[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 87 KB, 610x694, chainlink linkpool fees denominated in usd link token.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19088290 No.19088290 [Reply] [Original]

And just like that, Link node fees are set in USD.

>> No.19088306

token not needed

>> No.19088308

>>19088290
Wow , more nothingburger "news"
Imagine still holding this scam lmao

>> No.19088313

Can't tell if bait or if OP is legitimately retarded.

>> No.19088315

>>19088290
>3 years
>$650 million
>random number generator

>> No.19088353

3 years and you get this? kek

>> No.19088371

>>19088306
I know this is just low level fud to help you pass the time, but I would just like to say the token is needed to participate in the network and all this does is what EVERY blockchain ultimately will do which is help the user bypass figuring out how to acquire tokens. This is the beginning of blockchain going mainstream and becoming a part of every normies life while they don't even know it's happening.

>No, Kelly, I totally bought those Prada shoes with US dollars
>Yes Stacey but my pathetic engineering co-worker Gary said that what's actually happening is you buy LINK with your USD and then LINK is used to pay for the smart contract which guaranteed your Prada shoes were in stock and could be delivered to you
>Oh wow, Gary is pretty smart huh
>Yea, totally
>Gary bought a lot of LINK didn't he?
>He did, yea! He's pretty cute I think...
>Yea, he's so hot.

>> No.19088375

TOKEN
NOT
NEEDED

>> No.19088388

>>19088315
Still better than going from paypal 2.0 to a fishing app

>> No.19088395

Can someone on this board please build something that both uses this broken shit token and generates at least one real dollar per year doing something completely unrelated to the delusion powered eth vaporware ecosystem? Just once, if like to see a single link thread that wasn't the emperor's new clothes.

>> No.19088408
File: 5 KB, 299x213, 1360590863919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19088408

>>19088306
>>19088308
>>19088313
>>19088315
>>19088353
>>19088375
>>19088395

seething

>> No.19088412

>>19088290
This has nothing to do with chainlink

>> No.19088428

>>19088375
Token quite literally needed. It is an erc-677 (of which link is the only one) which has a call & transfer function, which is absolutely necessary for telling nodes what data to get and how to format as the same time as you pay them. Retard. It'd be two transactions for every request otherwise. Imagine being this retarded.

>> No.19088438

>>19088306
>>19088308
>>19088315
>>19088375
>>19088395
>>19088412
2 years

>> No.19088453

>>19088315
I think they managed to write a JSON parser too

>> No.19088493

>>19088371
In your sad little mind, Kelly and Stacy are clearly vapid, stupid, and materialistic. However, Prada shoes cost around $500. Tracy is clearly in gainful employment if she can afford designer shoes with her disposable income. She probably earns more than you, and dresses impeccably too.

>> No.19088499

>>19088408
Not even remotely an argument. Show me a single instance of link doing real work (not some bullshit crypto sleight of hand) for any amount of real money, for a non cryptosphere entity, and I'll never "fud" again. PROMISE.

>Fake partnerships or theoretical mumbo jumbo need not apply.

>> No.19088522

>>19088499
>Show me a single instance of link doing real work
Synthetix, Aave, bZx, ...

>> No.19088572

>>19088499
You’re supposed to invest in companies BEFORE they become mainstream, retard. If you only bought Chainlink after they’d already started to be used by legacy systems like the global financial markets they are aiming for you wouldn’t make any money.
Case in point: low IQ idiots only bought link *after* the google partnership. Truly smart money bought at 50c, anticipating such developments in future.
Thus, those who have already accumulated, and even those buying now, in anticipation of future mass adoption, are smart, unlike you, who won’t see the value in Chainlink until it’s already mooned and adopted. By then it will be too late for you.

>> No.19088584

>>19088522
>not some bullshit crypto sleight of hand
Failed. Take another swing. Please. I want to believe. Get me there.

>> No.19088597

>>19088493
Based biz anon performing due diligence on a baseless and purely hypothetical scenario

>> No.19088609

>>19088572
>google partnership
>Fake partnerships or theoretical mumbo jumbo need not apply.
Want to try again?

>> No.19088640

>>19088597
Little does he know I am actually DaJohnson and I fucked his girlfriend with my boys last night.

>> No.19088668

>>19088522
kek, literal WHO garbage

>> No.19088675

>>19088290
And wallah

>> No.19088684

>>19088371
After the VRF release all data that comes into the blockchain are completely randomized and aggregated, giving the best data results possible. if anything this BTFO staking, as it makes it irrelevant. Why would anyone pay for collateral, when that data is already fully protected. This brings up the question, what value does the token bring ?

>> No.19088689
File: 598 KB, 598x780, 1362665267311.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19088689

>>19088584
>>19088609
>>19088668
Absolutely buttblasted.

>> No.19088710

>>19088684
>Why would anyone pay for collateral, when that data is already fully protected.
Nothing is ever "fully protected" you dip.

>> No.19088724

>>19088290
They display price in usdt but the payment is in link retard

>> No.19088809

>>19088609
You missed the point of my post, poor reading comprehension. Let me tell you again: if you only invest in something AFTER it has mooned you won’t make any money. You have to be willing to take a risk. The risk here is that Chainlink doesn’t deliver - you clearly think it will never deliver, but we are already seeing development and adoption in fringe industries like DeFi, and soon, gaming.
The fact that Chainlink is still really just setting up the stage for mainstream smart contract adoption is not FUD, lol.
If you had the ability to analyse the available information and predict what will happen in the future - like Chainlink investors do - you would be up by tens of thousands of dollars like those of us who bought under 50 cents. ;-)

>> No.19088863

So really truly nothing. Not s single real dollar worth of work has been done with this in 3 years. Unbelievably pathetic.

There's probably 10-20 anons itt lurking willing to recant all previous fud, if you can show a single real dollars worth of work, and we get
>u mad?
memes

>> No.19088878

>>19088290
Et voula

>> No.19088895

>>19088684
The most basic thing that nodes can do to screw something up is just shut their nodes down. So no, staking is not irrelevant. A node with 10k link staked has more to lose by shutting its node down than a node with no link staked.

>> No.19088897

>>19088428
>erc-677
lmao

>> No.19088911

>>19088290
I'm so happy I dumped this at $4.50 and re-bought at $1.80 TWICE. hahaha. Free money! Now I have 400,000 LINK and 5x my initial cashed out. I also bought like 5M UND. Based sergey autism.

>> No.19088926

>>19088911
Sure you did, larper

>> No.19088943

>>19088911
R u me? We in same village Mumbai?

>> No.19088998
File: 189 KB, 548x495, 1586982959055.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19088998

CHAINLINK BAD
CHAINLINK FUCKING BAAAAADDDDD

>> No.19089067

So fucking sad... I'll lower the bar. Show me where chainlink has done a single American penny worth of work for a company or even an individual. Again, moving around fake money, or verifying useless data, in the crypto world not accepted.

A single real world instance of use.

>> No.19089160

>>19089067
When Chainlink/smart contracts are adopted by legacy systems (non DeFi etc), will you be convinced, and buy in, then? Because you’ll be priced out by then.
There is no scenario where legacy industries adopt this new way of working BEFORE crypto start ups like AAVE and other DeFi. Big players will allow small startups to take on all the risk of adopting a new technology.

What you’re asking is fundamentally a stupid question, is what I’m getting at. Because by the time your criteria for worthiness are fulfilled, you will be priced out, and buying my bags at $50.

>> No.19089261

>>19088724
That’s what he’s saying.

>> No.19089277

>>19089160
So nothing. Nobody has used thos to travel inventory, check the weather, verify receipt of an email, NOTHING.

3 years, millions of dollars, billions of man hours in shilling, and not a single American penny of real world value has been exchanged worth this protocol and token.

>> No.19089307

>>19089160

Imagine only a x10 in crypto

>> No.19089359

>>19089277
>real world value
DeFi is real money kek.

Now answer my question: once link has been adopted by your definition of “real” industries, will you be priced out?

>> No.19089611

>>19089359
Moving pretend money around on otherwise valueless blockchains, and checking the transactions devoid of real world value for accuracy, isn't real world value. It's slightly less real, in a very exact sense, than the World of Warcraft economy. It's mathematically managing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Show me a single penny worth of work this protocol/ token has done for a real company or individual. ANYTHING that isn't playing make believe on another delusion powered blockchain.

Here! I'll lower the bar again.

NO VALUE TRANSACTED! Just something useful in a non monetary way or entertaining. A website widget or fortune telling phone app. Anything non crypto.

>> No.19089730

>>19088313
This is quite important. You think companies who are clueless about the details want to know prices in autistic internet cube values?
No they want in and out cold hard cash.

you are the retard. This is a necessary step

>> No.19089795

>>19088395

Dude, whining aside, this is correct. We do need real world use. But even the bitterest fudster would have to concede that A) making these things will take time, and B) development of all these crypto-centric things in the meantime is a good sign.

>> No.19089817

>>19089067
axa fizzy flight insurance

>> No.19089832
File: 2.34 MB, 1684x1480, quackto.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19089832

about to sell my 1,000 link

>> No.19089885

>>19089611
Calm down. I’m not even disagreeing with you that smart contracts have yet to see mainstream adoption, so you can stop screeching. You still didn’t answer my question: what happens when all these developments you’re screeching haven’t yet happened, take place? You’ll be priced out, right? ;)

>> No.19089930

>>19088371
>engineering co-worker
you act like i'm not a scumbag degenerate with a huge stack, anon.

>> No.19089944

>>19089832
b-b-but staking anon STAKING. Please don't sell, we need you to keep up the price as we dump.

>> No.19089957

>>19088290
Jesus Christ you guys are still talking about this shit? lmao

>> No.19089963
File: 153 KB, 1132x464, 1575081212444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19089963

>>19088315
>>19088438
And they still won't learn

>> No.19089982

>>19088438
The chainlink scam was born mid 2017 you newfag

>> No.19090004

>>19088572
>google partnership

A google blog post doesn't count as a partnership, sanjeet

>> No.19090048

>>19089885
>priced out
I guess in a disconnected sense. If your speculative gamble goes exactly as you hope, I'd be priced out, but I'd be priced out of an asset I don't invest in, in an industry I don't follow.

I guess I'm priced out of owning ocean front property in Fiji, if Fiji is even on the ocean (idk). Is Fiji even a real place?

I make my own money is basically what I'm trying to say.

>> No.19090140

>>19088499
I accepted 54 link last night to bang ur mom.

Also checked.

>> No.19090214

>>19088388
kekt, chekt and rekt

>> No.19090235

>>19090140
You know. I'm tempted to accept this as a real value transfer, but you definitely overpaid.

>> No.19090245

>>19088597
poor due diligence, too. prada shoes are way more than $500. more like $1000.

>> No.19090304

>>19089832

Good, literally the signal to moon.

>> No.19090357

>>19088290
is that really the chainlink official twitter?

im still holding on to my small bag of 10k linkies i bougth in 2017

but thats just bearish as fuck.

going to sell half of stack now

>> No.19090447

>>19088895
This isnt even an argument. Why would it shut down ? Why should someone be penaltized 10k LINK when the node goes offline ? Does the ETH network go down when couple of nodes go offline because of hurricane on Florida ?

>> No.19090916

>>19090357
lol you wish

>> No.19090949

Link unnecessarily centralized power at the node operator level.

>> No.19090999

>>19088597
>>19090245
Even worse, he forgot to take into account that poor normies shell out big bucks for useless luxury items to gain status, thus invalidating his premise.

>> No.19091008

>>19088493

As if Tracy isn't in massive debt spending money she doesn't have on those prada shoes to signal status to people she doesn't even like in this hypothetical scenario

>> No.19091048

>>19090357
are you retarded? in what way is this bearish?

>> No.19091183

>>19091048
Token not needed, boi
USD will pay

>> No.19091201

10k link to make it, 1k to not necc

>> No.19091226

>>19091183
>to calculate the fee in LINK
Brainlet

>> No.19091240

>>19088290
:) just in time for USDC WOW WHAT A COINCIDENCE??????? Love all my link frens but please can we all just go dark over link at this point on this board? Atleast until we make it? I really don’t want new fags and the eventual normies getting in on this

>> No.19091259
File: 5 KB, 255x197, 1527990422235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19091259

>>19091183

>> No.19091283

>>19090999
i'll have to check and disagree, my friend. you surely appreciate a well-dressed woman, even if you're not consciously aware of it.

>> No.19091517

>>19090048
>COPE
imagine how you’ll feel when link is $300 and you knew about it at $3.
This is your future. Good luck.

>> No.19091906

>>19091283
I do, but it turns me off when I find out she bought those $1000 shoes on a $2000 monthly salary

>> No.19092031

>>19091906
That's $2000/month of spending money. Rent is just giving a blowjob with swallowing on special occasions like his birthday and maybe valentines day. Anal once every few years and he'll get her the expensive stuff. She only works to maintain the illusion that she is independent and he will have to spend more to keep her feeling pampered. Can't exactly complain about a $5k bracelet when you spend all day on Facebook by the pool. Spending all day on Facebook at the office with friends is more fun anyway. She can't lose here.

>> No.19092188

>>19092031
I thank god every day that I was born a zoophile

>> No.19092253

>>19090447
If there is Insurance Smart Contract that pays 1billion when executed as written and the data comes from node and it decides to shut it down the whole contract is compromised for frauds and thus the node operator penaltiez...

>> No.19092339

>>19090447

You simply wouldn't host a node in a hurricane prone area. If you did, you would certainly not try have anything valuable on it as you have high risk of losing it(your node).

This is why retail neet nodes are a meme. They wont get huge jobs because they simply dont know or have the means to do it. they cant afford to host a node hundreds of miles away in a data center not prone to natural disasters etc