and Amazon of our day, assuming crypto and nano as well assume their rightful roles.

>>19132164
btw, for this pic, the game client actually uses fully confirmed nano as the in game currency. When an NPC is killed and nano is gained in game, the actual wallet attached to the player's ID also increases count. Same deal when spending it. Needless to say, this creates a whole new ecosystem for game worlds, and moves them one step closer to integration with our own.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMtzOkaNnXc&t=2s

NanoQuake: https://twitter.com/nanoquake?lang=en

This is your pilot, George Coxon speaking, next route is the moon, so buckle up and hold onto your butts!

It isn't that hard to understand

so many fucking memes, so little fucking time

Linkies are also welcome of course

Please buy NANO sirs, it is very good coin I promise you dear. Works now, lightning quick transfers, as fast as Arjuna's Brahmashirsha Astra, used to strike down Kaurava army during the Virata war. NANO is free like the sacred cow, wondering field to field, eating and pooping leaving no waste. This is the magic of the divine animal, what comes out is food for the grass which in turn is food for the cow. Thus the cycle of life is complete with no waste, not even land to be mined or tilled. NANO sirs, I tell you sincerely is much like this, and due to the perfect sacred geometric design of the block lettuce can expand like the flower of life, with unlimited capability. There is no inflation, no rewards, no incentive. It just exists, like ascended Bodhisattva, here for benefit of all. For this I think it is the best long term investment. True revolutionary technologies. Thank you kindly sirs. India superpower 2020.

>>19128579
Fuck you I lost 5000 nano in bitgrail scam

>>19133627
go fuck your mother if you want fuck

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR CRYPTO

>>19133653
shut the fuck up FAGGOT or I'll fuck you UP

kek

>>19128426
Nano has no active developers any more, and they didn't solve the distribution problem.

>>19134860
thx for the bump lad, have an upvoat xd

>>19130278
but here is the dev team, still working on nano, still putting in github comments, and still updating the code, with commits as recent as yesterday
>>19134860
>https://github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node

How does it feel to lie when your words are brushed off like a chink-flu against my haz-mat suit?

>>19134875
>>19134909
No developers, still hasn't solved the distribution problem. Smhtbh

Don't forget Vitalik plans on forking the ETH network just to get Nano off of it

>>19128426
>Nano
*Xdag

>>19135153
No thank you, this is a thread for Nano frens. We do not need any curry thank you sir.

>>19135191
>Nano
>107 issues
>22 pull requests
>not minable
Ok pajeet

>>19135231
I have to laugh at the hypocrisy. This is a Nano thread. You are not a Nano poster. Nano has been in the top 50 for longer than xdag has even existed. xdag is a non name, low cap, unheard of project. It isn't going to catch on. You are not going to make any money from it. And you certainly are not going to convince any Nano frens to risk their holdings on it. We are in Nano because we know that it works, and we know it is the future.

Please go make a new post about your cryptocurrency in your own thread, where it will garnish zero attention, and then you will realize who the pajeet really is.

>>19135351
Ok pajeet, raiblocks never aolved it's distribution problem, unlike xdag.

>>19135450
>Notice me Senpai
The post

>>19135351
>xdag is a non name, low cap, unheard of project. It isn't going to catch on. You are not going to make any money from it.
Just like raiblocks?

>>19135351
>We are in Nano because we know that it works, and we know it is the future.
No, xdag is. No one wants a centralized distribution model.

>>19135479

>>19135522
Notice how the nano shill can't form an argument, and must resort to reaction images. Nano is a dead project that had centralized distribution.

>>19135351
>I have to laugh at the hypocrisy.
>Nano has been in the top 50 for longer than xdag has even existed.
Bitcoin has been number 1 for longer than r̶a̶i̶b̶l̶o̶c̶k̶s̶ nano has.

>>19135351
>You are not going to make any money from it.
They will lose money with nano.
>pic related

>>19135351
>We are in Nano because we know that it works, and we know it is the future.
No, the future is minable, feeless, and private.
XDAG is still working on privacy, you know, they have actual developers.

I think he noticed me, anon. I really do!

>>19135712
You haven't been able to answer the question about centralized distribution, you keep posting unoriginal reaction images. Did you buy at $37.00?

Well, since you asked nicely, Kohai, I have been DCA'ing for a while now. There is zero reason to believe the initial distribution was abused. It is similar to the initial mining of BTC. For all we know, Satoshi mined a lot more than 1 million. The difference here is, Satoshi is anonymous. The Nano foundation is not. Be it them, or others, the initial supply was distributed. It doesn't change much for me or anyone else holding. The coins are out there and the market decides what happens from then on.

>>19135351
>Please go make a new post about your cryptocurrency in your own thread, where it will garnish zero attention, and then you will realize who the pajeet really is.
Just like this thread? You nano shills needed to die off in early 2018.

lmao you are so mad, its okay eventually you will come to terms with life and your situation, whatever that may be. Once you find peace, feel free to join us over here with the future of sound money.

>>19135855
>For all we know, Satoshi mined a lot more than 1 million. The difference here is, Satoshi is anonymous. The Nano foundation is not. Be it them, or others, the initial supply was distributed
Satoshi did it for testing purposes, you & that one nano dev are not Satoshi. raiblock's centralized distribution is because the developers couldn't make a minable DAG (well a block lattice but who really cares about it anymore) unlike xdag, an original C implementation which has decentralized distribution via mining. It's also fee-less.
>its okay eventually you will come to terms with life and your situation, whatever that may be. Once you find peace, feel free to join us over here with the future of sound money.
I hope you will, anon. Nano is dead, move on.

>>19135981
t.

You can have these Nano when you pry them from my cold dead hands

>>19128579

1002-2999: fren

>>19136533

>>19128715
Never

>>19136674
Nano 5k by 2022

>>19136823
nano is a reddit coin that sucks, and you are a spammer.

>>19130364
comparing Nano to actual UTXO blockchains
>JUST

>>19137127

just like nano roodit, its a few people talkin a lot

>>19130364
Yeah that image is a huge yikes.

Send in the clowns